Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 99(2): 140-146, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499053

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to analyze the rate of no planificated hospitalization after ambulatory surgical procedures by laparoscopy, and identify associated risk factors to failure in the ambulatory manage of this patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed during 18 months and included 297 patients treated with ambulatory laparoscopies performed at University Hospital La Fe of Valencia. The need for hospital admission, same day after surgery, was considered the main variable. Variables were recorded for preoperatives, intraoperatives o postoperatives factors. To identify risk factors and variables associated with complications, statistical analyses were calculated with logistic regression models. RESULTS: After laparoscopic surgery, the 8.1% of patients required hospitalization. This rate was significantly superior in gynecologic surgery, patients with previous surgery complications, superior ASA classified (II and III) and smokers. Likewise, patients with pneumoperitoneum time over 45minutes presented a higher hospitalization rate; also founded in patients with anesthetic or surgery complications (including conversion to laparotomy). At least, the rate of hospitalization was significantly superior in relation with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). CONCLUSION: The rate of patients who need hospitalization after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery was 8.1%, of which 5.5% were general surgeries and 12.1% were gynecologic surgeries. The mots relationated factors with ambulatory manage failure, analyzed with multiple regression, were the appearance of surgery complications, the pneumoperitoneum time over 100minutes and the PONV.

2.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 99(2): 140-146, feb. 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS (Espanha) | ID: ibc-201228

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la tasa de ingreso no planificado tras cirugía laparoscópica ambulatoria e identificar factores relacionados con el fracaso de la ambulatorización en este tipo de pacientes. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional prospectivo de 297 pacientes adultos intervenidos mediante cirugía laparoscópica en régimen ambulatorio en el Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe de Valencia durante 18 meses. Como variable principal se consideró la necesidad de ingreso hospitalario el mismo día de la intervención. Como variables independientes se registraron factores preoperatorios, intraoperatorios y postoperatorios. Mediante regresión múltiple se comprobó la asociación de ingreso postoperatorio con sus factores condicionantes, realizando un ajuste estadístico por las posibles variables de confusión. RESULTADOS: Tras la cirugía laparoscópica el 8,1% de los pacientes precisó ingreso hospitalario. Esta proporción fue significativamente superior en las pacientes intervenidas de cirugía ginecológica, en los que habían presentado complicaciones en cirugías previas, en pacientes con un ASA superior y en fumadores, así como en quienes se prolongó el tiempo de neumoperitoneo por encima de 45 minutos. También lo fue entre los pacientes que presentaron complicaciones anestésicas o quirúrgicas intraoperatorias. Por último, la proporción de pacientes ingresados fue significativamente superior cuando presentaron NVPO. CONCLUSIÓN: La proporción de pacientes que ingresaron tras cirugía laparoscópica ambulatoria fue del 8,1%, correspondiendo al 5,5% de los sometidos a cirugía general y al 12,1% de las sometidas a cirugía ginecológica. Los factores más relacionados con el fracaso ambulatorio fueron la presencia de complicaciones quirúrgicas, el tiempo de neumoperitoneo superior a 100 minutos y la aparición de náuseas postoperatorias


INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to analyze the rate of no planificated hospitalization after ambulatory surgical procedures by laparoscopy, and identify associated risk factors to failure in the ambulatory manage of this patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed during 18 months and included 297 patients treated with ambulatory laparoscopies performed at University Hospital La Fe of Valencia. The need for hospital admission, same day after surgery, was considered the main variable. Variables were recorded for preoperatives, intraoperatives o postoperatives factors. To identify risk factors and variables associated with complications, statistical analyses were calculated with logistic regression models. RESULTS: After laparoscopic surgery, the 8.1% of patients required hospitalization. This rate was significantly superior in gynecologic surgery, patients with previous surgery complications, superior ASA classified (II and III) and smokers. Likewise, patients with pneumoperitoneum time over 45 minutes presented a higher hospitalization rate; also founded in patients with anesthetic or surgery complications (including conversion to laparotomy). At least, the rate of hospitalization was significantly superior in relation with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). CONCLUSION: The rate of patients who need hospitalization after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery was 8.1%, of which 5.5% were general surgeries and 12.1% were gynecologic surgeries. The mots relationated factors with ambulatory manage failure, analyzed with multiple regression, were the appearance of surgery complications, the pneumoperitoneum time over 100 minutes and the PONV


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Pneumoperitônio Artificial/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA