The landscape of renal replacement therapy in Veterans Affairs Medical Center intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient dialysis is standardized with several evidence-based measures of adequacy and quality that providers aim to meet while providing treatment. By contrast, in the intensive care unit (ICU) there are different types of prolonged and continuous renal replacement therapies (PIRRT and CRRT, respectively) with varied strategies for addressing patient care and a dearth of nationally accepted quality parameters. To eventually describe appropriate quality measures for ICU-related renal replacement therapy (RRT), we first aimed to capture the variety and prevalence of basic strategies and equipment utilized in the ICUs of Veteran Affairs (VA) medical facilities with inpatient hemodialysis capabilities. METHODS: Via email to the dialysis directors of all VA facilities that provided inpatient hemodialysis during 2018, we requested survey participation regarding aspects of RRT in VA ICUs. Questions centered around the mode of therapy, equipment, solutions, prescription authority, nursing, anticoagulation, antimicrobial dosing, and access. RESULTS: Seventy-six centers completed the questionnaire, achieving a response rate of 87.4%. Fifty-five centers reported using PIRRT or CRRT in addition to intermittent hemodialysis. Of these centers, 42 reported being specifically CRRT-capable. Over half of respondents had the capabilities to perform PIRRT. Twelve centers (21.8%) were equipped to use slow low efficient dialysis (SLED) alone. Therapy was largely prescribed by nephrologists (94.4% of centers). CONCLUSIONS: Within the VA system, ICU-related RRT practice is quite varied. Variation in processes of care, prescription authority, nursing care coordination, medication management, and safety practices present opportunities for developing cross-cutting measures of quality of intensive care RRT that are agnostic of modality choice.

Sexual Dysfunction in Women With Kidney Disease.

Sexual health is inversely associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, depression, poor self-image, and impaired quality of life. Many women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESKD experience symptoms of sexual dysfunction which is underrecognized secondary to a variety of factors including physicians' discomfort in discussing sexual health, patients' reluctance to bring up sexual health, difficulty in the assessment of sexual health in comparison to men, and the overall lack of well-conducted clinical studies in women. The pathophysiology is not fully understood but likely involves changes in sex hormones throughout the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Proper evaluation of this axis is necessary as treatment is tailored to these findings and can improve outcomes. A comprehensive assessment of sexual dysfunction inclusive of women with varying gender identification and sexual orientation, partnered with recognition and treatment of contributing factors as well as identifying the underlying cause, is paramount. With the lack of studies, particularly in women with CKD, treatment options, in some cases, can be considered unchartered territory. In this article, we will review available evidence on the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment for sexual dysfunction in women with CKD and ESKD.