Demonstration of neutron radiation-induced nucleation of supercooled water.

We present here direct evidence for neutrons causing nucleation of supercooled water. Highly purified water (20 nm filtration) is cooled to well below freezing (as low as -20 °C) with a radioactive calibration source of neutrons/gamma-rays either present or removed during each of many control cooling runs for the same volume of water. When it is primarily neutrons irradiating the sample bulk, the non-equilibrium freezing point (also known as the "supercooling point") is, on average, +0.7 °C warmer than the control equivalent, with a statistical significance of greater than 5 Sigma, with systematic uncertainty included. This effect is not observed with water in the presence of gamma-rays instead of neutrons. While these neutrons should have theoretically had sufficient energy to mount the energy barrier, corroborating our results, their raising of supercooling temperature has never been reported experimentally to the best of our knowledge. The potential to use deeply supercooled solutions, not only water, as metastable detectors for radiation and perhaps dark matter or neutrino physics presents now a new avenue for exploration.

Donepezil therapy in clinical practice: a randomized crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of donepezil hydrochloride for the treatment of Alzheimer disease in patients drawn from clinical practice. DESIGN: Two-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked crossover study. SETTING: Memory disorders units at Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women's hospitals, Boston. PATIENTS: Sixty individuals (30 men and 30 women; mean +/- SD age, 75.0+/-9.5 years) with probable Alzheimer disease and scores of 20 or less on the information-memory-concentration subscale of the Blessed Dementia Scale. INTERVENTIONS: Placebo wash-in, followed in randomized sequence by (1) donepezil hydrochloride therapy, 5 mg/d, for 6 weeks, followed by placebo washout for 6 weeks and (2) placebo treatment for 6 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores from the beginning to the end of the two 6-week treatment periods. RESULTS: Among patients completing treatment and testing for both periods (n = 48), subscale scores improved (mean +/- SEM) 2.17+/-0.98 points (95% confidence interval, 0.20-4.10 points) during donepezil therapy relative to placebo therapy (P = .04). Scores returned toward baseline within 3 weeks of drug washout. There was no associated change in caregiver-rated global impression (donepezil vs placebo: proportion improved, 0.24 vs 0.22; proportion worsened, 0.27 vs 0.35; P = .34) or on specific tests of explicit memory or verbal fluency. Contrary to studies with tacrine, the presence of the apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele did not predict donepezil treatment failure. Most common adverse events related to donepezil therapy were nausea (5 patients), diarrhea (3 patients), and agitation (3 patients). Serious events possibly related to drug use were seizure, pancreatitis, and syncope (1 patient each). CONCLUSION: This independent confirmation of data from phase 3 trials suggests that donepezil therapy modestly improves cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease who are encountered in clinical practice.

Circadian variation of tacrolimus disposition in liver allograft recipients.

The aim of this study was to characterize the circadian variation of oral tacrolimus disposition in 8 stable liver allograft recipients. In the steady state, a total of 23 blood samples was taken before and after tacrolimus administration during a 24-hr period and the pharmacokinetic parameters were compared. The area under the curve (AUC) of tacrolimus after the morning dose was significantly larger than after the evening dose (211+/-43 ng x hr/ml [morning] vs. 179+/-45 ng x hr/ml [evening], P=0.02). The time to peak (Tmax) was significantly shorter after the morning dose than after the evening dose (1.6+/-0.7 hr [morning] vs. 2.9+/-0.6 hr [evening], P=0.002). The peak (Cmax) was significantly higher after the morning dose than after the evening dose (32.2+/-10.2 ng/ml [morning] vs. 19.1+/-4.3 ng/ml [evening], P=0.003). However, the trough (Cmin) was not significantly different between the morning dose and the evening dose (13.1+/-3.9 ng/ml [morning] vs. 13.3+/-4.4 ng/ml [evening], P=0.4). This study demonstrated that tacrolimus disposition in liver transplant patients was determined by administration time.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Our clinical trial was designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. METHODS: A randomized three-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study was performed at 15 North American centers to compare three immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus + azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (Neoral) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus tacrolimus + MMF. All patients were first cadaveric kidney transplants receiving the same maintenance corticosteroid regimen. Only patients with delayed graft function (32%) received antilymphocyte induction. A total of 223 patients were randomized, transplanted, and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demography between the three treatment groups. At 1 year the results are as follows: acute rejection 17% (95% confidence interval 9%, 26%) in tacrolimus + AZA; 20% (confidence interval 11%, 29%) in cyclosporine + MMF; and 15% (confidence interval 7%, 24%) in tacrolimus + MMF. The incidence of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy was 12% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 11% in the cyclosporine + MMF group, and 4% in the tacrolimus + MMF group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus requiring insulin was 14% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 7% in the cyclosporine + MMF and 7% in the tacrolimus + MMF groups. CONCLUSIONS: All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.

Sudden hearing loss associated with tacrolimus in a kidney-pancreas allograft recipient.

A 38-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes underwent kidney-pancreas transplantation. Her postoperative course was complicated due to recurrent acute graft rejections and pancreatitis. After initial immunosuppression with microemulsion cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with muromonab-CD3 induction, cyclosporine was switched to tacrolimus on day 44. The initial dosage was 5 mg twice/day, but it was gradually increased to 10 mg twice/day, aiming at 15-20 ng/ml. On day 17 of tacrolimus therapy the woman developed sudden hearing loss with tinnitus. The serum tacrolimus level was 28.3 ng/ml (therapeutic range 10-20 ng/ml) on day 20 of tacrolimus therapy, and peaked at 34.9 ng/ml on day 28. Two audiograms performed on days 28 and 29 confirmed bilateral hearing loss of 80% for speech perception, characterized as mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss with speech reception threshold of 35 dB (normal < 20 dB) in both ears. The tacrolimus dosage was gradually reduced to 6 mg twice/day by day 36, with drug level 9.7 ng/ml, after which her hearing gradually recovered.

Intrahepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the era of liver transplantation.

Surgical resection has been the standard approach for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Long-term survival, however, is limited because of recurrence or hepatic decompensation. Failure of chemotherapeutic regimens or liver transplantation (OLT) to prevent recurrence has resulted in the need for multimodality therapies. We report our experience with preoperative hepatic arterial chemoembolization (CET) followed by OLT in highly select patients. Over a 33-month period, 23 of 41 patients (56%) referred with primary (n = 16) or metastatic neuroendocrine (n = 7) liver tumors met eligibility requirements. Despite mild, self-limited chemical hepatitis, CET was well tolerated in all but three elderly patients who succumbed to liver failure. Four of five patients ultimately received OLT. Three are alive and free of disease at a mean followup of 17 months, one died of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, and one (NET) remains well at 33 months with elevated glucagon levels but no measurable disease. All NET patients are alive with resolution of hormonal symptoms. Four of five noncirrhotic patients died of disease, and one has progressive tumor growth. Although OLT following CET achieves superior survival, its application is limited to a minority of patients with such tumors. Careful pretreatment staging and patient selection combined with caution in the use of CET in elderly cirrhotic patients is critical to the success of such therapies.

Long-term results of kidney transplantation: a single center experience.

Overall, patient and renal allograft survivals after cadaveric transplantation have improved significantly since the incorporation of CsA into the standard immunosuppressive regimen. Overall, patient and renal allograft survivals were significantly better for non-diabetic recipients when compared to diabetic recipients after cadaveric transplantation. Living-donor renal transplant recipients have a better outcome than cadaveric transplant recipients. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death after renal transplantation. Death on dialysis accounted for the second largest number of posttransplant mortalities. Sepsis and malignancy remained the next most important causes of death after renal transplantation.