Graft Augmentation Versus Bridging for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the healing rates and clinical outcomes of the 2 different graft indications (i.e., augmentation vs bridging) during rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed for clinical studies of rotator cuff repair using grafts for large to massive tears. The primary outcome was tendon healing on either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound. The secondary outcomes included visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and University of California at Los Angeles score, and forward elevation. Studies were divided into augmentation and bridging groups, and outcomes were compared statistically. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 13 study groups were included: 167 repairs in the augmentation group and 247 repairs in the bridging group. For augmentation and bridging groups, the mean age was 62.2 and 62.8 years and the mean follow-up was 28.5 and 37.7 months, respectively. The estimated healing rates were 64.0% for augmentation and 77.9% for bridging. Although both procedures had improved clinical outcomes, no statistical difference between groups was detected except lower visual analog scale in the bridging group at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Bridging grafts had no significant difference in healing or clinical outcomes when compared with a graft used for augmentation. Bridging grafts may be considered for this difficult patient population with large to massive rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Long-term outcomes following isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 9- to 12-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair have been rarely reported. Because of its relative novelty, little is known about recurrent instability, postoperative arthritis, and patient satisfaction, particularly for well-established modern procedures. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following arthroscopic Bankart repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2003 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrent instability, radiographic, and clinical scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], and Rowe scores) were evaluated. Patient factors (ie, age, gender, side, number of instability episodes, contact sports, and bone loss) were analyzed to determine the correlation with outcome measures. RESULTS: Among the 98 patients (102 shoulders), we were able to contact 50 patients (51 shoulders, mean age 27.0 years, mean follow-up 121.2 months). Significant bone loss in glenoid and humerus was arthroscopically observed in 16 (31.4%) and 28 (54.9%) shoulders, respectively. Sixteen shoulders (31.4%) experienced recurrent instability. Recent radiographs were obtained for 38 shoulders, 14 (36.8%) of which showed moderate to severe arthritis. Clinical outcomes at follow-up were 89.3, 10.8, and 76.0 for ASES, SST, and Rowe scores, respectively. Neither recurrent instability nor arthritis was correlated with any patient factors. CONCLUSION: When isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair was used in all patients with shoulder instability regardless of bony defect, postoperative recurrent instability and arthritis rates were unacceptably high. Additional procedures should be chosen after careful consideration of multiple patient factors.

Fractura triplanar del extremo distal del radio: reporte de caso / Triplanar fracture of the distal end of the radius: case report

Triplanar fractures are those that occur in 3 separate planes at the end of an immature long bone. They typically cross the epiphysis in the sagittal plane, physis in the transverse plane, and metaphysis in the coronal plane. Due to their nature, they are considered an intra-articular injury. Radiographically, these fractures often resemble a Salter-Harris type III epiphyseal slip injury on the anterior-posterior view and a Salter-Harris type II on the lateral view and are consequently considered a Salter-Harris type IV. Only 5 cases of triplanar fracture of the distal end of the radius have been reported so far in the literature, the second case managed with open reduction and internal fixation is reported. This is a 12-year-old patient with a history of trauma to the right wrist after a traffic accident, with deformity and functional limitation and diagnostic images that confirm a fracture at the metaphyseal level of the distal end of the right radius with radial displacement and a stroke. fracture that goes through the epiphysis, physis and metaphysis. An open reduction and internal fixation was performed. 2 years after the injury, the patient is asymptomatic, with preserved ranges of joint mobility and diagnostic images with evidence of adequate consolidation of the fracture, absence of alteration of the physis and consequent normal growth of the radius. Level of Evidence: IV.

Can Grafts Provide Superior Tendon Healing and Clinical Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repairs?: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears commonly retear. To improve healing rates, a number of different approaches have been utilized, including the use of grafts, which may enhance the biomechanical and biologic aspects of the repair construct. However, the outcomes after the use of grafts are diverse. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature for large to massive rotator cuff tears to determine whether the use of grafts generally provides superior tendon healing and clinical outcomes to the repairs without grafts. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Clinical studies comparing the repairs with (graft group) and without grafts (control group) were included and analyzed. The primary outcome was tendon healing on either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound. The secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale for pain, University of California at Los Angles (UCLA) score, and forward elevation range. Differences between groups in all outcome measures were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Six comparative studies (level of evidence 2 or 3) with 13 study groups were included. A total of 242 repairs in the graft group (mean age, 62.5 ± 4.6 years) and 185 repairs in the control group (mean age, 62.5 ± 5.0 years) were analyzed. The graft types utilized included autograft (fascia lata) in 1 study, allograft (human dermis) in 2 studies, xenograft (bovine pericardium, porcine small intestine submucosa) in 2 studies, synthetic graft (polypropylene) in 1 study, and a combination of autograft (the long head of biceps) and synthetic graft (polypropylene) in 1 study. The overall mean follow-up time was 28.4 ± 9.0 months. When 1 or 2 studies/study groups were excluded due to practical or statistical reasons, the graft group demonstrated significantly improved healing (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.58-3.90; P < .0001) and all clinical outcome measures at final follow-up (P ≤ .02). CONCLUSION: The use of grafts generally provides superior tendon healing and clinical outcomes compared to repairs without grafts, except for some specific graft types (eg, porcine small intestine submucosa, bovine pericardium). Further investigations are required to determine the benefits of the use of grafts.