A glycolytic metabolite bypasses "two-hit" tumor suppression by BRCA2.

Knudson's "two-hit" paradigm posits that carcinogenesis requires inactivation of both copies of an autosomal tumor suppressor gene. Here, we report that the glycolytic metabolite methylglyoxal (MGO) transiently bypasses Knudson's paradigm by inactivating the breast cancer suppressor protein BRCA2 to elicit a cancer-associated, mutational single-base substitution (SBS) signature in nonmalignant mammary cells or patient-derived organoids. Germline monoallelic BRCA2 mutations predispose to these changes. An analogous SBS signature, again without biallelic BRCA2 inactivation, accompanies MGO accumulation and DNA damage in Kras-driven, Brca2-mutant murine pancreatic cancers and human breast cancers. MGO triggers BRCA2 proteolysis, temporarily disabling BRCA2's tumor suppressive functions in DNA repair and replication, causing functional haploinsufficiency. Intermittent MGO exposure incites episodic SBS mutations without permanent BRCA2 inactivation. Thus, a metabolic mechanism wherein MGO-induced BRCA2 haploinsufficiency transiently bypasses Knudson's two-hit requirement could link glycolysis activation by oncogenes, metabolic disorders, or dietary challenges to mutational signatures implicated in cancer evolution.

Clinical relevance of PD-1 positive CD8 T-cells in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the relevance of PD-1+CD8+ T-cells in gastric cancer (GC) including prognostic significance, association with chemotherapy and immunotherapy sensitivity and correlations with the tumor microenvironment (TME). METHODS: Discovery cohort: GC samples were evaluated for AE1/3, CD8, PD-1, Ki-67 and Granzyme-B expression with fluorescence-based multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Validation cohorts: we analyzed bulk RNAseq GC datasets from TCGA, the "3G" chemotherapy trial and an immunotherapy phase 2 trial. The cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that influenced overall survival (OS). To study the TME, we analyzed single-cell RNAseq performed on GCs. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort of 350 GCs, increased PD-1 expression of CD8 T-cells was prognostic for OS (HR 0.822, p = 0.042). PD-1 expression in CD8 T-cells highly correlated with cytolytic [Granzyme-B+] (r = 0.714, p < 0.001) and proliferative [Ki-67+] (r = 0.798, p < 0.001) activity. Analysis of bulk RNAseq datasets showed tumors with high PD-1 and CD8A expression levels had improved OS when treated with immunotherapy (HR 0.117, p = 0.036) and chemotherapy (HR 0.475, p = 0.017). Analysis of an scRNAseq dataset of 152,423 cells from 40 GCs revealed that T-cell and NK-cell proportions were higher (24% vs 18% and 19% vs 15%, p < 0.0001), while macrophage proportions were lower (7% vs 11%, p < 0.0001) in CD8PD-1high compared to CD8PD-1low tumors. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest GC cohorts of mIHC combined with analysis of multiple datasets providing orthogonal validation of the clinical relevance of PD-1+CD8+ T-cells being associated with improved OS. CD8PD-1high tumors have distinct features of an immunologically active, T-cell inflamed TME.

Immunohistochemistry study of tumor vascular normalization and anti-angiogenic effects of sunitinib versus bevacizumab prior to dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Tumor angiogenesis controlled predominantly by vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor (VEGF-VEGFR) interaction plays a key role in the growth and propagation of cancer cells. However, the newly formed network of blood vessels is disorganized and leaky. Pre-treatment with anti-angiogenic agents can "normalize" the tumor vasculature allowing effective intra-tumoral delivery of standard chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was applied to investigate and compare the vascular normalization and anti-angiogenic effects of two commonly used anti-angiogenic agents, Sunitinib and Bevacizumab, administered prior to chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective clinical trial enrolled 38 patients into a sunitinib cohort and 24 into a bevacizumab cohort. All received 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and pre-treatment with either sunitinib or bevacizumab. Tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline, after cycle 1 (C1) and cycle 4 (C4) of chemotherapy. IHC was performed to assess the tumor vascular normalization index (VNI), lymphatic vessel density (LVD), Ki67 proliferation index and expression of tumor VEGFR2. RESULTS: In comparison to Bevacizumab, Sunitinib led to a significant increase in VNI post-C1 and C4 (p < 0.001 and 0.001) along with decrease in LVD post-C1 (p = 0.017). Both drugs when combined with chemotherapy resulted in significant decline in tumor proliferation after C1 and C4 (baseline vs post-C4 Ki67 index p = 0.006 for Sunitinib vs p = 0.021 for Bevacizumab). Bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in VEGFR2 expression post-C1 (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Sunitinib, in comparison to Bevacizumab showed a greater effect on tumor vessel modulation and lymphangiogenesis suggesting that its administration prior to chemotherapy might result in improved drug delivery. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02790580 (first posted June 6, 2016).

Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel (IP-PTX) to paclitaxel/5-fluoropyrimidine has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases (GCPM) but has not been studied with standard-of-care platinum/fluoropyrimidine combinations. Our goal to was evaluate IP-PTX with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) in GCPM. METHODS: Forty-four patients with GCPM received IP PTX (40 mg/m2, Days 1, 8), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily, Days 1-14) and intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, Day 1) in 21-day cycles. Patients with synchronous GCPM underwent conversion surgery if they had good response after chemotherapy, conversion to negative cytology, no extraperitoneal metastasis, and no peritoneal disease during surgery. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety. Outcomes from the trial were compared against a matched cohort of 39 GCPM patients who received systemic chemotherapy (SC) comprising platinum/fluoropyrimidine. RESULTS: The median OS for the IP and SC groups was 14.6 and 10.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.74; p = 0.002). The median PFS for the IP and SC group was 9.5 and 4.4 months respectively (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p < 0.001). Patients in the SC group were younger (IP vs. SC, 61 vs. 56 years, p = 0.021) and had better performance status (ECOG 0, IP vs. SC, 47.7% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.007) compared with the IP cohort. In IP group, conversion surgery was performed in 36.1% (13/36) of patients, with a median OS of 24.2 (95% CI 13.1-35.3) months and 1-year OS of 84.6%. CONCLUSIONS: IP PTX with XELOX is a promising treatment option for GCPM patients. In patients with good response, conversion surgery was feasible with favourable outcomes.

Choice of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay influences clinical eligibility for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now standard-of-care treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC). To guide patient selection for ICI therapy, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) biomarker expression is routinely assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, with an increasing number of approved ICIs, each paired with a different PD-L1 antibody IHC assay used in their respective landmark trials, there is an unmet clinical and logistical need for harmonization. We investigated the interchangeability between the Dako 22C3, Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP-142 assays in GC PD-L1 IHC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we scored 362 GC samples for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cells (IC) using a multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence technique. Samples were obtained via biopsy or resection of gastric cancer. RESULTS: The percentage of PD-L1-positive samples at clinically relevant CPS ≥ 1, ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cut-offs for the 28-8 assay were approximately two-fold higher than that of the 22C3 (CPS ≥ 1: 70.3 vs 49.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 5: 29.1 vs 13.4%, p < 0.001; CPS ≥ 10: 13.7 vs 7.0%, p = 0.004). The mean CPS score on 28-8 assay was nearly double that of the 22C3 (6.39 ± 14.5 vs 3.46 ± 8.98, p < 0.001). At the clinically important CPS ≥ 5 cut-off, there was only moderate concordance between the 22C3 and 28-8 assays. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that scoring PD-L1 CPS with the 28-8 assay may result in higher PD-L1 scores and higher proportion of PD-L1 positivity compared to 22C3 and other assays. Until stronger evidence of inter-assay concordance is found, we urge caution in treating the assays as equivalent.

Low-Dose Nivolumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND: The approved doses of the single agent nivolumab - an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody - for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are 3 mg/kg and a 240-mg flat dose, despite efficacy shown at lower doses in earlier CheckMate trials. In view of financial constraints, the minimum dose of nivolumab required for efficacy remains a critical area of inquiry. METHODS: A retrospective review of RCC patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment was conducted. Using the median cutoff of the maximum dose per body weight received, we investigated the effect of lower dosages on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse event-free survival (irAE-FS). Survival analysis was made by Kaplan-Meier, by uni- and multivariable Cox models, and by modeling the statistical interaction between dosages and survival. RESULTS: 32 patients were recruited: 8 patients (25%) receiving first-line treatment and 24 (75%) receiving second-line treatment and beyond. A median split at 2.15 mg/kg yielded 16 patients in both the lower-dose (LD) and the higher-dose (HD) cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) demonstrated no difference in OS after adjustment for gender (HR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.05, p = 0.054; favoring LD), as well as in PFS after adjustment for gender and concurrent radiation therapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.34, p = 0.210; favoring LD). No differences in ORR were observed (50.0 vs. 43.8%, p = 1.00, in the LD and the HD cohort, respectively). Immune-related phenomena were observed in the LD group, including pseudoprogression and increased all-grade immune-related toxicities (irAE-FS: HR = 1.72, 95% CI 0.48-6.14, p = 0.293; favoring HD). Iterative dichotomization of dosages showed no dose-OS or dose-irAE-FS relationship. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests no apparent reduction in efficacy when using a low-dosage nivolumab regimen.

Third generation EGFR TKIs: current data and future directions.

Acquired T790 M mutation is the commonest cause of resistance for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant patients who had progressed after first line EGFR TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor). Several third generation EGFR TKIs which are EGFR mutant selective and wild-type (WT) sparing were developed to treat these patients with T790 M acquired resistant mutation. Osimertinib is one of the third generation EGFR TKIs and is currently the most advanced in clinical development. Unfortunately, despite good initial response, patients who was treated with third generation EGFR TKI would develop acquired resistance and several mechanisms had been identified and the commonest being C797S mutation at exon 20. Several novel treatment options were being developed for patients who had progressed on third generation EGFR TKI but they are still in the early phase of development. Osimertinib under FLAURA study had been shown to have better progression-free survival over first generation EGFR TKI in the first line setting and likely will become the new standard of care.

Protein kinase Cε activity induces anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic genes via an ERK1/2- and NF-κB-dependent pathway to enhance vascular protection.

Vascular endothelial injury predisposes to endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis. We have investigated the hypothesis that PKCε (protein kinase Cε) is an important upstream regulator of cytoprotective pathways in vascular ECs (endothelial cells). Depletion of PKCε in human ECs reduced expression of the cytoprotective genes A1, A20 and Bcl-2. Conversely, constitutively active PKCε expressed in human ECs increased mRNA and protein levels of these cytoprotective genes, with up-regulation dependent upon ERK1/2 (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2) activation. Furthermore, inhibition of NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) by the pharmacological antagonist BAY 11-7085 or an IκB (inhibitor of NF-κB) SuperRepressor prevented cytoprotective gene induction. Activation of PKCε enhanced p65 NF-κB DNA binding and elevated NF-κB transcriptional activity. Importantly, although NF-κB activation by PKCε induced cytoprotective genes, it did not up-regulate pro-inflammatory NF-κB targets [E-selectin, VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1) and ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1)]. Indeed, PKCε exhibited cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory actions, including inhibition of TNFα (tumour necrosis factor α)-induced JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) phosphorylation and ICAM-1 up-regulation, a response attenuated by depletion of A20. Thus we conclude that PKCε plays an essential role in endothelial homoeostasis, acting as an upstream co-ordinator of gene expression through activation of ERK1/2, inhibition of JNK and diversion of the NF-κB pathway to cytoprotective gene induction, and propose that PKCε represents a novel therapeutic target for endothelial dysfunction.

Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic breast cancers with or without prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidines are commonly used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has shown activity in patients with colorectal and gastric cancers despite prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines. We investigate the role of FTD/TPI in patients with MBC with or without prior fluoropyridines in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Patients with MBC were enroled first into a run-in dose confirmation phase, followed by two parallel cohorts including patients with (Cohort A) and without (Cohort B) prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines, where they were treated with FTD/TPI. Primary objectives for each cohort included determination of progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives included determination of objective response rates (ORR), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (42 Cohort A, 32 Cohort B) were enroled, all of whom were evaluable for toxicity and survival, with 72 evaluable for response. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.8-8.3) and 9.4 months (95% CI 5.5-14.0) respectively in Cohorts A and B. Responses were observed regardless of prior exposure to fluoropyrimidines, with ORR of 19.5% (95% CI 8.8-34.9) and 16.1% (95% CI 5.5-33.7) in Cohorts A and B, and 6-month clinical benefit rates of 56.1% (95% CI 39.7-71.5) and 61.3% (95% CI 42.2-78.2) respectively. The safety profile was consistent with known toxicities of FTD/TPI, including neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia, mitigated with dose modifications. CONCLUSION: FTD/TPI showed promising antitumour activity with manageable toxicity and is a clinically valid option in patients with MBC.

Real-world outcomes from use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the management of advanced/metastatic breast cancer in Asia.

Background: Oestrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed BC subtype. Combinations of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with anti-oestrogen therapy have led to improved survival compared with anti-oestrogen therapy alone for advanced/metastatic BC. The evaluation of CDK4/6i in the real-world facilitates treatment planning, insights into the incidence of drug toxicities, dose modifications including dose delays (DDs) and dose reductions (DRs) and improves prognostic accuracy in subgroups, for example geriatric patients, who are under-represented in clinical trials. Methods: This multi-centre study analysed retrospective and prospective data from 456 patients treated with CDK4/6i between January 2015 and December 2020. We examined patient characteristics, variation in prescribing practices, efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Results: In all, 456 patients were included in this study. The median age was 59 (range: 24-92). In total, 85 (19%) were ⩾70 years old. In all, 122 (27%) and 119 (26%) of patients were treated in the first-line and second-line settings, respectively. In total, 25 (5%), 31 (7%) and 145 (32%) of patients had brain, peritoneum and liver metastasis, respectively, at the time of CDK4/6i initiation. On univariate analysis, heavily pre-treated patients and those with distant metastases, involving the liver, brain or peritoneum, had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and 24-month overall survival (OS). Elderly patients (⩾70) had a shorter PFS; OS results were not mature. Majority of patients (n = 362, 80%) initiated treatment with the United States FDA-approved starting dose of CDK4/6i. In all, 330 (72%) had at least one DD and 217 (48%) patients required at least one DR, but these dose modifications were not associated with poorer survival outcomes. Patients age ⩾70 were more likely to require dose modifications leading to a lower treatment dose. The most common reason for DD/DR was neutropenia (60%) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was only 2%. Conclusions: Our study indicates CDK4/6i is effective and safe. Age ⩾ 70, distant metastases to liver, peritoneal or brain were negative prognostic factors. Age ⩾ 70 was associated with significantly increased requirement for dose modification; however, this did not impact survival outcomes. These findings provide reassurance that survival outcomes are not adversely affected in elderly patients when DD/DR is indicated.

Real-world experience of consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab consolidation is associated with improved survival following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the heterogeneity of stage III NSCLC patients, in this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in the real-world setting. METHOD: Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients were retrospectively studied: one cohort received CCRT, another had CCRT-durvalumab. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were relapse rate and safety. In CCRT-durvalumab cohort, association between blood markers with survival and pneumonitis risk were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled: 45 received CCRT, and 39 received CCRT-durvalumab. Median PFS was 17.5 months for CCRT-durvalumab and 8.9 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.47, p = 0.038). Median OS was not-reached for CCRT-durvalumab and 22.3 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.35, p = 0.024). Both EGFR-positive and wild-type (WT) patients had numerically improved PFS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT-alone, 17.5 versus 10.9 months and 11.8 versus 6.63 months, respectively (interaction p-value = 0.608). Grade 2+ pneumonitis was detected in 25% of patients in the durvalumab cohort. Most pneumonitis occurred at 3.5 weeks after durvalumab initiation. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3 and ≥5 were associated with shorter PFS with durvalumab. Week 6 platelet-lymphocyte-ratio ≥ 180 was associated with a lower risk of pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, durvalumab consolidation post CCRT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS and OS. Effect of durvalumab on PFS was not modified by EGFR status. Active surveillance for pneumonitis is crucial. Baseline NLR may help to predict the benefit of treatment with durvalumab.

Serial Tumor Molecular Profiling of Newly Diagnosed HER2-Negative Breast Cancers During Chemotherapy in Combination with Angiogenesis Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancers are heterogeneous with variable clinical courses and treatment responses. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate dynamic changes in the molecular landscape of HER2-negative tumors treated with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed HER2-negative breast cancer patients received low-dose sunitinib or bevacizumab prior to four 2-weekly cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 8 weeks of chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing was performed to assess for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number alterations (CNAs) of 440 cancer-related genes (ACTOnco®). Observed genomic changes were correlated with the Miller-Payne histological response to treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients received sunitinib and 18 received bevacizumab. In total, 77% were hormone receptor positive (HER2-/HR+) and 23% were triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). New therapy-induced mutations were infrequent, occurring only in 13%, and appeared early after a single cycle of treatment. Seventy-two percent developed changes in the variant allele frequency (VAF) of pathogenic SNVs; the majority (51%) of these changes occurred early at 2 weeks and were sustained for 8 weeks. Changes in VAF of SNVs were most commonly seen in the PI3K/mTOR/AKT pathway; 13% developed changes in pathogenic mutations, which potentially confer sensitivity to PIK3CA inhibitors. Tumors with poor Miller-Payne response to treatment were less likely to experience changes in VAF of SNVs compared with those with good response (50% [7/14] vs 15% [4/24] had no changes observed at any timepoint, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Serial molecular profiling identifies early therapy-induced genomic alterations, which may guide future selection of targeted therapies in breast cancer patients who progress after standard chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02790580 (first posted June 6, 2016).

Phase Ib/II Dose Expansion Study of Lenvatinib Combined with Letrozole in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: RET is an estrogen response gene with preclinical studies demonstrating cross-talk between the RET and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways. We investigate the role of lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against RET, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer were treated with lenvatinib plus letrozole in a phase Ib/II trial. Primary objectives included safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) determination in phase Ib, and objective response rates (ORR) in phase II dose expansion. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were recruited in dose finding, where deescalating doses of lenvatinib from 20 to 14 mg were investigated. Lenvatinib 14 mg plus letrozole 2.5 mg daily was determined as RP2D. Thirty-one patients with 5 median lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting (range, 0-11) were recruited in dose expansion. In this cohort, ORR was 23.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9%-42.3%], with median duration of response (DoR) of 6.9 months [interquartile range (IQR) 5.9 to 13.1]. Clinical benefit rate ≥6 months (CBR) was 50.0% (95% CI, 31.3%-68.7%). Similar efficacy was observed in the subgroup of 25 patients who progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy [ORR 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8%-40.7%), median DoR 6.9 months (IQR 5.9-13.1), and CBR 52.0% (95% CI, 31.3%-72.2%)]. Pharmacodynamic studies showed target modulation, with paired tumor biopsies indicating downregulation of RET/pERK and improved vascular normalization index. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus letrozole had manageable toxicity, with target engagement and preliminary antitumor activity observed, supporting further assessment in randomized studies.

Lorlatinib for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: The treatment of lung cancer has changed dramatically with the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target sensitizing somatic (gene) activations including anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangements. Despite remarkable initial responses, patients develop progressive disease via various resistance mechanisms, some of which are ALK dependent. Various next-generation ALK TKIs have been developed to improve on central nervous system (CNS) activity and also target the multitude of acquired resistance mechanisms. Of these, lorlatinib has the greatest spectrum of clinical activity against multiple ALK resistance mutations and has also demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with known brain metastases.Areas covered: We discuss the structure, pharmacology and efficacy of lorlatinib and also provide future perspectives in the management of patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Expert opinion: Patients invariably develop resistance during treatment with lorlatinib. Unique combinations of ALK resistance mutations may confer sensitivity to alternate ALK TKIs. There is a move toward individualized biomarker-driven treatment strategies to identify the select group of candidates that can benefit from existing therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibition for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis or Hepatitis B: Experience from a single Asian centre.

BACKGROUND: The importance of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can no longer be understated since its move to front-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years. However, the safety and efficacy of ICI in special populations such as those with infections like tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B (HBV) remain unknown as they are routinely excluded from clinical trials. METHODS: Records of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with ICI from January 2014 to June 2019 at a single Asian centre were reviewed. Those with a history of HBV and/or TB were selected. In this group, safety and treatment outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were reported and compared against control. RESULTS: 191 patients received ICI, 47 (24.6%) had a history of TB/HBV. The median PFS in those with a history of TB/HBV was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.9-7.6), compared to 3.1 months (95% CI 2.4-3.8) in control (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.93, p = 0.021). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI 10.2-21.0) compared to 11.1 months (95% CI 7.6-14.7 months) in the control group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99, p = 0.046). Adverse events of any grade (G) were similar in both groups; slightly more patients with TB/HBV experienced G3 or higher adverse events. Four patients developed TB after initiation of ICI, none with previously documented TB experienced reactivation. Of the 42 patients with a history of HBV, eight had inactive chronic HBV and six had detectable viral load. None of the 34 patients who were previously exposed to HBV had reactivation. CONCLUSION: The use of ICI appears to be safe and efficacious in patients with TB/HBV infection. Prospective studies are required to identify those at risk in order to optimise care to these groups of patients.

CDK4-6 inhibitors in breast cancer: current status and future development.

INTRODUCTION: Aberrant cellular proliferation due to dysregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) retinoblastoma (Rb)-pathway occurs in several cancers. Selective inhibition of CDK4/6 is an attractive target particularly in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), where it has transformed the treatment of these cancers in recent years. Three CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have been approved for the treatment of HR+, HER2 negative (HER2-) MBC. Areas covered: We reviewed and compared the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and toxicity profiles of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors and discussed several challenges in the use of these drugs, particularly in identifying biomarkers, optimizing dosing strategies, and finding best combinations with other therapies. Expert opinion: All three CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy when added to endocrine therapy in the treatment of HR+/HER2- MBC with consistent improvements in progression-free survival across all phase III trials. As efficacy appears similar between the drugs, differences in toxicities, dosing schedule, and monitoring requirements may influence the choice of CDK4/6 inhibitor. There is a paucity of predictive biomarkers that have been identified thus far, but a few promising biomarkers have been studied in the preclinical setting and results of ongoing clinical studies are awaited to validate their utility.

Treatment of EGFR T790M-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The treatment of lung cancer has changed dramatically with the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target sensitizing somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Despite remarkable initial responses, patients eventually develop progressive disease, with the most common cause of resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs being the acquired T790M mutation. Various third-generation EGFR TKIs have been developed to specifically target this acquired mutation, of which osimertinib is currently the only approved agent. In addition, the eagerly anticipated data from the FLAURA study recently found improved efficacy with increased progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib compared to standard of care first-generation EGFR TKIs in the first-line setting. Of note, osimertinib has also demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with known brain metastases. However, as patients invariably develop resistance during treatment with osimertinib, most commonly with the development of triple mutated EGFR (sensitizing mutations/T790M/C797S), which is resistant to all existing EGFR TKIs, efforts are currently ongoing to develop new strategies or novel compounds to specifically target this resistance mechanism.

PKCε-CREB-Nrf2 signalling induces HO-1 in the vascular endothelium and enhances resistance to inflammation and apoptosis.

AIMS: Vascular injury leading to endothelial dysfunction is a characteristic feature of chronic renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and systemic inflammatory conditions, and predisposes to apoptosis and atherogenesis. Thus, endothelial dysfunction represents a potential therapeutic target for atherosclerosis prevention. The observation that activity of either protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) or haem oxygenase-1 (HO-1) enhances endothelial cell (EC) resistance to inflammation and apoptosis led us to test the hypothesis that HO-1 is a downstream target of PKCε. METHODS AND RESULTS: Expression of constitutively active PKCε in human EC significantly increased HO-1 mRNA and protein, whereas conversely aortas or cardiac EC from PKCε-deficient mice exhibited reduced HO-1 when compared with wild-type littermates. Angiotensin II activated PKCε and induced HO-1 via a PKCε-dependent pathway. PKCε activation significantly attenuated TNFα-induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and increased resistance to serum starvation-induced apoptosis. These responses were reversed by the HO antagonist zinc protoporphyrin IX. Phosphokinase antibody array analysis identified CREB1((Ser133)) phosphorylation as a PKCε signalling intermediary, and cAMP response element-binding protein 1 (CREB1) siRNA abrogated PKCε-induced HO-1 up-regulation. Likewise, nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) was identified as a PKCε target using nuclear translocation and DNA-binding assays, and Nrf2 siRNA prevented PKCε-mediated HO-1 induction. Moreover, depletion of CREB1 inhibited PKCε-induced Nrf2 DNA binding, suggestive of transcriptional co-operation between CREB1 and Nrf2. CONCLUSIONS: PKCε activity in the vascular endothelium regulates HO-1 via a pathway requiring CREB1 and Nrf2. Given the potent protective actions of HO-1, we propose that this mechanism is an important contributor to the emerging role of PKCε in the maintenance of endothelial homeostasis and resistance to injury.