Kinesiophobia contributes to worse functional and patient-reported outcome measures in Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of kinesiophobia or fear of reinjury on patient-reported outcome measures and physical performance measures in patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy (AT). METHODS: Three databases were systematically screened for studies from inception to May 22nd, 2023 for literature investigating the impact of kinesiophobia on PROMs or physical performance metrics in AT. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, pain, level of activity, self-reported injury severity, quality of life, single-leg hop performance, and heel-raise performance were recorded. Data was presented primarily in a narrative summary fashion. The MINORS score was used for all studies to perform a quality assessment of included studies. RESULTS: Six studies comprising 705 patients were included in this review. Variations of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11 or TSK-17) were used in all studies. TSK scores were strongly correlated with the Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and were correlated with decreased Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment Achilles (VISA-A) and Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores Quality of Life (FAOS-QoL) subscale scores. Kinesiophobia was associated with heel raise completion with conflicting evidence on correlations with hop test performance. CONCLUSION: Increased kinesiophobia scores (> 35 points), measured by TSK are associated with worse PROMs, including increased pain, decreased quality of life, increased self-reported severity, and is also associated with poorer physical performance measures in patients with AT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Clinical outcome results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) and replacement (TAA) are widely accepted options in managing end-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA). We hypothesize that clinical outcomes would be similar for both interventions. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial that collected data on patient demographics, complication rates, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. We evaluated pre and postoperative scores within and between cohorts. RESULTS: The thirty-nine ankles enrolled had a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.8 years. Total AOS scores improved significantly in both groups; 59.4 ± 15.9 to 38 ± 20 (p-value = 0.002) for TAA and 64.6 ± 19.7 to 31.8 ± 16.5 (p-value < 0.001) for AA at last follow-up. Complication rate was higher in the AA cohort with four major complications (20%). CONCLUSION: We observed a statistically significant benefit with TAA and AA. As a pilot trial, this study is meant to inform on design and feasibility of future RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Surgical interventions of Freiberg's disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Freiberg's disease is an osteonecrosis of the metatarsal head bone. Numerous surgical interventions can be provided; however, the literature is limited in systematic reviews discussing the various options. The study aimed to systematically review the quantity and quality of literatures exploring the surgical interventions. METHODS: Fifty articles were found to be relevant for assessing the efficacy of common surgical interventions. The articles were assigned a level of evidence (I-V) to assess their quality. Next, the studies were reviewed to provide a grade of recommendation (A-C, I). RESULTS: Two studies were found at level III that explored osteotomy and autologous transplantation; the other studies were level IV-V. There is poor evidence (grade C) in supporting of joint sparing and joint sacrificing for Freiberg's disease. CONCLUSION: Poor evidence exists to support the surgical interventions for Freiberg's disease, higher quality trials are needed to support the increasing application of these surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic review.

Treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis using hemiarthroplasty with a synthetic cartilage implant or arthrodesis: A comparison of operative and recovery time.

BACKGROUND: First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ1) hemiarthroplasty using a novel synthetic cartilage implant was as effective and safe as MTPJ1 arthrodesis in a randomized clinical trial. We retrospectively evaluated operative time and recovery period for implant hemiarthroplasty (n=152) and MTPJ1 arthrodesis (n=50). METHODS: Perioperative data were assessed for operative and anaesthesia times. Recovery and return to function were prospectively assessed with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscales and SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) subscore. RESULTS: Mean operative time for hemiarthroplasty was 35±12.3min and 58±21.5min for arthrodesis (p<0.001). Anaesthesia duration was 28min shorter with hemiarthroplasty (p<0.001). At weeks 2 and 6 postoperative, hemiarthroplasty patients demonstrated clinically and statistically significantly higher FAAM Sport, FAAM ADL, and SF-36 PF subscores versus arthrodesis patients. CONCLUSION: MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty with a synthetic cartilage implant took less operative time and resulted in faster recovery than arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective case control study.

Reoperations after tarsal coalition resection: a population-based study.

Few studies have evaluated the incidence of subsequent operations after tarsal coalition resection. Using administrative databases, we followed up a cohort of patients who had undergone tarsal coalition resection to determine the rates and possible risk factors for subsequent resection or arthrodesis. Patients (aged 8 years or older) who had been treated from July 1994 to August 2009 in Canada were identified and included. Those with nonidiopathic coalitions were excluded. The time-to-event data for the earliest subsequent procedure were fit to a Cox proportional hazards model that evaluated the patient, operative, and provider factors. Controlling for covariates, the hazard ratios were computed; however, the laterality of any subsequent operation could not be confirmed. A total of 304 patients underwent tarsal coalition resection at an average age of 24.2 ± 17.5 years. Of these 304 patients, 26 (8.6%) underwent subsequent resection and 16 (5.3%) mid- or hindfoot arthrodesis. Of all the factors, the need for future fusion was more likely only if the primary resection had been performed at an academic hospital or if the patient had undergone concomitant arthrodesis at primary resection of the coalition (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 8.5; and hazard ratio 9.7, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 56.1, respectively). The incidence of reoperation after primary tarsal coalition resection was low in our cohort. More than 85% of our patients never required additional operative intervention an average of 9 years after the initial resection. Our data also suggest that primary treatment of tarsal coalition with resection and concomitant arthrodesis increases the risk of requiring a second fusion in the future.

Cartiva: A Review of the Best Evidence.

The Cartiva implant is a synthetic polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel cartilage substitute that is used as a treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis. The implant was designed to relieve the pain associated with hallux rigidus while preserving or restoring range of motion. A summary of outcomes, reasons for these outcomes, and technique pearls will be reviewed here. Seminal articles and current evidence are all included in this article. The aim is for the surgeon to understand all the literature, allowing the surgeon to counsel their patients appropriately, optimize patient selection and to deal with complications.

The ability of outcome questionnaires to capture patient concerns following ankle reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare questions from outcome questionnaires with items generated by preoperative and postoperative ankle reconstruction patients (using the open-ended questions of self-reported Patient-Specific Index [PASI]) to determine whether existing questionnaires address patients' concerns. METHODS: Patients (n = 142) completed the PASI. Questions from 6 standardized questionnaires (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire [AAOS], patient-reported portion of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating System Ankle-Hindfoot Scale [AOFAS], Foot Function Index [FFI], Lower Extremity Functional Scale [LEFS], Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment [SMFA], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) and PASI were matched by 3 reviewers to corresponding categories in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Standardized questionnaires were then compared with the patient responses produced by the PASI. RESULTS: Patients identified 690 items corresponding to 45 ICF categories. Most PASI concepts fell into Activities and Participation (60.3%) and Body Functions (29.0%) components, including the categories "walking" (19.1%), "pain" (16.5%), and "recreation and leisure" (15.4%); 237 items were identified in questionnaires and linked to 39 ICF categories. Core issues in questionnaires ("pain," "walking," "stairs") were important concerns for patients, but other key patient concerns ("swelling," "recreation and leisure," "sports") were seldom included in questionnaires. CONCLUSION: No single questionnaire captured all patient concerns, and standardized questionnaires differed largely in content. This analysis may help guide development of a more comprehensive instrument for evaluating outcomes following ankle reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When choosing an outcome questionnaire, clinicians and researchers should consider the targeted outcome because no one questionnaire captures the full patient experience.

Metal hypersensitivity in foot & ankle orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review.

Introduction: Metal hypersensitivity affects 10-15% of individuals. Orthopaedic implants contain various metals and, therefore, metal hypersensitivity may impact patient outcomes. Purpose: We report a systematic review of the literature on metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing foot and ankle (F&A) surgery. Our goal is to provide an overview presenting symptoms, diagnostic methods, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed from its inception (01-Jan 1966) to 23-Nov 2021. MeSH search terms on F&A were used including orthopaedic surgeries, metal types, and hypersensitivity. All full-text, English, experimental and observational studies reporting on metal hypersensitivity in the context of foot and/or ankle surgeries using metallic orthopaedic devices were included. Article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction was performed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: Fifteen studies were identified, reporting on 45 patients (18 male and 27 female). Median age was 58 years and mean follow-up was 20.8 months. 42 static and three arthroplasty implants were included. In total, 19 patients (42.2%) were diagnosed with metal hypersensitivity to a constituent of their implant, including two (4.4%) patients diagnosed without metal hypersensitivity testing. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) tested negative to their metal implant components. Of the 19 patients allergic to a constituent of their implant, 14 underwent hardware removal and improved. Four patients were asymptomatic and the last was symptomatic, but not revised. Of these, 23 patients retained their hardware (eight with skin reactions) and two symptomatic patients underwent hardware removal. Conclusion: Metal hypersensitivity in the context of F&A surgery is not widely reported. It should be a differential diagnosis in patients who present with hypersensitivity-type symptoms once infection and mechanical failure are ruled out. This data informs a comprehensive algorithm for identifying and treating metal hypersensitivity in F&A patients. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Successful treatment of advanced Freiberg's disease with a modified Weil osteotomy, 5-year follow up: A Pilot case series with a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for Freiberg's disease is largely conservative. For severe disease and refractory cases, there are various surgical options. The purpose of this study was to report the 5-year clinical outcomes of a modified Weil osteotomy in the treatment of advanced Freiberg's disease. METHODS: Twelve patients (12 feet), with a mean age of 30.7 years (range 17-55), were treated with synovectomy and modified Weil osteotomy of the affected distal metatarsal head. There were 10 females and 2 males. Clinical outcomes were independently evaluated pre and postoperatively using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system and a subjective satisfaction score. Radiological union was evaluated postoperatively. Nine (75%) feet involved the 2nd metatarsal and 3 feet (25%) involved the 3rd metatarsal. According to the Smillie classification, 6 feet were Grade IV and 6 feet were grade V. RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow up and the mean follow-up time was 5.2 years (4-7). AOFAS scores improved from 48.1 + /- 7.4-88.9 + /- 10.1 postoperatively giving a mean improvement of 40.8 (p < 0.001). In total, 92% of patients were satisfied with their operation at latest follow-up, reporting excellent or good results. All patients had postoperative radiological union. One patient had a superficial postoperative infection that was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Modified Weil osteotomy is an effective treatment for advanced Freiberg's disease with good outcomes and few complications.

Transportal Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail Ankle Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review of Initial Series.

Background: There is currently a scarcity of information and consensus for transportal (arthroscopic or fluoroscopic) joint preparation during tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion, and therefore this review aims to summarize the available techniques and to evaluate the outcomes after this procedure. Methods: A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed for all English-language studies published from their inception to April 4, 2022. All articles addressing arthroscopy in TTC nailing were eligible for inclusion. The PRISMA Checklist guided the reporting and data abstraction. Descriptive statistics are presented. Result: A total of 5 studies with 65 patients were included for analysis. All studies used arthroscopic portals for tibiotalar and subtalar joint preparation (in 4 studies) prior to TTC nailing, with 4 studies using an arthroscope and 1 study using fluoroscopy. The overall major complication rate was 13.8%; however, there was only 1 instance of deep wound infection (1.5%) and 4 instances of surgical site infections (6.2%). Full fusion was achieved in 86% of patients with an average time to fusion of 12.9 weeks. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score preoperatively was 34.0 and postoperatively was 70.5. Conclusion: Although limited by the number of studies, transportal joint preparation during TTC nail ankle fusion is associated with good rates of complications and successful fusion. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

The association between preoperative COVID-19-positivity and acute postoperative complication risk among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative complications in COVID-19-positive patients undergoing common orthopaedic procedures. Methods: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent common orthopaedic surgery procedures from 1 January to 31 December 2021 were extracted. Patient preoperative COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching was conducted between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. Multivariable regression was then performed to identify both patient and provider risk factors independently associated with the occurrence of 30-day postoperative adverse events. Results: Of 194,121 included patients, 740 (0.38%) were identified to be COVID-19-positive. Comparison of comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of diabetes, heart failure, and pulmonary disease. After propensity matching and controlling for all preoperative variables, multivariable analysis found that COVID-19-positive patients were at increased risk of several postoperative complications, including: any adverse event, major adverse event, minor adverse event, death, venous thromboembolism, and pneumonia. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery were at increased risk of 30-day adverse events. Conclusion: COVID-19-positive patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery had increased odds of many 30-day postoperative complications, with hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery being the most high-risk procedures. These data reinforce prior literature demonstrating increased risk of venous thromboembolic events in the acute postoperative period. Clinicians caring for patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures should be mindful of these increased risks, and attempt to improve patient care during the ongoing global pandemic.

Differential Utilization Patterns of Total Ankle Arthroplasty vs Arthrodesis: A United States National Ambulatory Database Analysis.

Background: End-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a condition that can be treated with ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The goal of this study is to estimate the 2016-2017 United States' utilization of TAA and AA in specific ambulatory settings and delineate patient and hospital factors associated with the selection of TAA vs AA for treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: TAA and AA procedures performed for ankle osteoarthritis were identified in the 2016-2017 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) Database. Notably, the NASS database only examines instances of ambulatory surgery encounters at hospital-owned facilities. As such, instances of TAA and AA performed at privately owned or freestanding ambulatory surgical centers or those performed inpatient are excluded from this analysis. Cases were weighted using nationally representative discharge weights. Univariate analyses and a combined multiple logistic regression model were used to compare demographic, hospital-related, and socioeconomic factors associated with TAA vs AA. Results: In total, 6577 cases were identified, which represents 9072 cases after weighting. Of these, TAA was performed for 2233 (24.6%). Based on the logistic regression model, several factors were associated with increased utilization of TAA vs AA. With regard to patient factors, older patients were more likely to undergo TAA, as well as females. Conversely, patients with a higher comorbidity burden were less likely to receive TAA over AA.With regard to socioeconomic factors, urban teaching and urban nonteaching hospitals were significantly more likely to use TAA compared to rural hospitals. Similarly, privately insured patients and those with a median household income of $71 000 or more were also more likely to receive TAA over AA. Private hospitals ("not-for-profit" and "investor-owned") were significantly more likely to offer TAA over AA. Conclusion: Using a large nationally representative cohort, the current data revealed that during 2016-2017, 24.6% of operatively treated cases of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis in the ambulatory setting are treated with TAA. Associations between socioeconomic and hospital-level factors with TAA utilization suggest that nonclinical factors may influence surgical treatment choice for ankle osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Effective detection and management of low-velocity Lisfranc injuries in the emergency setting: principles for a subtle and commonly missed entity.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the ability of primary care physicians to recognize the mechanisms and common presentations of low-velocity Lisfranc injuries (LFIs) and to impart an improved understanding of the role of imaging and principles of primary care in low-velocity LFIs. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: A MEDLINE literature review was performed and the results were summarized, reviewing anatomy and mechanisms, clinical and imaging-based diagnoses, and management principles in the primary care setting. MAIN MESSAGE: Low-velocity LFIs result from various mechanisms and can have very subtle findings on clinical examination and imaging. A high degree of suspicion and caution are warranted when managing this type of injury. CONCLUSION: Although potentially devastating if missed, if a few treatment principles for low-velocity LFIs are applied from the initial presentation onward, outcomes from this injury can be optimized.

A Two-Stage Diabetic Foot Salvage Using Synthetic Bone Void Filler and Lesser Toe Fillet Flap: A Case Report.

CASE: A 54-year-old type 2 diabetic man with a diabetic forefoot ulcer and osteomyelitis successfully underwent a staged reconstruction to salvage his foot. An antibiotic-carrying bone void filler was used to decrease the infection burden after initial debridement. The fifth toe fillet flap was performed to cover the large soft-tissue defect. The patient returned to baseline ambulation at the 1-year follow-up with a well-incorporated flap. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the utility of combining an antibiotic-carrying bone void filler and a toe fillet flap in a two-stage approach to salvage complex diabetic foot ulcers.

Offloading Plantar Pressures in Healthy Adults: Stirrup Cast vs Total Contact Cast.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with significant morbidity and mortality while posing a challenge for healthcare professionals. Offloading is considered the mainstay of treatment. Total contact casting (TCC) is widely used but does not effectively offload the hindfoot. Some studies suggest that a metal stirrup is effective at offloading midfoot and hindfoot ulcers. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the offloading mechanism of TCC to a stirrup cast. METHODS: A pilot observational study assessing 12 healthy volunteers who underwent casting with a TCC or stirrup cast. A sensor (Pedar; Novel GmbH) that measures maximum force, peak pressure, and contact time and area of each foot region, was placed inside the cast to assess the offloading mechanisms of the 2 interventions. RESULTS: We measured a reduction in all plantar foot loading parameters from the TCC to the stirrup cast. The highest reductions of 85% to 96% (±5%-13%) were noted in maximum force and peak pressure under the forefoot (P < .0001) and found reductions in maximum force, the contact area of all regions of the foot, peak pressure and contact time of the forefoot and midfoot, and contact area of the hindfoot (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In this experimental trial of healthy adults, the stirrup cast was more effective than the TCC by offloading the foot mostly in the forefoot and midfoot.

Sex Differences in End-Stage Ankle Arthritis and Following Total Ankle Replacement or Ankle Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the influence of sex on patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and following total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis. METHODS: Patients who had undergone total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis and who had ≥2 years of follow-up were identified from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Prospective Ankle Reconstruction Database. Standard surgical techniques and implantation methods were followed, and STAR, Hintegra, Mobility, and Agility prostheses were used. Data were collected on patient demographics, revisions, secondary procedures, complications, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and expectations and satisfaction. Statistical analyses included 3-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression models controlling for inflammatory arthritis, age, preoperative scores, and surgery type. RESULTS: The study included 872 patients: 629 who had undergone total ankle replacement (316 men, 313 women) and 243 who had undergone ankle arthrodesis (154 men, 89 women). The mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 4.9 ± 2.4 and 4.0 ± 1.9 years for the total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis groups, respectively. Men were older than women (p ≤ 0.001). In both the total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis groups, women had higher AOS pain scores (i.e., more pain) than men preoperatively (p < 0.05). Pain was reduced significantly in both sexes postoperatively (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between sexes. In both the total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis groups, women had higher AOS disability scores (i.e., more disability) and lower SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores (i.e., worse function) than men both preoperatively and postoperatively (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, AOS disability and SF-36 PCS scores improved significantly from baseline in both sexes (p < 0.001). After controlling for covariates, sex was not a significant predictor of postoperative SF-36 MCS (Mental Component Summary), AOS pain, or AOS disability scores (p > 0.05) but explained 0.5% of variance in SF-36 PCS scores (p = 0.03). Sex did not significantly influence preoperative expectations or postoperative satisfaction. When patients with inflammatory arthritis were excluded, preoperative and postoperative outcome measures, expectations, and satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with end-stage ankle arthritis benefited from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis with similar magnitudes of improvement. Small differences in pain and function between men and women undergoing total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis mostly disappeared when controlling for potential confounding variables. Both total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis remain good options for men and women with end-stage ankle arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Living With Both a Total Ankle Replacement and an Ankle Fusion: A Qualitative Study From the Patients' Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle fusion are effective treatments for end-stage ankle arthritis. Comparative studies elucidate differences in treatment outcomes; however, the literature lacks evidence demonstrating what outcomes are important to patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate patients' experiences of living with both a TAR and ankle fusion. METHODS: This research study used qualitative description. Individuals were selected from a cohort of patients with TAR and/or ankle fusion (n = 1254). Eligible patients were English speaking with a TAR and contralateral ankle fusion, and a minimum of 1 year since their most recent ankle reconstruction. Surgeries were performed by a single experienced surgeon, and semistructured interviews were conducted by a single researcher in a private hospital setting or by telephone. Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores, radiographs, and ancillary surgical procedures were collected to characterize patients. Themes were derived through qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Ten adults (8 men, 2 women), ages 59 to 90 years, were included. Average AOS pain and disability scores were similar for both surgeries for most patients. Participants discussed perceptions of each reconstructed ankle. Ankle fusions were considered stable and strong, but also stiff and compromising balance. TARs were considered flexible and more like a "normal ankle," though patients expressed concerns about their TAR "turning" on uneven ground. Individuals applied this knowledge to facilitate movement, particularly during a first step and transitioning between positions. They described the need for careful foot placement and attention to the environment to avoid potential challenges. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the experiences of individuals living with a TAR and ankle fusion. In this unusual but limited group of patients, we found that each ankle reconstruction was generally perceived to have different characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. Most participants articulated a preference for their TAR. These findings can help clinicians better counsel patients on expectations after TAR and ankle fusion, and improve patient-reported outcome measures by better capturing meaningful outcomes for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Safety and Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a surgical procedure commonly reserved for patients suffering from symptomatic end-stage ankle arthritis. As the number of TAAs increases, so does the associated economic burden. Given these economic constraints, there has been interest in the feasibility of outpatient TAA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and satisfaction of patients undergoing outpatient TAA. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient TAA from July 2018 to June 2019. Inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing a primary TAA in the outpatient setting. This was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery or within 12 hours of surgery. All surgeries were completed by a single experienced surgeon through an anterior approach using the Cadence Total Ankle System. Prior to surgery, all patients received a popliteal nerve block. Patients were then discharged home with oral analgesic and a popliteal nerve catheter, which they removed after 48 hours. The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain control, which was measured using a numeric scale. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. A review of the current literature was then completed to supplement our results. RESULTS: In total, 41 patients were included in our analysis. In terms of the primary outcome, the average numeric scale score was 1.98, indicating excellent pain control. Additionally, nearly all 41 patients stated they were very satisfied with their postoperative pain control regimen. In terms of secondary outcomes, the majority of patients stated they were satisfied with discharge on the same day as surgery. There were no readmissions or major complications in our outpatient TAA cohort. When asked if they would recommend the care they experienced to a friend with the same condition, 95% of patients said that they would recommend this care pathway. Our literature review included 5 original studies, which were all retrospective level IV studies. These studies uniformly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of outpatient TAA. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrate the outpatient TAA is associated with excellent pain control using a multidisciplinary pain approach. The use of standardized outpatient postoperative pathways was effective in preventing readmissions and complications, while still resulting in high patient satisfaction scores. A review of the literature complemented our results, as there are largely no significant differences between outpatient and inpatient TAA.Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Two-Year Outcomes After Total Ankle Replacement With a Novel Fixed-Bearing Implant.

BACKGROUND: The Integra Cadence total ankle replacement (TAR) is a fourth-generation anatomic, fixed-bearing implant requiring minimal tibial and talar resection, which has been in clinical use since June 2016. The primary purpose of this study is to assess its short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after TAR using this prosthesis. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of consecutive patients that underwent TAR using this novel fourth-generation prosthesis between June 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome of interest was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). Secondary outcomes included Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) scores, radiographic alignment, complications, reoperations, and revisions. RESULTS: In total, 69 patients were included in our study. Fifty-one patients (73.9%) required a total of 91 ancillary procedures. Postoperatively, AOS pain scores decreased significantly by an average of 17.8±30.1 points from 45.9±18.2 to 28.4±27.3 (P < .001). AOS disability scores also decreased significantly following surgery by an average of 22.0±30.5 points from 53.9±18.5 to 32.5±27.9 (P < .001). The SF-36 physical component summary score improved 10.4±9.8 points from 33.1±9.1 to 42.6±9.1 (P < .001). Radiographic analysis demonstrated significant improvement to neutral coronal plane alignment, which was achieved in 97% of patients (P < .01) with no cyst formation at 2 years. There was 1 reported complication, 9 reoperations, and no metal or polyethylene component revisions. Overall, the 2-year implant survivorship was 100% in our cohort. Eighteen patients (26.1%) demonstrated fibrous ingrowth of the tibial component. However, outcome scores for these patients did not demonstrate any negative effects. CONCLUSION: In our hands, this TAR system demonstrated excellent early clinical and radiographic outcomes. Patients reported improved physical health status, pain, and disability in the postoperative period. Total ankle instrumentation allowed for accurate and reproducible implantation with correction of coronal and sagittal plane deformities. Early results for the clinical use of this TAR system are promising, but further long-term prospective outcome studies are necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.