Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted images.
BMC Med Imaging
; 20(1): 61, 2020 06 09.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517657
2.
Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 203(4): 909-16, 2014 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25247960
3.
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 199(3): W392-401, 2012 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22915432
4.
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.
Radiology
; 251(1): 41-9, 2009 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19332845
5.
Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model.
Radiology
; 252(2): 348-57, 2009 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19703878
6.
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
J Am Coll Radiol
; 16(10): 1456-1463, 2019 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092346
7.
Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham)
; 6(1): 015501, 2019 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30713851
8.
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
Radiology
; 247(1): 38-48, 2008 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18372463
9.
Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
Acad Radiol
; 14(6): 685-91, 2007 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17502258
10.
Impact of Different Study Populations on Reader Behavior and Performance Metrics: Initial Results.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng
; 101362017.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28845078
11.
Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk.
J Natl Cancer Inst
; 109(9)2017 09 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376149
12.
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 187(1): 47-50, 2006 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16794154
13.
Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
Acad Radiol
; 13(5): 621-9, 2006 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16627203
14.
Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas.
Acad Radiol
; 13(10): 1211-8, 2006 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16979070
15.
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.
Acad Radiol
; 13(10): 1229-35, 2006 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16979072
16.
A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection.
Int J Med Inform
; 75(10-11): 722-9, 2006.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16386460
17.
Tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Clin Imaging
; 40(2): 283-7, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26472036
18.
Dedicated Three-dimensional Breast Computed Tomography: Lesion Characteristic Perception by Radiologists.
J Clin Imaging Sci
; 6: 14, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27195180
19.
RE: Advanced Breast Cancer Definitions by Staging System Examined in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
J Natl Cancer Inst
; 113(7): 938-939, 2021 07 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33783531
20.
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Med Phys
; 32(10): 3144-50, 2005 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16279068