Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 118(4): 535-539, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28274469

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The current application of nanotechnology in dentistry is limited to nanoparticles incorporated into adhesive systems and composite resins. Dental stone is a widely used material, and the incorporation of silica nanoparticles is still unexplored. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of dental stone after the addition of silica nanoparticles in different concentrations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 180 specimens were prepared, 90 for each dental stone (Durone and Fuji Rock). For the control group (CG), no silica particles were added, while test group TGnI had silica nanoparticles added to 1 wt%, and test group TGnV had silica nanoparticles added to 5 wt%. The roughness, diametral tensile strength (DTS), and compressive strength were measured 24 hours after the start of spatulation. RESULTS: The mean roughness values for Durone were 0.55, 0.36, and 0.28 µm for CG, TGnI, and TGnV; for Fuji Rock, the mean roughness values were 0.47 for CG, 0.31 for TGnI, and 0.35 µm for TGnV. The mean DTS values for Durone were 6.0, 5.1, and 5.0 MPa for CG, TGnI, and TGnV, respectively, and for Fuji Rock, the mean DTS values were 6.4, 5.2, and 4.5 MPa for CG, TGnI, and TGnV, respectively. The mean compressive strength values for Durone were 35.4, 32.7, and 32.4 MPa for CG, TGnI, and TGnV, respectively, and for Fuji Rock, the mean compressive strength values were 42.9, 31.2, and 29.8 MPa for CG, TGnI, and TGnV respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surface roughness was statistically lower for the Durone and Fuji Rock stones (P<.001) when silica nanoparticles were added. The addition of silica nanoparticles did not significantly affect the DTS and compressive strength of Durone compared with CG (P>.05) but did affect the DTS of Fuji Rock when 5 wt% was added and the compressive strength in both concentrations (P<.05).


Assuntos
Sulfato de Cálcio , Força Compressiva , Materiais Dentários , Nanopartículas , Dióxido de Silício , Resistência à Tração , Teste de Materiais
2.
J Prosthet Dent ; 112(6): 1573-7, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25258259

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The optimum time after pouring a dental impression before removing the dental cast is unknown with regard to the strength and roughness of the stone. Setting times and the commercial products used are important variables. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of postpouring time on the surface roughness, compressive strength, and diametric tensile strength of Type IV dental stone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 270 specimens were prepared from 3 commercial brands of dental stone (Durone, Fuji Rock, and Tuff Rock). Surface roughness, compressive strength, and diametric tensile strength were assessed at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days after pouring. Specimens 6 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height were produced for roughness and diametric tensile strength tests. Specimens 3 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height were used to measure compressive strength. The results were analyzed with the general linear model and Tukey honestly significant difference test (α=.05). RESULTS: The surface roughness measured for the different types of dental stone tested varied from 0.3 µm (Durone, 1 hour) to 0.64 µm (Tuff Rock, 7 days). The diametric tensile strength ranged from 3.94 MPa (Tuff Rock, 1 hour) to 9.20 MPa (Durone, 7 days). The compressive strength varied from 26.67 MPa (Durone, 1 hour) to 65.14 MPa (Fuji Rock, 7 days). CONCLUSIONS: Surface roughness (P=.005), diametric tensile strength (P=.001), and compressive strength (P=.001) increased significantly with time after pouring. The commercial brand used affected roughness (P=.001), diametric tensile strength (P=.004), and compressive strength (P=.001). Tuff Rock exhibited the highest surface roughness. The highest diametric tensile strength values were recorded for Durone and Fuji Rock. Fuji Rock exhibited the highest compressive strength.


Assuntos
Sulfato de Cálcio/química , Revestimento para Fundição Odontológica/química , Força Compressiva , Análise do Estresse Dentário/instrumentação , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de Superfície , Temperatura , Resistência à Tração , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA