RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the level of pharmacy student well-being during the first 2 years of their didactic education utilizing the Well-being Index (WBI) and 5 Gears assessment. METHODS: WBI and 5 Gears data were tracked monthly for first- and second-year students enrolled at the Medical University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy from September 2019 to March 2022. Data were collected through monthly RedCap surveys, then de-identified and separated into 4 study cohorts (A-D). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Responses from 279 students were evaluated. WBI ratings showed variance across the first and second professional years of the program. Students also reported fluctuations in WBI throughout academic years, most often correlating with major events (scheduled breaks, COVID-19 pandemic). Similarly, the 5 Gears assessments results also changed throughout the study period, including variance within and between each academic year. CONCLUSION: Incorporating well-being assessments into the co-curriculum has allowed us to identify when students are struggling with their well-being, provide tools and resources to help enhance their well-being, and opportunities to discuss struggles with their peers. Colleges of Pharmacy must incorporate holistic approaches to address all aspects of well-being, including consideration of how the curriculum is impacting the student experience as well as institutional approaches to well-being.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Educação em Farmácia , Estudantes de Farmácia , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , FarmacêuticosRESUMO
Objective. To assess the impact of variable leadership development program formats on perceived participant growth.Methods. In 2020, the Phi Lambda Sigma national office began offering national Leader Academies to members, while University of South Florida Health Taneja College of Pharmacy simultaneously offered a Leader Academy program to its Phi Lambda Sigma students. Both programs used virtual leadership development tools from GiANT Worldwide, but differed in meeting frequency, content focus, and participant diversity. A 17-question pre- and postsurvey was developed from the Emotional Intelligence Leadership Inventory. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the cohorts.Results. Twenty-two respondents in the national cohort (66.7% response rate) and 15 in the single-institution cohort (100% response rate) were included. There was more diversity in age, ethnicity, and previous education in the national cohort. Significant improvements in perceived growth were noted in almost all areas. The only decrease noted was the national cohort response to "I strive to improve myself." The overall change in mean response values was generally higher for the single-institution cohort. Qualitative data supported these results and showed more notable references to emotional intelligence in the national cohorts (â¼50%) as compared to the single-institution cohort (<25%).Conclusion. Study results suggest that participation in a longitudinal leadership development program, regardless of cohort format, leads to perceived participant improvement in three categories. However, perceived benefit within each of these categories may vary depending on the cohort. Future studies are needed to further evaluate specific leadership arenas and validate the leadership assessment tool.