Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Nipple Discharge: Imaging Variability Among U.S. Radiologists.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 211(4): 920-925, 2018 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30106616
2.
Variability of Postsurgical Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey Study.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 210(1): 222-227, 2018 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064749
3.
Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 209(5): W322-W332, 2017 Nov.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28929809
4.
Does Preoperative MRI Workup Affect Mastectomy Rates and/or Re-excision Rates in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Carcinoma? A Retrospective Review.
Breast J
; 21(6): 604-9, 2015.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26387498
5.
Comparison of two-view digital breast tomosynthesis to three-view digital mammography in a simulated screening setting.
Acta Radiol
; 60(9): 1094-1101, 2019 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30525870
6.
Determining the impact of US mammography screening guidelines on patient survival in a predominantly African American population treated in a public hospital during 2008.
Cancer
; 119(3): 481-7, 2013 Feb 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22864994
7.
Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial.
Radiology
; 266(1): 81-8, 2013 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23150865
8.
2017 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Reports on Interpretive Performance at Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Welcome New Data, But Not as Benchmarks for Practice.
Radiology
; 283(1): 7-9, 2017 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28244802
9.
Do Radiologists Have Stage Fright? Tumor Staging and How We Can Add Value to the Care of Patients with Cancer.
Radiology
; 278(1): 11-2, 2016 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690989
10.
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
N Engl J Med
; 356(14): 1399-409, 2007 Apr 05.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17409321
11.
Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Med Phys
; 37(8): 4110-20, 2010 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20879571
12.
The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 194(5): 1378-83, 2010 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20410428
13.
The Clinically Relevant Breast Imaging Audit.
J Breast Imaging
; 2(1): 2-6, 2020 Feb 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424999
14.
How should screening breast US be audited? The BI-RADS perspective.
Radiology
; 272(2): 316-20, 2014 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058131
15.
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.
Radiology
; 251(1): 41-9, 2009 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19332845
16.
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
N Engl J Med
; 353(17): 1773-83, 2005 Oct 27.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16169887
17.
The breast density conundrum.
Radiology
; 269(3): 646-7, 2013 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24261494
20.
Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.
Radiology
; 247(1): 98-105, 2008 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18292479