Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 60
Filtrar
2.
JAMA ; 331(11): 974-976, 2024 03 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393714

RESUMO

This study examines the accuracy of labeling for galantamine products formulated as both generic drugs and dietary supplements, as well as tests for contamination with microorganisms.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Galantamina , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/normas
3.
JAMA ; 329(16): 1401-1402, 2023 04 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37097362

RESUMO

This study assesses the actual measured quantities of melatonin and cannabidiol (CBD) in products marketed and sold in the US as melatonin gummies compared with the quantities declared on their labels.


Assuntos
Canabidiol , Cannabis , Melatonina , Canabidiol/administração & dosagem , Canabidiol/análise , Melatonina/administração & dosagem , Melatonina/análise , Administração Oral , Estados Unidos , Formas de Dosagem
8.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab ; 26(5): 413-420, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26841433

RESUMO

Many studies have found that some dietary supplement product labels do not accurately reflect the actual ingredients. However, studies have not been performed to determine if ingredients in the same dietary supplement product vary over time. The objective of this study was to assess the consistency of stimulant ingredients in popular sports supplements sold in the United States over a 9-month period. Three samples of nine popular sports supplements were purchased over the 9-month period. The 27 samples were analyzed for caffeine and several other stimulants (including adulterants). The identity and quantity of stimulants were compared with stimulants listed on the label and stimulants found at earlier time points to determine the variability in individual products over the 9-month period. The primary outcome measure was the variability of stimulant amounts in the products examined. Many supplements did not contain the same number and quantity of stimulants at all time points over the 9-month period. Caffeine content varied widely in five of the six caffeinated supplements compared with the initial measurement (-7% to +266%). In addition, the stimulants-synephrine, octopamine, cathine, ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, strychnine, and methylephedrine-occurred in variable amounts in eight of the nine products. The significance of these findings is uncertain: the sample size was insufficient to support statistical analysis. In our sample of nine popular sports supplements, the presence and quantity of stimulants varied over a 9-month period. However, future studies are warranted to determine if the variability found is significant and generalizable to other supplements.


Assuntos
Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/análise , Suplementos Nutricionais , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Esportes , Cafeína/análise , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Efedrina/análogos & derivados , Efedrina/análise , Humanos , Octopamina/análise , Fenilpropanolamina/análise , Projetos Piloto , Pseudoefedrina/análise , Estricnina/análise , Sinefrina/análise , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 27(1): 51-6, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21845487

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pai You Guo is a weight loss supplement manufactured in China and adulterated with the banned pharmaceutical products sibutramine and phenolphthalein. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a voluntary recall of Pai You Guo in 2009, yet clinicians have noted its continued use among Brazilian-born women in Massachusetts. OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence of Pai You Guo use, associated side effects, modes of acquisition, and impact of FDA regulatory action on these outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using an anonymous questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Women ≤60 years of age, born in Brazil who attended one primary care clinic or one of six churches in Massachusetts. MAIN MEASURES: Prevalence of use, how users first heard about the product, location of purchase, associated side effects, patterns of use before and after the FDA recall. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-three percent (130/565) of respondents reported using Pai You Guo. In multivariate analysis, obesity (adj OR 3.7, p-value <0.001) and lack of insurance (adj OR 2.6, p-value 0.005) were associated with use. The majority of users (85%) reported at least one side effect. Dry mouth (59%), anxiety (29%), and insomnia (26%) were most commonly reported adverse effects. Nearly thirty-percent of users (38/130) purchased Pai You Guo from local stores and 9% (11/130) purchased it over the Internet. The majority of respondents (79/130; 61%) purchased Pai You Guo after the FDA recall. No respondent was aware of the FDA recall. CONCLUSIONS: Use of this pharmaceutically adulterated supplement is common among Brazilian-born women in Massachusetts. The FDA alerts and recall did not appear to decrease its use.


Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Fármacos Antiobesidade/química , Brasil/etnologia , Criança , China , Estudos Transversais , Ciclobutanos/efeitos adversos , Ciclobutanos/química , Recall de Medicamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/etnologia , Fenolftaleína/efeitos adversos , Fenolftaleína/química , Estados Unidos/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Am J Public Health ; 102(9): 1676-86, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22813089

RESUMO

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently warned consumers about the risks of weight loss supplements adulterated with multiple pharmaceutical agents. Some of these supplements combine potent anorectics, such as amphetamines derivatives, with benzodiazepines, beta-blockers, and other medications to suppress the anorectics' adverse effects. These weight loss supplements represent the most recent generation of rainbow diet pills, named for their bright and varied colors, which date back more than 70 years. Beginning in the 1940s, several US pharmaceutical firms aggressively promoted rainbow pills to physicians and patients. By the 1960s the pills had caused dozens of deaths before the FDA began removing them from the US market. We used a variety of original resources to trace these deadly pills from their origins in the United States to their popularity in Spain and Brazil to their reintroduction to the United States as weight loss dietary supplements.


Assuntos
Anfetaminas/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/efeitos adversos , Depressores do Apetite/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Redução de Peso , Anfetaminas/química , Anfetaminas/história , Fármacos Antiobesidade/química , Fármacos Antiobesidade/história , Depressores do Apetite/química , Depressores do Apetite/história , Brasil , Suplementos Nutricionais/história , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Espanha , Estados Unidos
12.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(10): 1156-1158, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959800

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Centrophenoxine (meclofenoxate) is prescribed in China and elsewhere to treat a variety of conditions including alcoholism and dementia, but the US Food and Drug Administration has not approved the drug for any indication. We designed our study to determine the presence and quantity of centrophenoxine in dietary supplements sold over-the-counter in the US. METHODS: Supplements were included in our study if the label included (a) the term "dietary supplement" and (b) "centrophenoxine" as a declared ingredient. Supplements were purchased online, and powder from each dietary supplement product was reconstituted in methanol and analyzed using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Seven products were analyzed. Centrophenoxine was present in all products in dosages ranging from 79 to 251 mg per serving. Consumers following the maximum recommended daily intake on the label would be exposed to 237 to 752 mg of centrophenoxine per day. Only 1 of 7 products (14%) listed a quantity of centrophenoxine on the label within ±10% of the actual amount. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware and advise patients that cognitive enhancement supplements may contain unapproved and prohibited drugs.


Assuntos
Meclofenoxate , Metanol , Humanos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Pós , Suplementos Nutricionais/análise , Cognição
13.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(4): 486-488, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34550038

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Phenibut is used to treat anxiety, insomnia, alcohol withdrawal and other conditions in Russia. The drug, however, has abuse potential and may cause lethargy, delirium, psychosis and coma. In the United States (US), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has never approved the use of phenibut as a prescription medication, but the drug is available over-the-counter in dietary supplements. More than 80 cases of coma and death have been associated with phenibut consumption and withdrawal, and the FDA recently warned that the drug is not permitted in over-the-counter supplements. We designed our study to determine the presence and quantity of phenibut in over-the-counter supplements before and after the FDA warnings. METHODS: Phenibut products were included if they (a) listed phenibut or a synonym as an ingredient on the label, (b) were labeled as a dietary supplement, and (c) were available for sale both before and after the FDA warning. Supplements were analyzed by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry; quantification was performed by isotope dilution method. RESULTS: Four brands of dietary supplements labeled as containing phenibut met the inclusion criteria. Prior to the FDA warnings, two of the four brands contained phenibut, at dosages of 484 mg and 487 mg per serving. After the FDA warning, all four products contained phenibut, ranging in dosages from 21 mg to 1,164 mg per serving. Phenibut was first detected only after the FDA warnings in two brands, and the quantity of phenibut increased in three of four products after the FDA warnings. Quantities detected per dose were as much as 450% greater than a typical 250 mg pharmaceutical tablet manufactured in Russia. CONCLUSION: Following FDA issuing an advisory that phenibut is not permitted in dietary supplements, the quantity of phenibut increased in 3 of 4 brands of over-the-counter phenibut supplements.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/análise , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/análogos & derivados
17.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 59(11): 975-981, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755516

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Weight loss and sports supplements containing deterenol have been associated with serious adverse events including cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence and quantity of experimental stimulants in dietary supplements labeled as containing deterenol sold in the United States. METHODS: Dietary supplements available for sale in the US and labeled as containing deterenol or one of its synonyms (e.g., isopropylnorsynephrine and isopropyloctopamine) were purchased online. For each brand, one container or subsample was analyzed by NSF International (Ann Arbor, MI) and one container or subsample by the Netherland's National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands). When differences existed between the two containers or subsamples of the same brand, both products were reanalyzed by Sciensano (Brussels, Belgium). NSF International carried out qualitative and quantitative analyses using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry. RIVM performed qualitative and quantitative analysis using UHPLC quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Sciensano carried out qualitative analysis using UHPLC quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Seventeen brands of supplements were analyzed. Many brands included more than one prohibited stimulant in the same product: 4 brands (24%, 4/17) included 2 stimulants, 2 (12%, 2/17) combined 3 stimulants, and 2 (12%, 2/17) combined 4 stimulants. The range of quantities per recommended serving size of the 9 stimulants detected were 2.7 mg to 17 mg of deterenol; 1.3 mg to 20 mg of phenpromethamine (Vonedrine); 5.7 mg to 92 mg of beta-methylphenylethylamine (BMPEA); 18 mg to 73 mg of octodrine; 18 mg to 55 mg of oxilofrine; 48 mg of higenamine; 17 mg of 1,3-dimethylamylamine (1,3-DMAA); 1.8 mg to 6.6 mg of 1,3-dimethylbutylamine (1,3-DMBA); and 5.3 mg of 1,4-dimethylamylamine (1,4-DMAA). CONCLUSION: Weight loss and sports supplements listing deterenol as an ingredient contained 9 prohibited stimulants and 8 different mixtures of stimulants, with as many as 4 experimental stimulants per product. These cocktails of stimulants have never been tested in humans and their safety is unknown.


Assuntos
Agonistas Adrenérgicos/análise , Fármacos Antiobesidade/análise , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/análise , Suplementos Nutricionais/análise , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/efeitos adversos , Alcaloides/análise , Aminas/análise , Anfetaminas/análise , Fármacos Antiobesidade/efeitos adversos , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Efedrina/análogos & derivados , Efedrina/análise , Heptanos/análise , Humanos , Octopamina/análogos & derivados , Octopamina/análise , Medição de Risco , Tetra-Hidroisoquinolinas/análise , Estados Unidos
18.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 11(3): e303-e307, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34484905

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the presence of unapproved pharmaceutical drugs in over-the-counter dietary supplements marketed to improve memory and cognitive function. METHODS: Supplements were identified by searching 2 supplement databases for products labeled as containing omberacetam, aniracetam, phenylpiracetam, or oxiracetam, 4 drugs not approved for human use in the United States. Products were purchased online and analyzed using nontargeted liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: In the 10 products tested, omberacetam and aniracetam were detected along with 3 additional unapproved drugs (i.e., phenibut, vinpocetine and picamilon). By consuming recommended serving sizes, consumers could be exposed to pharmaceutical-level dosages of drugs including a maximum of 40.6 ± 0.4 mg omberacetam (typical pharmacologic dose of 10 mg), 502 ± 0.8 mg of aniracetam (typical pharmacologic dose 200-750 mg), 15.4 ± 0.3 mg of phenibut (typical pharmacologic dose 250-500 mg), 4.3 ± 0.1 mg of vinpocetine (typical pharmacologic dose 5-40 mg), and 90.1 ± 0.7 mg of picamilon (typical pharmacologic dose 50-200 mg). Several detected drugs were not declared on the label, and several declared drugs were not detected in the products. For those products with drug quantities provided on the labels, 75% (9/12) of declared quantities were inaccurate. Consumers could be exposed to up to four-fold greater than pharmaceutical dosages and as many as 4 unapproved drugs when using individual products. CONCLUSIONS: Over-the-counter cognitive enhancement supplements may contain multiple unapproved drugs. The health effects of consuming untested combinations of unapproved drugs at unpredictable dosages without clinician oversight in supplements are unknown.

19.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 23(5): 1110-1115, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33772419

RESUMO

Among patients with COVID-19 evaluated in outpatient settings, factors associated with hospitalization remain poorly understood. Multivariable regressions were used to assess sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with increased odds of hospitalization among patients with confirmed COVID-19 between March 18, 2020 through April 25, 2020 at a community-based outpatient clinic in Massachusetts. Older age, BMI ≥ 25, self-reported dizziness/lightheadedness, temperature ≥ 99.5°F, tachycardia, and oxygen saturation < 95% were associated with increased odds of hospitalization after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. There was also an association between speaking Spanish as primary language and increased odds of hospitalization (compared to English, adjusted OR = 2.99 [95% CI 1.39, 6.39]). Speaking Portuguese as primary language was not associated with increased odds of hospitalization (compared to English, adjusted OR = 1.83 [0.78, 4.28]). In addition to several clinical risk factors established among inpatients, our study found that primarily speaking Spanish, but not Portuguese, was a marker of hospitalization risk among a diverse outpatient cohort of patients with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Humanos , Massachusetts , Pandemias , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA