RESUMO
In beef cattle, the selection for higher weights at young ages has been questioned with the argument that this criterion may increase the adult weight of cows, resulting in higher costs. Therefore, selection criteria should be employed to increase weights at young ages with minimal impact on the adult weight of cows. Additionally, the relationship between measures of cow production efficiency and other well-established selection criteria in breeding programs remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to longitudinally evaluate the relationship between the weaning index (WIndex) as a measure of efficiency and growth traits of the cows. Possible changes over time in WIndex due to selection applied for yearling weight (YW) were also investigated. The WIndex was proposed to maximize genetic response in the weaning weight of the calf while maintaining genetic gain in BW of the cow at zero. A random regression model was adopted to estimate correlations between WIndex, BW, hip height (HH), and body condition score (BCS) using records of Nelore cows from three lines. Genetic trends were calculated for the control line (NeC) and lines selected for greater YW (NeS and NeT). The age of 3 years was the most critical for the weaning efficiency of the cows. At this stage, young cows are still growing and wean lighter calves than their adult counterparts. The genetic correlation estimates between WIndex and BW (-0.58 to 0.04), HH (-0.05 to -0.34), and BCS (-0.51 to -0.17) were close to zero or negative. BW and HH were strongly correlated genetically across all ages (0.73-0.76). In general, HH exhibited a weak and negative genetic relationship with BCS. The genetic correlation between BW and BCS was stronger for advanced ages (0.45-0.68). In lines selected for YW, important increases in WIndex were observed. However, NeS has been selected since the 1980s until the present for YW, and thus, it showed a more pronounced trend of increasing BW and, consequently, a more modest trend of increasing WIndex compared to NeT. In contrast, WIndex exhibited a trend close to zero for NeC. In this context, monitoring HH and BCS can be useful to avoid losses in the weaning efficiency of cows. Furthermore, we suggest that one way to mitigate efficiency losses in calf production could involve stabilizing the BW of cows and increasing the weaning weight of calves using the WIndex.
Assuntos
Desmame , Feminino , Bovinos/genética , Animais , Peso Corporal/genética , FenótipoRESUMO
O objetivo desse trabalho foi comparar o intervalo de tempo de registro de cinco minutos com quatro intervalos de tempo (10, 15, 20 e 30 minutos), para avaliação dos comportamentos comendo, ruminando, em ócio, em pé, apresentados por bovinos confinados individualmente. Foram utilizados 62 machos Nelore desmamados, confinados durante 112 dias. O comportamento foi registrado a cada 28 dias, durante 24h, por observações diretas com rota de amostragem scan e intervalos de registro de 5 minutos, para o cálculo das seguintes características: tempo de alimentação, tempo de ruminação, tempo em ócio, tempo em pé e frequência de alimentação. Foram comparados os intervalos de registro por meio de variâncias, correlações e médias das características. Observou-se para as características, tendência de aumento da variância residual à medida que o intervalo de tempo entre dois registros aumentou, com exceção da frequência alimentar, em que foi observada tendência de diminuição da variância residual com o aumento do intervalo de registro. As médias ajustadas para as medidas de comportamento ingestivo obtidas nos intervalos de registro de 5, 10, 15, 20 e 30 minutos não diferiram significativamente (P>0,05) entre si, com exceção de tempo de alimentação, que apresentou menor valor (P<0,05) no intervalo de registro de 30 minutos em comparação ao intervalo de 5 minutos. Observou-se que até o intervalo de registro de 15 minutos, as correlações com o intervalo de registro de 5 minutos podem ser consideradas altas. Entretanto, acima de 15 minutos de intervalo de registro, a correlação com o intervalo de registro de 5 minutos cai abruptamente, deixando claro que intervalos de registros superiores a 15 minutos são inadequados para estimar as características de comportamento ingestivo de bovinos avaliadas.
: The objective of this study was to compare five-minute recording intervals with four time intervals (10, 15, 20 and 30 minutes) for estimation of eating, ruminating, idling and standing time, as well as meal frequency, of cattle housed in individual pens. Sixty-two weaned Nellore males housed in individual pens for 112 days were used. Ingestive behavior was evaluated every 28 days for 24 h. Direct observations were made using scan sampling and instantaneous sampling at intervals of 5 minutes. The recording intervals were evaluated using error variance, correlations, and adjusted means. For all traits, the residual variance tended to increase with increasing recording interval, except for meal frequency whose residual variance decreased with increasing recording interva. The adjusted means for the ingestive behavior measurements obtained at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 minutes did not differ significantly (P>0.05), except for meal frequency which was lower (P<0.05) in the 30-minute recording interval. The correlations with the 5-minute recording interval were considered high up to the 15-minute interval. However, for longer recording intervals, the correlation with the 5-minute recording interval decreased abruptly, showing that recording intervals longer than 15 minutes are inadequate to estimate ingestive behavior traits of cattle.
Assuntos
Masculino , Animais , Bovinos , Comportamento Alimentar , Ingestão de Alimentos , Registros de DietaRESUMO
O objetivo desse trabalho foi comparar o intervalo de tempo de registro de cinco minutos com quatro intervalos de tempo (10, 15, 20 e 30 minutos), para avaliação dos comportamentos comendo, ruminando, em ócio, em pé, apresentados por bovinos confinados individualmente. Foram utilizados 62 machos Nelore desmamados, confinados durante 112 dias. O comportamento foi registrado a cada 28 dias, durante 24h, por observações diretas com rota de amostragem scan e intervalos de registro de 5 minutos, para o cálculo das seguintes características: tempo de alimentação, tempo de ruminação, tempo em ócio, tempo em pé e frequência de alimentação. Foram comparados os intervalos de registro por meio de variâncias, correlações e médias das características. Observou-se para as características, tendência de aumento da variância residual à medida que o intervalo de tempo entre dois registros aumentou, com exceção da frequência alimentar, em que foi observada tendência de diminuição da variância residual com o aumento do intervalo de registro. As médias ajustadas para as medidas de comportamento ingestivo obtidas nos intervalos de registro de 5, 10, 15, 20 e 30 minutos não diferiram significativamente (P>0,05) entre si, com exceção de tempo de alimentação, que apresentou menor valor (P<0,05) no intervalo de registro de 30 minutos em comparação ao intervalo de 5 minutos. Observou-se que até o intervalo de registro de 15 minutos, as correlações com o intervalo de registro de 5 minutos podem ser consideradas altas. Entretanto, acima de 15 minutos de intervalo de registro, a correlação com o intervalo de registro de 5 minutos cai abruptamente, deixando claro que intervalos de registros superiores a 15 minutos são inadequados para estimar as características de comportamento ingestivo de bovinos avaliadas. (AU)
: The objective of this study was to compare five-minute recording intervals with four time intervals (10, 15, 20 and 30 minutes) for estimation of eating, ruminating, idling and standing time, as well as meal frequency, of cattle housed in individual pens. Sixty-two weaned Nellore males housed in individual pens for 112 days were used. Ingestive behavior was evaluated every 28 days for 24 h. Direct observations were made using scan sampling and instantaneous sampling at intervals of 5 minutes. The recording intervals were evaluated using error variance, correlations, and adjusted means. For all traits, the residual variance tended to increase with increasing recording interval, except for meal frequency whose residual variance decreased with increasing recording interva. The adjusted means for the ingestive behavior measurements obtained at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 minutes did not differ significantly (P>0.05), except for meal frequency which was lower (P<0.05) in the 30-minute recording interval. The correlations with the 5-minute recording interval were considered high up to the 15-minute interval. However, for longer recording intervals, the correlation with the 5-minute recording interval decreased abruptly, showing that recording intervals longer than 15 minutes are inadequate to estimate ingestive behavior traits of cattle.(AU)