An evaluation of the quality, suitability and impact on equity of clinical practice guidelines relevant to preterm birth for use in Aotearoa New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and a defining event for pregnant people, infants, and whanau (extended families). Recommendations have been made for a national preterm birth prevention initiative focusing on equity in Aotearoa New Zealand, including the development of a national best practice guide. An understanding of the number and quality of guidelines, and consideration of their suitability and impact on equity is required. METHODS: Guidelines were identified through a systematic literature search, search of professional bodies websites, and invitation to regional health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. Obstetric and midwifery clinical directors were invited to report on guideline use. Identified guidelines were appraised by a 23-member trans-disciplinary Review Panel; quantitatively using the AGREE-II instrument and qualitatively using modified ADAPTE questions. The quality of guidelines available but not in use was compared against those in current use, and by health services by level of maternity and neonatal care. Major themes affecting implementation and impact on equity were identified using Braun and Clarke methodology. RESULTS: A total of 235 guidelines were included for appraisal. Guidelines available but not in use by regional health services scored higher in quality than guidelines in current use (median domain score Rigour and Development 47.5 versus 18.8, p < 0.001, median domain score Overall Assessment 62.5 versus 44.4, p < 0.001). Guidelines in use by regional health services with tertiary maternity and neonatal services had higher median AGREE II scores in several domains, than those with secondary level services (median domain score Overall Assessment 50.0 versus 37.5, p < 0.001). Groups identified by the Review Panel as experiencing the greatest constraints and limitations to guideline implementation were rural, provincial, low socioeconomic, Maori, and Pacific populations. Identified themes to improve equity included a targeted approach to groups experiencing the least advantage; a culturally considered approach; nationally consistent guidance; and improved funding to support implementation of guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We have systematically identified and assessed guidelines on preterm birth. High-quality guidelines will inform a national best practice guide for use in Taonga Tuku Iho, a knowledge translation project for equity in preterm birth care and outcomes in Aotearoa.

The Biomarkers for Preterm Birth Study-A prospective observational study comparing the impact of vaginal biomarkers on clinical practice when used in women with symptoms of preterm labor.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the use of qualitative fetal fibronectin, quantitative fetal fibronectin, and placental α-microglobulin-1 in women with symptoms of preterm labor, to evaluate which vaginal biomarker performs the best in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included women who presented with symptoms of preterm labor at 24+0 to 34+0  weeks of gestation at a large tertiary maternity hospital in Auckland, New Zealand. Women were managed according to hospital guidelines using qualitative fetal fibronectin. Quantitative fetal fibronectin and placental α-microglobulin-1 tests were also taken, with clinicians blinded to the results. Management and delivery outcomes were collected from clinical records. The primary outcome was the rate of antenatal hospital admission. Analysis was performed according to predefined management protocols for each of the tests. RESULTS: A total of 128 women had all three biomarkers tests taken. Spontaneous preterm birth rates were 7/128 (5.5%) ≤34+0  weeks and 20/128 (15.6%) <37+0  weeks of gestation; 5/128 (3.9%) delivered within 7 days of testing. Positive results were recorded in 28 qualitative fetal fibronectin tests, 25 quantitative fetal fibronectin tests with 11 ≥200 ng/mL, and 16 placental α-microglobulin-1 tests. The use of quantitative fetal fibronectin or placental α-microglobulin-1 would have lowered antenatal admission rates: 27/128 (21.1%) for qualitative fetal fibronectin, 11/128 (8.6%) for quantitative fetal fibronectin (admission threshold ≥200 ng/mL), and 15/128 (11.7%) for placental α-microglobulin-1. No additional women with quantitative fetal fibronectin <200 ng/mL delivered within 7 days or missed corticosteroids compared with standard care (qualitative fetal fibronectin); however, an additional 3 cases had a false-negative placental α-microglobulin-1 and clinical care may have been compromised (no antenatal corticosteroids or admission). CONCLUSIONS: The use of quantitative fetal fibronectin (admission threshold ≥200 ng/mL) has the potential to reduce the rate of antenatal admissions for women with symptoms of preterm labor without compromising use of antenatal interventions that improve outcomes for babies born preterm.

The use of specialised preterm birth clinics for women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Specialised preterm birth clinics care for women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth. This systematic review assesses current practice within preterm birth clinics globally. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify all studies on preterm birth clinics on the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases. There were no restrictions to study design. Studies were limited to the English language and publications from 1998 onwards. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion, performed data extraction and reviewed methodological quality. Primary outcomes were referral criteria, investigations and interventions offered in preterm birth clinics. Secondary outcomes were the timing of planned first and last appointments and frequency of review. RESULTS: Thirty-two records fulfilled eligibility criteria and 20 studies were included in the main analysis following grouping of records describing the same study or clinic. Studies were of mixed study design and methodological quality. A total of 39 clinics were described; outcome data was not available for all clinics. Referral criteria included previous spontaneous preterm birth (38/38, 100%), previous mid-trimester loss (34/38, 89%) and previous cervical surgery (33/38, 87%). All clinics offered transvaginal cervical length scans. Additional investigations varied, including urogenital swabs (16/28, 57%) and fetal fibronectin (8/28, 29%). The primary treatment of choice for a sonographic short cervix was cervical cerclage in 10/33 (30%) clinics and vaginal progesterone in 6/33 (18%), with 10/33 (30%) using multiple first-line options and 6/33 (18%) using a combination of treatments. The majority of clinics planned timing of first review for 12-16 weeks (30/35, 86%) and the frequency of review was usually determined by clinical findings (18/24, 75%). There was a wide variation in gestational age at clinic discharge between 24 and 37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in the referral criteria, investigations and interventions offered in preterm birth clinics and in the timing and frequency of review. Consistency in practice may improve with the introduction of consensus guidelines and national preterm birth prevention programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration number: CRD42019131470.

Perinatal care provided for babies born at 23 and 24 weeks of gestation.

In recent years, significant improvements in survival and survival-free of major morbidity in babies born at 23+0 to 24+6  weeks of gestation have led to a more pro-active approach to resuscitation at these peri-viable gestations. Antenatal counselling and interventions, intrapartum care and postnatal advice should be part of the package of care provided to optimise outcomes for these babies and their families. This observational study assesses the perinatal care provided to mothers and their babies who were born at 23 and 24 weeks of gestations over a two-year period at a tertiary maternity hospital in New Zealand.

The experience and outcomes of a specialised preterm birth clinic in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: A greater understanding of the risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth and the importance of risk stratification to guide interventions has led to the introduction of preterm birth prevention clinics. AIM: To evaluate the experience and outcomes of the first specialised preterm birth clinic in New Zealand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study reviewed pregnancies cared for in a preterm birth clinic from 2013 to 2018. Cases were identified and data collected from a maternity database and electronic medical records. Analysis was by referral type. RESULTS: A total of 423 cases were included; 309 elective and 22 acute referrals in pregnancy, and 92 consultations outside pregnancy. For those referred electively in pregnancy, 138/309 (44.7%) fulfilled multiple referral criteria, and 57/309 (18.4%) had ≥2 previous spontaneous preterm births or second trimester losses. Excluding five pregnancies with first trimester miscarriage, 77/304 (25.3%) were managed with a history-indicated cerclage (11 placed pre-conception) and 217/304 (71.4%) had cervical surveillance as primary management, of which 133 (61.3%) did not require treatment. The remaining had treatment for a short cervix; 37 (17.0%) received an ultrasound-indicated cerclage only, 21 (9.7%) vaginal progesterone only and 26 (12.0%) both. Five women (1.6%) had a second trimester loss at 13+0 -19+6 and 58/297 (19.5%) had a spontaneous preterm birth at 20+0 -36+6  weeks. The 'take home baby' rate was 95.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy outcomes were similar to those reported by other preterm birth prevention clinics. The majority of women who received cervical surveillance as primary management were able to avoid additional treatment.

Psychological well-being of women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth cared for in a specialised preterm birth clinic: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychological well-being of pregnant women at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth, and the impact of care from a preterm birth clinic. DESIGN: Single-centre longitudinal cohort study over 1 year, 2018-2019. SETTING: Tertiary maternity hospital in Auckland, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth receiving care in a preterm birth clinic. INTERVENTION: Participants completed three sets of questionnaires (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and 36-Item Short Form Survey)-prior to their first, after their second, and after their last clinic appointments. Study-specific questionnaires explored pregnancy-related anxiety and perceptions of care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the mean State-Anxiety score. Secondary outcomes included depression and quality of life measures. RESULTS: 73/97 (75.3%) eligible women participated; 41.1% had a previous preterm birth, 31.5% a second trimester loss and 28.8% cervical surgery; 20.6% had a prior mental health condition. 63/73 (86.3%) women completed all questionnaires. The adjusted mean state-anxiety score was 39.0 at baseline, which decreased to 36.5 after the second visit (difference -2.5, 95% CI -5.5 to 0.5, p=0.1) and to 32.6 after the last visit (difference -3.9 from second visit, 95% CI -6.4 to -1.5, p=0.002). Rates of anxiety (state-anxiety score >40) and depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score >12) were 38.4%, 34.8%, 19.0% and 13.7%, 8.7%, 9.5% respectively, at the same time periods. Perceptions of care were favourable; 88.9% stated the preterm birth clinic made them significantly or somewhat less anxious and 87.3% wanted to be seen again in a future pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Women at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth have high levels of anxiety. Psychological well-being improved during the second trimester; women perceived that preterm birth clinic care reduced pregnancy-related anxiety. These findings support the ongoing use and development of preterm birth clinics.

Increasing compliance with a clinical practice guideline for fetal fibronectin testing and the management of threatened preterm labour: A quality improvement project.

OBJECTIVE: To increase adherence to a local hospital clinical practice guideline for the use of fetal fibronectin testing in women presenting with symptoms of threatened preterm labour. STUDY DESIGN: A quality improvement project using a multi-faceted implementation strategy. SETTING: National Women's Health, Auckland City Hospital; a tertiary referral maternity unit in Auckland, New Zealand. POPULATION: All obstetricians, junior obstetric doctors and hospital employed midwives. METHODS: A pre-education audit and survey, compulsory interactive educational intervention with audit feedback and provision of reminders followed by a post-education audit and survey one year later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of fetal fibronectin tests performed, proportion of tests performed meeting clinical criteria for testing and proportion of results managed according to hospital guideline. RESULTS: There was a 25% increase in the number of tests performed with an increase in the proportion that met clinical criteria for testing, 76% (31/41)-93% (51/55) (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-14.2). Adherence to guidelines for clinical management according to fFN results changed over time, 80% (33/41)-95% (52/55) (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.04-17.0). Clinician knowledge on some (but not all) indications for fFN testing improved. Education and reminders did not improve understanding of clinical scenarios that may result in a false positive fFN test. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-faceted approach of audit and clinician feedback, interactive education and reminders supports the implementation of a clinical practice guideline for the use of fFN as a preterm birth prediction test for women presenting with symptoms of threatened preterm labour.