RESUMO
The introduction of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to impact the attitudes gay and bisexual men (GBM) who consequently choose to take PrEP have towards treatment as prevention (TasP), and the extent to which they are willing to have condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) with an HIV-positive sexual partner who has an undetectable viral load (UVL). Using a cross-sectional sample from an observational cohort study conducted from August 2018 to March 2020, we examined the extent to which PrEP-experienced GBM are willing to have CLAI with a partner who has a UVL. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify associated variables. Of the 1386 participants included in the analyses, 79.0% believed in the effectiveness of TasP, and 55.3% were willing to have CLAI with a partner who has a UVL. Wiling participants were less worried about getting HIV when taking PrEP and more likely to believe in TasP. Further research is needed to better understand the gap between belief in TasP and willingness to have CLAI with a partner who has a UVL among PrEP-experienced GBM.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Homossexualidade Masculina , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Comportamento Sexual , Bissexualidade , Austrália/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world and, as such, cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed operations globally. Surgical techniques have changed dramatically over the past half century with associated improvements in outcomes and safety. Femtosecond lasers can be used to perform the key steps in cataract surgery, such as corneal incisions, lens capsulotomy and fragmentation. The potential advantage of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is greater precision and reproducibility of these steps compared to manual techniques. The disadvantages are the costs associated with FLACS technology. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of FLACS with standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) by gathering evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; LILACS; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO ICTRP and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs where FLACS was compared to PCS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently screened the search results, assessed risk of bias and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome for this review was intraoperative complications in the operated eye, namely anterior capsule, and posterior capsule tears. The secondary outcomes included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), quality of vision (as measured by any validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)), postoperative cystoid macular oedema complications, endothelial cell loss and cost-effectiveness. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 42 RCTs conducted in Europe, North America, South America and Asia, which enrolled a total of 7298 eyes of 5831 adult participants. Overall, the studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. In 16 studies the authors reported financial links with the manufacturer of the laser platform evaluated in their studies. Thirteen of the studies were within-person (paired-eye) studies with one eye allocated to one procedure and the other eye allocated to the other procedure. These studies were reported ignoring the paired nature of the data. There was low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the odds of developing anterior capsular tears when comparing FLACS and PCS (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.72; 5835 eyes, 27 studies) There was one fewer anterior capsule tear per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 4 fewer to 3 more). There was low-certainty evidence of lower odds of developing posterior capsular tears with FLACS compared to PCS (Peto OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.00; 5767 eyes, 26 studies). There were four fewer posterior capsule tears per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 6 fewer to same). There was moderate-certainty evidence of a very small advantage for the FLACS arm with regard to CDVA at six months or more follow-up, (mean difference (MD) -0.01 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.00; 1323 eyes, 7 studies). This difference is equivalent to 1 logMAR letter between groups and is not thought to be clinically important. From the three studies (1205 participants) reporting a variety of PROMs (Cat-PROMS, EQ-5D, EQ-SD-3L, Catquest9-SF and patient survey) up to three months following surgery, there was moderate-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the various parameters between the two treatment arms. There was low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the odds of developing cystoid macular oedema when comparing FLACS and PCS (Peto OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.28; 4441 eyes, 18 studies). There were three fewer cystoid macular oedema cases per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 10 fewer to 6 more). In one study the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (cost difference divided by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) difference) was GBP £167,620 when comparing FLACS to PCS. In another study, the ICER was EUR 10,703 saved per additional patient who had treatment success with PCS compared to FLACS. Duration ranged from three minutes in favour of FLACS to eight minutes in favour of PCS (I2 = 100%, 11 studies) (low-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence of little or no important difference in endothelial cell loss when comparing FLACS with PCS (MD 12 cells per mm2 in favour of FLACS, 95% CI -40 to 64; 1512 eyes, 10 studies). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review of 42 studies provides evidence that there is probably little or no difference between FLACS and PCS in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative visual acuity and quality of life. Evidence from two studies suggests that FLACS may be the less cost-effective option. Many of the included studies only investigated very specific outcome measures such as effective phacoemulsification time, endothelial cell count change or aqueous flare, rather than those directly related to patient outcomes. Standardised reporting of complications and visual and refractive outcomes for cataract surgery would facilitate future synthesis, and guidance on this has been recently published.
ANTECEDENTES: La catarata es la principal causa de ceguera en el mundo y, como tal, la cirugía de cataratas es una de las operaciones más realizadas en todo el mundo. Las técnicas quirúrgicas han cambiado radicalmente en el último medio siglo, con las consiguientes mejoras en los desenlaces y la seguridad. Los láseres de femtosegundo se pueden utilizar para realizar los pasos clave de la cirugía de cataratas, como las incisiones corneales, la capsulotomía y la fragmentación del cristalino. La ventaja potencial de la cirugía de cataratas asistida por láser de femtosegundo (FLACS por sus siglas en inglés) es la mayor precisión y reproducibilidad de estos pasos en comparación con las técnicas manuales. Las desventajas son los costes asociados con la tecnología FLACS. OBJETIVOS: Comparar la eficacia y la seguridad de la FLACS con la cirugía de cataratas estándar por facoemulsificación (PCS) con ultrasonido mediante la recopilación de evidencia de ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA). MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se realizaron búsquedas en el Registro Cochrane central de ensayos controlados (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]; que contiene el Registro de ensayos del Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión [Cochrane Eyes and Vision]; 2022, número 5); en Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; LILACS; el registro ISRCTN; ClinicalTrials.gov; la ICTRP de la OMS y el sitio web de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) de los EE. UU. No se aplicaron restricciones de fecha ni de idioma en las búsquedas electrónicas de ensayos. La última búsqueda en las bases de datos electrónicas se realizó el 10 de mayo de 2022. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se incluyeron los ECA en los que la FLACS se comparó con la PCS. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Tres autores de la revisión examinaron de forma independiente los resultados de la búsqueda, evaluaron el riesgo de sesgo y extrajeron los datos mediante los procedimientos metodológicos estándar previstos por Cochrane. El desenlace principal de esta revisión fueron las complicaciones intraoperatorias en el ojo operado, concretamente, desgarros de la cápsula anterior y posterior. Los desenlaces secundarios incluyeron la agudeza visual corregida a distancia (AVCD), la calidad de la visión (medida por cualquier medida de desenlace notificada por el paciente [PROM] validada), las complicaciones posoperatorias del edema macular cistoide, la pérdida de células endoteliales y la costeefectividad. La certeza de la evidencia se evaluó mediante el método GRADE. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron 42 ECA realizados en Europa, Norteamérica, Sudamérica y Asia, que reclutaron un total de 7298 ojos de 5831 participantes adultos. En general, los estudios tuvieron riesgo de sesgo incierto o alto. En 16 estudios, los autores informaron vínculos financieros con el fabricante de la plataforma láser evaluada en sus estudios. Trece de los estudios fueron estudios intrapersonales (ojo pareado) con un ojo asignado a un procedimiento y el otro ojo asignado al otro procedimiento. El informe de estos estudios no consideró la naturaleza pareada de los datos. Hubo evidencia de certeza baja de poca o ninguna diferencia en las probabilidades de desarrollar desgarros de la cápsula anterior al comparar FLACS y PCS (odds ratio [OR] de Peto 0,83; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 0,40 a 1,72; 5835 ojos, 27 estudios). Hubo un desgarro de la cápsula anterior menos por cada 1000 cirugías en el grupo de FLACS en comparación con el grupo de PCS (IC del 95%: 4 menos a 3 más). Hubo evidencia de certeza baja de menores probabilidades de desarrollar desgarros de la cápsula posterior con FLACS en comparación con PCS (OR de Peto 0,50; IC del 95%: 0,25 a 1,00; 5767 ojos, 26 estudios). Hubo cuatro desgarros de la cápsula posterior menos por cada 1000 cirugías en el grupo de FLACS en comparación con el grupo de PCS (IC del 95%: 6 menos a igual). Hubo evidencia de certeza moderada de una ventaja muy pequeña en el grupo de FLACS con respecto a la AVCD a los seis meses o más de seguimiento, (diferencia de medias [DM] 0,01 logMAR; IC del 95%: 0,02 a 0,00; 1323 ojos, siete estudios). Esta diferencia equivale a 1 letra logMAR entre los grupos y no se considera clínicamente importante. De los tres estudios (1205 participantes) que informaron sobre una variedad de PROM (CatPROMS, EQ5D, EQSD3L, Catquest9SF y encuesta de pacientes) hasta tres meses después de la cirugía, hubo evidencia de certeza moderada de poca o ninguna diferencia en los diversos parámetros entre los dos grupos de tratamiento. Hubo evidencia de certeza baja de poca o ninguna diferencia en las probabilidades de desarrollar edema macular cistoide al comparar FLACS y PCS (OR de Peto 0,84; IC del 95%: 0,56 a 1,28; 4441 ojos, 18 estudios). Hubo tres casos menos de edema macular cistoide por cada 1000 cirugías en el grupo de FLACS en comparación con el grupo de PCS (IC del 95%: 10 menos a 6 más). En un estudio, el cociente costeefectividad incremental (ICER) (diferencia de coste dividida por la diferencia de años de vida ajustados por la calidad [AVAC]) fue de 167 620 GBP al comparar FLACS con SCP. En otro estudio, el ICER fue de 10 703 euros ahorrados por paciente adicional que tuvo un tratamiento exitoso con PCS en comparación con FLACS. La duración varió entre tres minutos a favor de FLACS y ocho minutos a favor de PCS (I 2 = 100%, 11 estudios) (evidencia de certeza baja). Hubo evidencia de certeza baja de poca o ninguna diferencia importante en la pérdida de células endoteliales al comparar la FLACS con la PCS (DM 12 células por mm 2 a favor de la FLACS; IC del 95%: 40 a 64; 1512 ojos, 10 estudios). CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Esta revisión de 42 estudios aporta evidencia de que probablemente haya poca o ninguna diferencia entre la FLACS y la PCS en cuanto a las complicaciones intraoperatorias y posoperatorias, la agudeza visual posoperatoria y la calidad de vida. La evidencia de dos estudios indica que la FLACS podría ser la opción menos costeefectiva. Muchos de los estudios incluidos solo investigaron medidas de desenlace muy específicas, como el tiempo efectivo de facoemulsificación, el cambio en el recuento de células endoteliales o el brote acuoso, en lugar de las directamente relacionadas con los desenlaces de los pacientes. La notificación estandarizada de las complicaciones y los desenlaces visuales y refractarios de la cirugía de cataratas facilitaría la síntesis futura, y recientemente se han publicado guías al respecto.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Edema Macular , Facoemulsificação , Humanos , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Edema Macular/etiologia , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Catarata/complicações , LasersRESUMO
Current estimates suggest 50% of glaucoma blindness worldwide is caused by primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) but the causative gene is not known. We used genetic linkage and whole genome sequencing to identify Spermatogenesis Associated Protein 13, SPATA13 (NM_001166271; NP_001159743, SPATA13 isoform I), also known as ASEF2 (Adenomatous polyposis coli-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2), as the causal gene for PACG in a large seven-generation white British family showing variable expression and incomplete penetrance. The 9 bp deletion, c.1432_1440del; p.478_480del was present in all affected individuals with angle-closure disease. We show ubiquitous expression of this transcript in cell lines derived from human tissues and in iris, retina, retinal pigment and ciliary epithelia, cornea and lens. We also identified eight additional mutations in SPATA13 in a cohort of 189 unrelated PACS/PAC/PACG samples. This gene encodes a 1277 residue protein which localises to the nucleus with partial co-localisation with nuclear speckles. In cells undergoing mitosis SPATA13 isoform I becomes part of the kinetochore complex co-localising with two kinetochore markers, polo like kinase 1 (PLK-1) and centrosome-associated protein E (CENP-E). The 9 bp deletion reported in this study increases the RAC1-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) activity. The increase in GEF activity was also observed in three other variants identified in this study. Taken together, our data suggest that SPATA13 is involved in the regulation of mitosis and the mutations dysregulate GEF activity affecting homeostasis in tissues where it is highly expressed, influencing PACG pathogenesis.
Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/genética , Fatores de Troca do Nucleotídeo Guanina/genética , Mutação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Divisão Celular , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Olho/metabolismo , Feminino , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/patologia , Fatores de Troca do Nucleotídeo Guanina/química , Fatores de Troca do Nucleotídeo Guanina/metabolismo , Humanos , Cinetocoros/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linhagem , Isoformas de Proteínas/química , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Transporte ProteicoRESUMO
Traditionally, specific bioreceptors such as antibodies have rapidly identified bacterial species in environmental water samples. However, this method has the disadvantages of requiring an additional process to conjugate or immobilize bioreceptors on the assay platform, which becomes unstable at room temperature. Here, we demonstrate a novel mix-and-match method to identify bacteria species by loading the bacterial samples with simple bacteria interacting components (not bioreceptors), such as lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycan, and bovine serum albumin, and carboxylated particles, all separately on multiple channels. Neither covalent conjugation nor surface immobilization was necessary. Interactions between bacteria and the above bacteria interacting components resulted in varied surface tension and viscosity, leading to various flow velocities of capillary action through the paper fibers. The smartphone camera and a custom Python code recorded multiple channel flow velocity, each loaded with different bacteria interacting components. A multi-dimensional data set was obtained for a given bacterial species and concentration and used as a machine learning training model. A support vector machine was applied to classify the six bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, and Bacillus subtilis. Under optimized conditions, the training model predicts the bacterial species with an accuracy of > 85% of the six bacteria species.
Assuntos
Microfluídica , Smartphone , Bacillus subtilis , Escherichia coli , Indicadores e Reagentes , Aprendizado de MáquinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) experience barriers to accessing testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) may provide an opportunity to improve access to HCV care. This systematic review assessed the association of OAT and HCV testing, treatment, and treatment outcomes among PWID. METHODS: Bibliographic databases and conference presentations were searched for studies that assessed the association between OAT and HCV testing, treatment, and treatment outcomes (direct-acting antiviral [DAA] therapy only) among PWID (in the past year). Meta-analysis was used to pool estimates. RESULTS: Of 9877 articles identified, 22 studies conducted in Australia, Europe, North America, and Thailand were eligible and included. Risk of bias was serious in 21 studies and moderate in 1 study. Current/recent OAT was associated with an increased odds of recent HCV antibody testing (4 studies; odds ratio (OR), 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.39), HCV RNA testing among those who were HCV antibody-positive (2 studies; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.27-2.62), and DAA treatment uptake among those who were HCV RNA-positive (7 studies; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.20). There was insufficient evidence of an association between OAT and treatment completion (9 studies) or sustained virologic response following DAA therapy (9 studies). CONCLUSIONS: OAT can increase linkage to HCV care, including uptake of HCV testing and treatment among PWID. This supports the scale-up of OAT as part of strategies to enhance HCV treatment to further HCV elimination efforts.
Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa , Analgésicos Opioides , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Austrália/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente) , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , América do Norte , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tailândia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the association of alcohol consumption and type of alcoholic beverage with incident cataract surgery in 2 large cohorts. DESIGN: Longitudinal, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 469 387 participants of UK Biobank with a mean age of 56 years and 23 162 participants of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk with a mean age of 59 years. METHODS: Self-reported alcohol consumption at baseline was ascertained by a touchscreen questionnaire in UK Biobank and a food-frequency questionnaire in EPIC-Norfolk. Cases were defined as participants undergoing cataract surgery in either eye as ascertained via data linkage to National Health Service procedure statistics. We excluded participants with cataract surgery up to 1 year after the baseline assessment visit or those with self-reported cataract at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations of alcohol consumption with incident cataract surgery, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and diabetes status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident cataract surgery. RESULTS: There were 19 011 (mean cohort follow-up of 95 months) and 4573 (mean cohort follow-up of 193 months) incident cases of cataract surgery in UK Biobank and EPIC-Norfolk, respectively. Compared with nondrinkers, drinkers were less likely to undergo cataract surgery in UK Biobank (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.93) and EPIC-Norfolk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) after adjusting for covariables. Among alcohol consumers, greater alcohol consumption was associated with a reduced risk of undergoing cataract surgery in EPIC-Norfolk (P < 0.001), whereas a U-shaped association was observed in the UK Biobank. Compared with nondrinkers, subgroup analysis by type of alcohol beverage showed the strongest protective association with wine consumption; the risk of incident cataract surgery was 23% and 14% lower among those in the highest category of wine consumption in EPIC-Norfolk and UK Biobank, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a lower risk of undergoing cataract surgery with low to moderate alcohol consumption. The association was particularly apparent with wine consumption. We cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding, and further studies are required to determine whether this association is causal in nature.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Catarata/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Catarata/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Remission of Type 2 diabetes is achievable through dietary change and weight loss. In the UK, lifestyle advice and referrals to weight loss programmes predominantly occur in primary care where most Type 2 diabetes is managed. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between primary care experience and remission of Type 2 diabetes over 5-year follow-up. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of adults with Type 2 diabetes registered to 49 general practices in the East of England, UK. Participants were followed-up for 5 years and completed the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE) on diabetes-specific primary care experiences over the first year after diagnosis of the disease. Remission at 5-year follow-up was measured with HbA1c levels. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to quantify the association between primary care experience and remission of diabetes. RESULTS: Of 867 participants, 30% (257) achieved remission of Type 2 diabetes at 5 years. Six hundred twenty-eight had complete data at follow-up and were included in the analysis. Participants who reported higher CARE scores in the 12 months following diagnosis were more likely to achieve remission at 5 years in multivariable models; odds ratio = 1.03 (95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.05, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Primary care practitioners should pay greater attention to delivering optimal patient experiences alongside clinical management of the disease as this may contribute towards remission of Type 2 diabetes. Further work is needed to examine which aspects of the primary care experience might be optimized and how these could be operationalized.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Redução de PesoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report the 3-month results of a randomized trial (Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Trial [FACT]) comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial funded by the UK National Institute of Health Research (HTA 13/04/46/). PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred eighty-five patients with age-related cataract. METHODS: This trial took place in 3 hospitals in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Randomization (1:1) was stratified by site, surgeon, and 1 or both eyes eligible using a secure web-based system. Postoperative assessments were masked to the allocated intervention. The primary outcome was unaided distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the study eye at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included corrected distance visual acuity, complications, and patient-reported outcomes measures. The noninferiority margin was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). ISRCTN.com registry, number ISRCTN77602616. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We enrolled 785 participants between May 2015 and September 2017 and randomly assigned 392 to FLACS and 393 to PCS. At 3 months postoperatively, mean UDVA difference between treatment arms was -0.01 logMAR (-0.05 to 0.03), and mean corrected distance visual acuity difference was -0.01 logMAR (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.05 to 0.02). Seventy-one percent of both FLACS and PCS cases were within ±0.5 diopters (D) of the refractive target, and 93% of FLACS and 92% of PCS cases were within ±1.0 D. There were 2 posterior capsule tears in the PCS arm and none in the FLACS arm. There were no significant differences between arms for any secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery is not inferior to conventional PCS surgery 3 months after surgery. Both methods are as good in terms of vision, patient-reported health, and safety outcomes at 3 months. Longer-term outcomes of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are awaited.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser/métodos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Facoemulsificação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During an evolving outbreak or pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) including physical distancing, isolation, and mask use may flatten the peak in communities. However, these strategies rely on community understanding and motivation to engage to ensure appropriate compliance and impact. To support current activities for COVID-19, the objectives of this narrative review was to identify the key determinants impacting on engagement. METHODS: An integrative narrative literature review focused on NPIs. We aimed to identify published peer-reviewed articles that focused on the general community (excluding healthcare workers), NPIs (including school closure, quarantine, isolation, physical distancing and hygiene behaviours), and factors/characteristics (including social, physical, psychological, capacity, motivation, economic and demographic) that impact on engagement. RESULTS: The results revealed that there are a range of demographic, social and psychological factors underpinning engagement with quarantine, school closures, and personal protective behaviours. Aside from the factors impacting on acceptance and compliance, there are several key community concerns about their use that need to be addressed including the potential for economic consequences. CONCLUSION: It is important that we acknowledge that these strategies will have an impact on an individual and the community. By understanding the barriers, we can identify what strategies need to be adopted to motivate individuals and improve community compliance. Using a behavioural framework to plan interventions based on these key barriers, will also ensure countries implement appropriate and targeted responses.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Higiene , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Quarentena/métodos , Isolamento Social , COVID-19 , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Instituições AcadêmicasRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the safety, efficacy, and complication rate of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with congenital uveal coloboma and to evaluate the role of pupilloplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of 41 eyes (31 patients) with congenital coloboma that underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation between September 2012 and September 2018. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected for analysis. RESULTS: The mean patient age at surgery was 53.9 years (range 15-82). The primary indication for surgery was cataract removal for visual improvement, and lens subluxation was additionally present in two eyes (5%) preoperatively. The mean preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.90 LogMAR. Phacoemulsification surgery was performed in all cases and nine eyes (22%) had pupilloplasty for pupil reconstitution at the time of the procedure. Surgeon grade varied from trainee surgeon under supervision to consultant. Eight patients (19.5%) had posterior capsular rupture (PCR) with or without vitreous loss requiring anterior vitrectomy. Of these, 2 cases (5%) had dropped nuclear fragments requiring subsequent pars plana vitrectomy and lens fragment removal. The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.62 LogMAR (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Patients with iridolenticular choroidal coloboma appear to be more at risk of complications, as were cases performed by non-consultant surgeons. Contrary, patients with phakodonesis, preoperative anterior chamber vitreous, dense cataracts, and cases were iris hooks used had no significant difference at PCR rate. The risk of postoperative glare and pupilloplasty needs to be considered in cases with good visual potential to avoid a possible second procedure.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Coloboma , Facoemulsificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/complicações , Coloboma/complicações , Coloboma/diagnóstico , Coloboma/cirurgia , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitrectomia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the good outcome of implantable collamer lens (ICL) rotation to reduce post-operative vault. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of case report. A 43-year-old woman had V4c EVO + myopic non-toric ICL implantation and post-operatively she presented with anisocoria and high vault. She underwent surgery to rotate the ICL 90 degrees to a vertical orientation. RESULTS: We achieved a reduction in the vault from 1020 to 486 µm after vertical ICL rotation. Satisfactory refractive outcome and optimal vault were achieved and maintained during the period of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Optimal ICL sizing is important as too high vault/clearance is associated with problems such as angle closure glaucoma, pupil dilatation and anisocoria and too low vault/clearance to increased risk of cataract formation. Non-toric ICL rotation can be a simple surgical technique to deal with oversized lenses thus avoiding ICL exchange.
Assuntos
Anisocoria/cirurgia , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Predictions of added resistance and the effective power of ships were made for varying barnacle fouling conditions. A series of towing tests was carried out using flat plates covered with artificial barnacles. The tests were designed to allow the examination of the effects of barnacle height and percentage coverage on the resistance and effective power of ships. The drag coefficients and roughness function values were evaluated for the flat plates. The roughness effects of the fouling conditions on the ships' frictional resistances were predicted. Added resistance diagrams were then plotted using these predictions, and powering penalties for these ships were calculated using the diagrams generated. The results indicate that the effect of barnacle size is significant, since a 10% coverage of barnacles each 5 mm in height caused a similar level of added power requirements to a 50% coverage of barnacles each 1.25 mm in height.
Assuntos
Incrustação Biológica , Navios , Thoracica/fisiologia , Animais , Conservação de Recursos Energéticos , FricçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate time to pseudophakic retinal detachment (RD) after cataract surgery with posterior capsule rupture (PCR) to provide an evidence-based guide for postoperative management. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 907 eyes of 46 824 patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: Subanalysis of the United Kingdom Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database from 13 sites where data on both cataract and vitreoretinal surgery were recorded on the same electronic medical records system. Overall, 61 907 cataract operations were performed between October 2006 and August 2010. Analyses were restricted to cases with at least 3 months of potential postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Pseudophakic RD surgery was performed on 131 eyes of 129 patients (0.21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18%-0.25%). Of these, 36 were in eyes that had PCR during cataract surgery (3.27%; 95% CI, 2.37%-4.50%) and 95 were in eyes that did not have PCR (0.16%; 95% CI, 0.13%-0.19%). For eyes that progressed to RD surgery, the median time to pseudophakic RD surgery was 44 days for eyes with PCR, and 6.3 months for eyes without PCR. For all eyes (both with and without PCR), pseudophakic RD occurred earlier in cases performed by a trainee cataract surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic RD occurs earlier after cataract surgery complicated by PCR. Surgeon grade is a risk factor for pseudophakic RD. Posterior vitreous detachment and RD symptoms should be discussed with patients who undergo cataract surgery and have PCR to facilitate early attendance, and careful dilated postoperative examination for retinal tears is recommended in the first 2 months after surgery.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Ruptura da Cápsula Posterior do Olho/etiologia , Pseudofacia/etiologia , Descolamento Retiniano/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruptura da Cápsula Posterior do Olho/cirurgia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Medicina Estatal , Fatores de Tempo , Reino UnidoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate if previous intravitreal therapy is a predictor of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery. DESIGN: Multicenter, national electronic medical record (EMR) database study with univariate and multivariate regression modeling. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 65 836 eyes of 44 635 patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: Anonymized data were extracted for eyes undergoing cataract surgery from 20 hospitals using the same EMR for cases performed between 2004 and 2014. Variables included as possible risk indicators for PCR were age, sex, number of previous intravitreal injections, indication for intravitreal therapy, grade of healthcare professional administering intravitreal therapy, advanced cataract, and cataract surgeon grade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery. RESULTS: Data were available on 65 836 cataract operations, of which 1935 had undergone previous intravitreal therapy (2.9%). In univariate regression analyses, patient age, advanced cataract, junior cataract surgeon grade, and number of previous intravitreal injections were significant predictors of PCR. By considering the number of previous intravitreal injections as a continuous variable, the odds ratio for PCR per intravitreal injection was 1.04 (P = 0.016) after adjusting for age, advanced cataract, and cataract surgeon grade. Repeat analysis considering intravitreal injections as a categoric variable showed 10 or more previous injections were associated with a 2.59 times higher likelihood of PCR (P = 0.003) after again adjusting for other significant independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Previous intravitreal therapy is associated with a higher likelihood of PCR during cataract surgery. This study provides data to help inform surgeons and patients about the risk of complications when undergoing cataract surgery after multiple prior intravitreal injections. Further investigation is required to determine the cause behind the increased PCR risk.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Cápsula do Cristalino/lesões , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Ruptura da Cápsula Posterior do Olho/etiologia , Corpo Vítreo/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doenças Retinianas/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world, and cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed operations in the Western world. Preferred surgical techniques have changed dramatically over the past half century with associated improvements in outcomes and safety. Femtosecond laser platforms that can accurately and reproducibly perform key steps in cataract surgery, including corneal incisions, capsulotomy and lens fragmentation, are now available. The potential advantages of laser-assisted surgery are broad, and include greater safety and better visual outcomes through greater precision and reproducibility. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of laser-assisted cataract surgery with standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery by gathering evidence on safety from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to May 2016), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2016), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to May 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en) and the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) website (www.fda.gov). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 May 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials where laser-assisted cataract surgery was compared to standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the search results, assessed risk of bias and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome for this review was intraoperative complications in the operated eye, namely anterior capsule and posterior capsule tears. The secondary outcomes were visual acuity (corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)), refractive outcomes, quality of vision (as measured by any validated visual function score), postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness. MAIN RESULTS: We included 16 RCTs conducted in Germary, Hungary, Italy, India, China and Brazil that enrolled a total of 1638 eyes of 1245 adult participants. Overall, the studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. In 11 of the studies the authors reported financial links with the manufacturer of the laser platform evaluated in their studies. Five of the studies were within-person (paired-eye) studies with one eye allocated to one procedure and the other eye allocated to the other procedure. These studies were reported ignoring the paired nature of the data.The number of anterior capsule and posterior capsule tears reported in the included studies for both laser cataract surgery and manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery were low. There were four anterior capsule tears and one posterior capsule tear in 1076 eyes reported in 10 studies (2 anterior capsule tears in laser arms, 2 anterior capsule tears and 1 posterior capsule tear in standard phacoemulsification arms). We are very uncertain as to the effect of laser-assisted surgery compared to standard phacoemulsification surgery with respect to these two outcomes. For postoperative cystoid macular oedema and elevated postoperative intraocular pressures, again the evidence was inconclusive (odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 1.68; 957 eyes, 9 studies, low certainty evidence; and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.86; 903 eyes, 8 studies, low certainty evidence).We found little evidence of any important difference in postoperative visual acuity between laser-assisted and standard phacoemulsification arms. There was a small advantage for laser-assisted cataract surgery at six months in CDVA. However, the mean difference (MD) was -0.03 logMAR (95% CI -0.05 to -0.00; 224 eyes, 3 studies, low certainty evidence) which is equivalent to 1.5 logMAR letters and is therefore, clinically insignificant. No studies reported patient-reported outcome measures such as visual function.There were no data reported on costs or resource use but three studies reported the time taken to do the surgery. There was little evidence of any major difference between the two procedures in this respect (MD 0.1 minutes, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.21; 274 eyes, low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from the 16 randomised controlled trials RCTs included in this review could not determine the equivalence or superiority of laser-assisted cataract surgery compared to standard manual phacoemulsification for our chosen outcomes due to the low to very low certainty of the evidence available from these studies. As complications occur rarely, large, adequately powered, well designed, independent RCTs comparing the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted cataract surgery with standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery are needed. Standardised reporting of complications and visual and refractive outcomes for cataract surgery would facilitate future synthesis. Data on patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness are needed. Paired-eye studies should be analysed and reported appropriately.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/métodos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Adulto , Ruptura da Cápsula Anterior do Olho/etiologia , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Edema Macular/etiologia , Hipertensão Ocular/etiologia , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Ruptura da Cápsula Posterior do Olho/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide, with intraocular pressure as the only known modifiable risk factor. Vitamin D has been proposed to influence intraocular pressure and decrease retinal ganglion cell degeneration. Based on these findings, vitamin D has been suggested to prevent or reduce the severity of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), which is the most common form. METHODS: We applied two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses to data from the SUNLIGHT consortium and the UK Biobank to assess the causal effect of vitamin D levels and vitamin D deficiency on primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). MR analysis, including sensitivity tests using other GWAS summary statistics from FinnGen, was also performed. We also investigated the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on genes involved in vitamin D metabolic pathways and POAG. RESULTS: We found no statistical evidence that vitamin D levels (OR = 1.146, 95% CI 0.873 to 1.504, p = 0.326) or vitamin D deficiency (OR = 0.980 (95% CI 0.928 to 1.036, p = 0.471) causally affect the risk of developing POAG. Sensitivity analyses, including the use of a more relaxed p-value threshold, and use of winter-measured samples only, replication in the FinnGen dataset, and exploration of specific genetic markers also showed no evidence of association between SNPs for genes involved in key steps of vitamin D metabolism and POAG. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that vitamin D may not be a significant factor in modifying POAG risk, challenging the hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation could be effective in reducing POAG risk. Further research should focus on identifying other potential risk factors for POAG prevention strategies.
Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Vitamina D , População Branca , Humanos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/genética , Deficiência de Vitamina D/genética , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Vitamina D/sangue , População Branca/genética , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Fatores de Risco , Feminino , Masculino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Background: Cataract is one of the most prevalent causes of blindness worldwide. Whilst surgery is the primary treatment for cataracts, it is not always an available option, particularly in developing countries. Non-surgical methods of treatment would increase treatment availability for more patients. Several studies have investigated how topical application of oxysterols, such as lanosterol, may break down aggregated proteins and restore lens transparency. However, the results are conflicting and inconclusive. Aim: In this study, we focus on combining genetic evidence for associations between lanosterol related genetic variation and cataract to explore whether lanosterol is a potentially suitable drug treatment option. Method: Using data from 45,449 available cataract cases from the UK Biobank, with participant ages ranging from 40-69, we conducted a genetic association study (GWAS) to assess the risk of cataract. Cataract cases were defined using diagnostic and operation codes. We focused on genetic variants in the lanosterol synthase gene region. We also compared our results with previously published genetic associations of phytosterol-to-lanosterol ratios. Finally, we performed a genetic risk score analysis to test the association between lanosterol within the cholesterol synthesis pathway and the risk of cataract. Results: No statistically significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associations with cataract were observed in the gene region of lanosterol synthase at a multiple testing adjusted significance threshold of p < 0.05/13. The comparison between cataract risk and genetic association of 8 phytosterol-to-lanosterol GWAS results also showed no evidence to support lanosterol's protective properties for cataract risk. No statistically significant association was found between the lanosterol within the cholesterol synthesis pathway genetic risk score and cataract outcomes (OR = 1.002 p = 0.568). Conclusion: There was no evidence observed for genetic associations between lanosterol and cataract risk. Our results do not support lanosterol's potential role in treating cataracts. Further research may be needed to address the effect of lanosterol on specific cataract subtypes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To create a risk factor model for posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eligible operations between 01/04/2016 and 31/03/2022 from centres supplying data to the UK national cataract audit with complete data including patients' gender and age at surgery, anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurement and preoperative visual acuity (VA) were included. A logistic regression model was fitted to identify risk factors and calculate their odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for PCR. RESULTS: This analysis included 961,208 cataract operations performed on 682,381 patients from 136 participating centres by 3198 surgeons. 9730 (1.01%) of surgeries were complicated by PCR. The median age was 75.7 and 76.7 years for first and second eye surgery respectively, and 5154 (53.0%) were female. The highest risk factors for PCR were less experienced trainee surgeon (OR 3.75, 95% CI 3.33-4.24, p < 0.001), pseudoexfoliation/phacodonesis (OR 3.47, 95% CI 3.05-3.94, p < 0.001), younger males (OR 3.05, 95% CI 2.23-4.16, p < 0.001) and brunescent/white/mature cataract (OR 2.41, 95% CI 2.24-2.60, p < 0.001). Other risk factors identified were glaucoma, worse preoperative VA, previous intravitreal therapy, high myopia, previous vitrectomy, systemic diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, amblyopia, older age, shallower ACD and inability to lie flat and cooperate. CONCLUSION: Various surgical, patient and ocular factors increase the risk of PCR during cataract surgery. This risk factor model permits estimation of individualised risks for patients and allows risk-adjustment for surgeons to evaluate their PCR rates based on case complexity.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate which features from a patient's history are either high or low risk that could support healthcare professionals in ophthalmic emergency triage. METHODS: Prospective, 12,584 visits from 11,733 adult patients attending an Accident and Emergency department at a single tertiary centre were analysed. Data were collected by ophthalmic nurses working in triage, using an online form from August 2021 to April 2022. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was conducted to identify which features from the patients' history would be associated with emergency care. RESULTS: This study found that 45.5% (5731 patient visits (PV)) required a same day eye emergency examination (SDEE), 11.3% (1416 PV) needed urgent care, and 43.2% (5437 PV) were appropriate for elective consultations with a GP or optometrist. The MVA top ten features that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) that would warrant SDEE with odds ratio (95% CI) were: bilateral eye injury 36.5 [15.6-85.5], unilateral eye injury 25.8 [20.9-31.7], vision loss 4.8 [2.9-7.8], post-operative ophthalmic ( < 4 weeks) 4.6 [3.8-5.7], contact lens wearer 3.9 [3.3-4.7], history of uveitis 3.9 [3.3-4.7], photophobia 2.9 [2.4-3.6], unilateral dark shadow/curtain in vision 2.4 [1.8-3.0], unilateral injected red eye 2.0 [1.8-2.2] and rapid change in visual acuity 1.8 [1.5-2.2]. CONCLUSION: This study characterises presenting features covering almost 100 ophthalmic acute presentations that are commonly seen in emergency and elective care. This information could supplement current red flag indicators and support healthcare professionals in ophthalmic triage. Further research is required to evaluate the cost effectivity and safety of our findings for triaging acute presentations.