Intermittent clamping of the hepatic pedicle in simultaneous ultrasonography-guided liver resection and colorectal resection with intestinal anastomosis: is it safe?

PURPOSE: In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) potentially candidates to combined liver (LR) and colorectal resection (CRR), the extent of LR and the need of hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) in selected cases are considered risk factors for the outcome of the intestinal anastomosis. This study aimed to determine whether intermittent HPC is predictive of anastomotic leakage (AL) and has an adverse effect on the clinical outcome in patients undergoing combined restorative CRR and LR. METHODS: One hundred six LR have been performed for CRLM in our unit from July 2005. Patients who received CRR with anastomosis and simultaneous intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)-guided LR/ablation for resectable CRLM were included in this study. CRR was performed first. Intermittent HPC was decided at the discretion of the liver surgeon. The perioperative outcome was evaluated according to occurrence of AL and overall postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent simultaneous IOUS-guided LR/ablation and CRR with intestinal anastomosis; 19 underwent intermittent HPC (group ICHPY) while 19 did not (group ICHPN); the mean ± SD (range) duration of clamping in group ICHPY was 58.6 ± 32.2 (10.0-125.0) min. Postoperative results were similar between groups. One asymptomatic AL occurred in group ICHPY (5.2 %). Major postoperative complications were none in group ICHPY and one (5.2 %) in group ICHPN, respectively. One patient in group ICHPY died postoperatively (5.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that intermittent HPC during LR is not predictive of AL and has no adverse effect on the overall clinical outcome in patients undergoing combined restorative colorectal surgery and hepatectomy for advanced CRC.

Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the main indications for urgent surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness, even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize, especially with regards to the endoloop (EL) vs endostapler (ES) when it comes to stump closure. AIM: To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery - St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna (Italy) were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed in terms of surgical complications, in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections, abdominal abscesses, and total post-operative complications, in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA. CONCLUSION: Even when AA is complicated, the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.

[Efficacy, impact on survival and cost of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer aim]. / Il follow-up intensivo degli operati per cancro colon-rettale.

AIM OF THE STUDY: This retrospective study was aimed at establishing the efficacy, impact on survival and cost of an intensive follow-up program. METHODS: Data from 790 patients who underwent resections for primary colorectal carcinoma were prospectively entered into a data-base. Four hundred fifty-six patients who had radical surgery were followed-up with a 5-year preestablished schedule. Median follow-up was 42 months (range 2-108). RESULTS: Seventy-four adenomas, 7 metachronous carcinomas, 11 extra-colonic carcinomas and 96 recurrences (13 locoregional recurrences, 68 metastases and 15 cases of combined recurrences) were detected. Thirty-eight (39.6%) of 96 recurrences were amenable to salvage therapy and 23 relapses (24.0%) were radically resected. The median survival of patients who had recurrences was 38 months. The 5-year overall survival was significantly better in patients underwent radical surgery than those who were not treated with curative resection (60.0% vs 7.5%, p < 0.0001). Radical re-operations were performed in 2 (4.8%) of the 42 symptomatic patients and in 21 (38.9%) of the 54 cases with asymptomatic relapses. Median overall survival of patients with asymptomatic recurrences was significantly higher than those with syntomatic relapses (20 vs 6 months, p < 0.0001). The follow-up program used showed an efficacy of 4.6% and led to an expense, based on the exclusive cost of the visits and tests included, of 2087,10 Euro for colonic cancer and 2519.90 Euro for rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our intensive follow-up program after curative colorectal cancer surgery allowed to detect a quite large number of asymptomatic recurrences with a benefit in term of radical re-operation and overall survival.