Volar Distal Radius Buckle Fractures: Is Bracing and Home Management Safe?

BACKGROUND: A removable brace with home management is widely accepted treatment for distal radius buckle fractures, which most commonly involve the dorsal cortex. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if a removable brace and home management treatment is safe for volar distal radius buckle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isolated distal radius buckle fractures in children (3-16 years) diagnosed at an acute care visit (April 1, 2019 to May 31, 2022) were identified. Final diagnosis was confirmed using strict criteria including cortical buckling without cortical breach or physeal involvement. Cortical buckling was categorized as either dorsal or volar. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, treatment, and any complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three fractures were either dorsal (254, 76%) or volar (79, 24%) buckle fractures. Mean age (SD) for volar fractures (9.3 [2.2 years]; range, 4-14 years) was significantly higher than for dorsal fractures (8.5 (3.0 years); range, 3-15 years; P = 0.012). More girls had volar fractures (48 [60%], P = 0.006). Most fractures occurred after a standing-height fall. Two hundred forty-four (96%) dorsal and 76 (96%) volar fractures were initially treated with a removable brace. Two hundred fourteen (84%) dorsal and 66 (84%) volar fractures had orthopedic follow-up. Brace treatment continued for 167 (167/204, 82%) dorsal and 56 (56/63, 89%) volar fractures. Treatment changed from initial brace to cast for 37 (37/204, 18%) dorsal fractures and 7 (7/63, 11%) volar fractures, influenced by caregiver preference and/or sport participation requirements. Only 1 (1/79, 1%) patient with a volar fracture returned for an additional visit for persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosis of volar buckle fracture is made using the same strict criteria used for dorsal buckle fractures, removable brace and home management treatment is safe. Shared decision making with caregivers may alter buckle fracture treatment.

Decreasing Radiation Exposure to the Abdomen in Children with Chronic Constipation.

Background: Bowel management for children with chronic constipation may include repeated single-view abdomen radiographs (AXR) to monitor treatment success. Only one image of the abdomen is needed to include most of the colon, but technologists often make a second (or even third) exposure to be sure they have imaged the entire abdomen. Our quality improvement project aimed to reduce radiation exposure by decreasing the frequency of >1 exposure performed for AXR orders in children with chronic constipation from 27% to <10% by December 2022 and sustain. Methods: We counted baseline (01/2020-11/2020) and intervention (12/2020-5/2023) examinations with >1 exposure. Initial interventions were a structured communication to technologists and an article in the monthly department newsletter and later, a technologist education module. Additional interventions included communication to radiologists, project updates and encouragement to all technologists, and individual technologist feedback. A statistical process control chart tracked data to study process changes over time. Results: During the baseline and intervention periods, 525/1944 and 1329/8334 examinations, respectively, had >1 exposure performed for AXR orders. Interventions created 2 centerline shifts. Overall, examinations with >1 exposure decreased from 27% to 13.5%. Conclusions: Frequency of >1 exposure performed for AXR orders in children with chronic constipation decreased from 27% to 13.5% through education and communication. This was sustained. We plan to assign training modules for all new technologists, policy reminders (annual training in odd years) for all technologists, and continue individualized learning opportunities.

Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool.

The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-time, encounter-specific reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow. Methods: A multidisciplinary team outlined requirements for a new electronic quality-reporting tool, including point-of-care access during imaging workflow and simultaneous automatic capture of encounter-specific clinical information from the hospital information system. Information system experts created a user-friendly interface for categories based on stages of imaging workflow (Planning, Acquisition, Processing, Interpretation, Communication, and Data Collection). Team members trained all department staff. Quality coordinators sorted entries and monitored personnel engagement for two 36-week periods: immediately after launch and 3 years later. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze proposed and completed QI projects during these periods. Results: There were 1,498 entries during the first 36 weeks. Ninety-three percent of radiologists and 56% of technologists participated. Three years later, there were 1,251 entries in 36 weeks. Data collection entries for established QI projects increased from 380 (25%) to 487(39%). The engagement continued among radiologists but decreased among technologists over time. Submissions for QI projects increased from baseline. The project completion rate increased. Conclusion: We created a QI reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow, which improved the participation of our imaging professionals and increased the number of completed QI projects.

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Distinguishing Buckle Fractures From Other Distal Radius Fractures in Children.

Introduction: Accurately distinguishing between stable and unstable isolated distal radius fractures (DRF) in children allows for appropriate fracture-specific treatment. Although fractures with cortical disruption, displacement, or angulation are unstable, distinguishing stable buckle fractures (BF) from more subtle potentially unstable DRF is challenging. Our quality improvement project aimed to improve radiology reporting accuracy for these subtle fractures from 23% to 90% in a large tertiary pediatric hospital. Methods: Exams with a reported isolated distal radius fracture during baseline (January-March 2016) and intervention (April 2016-June 2019) were reviewed for accuracy. We introduced 3 types of interventions: radiologist education (self-directed learning modules and individual feedback), a new standardized report template, and a measurement tool ("The 1 cm Rule"). In addition, a statistical process control chart tracked accuracy data to study process changes over time. Results: During the baseline and intervention period, 22 and 480 radiographs, respectively, had either a stable BF or a potentially unstable isolated DRF. Each intervention type created a centerline shift. Overall, reporting accuracy increased from 23% to 90%. Most reports (95%, 639/676) used the template and standard terminology for reporting DRF. Conclusions: Radiology reporting diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing between stable BF and potentially unstable DRF in children increased to 90% through education, standardized reporting, and a measurement tool to enhance radiologist performance. Our institution plans to expand fracture-specific treatment practices with improved radiology reporting accuracy, including bracing and home management of stable BF diagnosed during an acute care visit.