Uninterrupted Continuation of VV-ECMO Without Anticoagulation for 44 Days in COVID-19 ARDS: A Precarious Quandary.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has become a mainstay treatment modality for a select patient population who do not respond to conventional medical therapy suffering from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. This therapy necessitates the utilization of anticoagulation, whether unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin, to prevent thrombotic complications. Scarce are reports of VV-ECMO implementation leading to acute hemorrhage mandating cessation of anticoagulation in a patient suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Herein, the authors report a case of a successful outcome in a COVID-19 ARDS patient who suffered an acute hemorrhagic complication leading to pre-emptive termination of systemic anticoagulation. The authors believe this to be one of the first such cases in the literature.

Right Ventricular Failure Manifesting in Corona Virus Disease 2019 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Call to Transition from Venovenous Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation to Right Ventricular Assist Device Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation.

Often labeled the forgotten ventricle, the right ventricle's (RV) importance has been magnified over the last 2 years as providers witnessed how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has a predilection for exacerbating RV failure. Venovenous extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has become a mainstay treatment modality for a select patient population suffering from severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Concomitant early implementation of a right ventricular assist device with ECMO (RVAD-ECMO) may confer benefit in patient outcomes. The underlying mechanism of RV failure in COVID-19 has a multifactorial etiopathogenesis; nonetheless, clinical evaluation of a patient necessitating RV support remains unchanged. Herein, the authors report the case of a critically ill patient who was transitioned from a conventional VV-ECMO Medtronic Crescent cannula to RVAD-ECMO, with the insertion of the LivaNova ProtekDuo dual-lumen RVAD cannula.

Predictors of Neurologic Recovery in Patients Who Undergo Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a rescue strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being used for nonresponders to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. To identify patients most likely to benefit from ECPR, the authors investigated predictors of hospital discharge with good neurologic function. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Single institution academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent ECPR. INTERVENTIONS: Venoarterial ECMO initiation for witnessed refractory cardiac arrest from 2009-2019. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and post-ECMO outcomes were compared between patients who had good versus poor neurologic function at discharge. Good neurologic function was defined as a cerebral performance category 1 to 2, whereas poor neurologic function was defined as a cerebral performance category 3 to 5. Of 54 patients, 13 (24%) were discharged with good neurologic function and 41 (76%) had poor neurologic function (n = 38 in-hospital deaths; n = 3 discharged with severe disability.) Survivors with good neurologic function were younger (41 v 61 y; p = 0.03), more likely to arrest because of pulmonary embolism (46% v 10%; p = 0.01), and more likely to receive concurrent Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) placement while on ECMO (38% v 12%; p = 0.03.) Young age was the most important predictor of good neurologic function (odds ratio 0.92 [0.87-0.97]; p = 0.004), with a threshold for improved survival around 60 years. For all patients, survival to discharge was 30%; however, among survivors with good neurologic function, 5-year survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: ECPR is associated with high rates of neurologic morbidity and mortality. However, in select patients, it may be an acceptable option with favorable long-term survival. Additional studies are indicated to further define the appropriate selection criteria for ECPR implementation.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Biventricular Function in 249 Patients During the Peri-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Period.

OBJECTIVES: At a quaternary care center that regularly performs and cares for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a database of all adult patients since 2009 was assembled with echocardiographic parameters of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular function. From the database, 175 venoarterial (VA) and 74 venovenous (VV) ECMO patients were analyzed to compare the decannulation echocardiographic assessments of biventricular function before, during, and after ECMO in survivors and nonsurvivors. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review-based study. SETTING: A single quaternary care center. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients who received ECMO from 2009 to 2017 with both survival data and echographic studies were included in this retrospective study. INTERVENTIONS: When indicated, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms were performed for ECMO patients. The results of these echocardiograms were reviewed retrospectively, and differences between survivors and nonsurvivors were examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A retrospective chart review of before, during cannulation, and after decannulation echocardiographic assessments of biventricular function was performed. On average, VA ECMO survivors had better post-decannulation LV function than did nonsurvivors by a full clinical grade-mild impairment versus moderate impairment (p < 0.001). RV function comparison was similar-mild impairment in survivors versus moderate impairment in nonsurvivors (p = 0.007). LV and RV function before and during ECMO in survivors was not different from that of nonsurvivors. The change in biventricular function from before to after cannulation and during cannulation to post-cannulation was approximately a full clinical grade better in survivors than nonsurvivors (p < 0.01 in all cases). In VV ECMO patients, post-decannulation RV function was significantly worse in nonsurvivors (moderate dysfunction vs borderline normal function) (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective chart review of 249 patients suggests that echocardiographic assessment of biventricular function before ECMO cannulation is not prognostic in VA or VV ECMO patients. Post-decannulation assessment of biventricular function may aid in triaging more "at risk" patients because nonsurvivors have significantly worse biventricular function after decannulation. The failure to improve biventricular function from the before to after ECMO phases and the during to after ECMO phases is concerning for a poor prognosis.