Accurate assessment of functional abilities in pre-schoolers for diagnostic and funding purposes: A comparison of the Vineland-3 and the PEDI-CAT.

AIM: Assessment of functional abilities is an essential component in the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children. Functional abilities, assessed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adapted Test (PEDI-CAT), are used to determine eligibility for early intervention funded under the National Disability Insurance Scheme in Australia (NDIS). This study aims to compare the use of the PEDI-CAT with the Vineland-3, a comprehensive parent interview for the determination of support needs, diagnosis, and eligibility for funding. METHOD: Seventy-five preschool aged children referred for formal diagnosis were assessed with the Vineland-3, and subscale scores reviewed for clinical judgement. These children were also assessed on the PEDI-CAT speedy version and the results on the two tests compared. RESULTS: The PEDI-CAT was less sensitive than the Vineland-3 to the functional difficulties being experienced in this population of preschool aged children. The Vineland-3 had floor effects on some scales and deficits masked by skills in other areas in the same domain, but standard subscale scores allowed skills and areas needing support to be defined. Overall 25% of children clinically in need of support were not identified on the Pedi-cat compared to only 4% using Vineland Domain scores and 3% using Vineland-3 subscale scores. The PEDI-CAT also identified significantly lower levels of support required with only 32% of children found to need very substantial support compared to 40% of children on the Vineland Domain scores, and 59% using subscale scores. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, the Vineland-3 comprehensive interview interpreted using subscale scores as well as domain scores is more sensitive than the PEDI-CAT in identifying young children in need of support as well as the areas and degree of support required.

Families referred to a Child Assessment Team: the Campbelltown experience.

AIM: To study the socio-demographic and psychosocial risk factors of families presenting with their children for a diagnostic developmental assessment. METHODS: Socio-demographic details of children who had a multidisciplinary developmental assessment with the Child Assessment Team at Campbelltown Hospital between January 2009 and December 2010 were collated and compared with census data. RESULTS: In 2009 and 2010, 277 families were seen by the Child Assessment Team. A detailed socio-demographic profile was available for 251 (91%) families. Parents seen in the clinic were more likely to be younger, single, born overseas, have less post-school education, identify as Aboriginal and/or live in public housing compared with the district rates. CONCLUSIONS: Families presenting to the developmental clinic have more socio-economic disadvantage compared with the referring district. This has implications for service delivery and clinical presentation, and highlights the importance of the social worker's role in a developmental diagnostic team.

Emergency department presentations by Aboriginal children: issues for consideration for appropriate health services.

AIM: This study describes the presentations made to the Sydney Children's Hospital (SCH) Emergency Department (ED) by local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) children with particular reference to children who present frequently or whose presentation was preventable. METHODS: Data from the SCH ED Information System were extracted for all presentations made by children who identified as Aboriginal, aged between 0-15 years, who presented between 2005-2008. Presentations were coded according to the presenting problem, diagnosis, outcome, and whether the presentations were potentially preventable. Preventable presentations include those presentations considered to be avoidable and those that could have been managed by a local primary care or community service. RESULTS: There were 1252 presentations to the SCH ED by 453 Aboriginal children aged 0-15 years. More than 50% of children presented more than once. Seventy-nine children presented more than five times. Nearly 45% of presentations were coded as potentially preventable. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of ED presentations were potentially preventable with the use of culturally appropriate and accessible local community and primary health care services and better referral pathways back to these services. Community engagement is required to raise awareness of common presentations and to look at strategies to prevent common problems both occurring and presenting to the ED. This will enhance the health of urban Aboriginal children.

Neonates with congenital Cytomegalovirus and hearing loss identified via the universal newborn hearing screening program.

BACKGROUND: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Currently, there are no universal CMV screening programs for newborns or routine CMV testing of neonates with hearing loss in Australia, or elsewhere. OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of congenital CMV infection in infants with hearing loss identified using routine resources via the Australian universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) program. STUDY DESIGN: Infants who failed UNHS, referred for audiological testing and found to have permanent hearing loss were screened for CMV via PCR of urine and saliva. Congenital CMV was diagnosed if CMV was detected in infants ≤30 days of age, or using retrospective testing on stored new born screening cards, retrospective testing, or using clinical criteria if >30 days of age. The cohort was analyzed for time of testing and prevalence of congenital CMV determined. RESULTS: The Audiology Department reviewed 1669 infants who failed UNHS between 2009 and 2016. Thirty percent (502/1669) had permanent hearing loss confirmed, of whom 336/502 were offered CMV testing. A definite (n = 11) or probable (n = 8) diagnosis of congenital CMV occurred in 19/323 (5.9%), of whom definite diagnoses were made in 4/19 on tests positive prior to 21 days of life, in 5/19 who were positive on neonatal blood screening card (NBSC) testing, in 2/19 who were positive on placental testing. In 8/19 probable diagnoses were made based on positive testing between ages 23-42 days and a consistent clinical syndrome in the absence of another cause for hearing loss after genetic and other testing. CMV testing mirrored the timing of audiological testing, with ∼40% completing audiology and CMV testing by 21 days, and 64% by 30 days. CONCLUSION: This program, utilizing existing clinical services identified probable congenital CMV in ∼6% of a large cohort failing UNHS with permanent hearing loss, of whom more than half were definite diagnoses. No additional assets were required to those already existing in this tertiary referral pediatric centre, whilst providing useful and timely data for clinical and audiological management.