RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Screening for cognitive deficits is essential in neurodegenerative disease. Screening tests, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), are easily administered, correlate with neuropsychological performance and demonstrate diagnostic utility. Yet, administration time is too long for many clinical settings. METHODS: Item response theory and computerised adaptive testing simulation were employed to establish an abbreviated MoCA in 1850 well-characterised community-dwelling individuals with and without neurodegenerative disease. RESULTS: 8 MoCA items with high item discrimination and appropriate difficulty were identified for use in a short form (s-MoCA). The s-MoCA was highly correlated with the original MoCA, showed robust diagnostic classification and cross-validation procedures substantiated these items. DISCUSSION: Early detection of cognitive impairment is an important clinical and public health concern, but administration of screening measures is limited by time constraints in demanding clinical settings. Here, we provide as-MoCA that is valid across neurological disorders and can be administered in approximately 5â min.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/diagnóstico , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico por Computador , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estatística como Assunto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low health literacy (HL) indicates a limited ability to understand and use basic information to make appropriate healthcare decisions. While low HL is associated with higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in multiple chronic conditions, little is known about HL and its associations in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of non-demented adults with PD participating in the National Parkinson Foundation Parkinson's Outcomes Project at the University of Pennsylvania. Subjects were administered two brief HL assessments-the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), a word-recognition test, and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a test of literacy, numeracy and understanding of health information-as well as demographic and clinical questionnaires. Adverse outcomes included falls in the 3 months preceding the study visit, and hospital admissions, emergency room visits, infections, or injuries in the preceding year. Caregiver burden was measured using the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index. RESULTS: 168 subjects completed both HL screens (mean 65.8 years, 65.5% male, 65.2% Hoehn & Yahr Stage 2). Using the REALM-SF, 97.6% of subjects had adequate HL. Using the NVS, however, 29.8% had low HL, which was associated with older age, lower education, male gender, greater disease severity, and poorer cognition. Low HL was associated with hospital admission and increased caregiver burden. CONCLUSIONS: Low HL is common and associated with greater caregiver burden and a higher likelihood of hospitalization in patients with PD. Since HL is associated with both disease severity and adverse outcomes, it may be an important, modifiable contributor to morbidity.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is associated with increased disability and healthcare costs. Individuals' beliefs regarding their medical conditions and treatments impact medication adherence. While instruments exist to measure patients' beliefs about medications in general, no such tool exists for PD. OBJECTIVES: Create an instrument eliciting medication beliefs of persons with PD; identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with beliefs; and examine whether beliefs are associated with dopaminergic therapy adherence. METHODS: We developed the Parkinson's Disease Medication Beliefs Scale (PD-Rx) in four phases: focus groups of patients and caregivers to generate items, scale development, expert and patient revision of items, and a cross-sectional validation sample (nâ=â75). Adherence was calculated using two approaches incorporating self-reported medication lists. RESULTS: The PD-Rx consists of 11 items covering benefits and risks of PD pharmacotherapies. The scale covers motor improvement, current adverse effects, and future concerns. Higher scores indicate more positive beliefs. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alphaâ=â0.67). Test-retest reliability was 0.47. Quality of life was associated with PD-Rx scores, and lower scores were associated with non-adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Negative beliefs about PD treatments are associated with lower quality of life and may be related to medication non-adherence. Further study of any causal relationship between beliefs and medication non-adherence in PD will inform the design of future patient-centered interventions to improve adherence.