Double strand breaks (DSBs) as indicators of genomic instability in PATRR-mediated translocations.

Genomic instability contributes to a variety of potentially damaging conditions, including DNA-based rearrangements. Breakage in the form of double strand breaks (DSBs) increases the likelihood of DNA damage, mutations and translocations. Certain human DNA regions are known to be involved in recurrent translocations, such as the palindrome-mediated rearrangements that have been identified at the breakpoints of several recurrent constitutional translocations: t(11;22)(q23;q11), t(17;22)(q11;q11) and t(8;22) (q24;q11). These breakpoints occur at the center of palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRRs), which suggests that the structure of the DNA may play a contributory role, potentially through the formation of secondary cruciform structures. The current study analyzed the DSB propensity of these PATRR regions in both lymphoblastoid (mitotic) and spermatogenic cells (meiotic). Initial results found an increased association of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) at PATRR regions in experiments that used SCEs to assay DSBs, combining SCE staining with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Additional experiments used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with antibodies for either markers of DSBs or proteins involved in DSB repair along with quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify the frequency of DSBs occurring at PATRR regions. The results indicate an increased rate of DSBs at PATRR regions. Additional ChIP experiments with the cruciform binding 2D3 antibody indicate an increased rate of cruciform structures at PATRR regions in both mitotic and meiotic samples. Overall, these experiments demonstrate an elevated rate of DSBs at PATRR regions, an indication that the structure of PATRR containing DNA may lead to increased breakage in multiple cellular environments.

The Recurrent t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) Can Occur as a Post-Zygotic Event.

The AT-rich repeat on chromosome 22q11.2 is known to be involved in the recurrent constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11.2). Segregation of this translocation has been reported in several hundred families, but a de novo translocation event has been identified in only 8 cases, and everytime the translocation originated in paternal germ-line chromosomes. Further, de novo t(11;22) rearrangements have been detected in the sperm of healthy males, leading to the hypothesis that it occurs somewhere along the meiosis-spermatogenesis pathway. This report describes a woman whose constitutional karyotype revealed mosaicism for the recurrent t(11;22) and the subsequent testing performed to determine the origin of the translocation event. Karyotype analysis, translocation-specific PCR, human identity testing, and a SNP genotyping array were performed to detect mosaicism and/or chimerism. As a result, the SNP genotyping array revealed no evidence for mosaicism in genomic DNA beyond mosaicism for the balanced t(11;22). Human identity testing and the SNP genotyping array ruled out chimerism. PCR of the translocation breakpoint followed by sequencing confirmed that the translocation had occurred at the typical t(11;22) breakpoints. In conclusion, these results indicate that the translocation occurred post-fertilization, providing the first evidence of a de novo t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) occurring in a maternal mitotic environment.