RESUMO
We investigated the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin over 24 weeks in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) using pooled data from four phase III trials. In these trials, patients were randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg or placebo as monotherapy or add-on to metformin, metformin plus sulphonylurea or pioglitazone ± metformin. In total, 1326 patients from Asia received ≥1 dose of study drug. At week 24, adjusted mean differences versus placebo in change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were -0.66% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.76, -0.56] and -0.73% (95% CI -0.83, -0.64) and in weight were -1.6 kg (95% CI -1.9, -1.3) and -1.8 kg (95% CI -2.1, -1.5) with empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (all p < 0.001). Empagliflozin significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The proportion of patients reporting ≥1 adverse event was similar across treatment groups, but events consistent with genital infection were more common in patients treated with empagliflozin 10 mg (3.4%) or 25 mg (2.3%) than placebo (0.9%). Thus in Asian patients with T2DM, empagliflozin reduced HbA1c, weight and blood pressure, and was well tolerated.
Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosídeos/uso terapêutico , Ásia/epidemiologia , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Compostos Benzidrílicos/administração & dosagem , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Glucosídeos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Pioglitazona , Tiazolidinedionas/administração & dosagem , Tiazolidinedionas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Xpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay is a rapid PCR-based assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA (MTBc) and mutations associated with rifampin resistance (RIF). An updated version introduced in 2011, the G4 Xpert, included modifications to probe B and updated analytic software. METHODS: An analytical study was performed to assess Xpert detection of mutations associated with rifampin resistance in rifampin-susceptible and -resistant isolates. A clinical study was performed in which specimens from US and non-US persons suspected of tuberculosis (TB) were tested to determine Xpert performance characteristics. All specimens underwent smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, conventional drug-susceptibility testing and Xpert testing; DNA from isolates with discordant rifampin resistance results was sequenced. RESULTS: Among 191 laboratory-prepared isolates in the analytical study, Xpert sensitivity for detection of rifampin resistance associated mutations was 97.7% and specificity was 90.8%, which increased to 99.0% after DNA sequencing analysis of the discordant samples. Of the 1,096 subjects in the four clinical studies, 49% were from the US. Overall, Xpert detected MTBc in 439 of 468 culture-positive specimens for a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.2%-95.7%) and did not detect MTBc in 620 of 628 culture-negative specimens for a specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 97.5%-99.4%). Sensitivity was 99.7% among smear-positive cases, and 76.1% among smear-negative cases. Non-determinate MTBc detection and false-positive RIF resistance results were low (1.2 and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The updated Xpert assay retained the high sensitivity and specificity of the previous assay versions and demonstrated low rates of non-determinate and RIF resistance false positive results.
Assuntos
Antibióticos Antituberculose , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Rifampina , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bioensaio , Estudos de Casos e Controles , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Países em Desenvolvimento , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
COVID-19/transmissão , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Estudantes , Adolescente , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Criança , Busca de Comunicante , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Período de Incubação de Doenças Infecciosas , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMO
Mycoplasma genitalium is fastidious to culture, and its detection in human clinical specimens relies mainly on molecular methods. Phenotypic determination of antibiotic susceptibility for this bacterium is not a timely or feasible option for most clinical laboratories. This study sought to determine whether next-generation sequencing technologies can effectively be employed in determining genetic mutations associated with drug resistance in M. genitalium samples collected in Aptima Hologic tubes and possibly integrating them into viable workflows in public health laboratories. Following analysis by a custom-designed bioinformatics pipeline, at least one mutation/sample has been identified in 94/98 specimens in at least one of seven loci (macrolides: rrl, rplD, rplV; fluoroquinolones: parC, parE, gyrA, gyrB) described previously to be connected to antibiotic resistance. This method identified a total of 469 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (452 mutations): 134 of 23S rRNA SNPs and 318 amino acid mutations: 114 substitutions and 204 synonymous; the turnaround time (sample to analyzed sequence) was typically 3 days. The assays and workflows described in this work demonstrated that the determination of a drug resistance profile for macrolides and fluoroquinolones of M. genitalium samples by using next-generation sequencing in clinical samples is a feasible approach that can be implemented in clinical laboratories, following thorough and extensive validation studies.IMPORTANCEThe mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium are complex and involve several genetic loci. The molecular methods for accurately characterizing resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides in this organism are often not available or approved for patient use and do not cover all genetic determinants. To this end, we propose a next-generation sequencing-based method with a turnaround time of 3 days that includes the investigation of all drug resistance loci of M. genitalium. Following adaptation, validation, and verification for routine clinical use, assays based on this method may yield molecular results that can be used to guide proper treatment regimens and for surveillance of drug resistance in the general population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued updated guidelines for HIV testing in 2014. These guidelines recommend screening using an HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) test and create the ability to identify algorithm-defined acute HIV infections (AHI). The guidelines also recommend laboratory confirmation of preliminary positive point of care (POC) rapid HIV test results and specimens from high-risk individuals who test POC rapid negative. The Florida Public Health Laboratory (FPHL) switched from an antibody-only algorithm to the CDC recommended algorithm April 16, 2012. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the FPHL HIV testing data and evaluate the impact of the CDC recommended algorithm on the identification of AHI, time to result and inconclusive HIV reports. STUDY DESIGN: FPHL HIV test data, for the period January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2019, was reviewed to determine the number of AHI cases identified, the number of indeterminate HIV results and the time from specimen receipt to result for tests in the antibody-only and CDC recommended algorithms. In addition, POC rapid results were compared to laboratory-based results for AHI cases for which rapid test results were available. RESULTS: There was no difference in time to result between the antibody-only and CDC recommended algorithms for HIV negative specimens. The time to result for HIV-1 positive specimens decreased from an average of 5 days with the antibody-only algorithm to an average of 1 day with the CDC recommended algorithm. The average number of indeterminate results per month decreased from 6.25 per month with the antibody-only algorithm to an average of 2.5 per month using the CDC recommended algorithm. Despite HIV seropositivity decreasing by 0.5% during the study period (2012 = 3.1% [3,892/124,394]: 2019 = 2.6% [2,456/95,525]), AHI cases increased annually from a total of 4 in 2012 to over 50 in 2019 and cases were identified in 30 of 67 Florida counties. The increase in identification of AHIs is credited to educational efforts with healthcare providers to encourage further testing on individuals with risk factors for HIV and a recent POC HIV-1/2 rapid negative test result. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicates that performing HIV testing according to the CDC recommended algorithm decreased time to result for HIV positive results, reduced the number of indeterminate results and identified algorithm-defined AHI. In addition, laboratory-based testing is warranted for high-risk individuals who test negative by POC rapid testing.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Algoritmos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Teste de HIV , HIV-2 , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Secukinumab has demonstrated sustained long-term efficacy with a favourable safety profile in various manifestations of psoriatic disease. We investigated effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, other biologics and conventional systemic therapies in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting. METHODS: REALIA was a non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, parallel group study. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old with chronic plaque psoriasis commencing a new treatment with a biologic agent or conventional systemic therapies. RESULTS: At baseline, 541 patients were divided into three cohorts based on treatment initiated: conventional systemics (173), secukinumab (184) and other biologics (184). A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved almost clear to clear skin based on physician's judgement in secukinumab versus conventional systemics at month 3 (64.7% versus 22.8%, P < 0.001) and month 6 (61.8% versus 20.8%, P < 0.001). At month 12, clear to almost clear skin was achieved by 52.1% of the patients in secukinumab versus 35.8% in conventional systemics (P = 0.066). The proportion of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 on conventional systemics, secukinumab and other biologics was 18.8%, 59.7% and 40.0% at month 3 and 35.3%, 60.8% and 50.0% at month 12, respectively. Secukinumab patients showed significantly higher change in PASI total score from baseline versus conventional systemics at month 3 {least squares [LS] mean [standard error (SE)]: -14.49 [0.648] versus -8.48 [1.149], P < 0.001} and numerically higher [LS mean (SE): -13.60 (0.475) versus -10.84 (1.733), P = 0.122] at month 12. The proportion of patients with Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 score on conventional systemics, secukinumab and other biologics was 22.6%, 65.0% and 41.6% at month 3 and 32.0%, 63.5% and 41.3% at month 12, respectively. Safety profile was comparable across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting in an Asia-Pacific and Middle East population, and these results are in agreement with clinical outcomes of secukinumab reported in randomised clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 170803-001645.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefits of iron chelation therapy (ICT) in the management of chronic iron overload and related complications, compliance to long-term ICT is challenging. Results from the ECLIPSE study, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the safety of deferasirox dispersible tablet and film-coated tablet (FCT) formulations in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated over 24 weeks. METHODS: The aim of the current study (a 2-year, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 3 study) is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of deferasirox FCT in a subset of patients with TDT or lower/intermediate-risk MDS treated for 2 years after the completion of 24 weeks of treatment with deferasirox in the ECLIPSE phase 2 study. RESULTS: Of 53 patients enrolled, 34 (64.2%) completed treatment and study. Adverse events (AEs) reported in most patients (~ 70%) were of mild to moderate severity. Headache and diarrhea were the most frequently (> 25%) reported AEs. None of the serious AEs (including 1 death) were considered treatment related. No new safety signal was identified, and long-term safety of deferasirox FCT was consistent with the known safety profile of deferasirox. No major concerns associated with gastrointestinal tolerability, renal safety, or hematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia/neutropenia) were reported during the 2 years. Patients receiving deferasirox FCT had a treatment compliance (by pill count) of ~ 90% and persistence (continuous use for ≥ 30 days) of > 95%. Reduction in serum ferritin level was almost consistent starting from week 2 across all post-baseline time points (relative reduction: month 6, 19%; month 12, 29%). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this 2-year interventional study suggest that the recommended dosing of deferasirox FCT, with better tolerability, palatability, and compliance, offers a favorable option of ICT for long-term management of iron overload and associated complications in TDT.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720536. Registered 28 March 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720536.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a condition characterized by recurrent itchy hives and/or angioedema for ≥6 weeks. Most of the data about CU come from western countries with very little information available about CU in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. METHODS: AWARE-AMAC is a 24-month prospective, observational, real-world, non-interventional study in patients aged ≥18 years from Asia, the Middle East, and Africa (AMAC) with CU refractory to H1-antihistamines (H1-AH). The main objective was to describe the real-world experience with CU, including clinical characteristics, presence of angioedema, treatment patterns (shifts between treatment classes and changes within a treatment class), investigator-assessed disease control, and the impact on quality of life. Subgroups of interest were type of CU at Baseline and treatment class (based on 2013 urticaria guidelines). There were no mandatory visits and diagnostic/monitoring procedures additional to routine practice, except the patient diary (7-day Urticaria Activity Score) and patient reported outcome assessments. RESULTS: The focus of the current manuscript is on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who formed 98% of the sample. Patients were predominantly female (69.6% female, mean age ± SD 39.8 ± 13.29 years). Time since current diagnosis (Mean ± SD) was 28.6 ± 49.06 months. Amongst patients with CSU, 31.0% had comorbid chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU) and 46.4% had a history of angioedema. 91.9% received H1-AH therapy (±other treatments). The most frequently prescribed treatment classes at Baseline were any/combination of medications, not classified under the other 7 treatment classes, named "Others" (30.5%) followed by, omalizumab (OMA; 23.6%) and second-generation H1-AH monotherapy (sgAH; 15.1%). At Month 12, the most prescribed treatment classes (>15%) for patients were OMA (23.5%) and "Other" (21.3%); 19.7% received "No drug". At Month 24, OMA (22.5%), and "Other" (17.9%) were most frequently prescribed; 28.6% received "No drug". Overall, 79.5% of patients had some type of change in treatment. Over the study period, improvement in self-reported QoL increased, which was mirrored by better disease control. CONCLUSION: In AMAC countries, the non-recommended "Other" treatment class played a major role in the initial management of CU patients. High usage of H1-AH (±other treatments) and OMA was observed. Treatment changes were observed in a majority of patients. Treatment escalation from sgAH was mostly via OMA. Improvement of disease control and QoL was achieved during the study period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational study (NA).
RESUMO
In Florida, where syphilis is a reportable disease, the number of primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis cases has increased from 3,266 in 2008-2010 to 5,340 in 2013-2015, a 63% increase. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and sensitivity of the syphilis reverse algorithm with the traditional algorithm for detecting P&S (infectious) syphilis cases. Clinical specimens from individuals who self-referred for syphilis testing at public health clinics were processed using the traditional algorithm (non-treponemal rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test followed by a confirmatory treponemal (EIA) test) and then further tested with the Architect Syphilis TP (ASTP) immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL, USA) or by RPR confirmation, if needed (reverse algorithm). Of 1,079 specimens, 59 were positive for syphilis. The sensitivity of the reverse algorithm was 98.3% (58/59) and of the traditional algorithm was 72.9% (43/59). Based on clinical evidence, of the 16 traditional algorithm-negative but reverse algorithm-positive cases, 68.8% (11/16) were classified as missed P&S infections (treatment naïve) and 31.2% (5/16) were classified as missed past syphilis (latent or infections with documented linkage to care). The reverse algorithm enables the detection of additional P&S syphilis cases missed by our current traditional algorithm.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Testes de Aglutinação , Florida , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
The emergence of Zika virus in the Americas in 2015 and its association with birth defects and other adverse health outcomes triggered an unprecedented public health response and a demand for testing. In 2016, when Florida exceeded state public health laboratory capacity for diagnostic testing, the state formed partnerships with federal and commercial laboratories. Eighty-two percent of the testing (n = 33 802 of 41 008 specimens) by the laboratory partners, including Florida's Bureau of Public Health Laboratories (BPHL; n = 13 074), a commercial laboratory (n = 19 214), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; n = 1514), occurred from July through November 2016, encompassing the peak period of local transmission. These partnerships allowed BPHL to maintain acceptable test turnaround times of 1 to 4 days for nucleic acid testing and 3 to 7 days for serologic testing. Lessons learned from this response to inform future outbreaks included the need for early planning to establish outside partnerships, adding specimen triage strategies to surge plans, and integrating state and CDC information systems.
Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Saúde Pública , Infecção por Zika virus , Zika virus/isolamento & purificação , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated guidelines in 2014 for the laboratory diagnosis of HIV in the United States, which recommend use of a supplemental immunoassay (IA) that differentiates HIV-1 from HIV-2 after a repeatedly reactive HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody "Combo" screening test. In October 2014, Bio-Rad Laboratories introduced the FDA-cleared Geenius HIV-1/HIV-2 Supplemental assay and in July 2016, it replaced the Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation rapid test as the second test in the HIV diagnostic algorithm. OBJECTIVE: To compare performance of the new FDA-cleared Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/HIV-2 Supplemental assay and the Bio-Rad Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation assay for use as the primary supplemental test in the 2014 CDC/APHL HIV Diagnostic Algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Two sets of specimens were used to assess the performance of Geenius; 340 select retrospective specimens, obtained through routine clinical submissions from individuals seeking HIV serostatus determinations and 10 known HIV-2 antibody reactive specimens provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories. Panels were created and characterized solely by in-house laboratory results. The panels consisted of: algorithm-defined "established HIV-1 infections" (n=250), "acute HIV-1 infections" (n=20), "early HIV-1 infections" (n=10) and "false positive Combo specimens" (n=60). RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS: The Geenius assay provides significant advantages over Multispot as an appropriate replacement for the primary supplemental test in the HIV Diagnostic Algorithm. In this retrospective study, Geenius was highly concordant with Multispot, reclassified some acute and early algorithm-defined HIV-1 positive specimens and demonstrated a potential decrease in the number HIV-1 RNA nucleic acid amplification tests needed to complete the diagnostic algorithm.
Assuntos
Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Imunoensaio , Saúde Pública , Algoritmos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/instrumentação , Feminino , Florida , Anticorpos Anti-HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , HIV-1/genética , HIV-1/imunologia , HIV-1/isolamento & purificação , HIV-2/genética , HIV-2/imunologia , HIV-2/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Imunoensaio/instrumentação , Imunoensaio/métodos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/instrumentação , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of drugs can vary between different races or ethnic populations because of differences in the relationship of dose to exposure, pharmacodynamic response or clinical efficacy and safety. In the present post-hoc analysis, we assessed the influence of race on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of monotherapy with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, linagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in two comparable, previously reported randomized phase III trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study 1 (with a 12-week placebo-controlled phase) recruited Japanese patients only (linagliptin, n = 159; placebo, n = 80); study 2 (24-week trial) enrolled Asian (non-Japanese; linagliptin, n = 156; placebo, n = 76) and white patients (linagliptin, n = 180; placebo, n = 90). RESULTS: Linagliptin trough concentrations were equivalent across study and race groups, and were higher than half-maximal inhibitory concentration, resulting in dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition >80% at trough. Linagliptin inhibited plasma dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity to a similar degree in study 1 and study 2. Linagliptin reduced fasting plasma glucose concentrations by a similar magnitude across groups, leading to clinically relevant reductions in glycated hemoglobin in all groups. Glycated hemoglobin levels decreased to a slightly greater extent in study 1 (Japanese) and in Asian (non-Japanese) patients from study 2. Linagliptin had a favorable safety profile in each race group. CONCLUSIONS: Trough exposure, pharmacodynamic response, and efficacy and safety of linagliptin monotherapy were comparable among Japanese, Asian (non-Japanese) and white patients, confirming that the recommended 5-mg once-daily dose of linagliptin is appropriate for use among different race groups.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Linagliptina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Povo Asiático , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/farmacocinética , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacocinética , Linagliptina/efeitos adversos , Linagliptina/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , População BrancaRESUMO
AIMS: Liver disease is highly prevalent among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin in subjects with T2DM and hepatic disorders. METHODS: Data were pooled from 17 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of linagliptin in T2DM subjects that included individuals with self-reported history of hepatic disorders at baseline. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: Of the 7009 participants (56% white, 39% Asian), 574 had hepatic disorders, most commonly hepatic steatosis (60%). At week 24, adjusted mean±standard error (SE) change in HbA1c from baseline in those with hepatic disorders was -0.75%±0.05 with linagliptin and -0.20%±0.08 with placebo [treatment difference: -0.54% (95% confidence interval-0.72 to -0.36); P<.0001]. There was no significant difference in HbA1c reduction between subjects with or without baseline hepatic disorders (P=.4042). Among subjects with hepatic disorders, 13.5% and 14.8% of the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively, reported drug-related adverse events while 10.4% and 15.9%, respectively, reported hypoglycemia. Overall, adverse event rates were similar in individuals with or without hepatic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This large pooled analysis suggests that linagliptin is effective and well tolerated in people with T2DM and liver disease.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Linagliptina/uso terapêutico , Hepatopatias/complicações , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autorrelato , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: To determine the effects of empagliflozin on adiposity indices among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Changes in weight, waist circumference, estimated total body fat, index of central obesity and visceral adiposity index were assessed using analysis of covariance and testing of treatment by strata for age, sex and baseline waist circumference in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus randomized to blinded treatment with empagliflozin versus placebo in clinical trials of 12 weeks (cohort 1) or 24 weeks (cohort 2) duration. RESULTS: This study comprised 3300 patients (cohort 1, N = 823; cohort 2, N = 2477). Empagliflozin reduced weight, waist circumference and adiposity indices versus placebo in both cohorts. Adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline in empagliflozin versus placebo was -1.7 kg (-2.1 to -1.4 kg) and -1.9 kg (-2.1 to -1.7 kg) for body weight (p < 0.001); -1.3 cm (-1.8 to -0.7 cm) and -1.3 cm (-1.7 to -1.0 cm) for waist circumference (p < 0.001); -0.2% (-0.7% to 0.3%; p = 0.45) and -0.3% (-0.7% to 0.0%; p = 0.08) for estimated total body fat; -0.007 (-0.011 to -0.004) and -0.008 (-0.010 to -0.006) for index of central obesity (p < 0.001); and -0.3 (-0.5 to 0.0; p = 0.07) and -0.4 (-0.7 to -0.1; p = 0.003) for visceral adiposity index in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Adipose reductions were seen across most age, sex and waist circumference subgroups. CONCLUSION: Empagliflozin significantly reduced weight and adiposity indices with the potential to improve cardiometabolic risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosídeos/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Adiposidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Glicemia/análise , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
AIMS: This analysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination therapy in <65 y.o. patients, overweight/obese, and with uncontrolled T2DM. METHODS: Pooled analysis from three phase-III trials, in <65 y.o. patients, with BMI 25-35kg/m2, and HbA1c ≥8% at baseline. Patients (N=439) were randomized to placebo (n=138), empagliflozin 10mg (n=160), or empagliflozin 25mg (n=141) once daily (24weeks) as add-on to metformin, to metformin plus sulfonylurea, or to pioglitazone ± metformin. RESULTS: At week 24, adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA1c were -0.19% (0.07) for placebo vs. -1.10% (0.07) and -1.10% (0.07) for empagliflozin 10 and 25mg, respectively (both p<0.001). Adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in weight were -0.33kg (0.21) for placebo vs. -1.94kg (0.19) and -2.14kg (0.20) for empagliflozin 10 and 25mg, respectively (both p<0.001). Adverse events were reported in 57.2% on placebo, 64.4% on empagliflozin 10mg and 59.6% on empagliflozin 25mg. Genital infection AEs were reported in 1.4% on placebo, 3.8% on empagliflozin 10mg, and 5.0% on empagliflozin 25mg. CONCLUSIONS: In this specific population, empagliflozin in combination with other oral agents, significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight and was well tolerated.
Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosídeos/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/complicações , Sobrepeso/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Glucose-lowering treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease are limited. We evaluated the potential for linagliptin in combination with insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild-to-severe renal impairment. Data for participants in two phase 3 trials with linagliptin who were receiving insulin were analysed separately (n = 811). Placebo-adjusted mean HbA1c changes from baseline were -0.59% (mild renal impairment) and -0.69% (moderate renal impairment) after 24 weeks and -0.43% (severe renal impairment) after 12 weeks. Drug-related adverse events with linagliptin were similar to placebo (mild renal impairment: 19.9% vs. 26.5%; moderate renal impairment: 22.0% vs. 25.0%; severe renal impairment: 46.3% vs. 43.6%, respectively). Frequencies of hypoglycaemia in patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment were 34.9%, 35.6% and 66.7% with linagliptin and 37.5%, 39.7% and 49.1% with placebo, respectively. Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were low (⩽5.6%). Adding linagliptin to insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease improved glucose control and was well tolerated.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Linagliptina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Idoso , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pioglitazona , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in black/African Americans from North and South America is high; yet data evaluating antidiabetic agents in this population is scarce. To address this gap, we pooled data from the clinical development program for linagliptin. METHODS: A retrospective pooled analysis of eight completed randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III trials of linagliptin identified 336 patients with type 2 diabetes who self-identified their ethnicity as black or African American. Participants received linagliptin (n = 173, 5 mg/day) or placebo (n = 163) as monotherapy, or as add-on to other antidiabetic agents, including insulin. The primary end point was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 18 or 24. RESULTS: The placebo-adjusted mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) in HbA1c from baseline was -0.69% (-0.92 to -0.46; p < 0.0001) at week 18 (eight trials), and -0.64% (-0.90 to -0.39; p < 0.0001) at week 24 (six trials). The placebo-adjusted mean change (95% CI) in fasting plasma glucose from baseline was -11.7 mg/dL (-23.1 to -0.3; p = 0.0446) at week 18 and -14.7 mg/dL (-25.7 to -3.8; p = 0.0087) at week 24. Incidence of investigator-defined hypoglycemia was similar between the two groups (linagliptin, 12.1%; placebo, 11.7%). Overall, the safety profile of linagliptin in this patient group was comparable to that of placebo, with comparable incidence of adverse events; linagliptin was weight-neutral in this patient population. CONCLUSION: Linagliptin provided clinically significant improvements in glycemic control without increased risk of hypoglycemia and without weight gain, representing a useful type 2 diabetes therapy option for the black/African American population.
Assuntos
População Negra , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Purinas/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Argentina , Brasil , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Jejum/sangue , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Linagliptina , Masculino , México , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors cause substantially less weight loss than expected from the energy excreted via glycosuria. Our aim was to analyze this phenomenon quantitatively. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.8 ± 0.8% [62 ± 9 mmol/mol], estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 89 ± 19 mL â min(-1) â 1.73 m(-2)) received empagliflozin (25 mg/day) for 90 weeks with frequent (n = 11) assessments of body weight, eGFR, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Time-dependent glucose filtration was calculated as the product of eGFR and FPG; time-dependent glycosuria was estimated from previous direct measurements. The relation of calorie-to-weight changes was estimated using a mathematical model of human energy metabolism that simulates the time course of weight change for a given change in calorie balance and calculates the corresponding energy intake changes. RESULTS: At week 90, weight loss averaged -3.2 ± 4.2 kg (corresponding to a median calorie deficit of 51 kcal/day [interquartile range (IQR) 112]). However, the observed calorie loss through glycosuria (206 kcal/day [IQR 90]) was predicted to result in a weight loss of -11.3 ± 3.1 kg, assuming no compensatory changes in energy intake. Thus, patients lost only 29 ± 41% of the weight loss predicted by their glycosuria; the model indicated that this difference was accounted for by a 13% (IQR 12) increase in calorie intake (269 kcal/day [IQR 258]) coupled with a 2% (IQR 5) increase in daily energy expenditure (due to diet-induced thermogenesis). This increased calorie intake was inversely related to baseline BMI (partial r = -0.34, P < 0.01) and positively to baseline eGFR (partial r = 0.29, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic glycosuria elicits an adaptive increase in energy intake. Combining SGLT2 inhibition with caloric restriction is expected to be associated with major weight loss.
Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Metabolismo Energético/efeitos dos fármacos , Glucosídeos/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Transportador 2 de Glucose-Sódio/metabolismo , Adulto , Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors are an increasingly used antihyperglycemic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Linagliptin, an orally administered DPP-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated favorable efficacy/safety in clinical trials. The aim of this post hoc pooled analysis was to expand current knowledge of the safety of linagliptin. METHODS: Safety data for once-daily linagliptin 5 mg (1 study of linagliptin 2.5 mg twice daily) were analyzed from 22 randomized, double-blind, Phase I-III, placebo-controlled clinical trials of ≤102 weeks' duration. Assessments of pooled data included incidence of patient-reported adverse events (AEs). FINDINGS: Data from 7400 patients (linagliptin, 4810; placebo, 2590) were pooled. Most patients (58.4%) had T2DM diagnosis for >5 years; approximately 75% were receiving ≥1 type of background therapy in addition to linagliptin/placebo. Overall exposure to the study drug was 2412.8 years for linagliptin and 1481.4 years for placebo (mean [SD], 183 [120] days and 209 [150] days, respectively). Overall frequencies of AEs were similar for linagliptin- and placebo-treated patients (57.3% and 61.8%, respectively). The incidence of neoplastic AEs was low (0.6% and 0.9%, respectively); there were no reports of pancreatic neoplasia. Pancreatitis was observed in 2 linagliptin-treated patients (<0.1%) and 1 placebo-treated patient (<0.1%). The occurrence of cardiac disorder AEs was similar in linagliptin- and placebo-treated patients (3.2% [n = 153] and 3.3% [n = 83], respectively); the incidence of heart failure AEs for linagliptin- and placebo-treated patients was 0.2% (n = 11) and 0.3% (n = 7), respectively. Overall, linagliptin was weight neutral. Occurrence of investigator-defined hypoglycemic AEs was low for both linagliptin and placebo (11.5% vs 14.0%). In patients receiving concomitant sulfonylurea therapy, investigator-defined hypoglycemic AEs were more frequent with linagliptin versus placebo (22.1% [238/1079] vs 14.5% [61/421], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed similar frequencies of AEs for linagliptin- and placebo-treated patients across different age groups and renal function levels. IMPLICATIONS: This updated and expanded pooled, post hoc analysis of 22 placebo-controlled trials of linagliptin 5 mg daily supports previous findings of the acceptable overall safety/tolerability profile of linagliptin when administered to a broad range of patients with T2DM. Linagliptin-treated patients demonstrated a low overall risk of hypoglycemia (risk increased by concomitant sulfonylurea therapy). As with all pooled analyses, this study is limited by the use of data from different studies, and the relatively short duration of some included studies, although use of individual patient data from consistently designed trials should minimize methodological differences between trials. Results from ongoing clinical trials will provide additional insight into the long-term safety/tolerability of linagliptin.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemia/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Linagliptina/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/induzido quimicamente , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association of Public Health Laboratories have proposed a new HIV-1/2 Diagnostic Algorithm: a fourth-generation HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab immunoassay (IA) followed, when repeatedly reactive, by an HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation test, and if that is non-reactive, HIV-1 nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT). The objective of the study was to evaluate performance of the new algorithm after five months of utilization in our high volume, high HIV-1 seroprevalence public health population. METHODS: Algorithm sensitivity and specificity was evaluated on 51,953 prospective serum or plasma specimens from individuals self-referring for HIV serostatus determination. Specimens were tested on the day of receipt or maintained at 4°C until the next testing opportunity. If the initial HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab IA (Abbott Combo) was nonreactive, a negative lab interpretation report would follow. If the initial IA was reactive, repeat screening in duplicate was immediately performed. Repeatedly reactive specimens were tested with an HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation assay (Multispot [MS] HIV-1/HIV-2 Rapid Test) on the same or next workday. If the Abbott Combo-MS assays were discordant, HIV-1 NAT (APTIMA(®) HIV-1 RNA) was performed. In addition to the algorithm performance, we also evaluated the laboratory "specimen receipt to reporting" turnaround time (TAT). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the new HIV Diagnostic Algorithm with serum and plasma specimens over the initial 5 month period was 100% (922/922) and 99.99% (51,030/51,031), respectively. Two algorithm-defined acute HIV-1 infections (AHI) were detected. In addition only 3 of the 992 MS secondary tests performed were interpreted as HIV-1 Indeterminate (HIV-1 recombinant gp41 reactivity only). Of these, 2 were HIV-1 NAT reactive, defined in-house as an early HIV infection (EHI) and one was HIV-1 NAT nonreactive, indicating a false positive initial screening result. Laboratory TAT for reporting concordant reactive Abbott Combo-MS results in ≤ 2 workdays was 96%, compared to 22% for reporting concordant reactive 3rd generation IA-Western blot results. CONCLUSIONS: In our public health testing population, results from the new HIV Diagnostic Algorithm exceeded those of the 3rd generation IA-WB algorithm with respect to HIV-1 sensitivity. The identification of two algorithm-defined AHIs provided the opportunity to inform these individuals of their HIV status and link them to medical care earlier than the scheduled posttest counseling appointment.