Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Health Behav ; 29(3): 215-27, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15899685

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To pilot a worksite smoking intervention. METHODS: Following baseline assessment, participants (N=6378) received cancer risk feedback; 2 annual evaluations were conducted. RESULTS: Using all data, smoking dropped from 13.7% to 8.4% and 9.3%, and smoker's readiness to quit increased. Using complete data, smoking initially increased from 5.7% to 6.7%, but subsequently decreased to 5.3%; the increase in smoker's readiness to quit remained. Being male, younger, and with lower education and self-efficacy predicted smoking. Lower age and higher self-efficacy predicted readiness to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a formal evaluation of a worksite smoking intervention using cancer risk feedback.


Assuntos
Retroalimentação Psicológica , Neoplasias , Saúde Ocupacional , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Philadelphia , Projetos Piloto , Medição de Risco , Autoeficácia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 2(1): 43-50, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12453335

RESUMO

Coadministration of eniluracil with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) allows the oral absorption of small doses of 5-FU, resulting in therapeutic plasma levels. A phase II clinical trial of this combination using a continuous dosing schedule was carried out in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Fifty-three previously untreated patients and 46 patients who had received one prior regimen for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received 10 mg/m2 of eniluracil and 1 mg/m2 of 5-FU twice daily for 28 days, with cycles repeated after a 7-day rest until progression of disease or prohibitive toxicity. Seven of 53 previously untreated patients had an objective tumor response (13.2%): 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. The mean duration of response was 6.3 months. Only 1 of the 45 evaluable patients in the previously treated group had a partial response, with no complete responses. The duration of response was 3 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for the previously untreated group and 2.5 months for the previously treated group. Median overall survival was 11.1 months for the previously untreated group and 9.0 months for the previously treated group. Hematologic toxicity was infrequent, with 3 patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity. Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity included 11 patients with diarrhea, 5 with nausea, and 4 with vomiting. Other common toxicities included anemia and stomatitis, but they were generally mild. This regimen is well tolerated and shows activity in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is similar to that observed with other 5-FU-based regimens. This regimen has not shown to be effective in patients who have had prior chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Uracila/análogos & derivados , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Esquema de Medicação , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Uracila/administração & dosagem , Uracila/efeitos adversos
3.
J Occup Environ Med ; 44(5): 398-406, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12024685

RESUMO

The worksite is an ideal forum for cancer risk assessment. We describe here the baseline characteristics of a large cohort. Participants completed surveys that assessed a variety of risk factors and behavioral mediators. Personalized feedback letters identified cancer risks. A total of 4395 surveys were received. Cancer prevalence was 6.5% (range, 4.3% to 11.2%). The most common risk factors were lack of exercise (41%; 32% to 68%), obesity (28%; 24% to 39%), and smoking (14%; 13% to 32%). Cardiovascular risk was also common (25%; 15% to 48%). Screening was fair to good for all cancers except colon cancer. The perceived risk for cancer was less than that for cardiovascular disease (P < 0.0001). Most smokers were in the pre-contemplation phase, whereas action/maintenance phases predominated for breast and colon cancer screening. Modifiable cancer risk factors can be identified in the majority of workers. Inaccurate risk perception is an important target for future interventions.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Pennsylvania , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Medição de Risco , Assunção de Riscos , Fumar , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA