Inconclusive evidence of treatment modalities for peri-implantitis.

Data sources Ovid Medline, Embase, EBM Review, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Study selection Randomised controlled trials or prospective cohort studies published in English with ≥10 patients and ≥6 months follow-up (the longest follow-up period was chosen in longitudinal studies which were published more than once). Experimental animal or in vitro studies were excluded.Data extraction and synthesis Data on the primary outcome reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP) in implants treated surgically for peri-implantitis, and secondary outcomes pocket probing depth (PPD) and RBL (radiographic bone-loss) were extracted and meta-analysis conducted. Results Sixteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Four treatment modalities to supplement mechanical debridement were identified: (1) apically repositioned flap, (2) chemical surface decontamination, (3) implantoplasty and (4) bone augmentation. Inconsistent results were evident which were dependent on several treatment-independent factors. No clinical benefits were identified for the additional use of surface decontamination, while limited evidence demonstrated improvement of clinical and radiographic outcomes after implantoplasty. The effect of bone augmentation appeared limited to 'filling' radiographic defects. The meta-analysis was conducted using eight randomised clinical trials and two controlled prospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated that implants treated with surface decontamination had SMD of -0.21 (95% CI: -1.70 to 1.27) for periodontal pocket reduction (PPD) reduction. Only one study reported the effect of implantoplasty on PPD, which shows a significant SMD of -3.33 (95% CI: -4.37 to -2.28 mm). Bone augmentation with grafting materials and the additional use of membrane resulted in SMD of 0.15 mm (95% CI: -0.55 to 0.84 mm) and 0.30 mm (95% CI: -0.31 to 0.91 mm), respectively. In terms of RBL changes, the use of surface decontamination methods resulted in SMD of 0.54 mm (95% CI: -0.20 to 1.28 mm). Implants treated with implantoplasty had SMD of -3.38 (95% CI: -.43 to -2.33 mm). The SMD for RBL changes after the use of bone augmentation was -1.05 (95% CI: -1.80 to -0.31 mm). However, the additional use of membrane had SMD of -0.16 (95% CI: -0.56 to 0.24 mm.Conclusions The outcomes of the currently available surgical interventions for peri-implantitis remain unpredictable. There is no reliable evidence to suggest which methods are the most effective. Further randomised controlled studies are needed to identify the best treatment methods.

Insufficient evidence of the effect of systemic antibiotics on adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess.

DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Oral Health Groups Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, OpenGrey, ZETOC Conference Proceedings World Health Organization (WHO) International Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry databases were searched with no restrictions on the language or date of publication. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials of systemic antibiotics in adults with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess, with or without surgical intervention (considered in this situation to be extraction, incision and drainage or endodontic treatment) and with or without analgesics. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study selection, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment were carried out independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: Two trials involving 62 patients were included. They compared the effects of oral penicillin V potassium versus a matched placebo given in conjunction with a surgical intervention and analgesics to adults with an acute apical abscess or symptomatic necrotic tooth. One study was considered to have a high risk of bias and the other an unclear risk of bias. The primary outcomes were patient-reported pain and swelling. There were no statistically significant differences in participant-reported measures of pain or swelling at any of the time points assessed within the review. The body of evidence was assessed as at very low quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is very low quality evidence that is insufficient to determine the effects of systemic antibiotics on adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess.