Pilot Study: Short Term Impact of Radiation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism.

Despite the risk of complications, high dose radiation therapy is increasingly utilized in the management of selected bone malignancies. In this study, we investigate the impact of moderate to high dose radiation (over 50 Gy) on bone metabolism and structure. Between 2015 and 2018, patients with a primary malignant bone tumor of the sacrum that were either treated with high dose definitive radiation only or a combination of moderate to high dose radiation and surgery were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. Quantitative CTs were performed before and after radiation to determine changes in volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) of the irradiated and non-irradiated spine. Bone histomorphometry was performed on biopsies of the irradiated sacrum and the non-irradiated iliac crest of surgical patients using a quadruple tetracycline labeling protocol. In total, 9 patients were enrolled. Two patients received radiation only (median dose 78.3 Gy) and 7 patients received a combination of preoperative radiation (median dose 50.4 Gy), followed by surgery. Volumetric BMD of the non-irradiated lumbar spine did not change significantly after radiation, while the BMD of the irradiated sacrum did (pre-radiation median: 108.0 mg/cm3 (IQR 91.8-167.1); post-radiation median: 75.3 mg/cm3 (IQR 57.1-110.2); p = 0.010). The cancellous bone of the non-irradiated iliac crest had a stable bone formation rate, while the irradiated sacrum showed a significant decrease in bone formation rate [pre-radiation median: 0.005 mm3/mm2/year (IQR 0.003-0.009), post-radiation median: 0.001 mm3/mm2/year (IQR 0.001-0.001); p = 0.043]. Similar effects were seen in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes. This pilot study shows a decrease of volumetric BMD and bone formation rate after high-dose radiation therapy. Further studies with larger cohorts and other endpoints are needed to get more insight into the effect of radiation on bone. Level of evidence: IV.

Assessing the Safety and Utility of Wound VAC Temporization of the Sarcoma or Benign Aggressive Tumor Bed Until Final Margins Are Achieved.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of microinvasive sarcoma or benign aggressive pathologies can be limb- and life-threatening. Although frozen pathology is reliable, tumor microinvasion can be subtle or missed, having an impact on surgical margins and postoperative radiation planning. The authors' service has begun to temporize the tumor bed after primary tumor excision with a wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) pending formal margin analysis, with coverage performed in the setting of final negative margins. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients managed at a tertiary referral cancer center with VAC temporization after soft tissue sarcoma or benign aggressive tumor excision from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2019 and at least 2 years of oncologic follow-up evaluation. The primary outcome was local recurrence. The secondary outcomes were distant recurrence, unplanned return to the operating room for wound/infectious indications, thromboembolic events, and tumor-related deaths. RESULTS: For 62 patients, VAC temporization was performed. The mean age of the patients was 62.2 ± 22.3 years (median 66.5 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.7-72.5 years), and the mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5.3 ± 1.9. The most common tumor histology was myxofibrosarcoma (51.6%, 32/62). The mean volume was 124.8 ± 324.1 cm3, and 35.5% (22/62) of the cases were subfascial. Local recurrences occurred for 8.1% (5/62) of the patients. Three of these five patients had planned positive margins, and 17.7% (11/62) of the patients had an unplanned return to the operating room. No demographic or tumor factors were associated with unplanned surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that VAC-temporized management of microinvasive sarcoma and benign aggressive pathologies yields favorable local recurrence and unplanned operating room rates suggestive of oncologic and technical safety. These findings will need validation in a future randomized controlled trial.

Temporizing Wound VAC Dressing Until Final Negative Margins are Achieved Reduces Myxofibrosarcoma Local Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The microinvasive nature of suprafascial myxofibrosarcoma reduces the accuracy of intraoperative margin assessment, and tumor bed resections after soft-tissue reconstruction are unreliable. In 2017, we began temporizing the excised tumor bed with a wound VAC, delaying soft-tissue coverage until final negative margins were achieved. We compare the oncologic/surgical outcomes of suprafascial myxofibrosarcomas managed with VAC temporization (VT) with single-stage excision/reconstruction (SS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied suprafascial myxofibrosarcomas managed from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019 for patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and had at least 2 years of oncologic follow-up at a tertiary referral cancer center. Our primary outcome was local recurrence. Comparisons were performed by using Fisher's exact test or Student's t test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (18 VAC temporized, 35 single stage) were included. While VT patients were older (74.9 ± 10.2 vs. 63.9 ± 13.6, p = 0.003), treatment groups did not significantly differ with respect to comorbidity, tumor volume, stage and grade. VT patients had significantly fewer local recurrences (5.6% vs. 28.6% after SS, p = 0.048) and R1 resections that required an unplanned readmission for tumor bed reexcision (0% vs. 37.1% after SS, p = 0.002). VT required more total surgeries (2.8 ± 0.9 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 for SS, p = 0.0002). Postoperative infectious and wound complications were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Our VAC temporization strategy had a significantly lower LR than SS treatment. While high quality multi-institutional validation is required, VT may represent a paradigm shift in the management of myxofibrosarcoma.

Low-dose preoperative radiation, resection, and reduced-field postoperative radiation for soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy (RT) enables conservative surgery for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). RT can be delivered either pre-operatively (PreRT) or postoperatively (PORT), yet in some patients, neither approach is fully satisfactory (e.g., urgent surgery or wound healing risk prevents PreRT, yet PORT alone cannot cover the entire surgical field). We hypothesized that, in such situations, low-dose PreRT (LD-PreRT) would decrease the risk of intraoperative tumor seeding and thus permit PORT to a reduced volume (covering the high-risk tumor bed but not all surgically manipulated tissues). METHODS: We identified a single-institution retrospective cohort of 78 patients treated with LD-PreRT (10-30 Gy), resection, and PORT between 1980 and 2018. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8.2 years, 8-year overall survival (OS) was 65.9%, disease-free survival (DFS) 50.5%, and local control (LC) 76.7%; in 45 patients with extremity/superficial trunk (E/ST) STS, 8-year LC was 80.9%. Both before and after propensity score adjustment, there were no differences in OS, DFS, or LC between this cohort and a separate cohort of 394 STS (221 E/ST-STS) patients treated with surgery and PORT alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients for whom neither PreRT nor PORT alone is optimal, LD-PreRT may prevent intraoperative tumor seeding and enable PORT to a reduced volume while preserving oncologic outcomes.

Role of Radiation Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, aggressive, and heterogenous tumors, comprising approximately 1% of adult cancers with over 50 different subtypes. The mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) includes surgical resection. The addition of radiation therapy (RT), either preoperatively or postoperatively, has been used to potentially decrease the risk of local recurrence. The recently published results from STRASS (EORTC-STBSG 62092-22092), which randomized patients to receive or not receive preoperative radiation, indicate no abdominal recurrence-free survival benefit (primary endpoint) nor overall survival benefit to date from the addition of preoperative RT prior to surgical resection in patients with RPS. Keeping in mind caveats of subgroup analyses, the data show a significant reduction in local recurrence with radiation therapy in resected patients and non-significant trends toward improved abdominal recurrence-free survival in all patients and improved local control and abdominal recurrence-free survival in patients with liposarcoma and low-grade sarcoma. Given the high rate of local failure with surgery alone, it is possible that higher RT dose and/or selective RT dose painting may improve outcomes. Prior to treatment, the authors encourage multidisciplinary review and discussion of management options at a sarcoma center for patients with RPS. Selective use of RT may be considered for patients at high risk of local recurrence.

Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases: High rates of local control with favorable toxicity.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Oligometastatic sarcoma pulmonary metastases (PM's) are traditionally treated with resection and/or chemotherapy. We hypothesize that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective, safe alternative to surgery that can achieve excellent local control (LC) with a favorable toxicity profile. METHODS: Patients treated with SBRT for sarcoma PM's from 2011 to 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania were included. Median dose was 50 Gy. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography/CT Q3 months post-SBRT. RESULTS: 44 patients with 56 separate PM's were treated with SBRT. Median age was 59 (range 19-82). 82% received prior chemotherapy, 66% had prior pulmonary resections (range, 1-5 resections), and 32% received prior thoracic radiotherapy. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.5-8.1 cm). Median follow-up was 16 months and 25 months for patients alive at last follow-up. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) and 46% (95% CI, 38%-55%). LC at 12 and 24 months was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%) and 90% (95% CI, 84%-96%). LC and overall survival did not differ based on age, gender, histology, fractionation, lesion location, or size (P > .05). Three developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 grade-2 chest-wall toxicities; one had grade-2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the first multi-institutional series on SBRT for sarcoma PM's, SBRT has excellent LC and is well-tolerated. SBRT should be considered as an alternative/complement to resection.

Novel Body Composition Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine abdominal and breast adipose tissue parameters on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) that may serve as outcome predictors in breast angiosarcoma patients. MATERIALS: Women with breast angiosarcoma (n = 13) who underwent 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT were identified. A control group was selected (n = 25). Abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were assessed on unenhanced computed tomographies. Breast adipose tissue (BAT) volumes of the uninvolved breast were quantified. Metabolic activity of VAT, SAT, and BAT was calculated (standardized uptake value [SUV]). RESULTS: Breast angiosarcoma patients had higher metabolic activity of VAT compared with controls (SUV 0.93 ± 0.39 vs 0.64 ± 0.11, P = 0.044). Within the patient group, there were 6 deaths (46.2%). Patients who died had higher SAT activity (SUV 0.52 ± 0.24 vs 0.29 ± 0.06, P = 0.027) and higher BAT metabolic activity (SUV 0.48 ± 0.20 vs 0.27 ± 0.11, P = 0.045) compared with nondeceased patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast angiosarcoma have higher metabolic activity of VAT. Higher abdominal SAT and higher BAT metabolic activity of the uninvolved breast might predict mortality.

Low dose radiotherapy is associated with local complications but not disease control in sacral chordoma.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the disease control and complications of the treatment of sacrococcygeal chordoma from four tertiary cancer centers with emphasis on the effects of radiotherapy in surgically treated patients. METHODS: A total of 193 patients with primary sacrococcygeal chordoma from 1990 to 2015 were reviewed. There were 124 males, with a mean age of 59 ± 15 years and a mean follow-up of 7 ± 4 years. Eighty-nine patients received radiotherapy with a mean total dose of 61.8 ± 10.9 Gy. RESULTS: The 10-year disease-free and disease-specific survival was 58% and 72%, respectively. Radiation was not associated with local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.17; P = 0.71), metastases (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.45-1.91; P = 0.85) or disease-specific survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.46-2.00; P = 0.91). Higher doses (≥70 Gy; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.20-1.32; P = 0.17) may be associated with reduced local recurrence. Radiotherapy was associated with wound complications (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.64-4.82;, P < 0.001) and sacral stress fractures (HR, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.88-14.38; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter review, radiotherapy was not associated with tumor outcome but associated with complications. The routine use of radiotherapy with en-bloc resection of sacrococcygeal chordomas should be reconsidered in favor of a selective, individualized approach with a radiation dose of ≥70 Gy.

Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.

BACKGROUND: We developed a machine learning algorithm to predict the survival of patients with chondrosarcoma. The algorithm demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration on internal validation in a derivation cohort based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. However, the algorithm has not been validated in an independent external dataset. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) algorithm accurately predict 5-year survival in an independent patient population surgically treated for chondrosarcoma? METHODS: The SORG algorithm was developed using the SEER registry, which contains demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome values; and includes approximately 30% of the cancer patients in the United States. The SEER registry was ideal for creating the derivation cohort, and consequently the SORG algorithm, because of the high number of eligible patients and the availability of most (explanatory) variables of interest. Between 1992 to 2013, 326 patients were treated surgically for extracranial chondrosarcoma of the bone at two tertiary care referral centers. Of those, 179 were accounted for at a minimum of 5 years after diagnosis in a clinical note at one of the two institutions, unless they died earlier, and were included in the validation cohort. In all, 147 (45%) did not meet the minimum 5 years of followup at the institution and were not included in the validation of the SORG algorithm. The outcome (survival at 5 years) was checked for all 326 patients in the Social Security death index and were included in the supplemental validation cohort, to also ascertain validity for patients with less than 5 years of institutional followup. Variables used in the SORG algorithm to predict 5-year survival including sex, age, histologic subtype, tumor grade, tumor size, tumor extension, and tumor location were collected manually from medical records. The tumor characteristics were collected from the postoperative musculoskeletal pathology report. Predicted probabilities of 5-year survival were calculated for each patient in the validation cohort using the SORG algorithm, followed by an assessment of performance using the same metrics as used for internal validation, namely: discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. Discrimination was calculated using the concordance statistic (or the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve) to determine how well the algorithm discriminates between the outcome, which ranges from 0.5 (no better than a coin-toss) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination). Calibration was assessed using the calibration slope and intercept from a calibration plot to measure the agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. A perfect calibration plot should show a 45° upwards line. Overall performance was determined using the Brier score, ranging from 0 (excellent prediction) to 1 (worst prediction). The Brier score was compared with the null-model Brier score, which showed the performance of a model that ignored all the covariates. A Brier score lower than the null model Brier score indicated greater performance of the algorithm. For the external validation an F1-score was added to measure the overall accuracy of the algorithm, which ranges between 0 (total failure of an algorithm) and 1 (perfect algorithm).The 5-year survival was lower in the validation cohort than it was in the derivation cohort from SEER (61.5% [110 of 179] versus 76% [1131 of 1544] ; p < 0.001). This difference was driven by higher proportion of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma in the institutional population than in the derivation cohort (27% [49 of 179] versus 9% [131 of 1544]; p < 0.001). Patients in the validation cohort also had larger tumor sizes, higher grades, and nonextremity tumor locations than did those in the derivation cohort. These differences between the study groups emphasize that the external validation is performed not only in a different patient cohort, but also in terms of disease characteristics. Five-year survival was not different for both patient groups between subpopulations of patients with conventional chondrosarcomas and those with dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. RESULTS: The concordance statistic for the validation cohort was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). Evaluation of the algorithm's calibration in the institutional population resulted in a calibration slope of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.68-1.3) and calibration intercept of -0.58 (95% CI, -0.20 to -0.97). Finally, on overall performance, the algorithm had a Brier score of 0.152 compared with a null-model Brier score of 0.237 for a high level of overall performance. The F1-score was 0.836. For the supplementary validation in the total of 326 patients, the SORG algorithm had a validation of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93). The calibration slope was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.87-1.39) and the calibration intercept was -0.26 (95% CI, -0.57 to 0.06). The Brier score was 0.11, with a null-model Brier score of 0.19. The F1-score was 0.901. CONCLUSIONS: On external validation, the SORG algorithm retained good discriminative ability and overall performance but overestimated 5-year survival in patients surgically treated for chondrosarcoma. This internet-based tool can help guide patient counseling and shared decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Radiation therapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma management.

Surgery is potentially curative for primary non-metastatic retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS), although patients remain at risk for local recurrence. To reduce this risk, the addition of radiotherapy to radical surgery may be considered. Nevertheless, level I evidence to support radiotherapy is currently lacking. The results from the EORTC-STBSG 62092-22092 studying this question are awaited. This manuscript addresses issues to consider when radiation-oncologists engage in a multidisciplinary treatment approach for RPS patients, including radiotherapy.

Localized Adult Ewing Sarcoma: Favorable Outcomes with Alternating Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Ifosfamide, Etoposide (VDC/IE)-Based Multimodality Therapy.

BACKGROUND: In children with localized Ewing sarcoma (ES), addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (VDC/IE) improved 5-year overall survival (OS) to 70%-80%. Prior to delivery of VDC/IE in adults, 5-year OS was <50%. We reviewed our institutional outcomes for adults with ES who received VDC/IE-based treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1997-2013, 67 adults with localized ES were treated with curative intent. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were determined using Kaplan-Meier method; comparisons were assessed with log-rank. Proportional hazard models were used to determine predictive factors. RESULTS: All patients received VDC/IE (median 14 cycles.) Local therapy was surgery for 33, radiation therapy for 17, or both for 17. Median follow-up for living patients was 5.2 years. Six patients had disease progression on therapy. Site of first failure was local for three, local and distant for two, and distant for ten. Five-year LRFS was 91%; 5-year LRFS was 96% for nonpelvic disease and 64% for pelvic disease (p = .003). Five-year PFS was 66%, and 5-year OS was 79%. On multivariate analysis, pelvic site had a 3.3 times increased risk of progression (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Survival for adults with localized ES treated with VDC/IE-based multimodality therapy appears to be better than historical data and similar to excellent outcomes in children. Pelvic site of disease remains a predictor of worse outcome. Given the paucity of literature for adult ES, these data help validate VDC/IE-based therapy as an appropriate treatment approach for this rare disease in adults. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is rare in adults. Treatment approaches for adults have been extrapolated from the pediatric experience, and there is a sense that adults fare less well than children. We reviewed treatment outcomes in adults with localized ES treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in alternation with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) as part of multimodality therapy. Survival outcomes appear to be better than historical data for adults and similar to the excellent outcomes for children. These data help validate VDC/IE-based therapy as an appropriate treatment approach for this rare disease in adults.

Improved local control with an aggressive strategy of preoperative (with or without intraoperative) radiation therapy combined with radical surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine our outcomes with advanced preoperative and intraoperative radiation therapy (XRT) combined with aggressive en bloc surgical resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) as a strategy to minimize the risk of local recurrence (LR). METHODS: From 2003 to 2013, 46 patients with RPS received preoperative XRT followed by radical en bloc surgical resection, with or without intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT). Clinical and pathologic variables predictive of LR and distant recurrence (DR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had primary tumors and 80% were intermediate grade or higher. All patients received preoperative XRT to a median dose of 50.4 Gy and underwent complete (R0/R1) tumor resection, and 16 patients received IOERT. After a median follow-up of 53 months, 33 (72%) patients were disease-free, and there were 8 (17%) DRs, 2 (4%) abdominal recurrences outside of the XRT field, and 5 (10.9%) LRs. High tumor grade and recurrent disease at presentation were the only factors associated with higher rates of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent local control can be achieved with a coordinated strategy of preoperative (±intraoperative) XRT combined with aggressive en bloc surgical resection of RPS, but systemic failure remains a problem for higher-grade tumors.

The Width of the Surgical Margin Does Not Influence Outcomes in Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated With Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether the quantitative width of the surgical margin influences outcomes in patients with extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 382 patients with localized extremity or truncal STS who underwent limb-sparing surgery and RT from 1983 to 2010, and we analyzed the significance of resection margin status and quantitative margin width on outcomes. RESULTS: Surgical margins were positive in 68 (18%) patients and negative in 314 (82%) patients. For those patients with a reported quantitative margin width (n = 235), the width of the negative margin was ≤1 mm (n = 128), >1 mm and ≤5 mm (n = 79), and >5 mm (n = 28). At a median follow-up of 82 months, the local recurrence rates were 5.4% and 11.8% for margin-negative and margin-positive patients, respectively. There were no differences in the rates of local or distant recurrence nor of any survival outcome based on the quantitative width of the surgical margin, provided that it was negative. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing RT and limb-sparing surgery for STS, achieving a negative margin is essential for optimizing both local control and survival. However, the absolute quantitative width of the negative margin does not significantly influence outcome, and so attempts at wide margins of resection appear to be unnecessary. Importantly, the conclusions drawn from this study must not be applied to those patients undergoing surgery alone as the local treatment of their STS, in which case wider margins of resection may be necessary. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In patients undergoing radiation therapy and limb-sparing surgery for soft tissue sarcoma, the quantitative width of the negative margin does not influence outcome, and so attempts at wide margins of resection appear to be unnecessary, especially when such attempts compromise the functional outcome. Importantly, the conclusions drawn from this study must not be applied to those patients undergoing surgery alone as the local treatment of their soft tissue sarcoma, in which case wider margins of resection may be necessary.

Prognostic factors in alveolar soft part sarcoma: A SEER analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and analyzed the effect of surgery for patients presenting with and without metastatic disease (DM). METHODS: The SEER Registry was queried for patients with ASPS from 1973-2012. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox proportional hazards were used to analyze survival outcomes and risk variables. RESULTS: Among 251 patients, 43% had DM and 67% locoregional disease (LR) on presentation. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 56% (82% and 27% for LR and DM, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03 per year, P < 0.001), tumor size >10 cm (HR = 2.76, P = 0.013), DM at diagnosis (HR = 3.79, P < 0.001), and truncal primary site (HR = 1.63, P = 0.035) as independent factors predicting worse OS. For LR patients, surgery plus radiotherapy (RT) resulted in better OS compared to surgery alone P = 0.014. For DM patients, primary site surgery significantly improved survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ASPS presents with high metastasis rate but has a relatively indolent clinical course and a favorable prognosis with prolonged survival. Aggressive treatment using adjuvant RT with surgery is indicated in patients with LR disease and surgery is indicated in patients presenting with DM. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:581-586. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Preoperative radiation therapy combined with radical surgical resection is associated with a lower rate of local recurrence when treating unifocal, primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local recurrence (LR) is the primary cause of death in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RP-LPS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the addition of preoperative radiation therapy (XRT) to radical resection for RP-LPS at a single institution was associated with improved LR. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with unifocal, primary RP-LPS who underwent complete R0/R1 resection at a single institution between 1991 and 2013. Multiple patient, tumor, and surgeon characteristics were tested to evaluate their association to LR (recurrence in the retroperitoneal space). We used competing risk hazards regression to evaluate the effect of preoperative XRT on the probability of LR. RESULTS: There were 41 patients with liposarcoma histology whose tumors included entirely well-differentiated (N = 13), de-differentiated components (n = 26), myxoid (n = 1), and NOS (n = 1). Preoperative XRT was significantly associated with a lower probability of LR (HR 0.11, 95%CI 0.01-0.91, P = 0.04) and a higher 5-year local recurrence-free survival (95.6%, 95%CI 72.4-99.4%, vs. 75.0%, 95%CI 40.8-91.2%; P = 0.0213), but not with 5-year distant recurrence-free survival or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative XRT combined with complete R0/R1 resection for unifocal, primary RP-LPS was associated with improved LR and it should be considered in the multimodality treatment of RP-LPS. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:814-820. © 2016 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical outcomes for patients after surgery and radiation therapy for mesenchymal chondrosarcomas.

INTRODUCTION: We report the outcome of 23 patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcomas treated with surgery and radiation therapy +/- chemotherapy. The intent of the project was to review the impact of patient and treatment variables on treatment outcome, in particular with regard to extent of surgery and radiation dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcomas were treated with surgery and radiation therapy (min. dose 44 Gy; max. dose 78 Gy; median dose 60 Gy; mean dose 61 Gy). RESULTS: The median survival for the entire cohort of patients was 21.65 years (95% confidence interval ± 4.25). The 5- and 10-year OS was 78.6%. Median disease-free survival for the 23 patients was 7.2 years. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 and 5 years was 70.7% and 57.8%, respectively. The local control rate at 5 and 10 years was 89.5% (95%CI 64.1-97.3%). Only three patients experienced local failure, three patients had regional failure, and eight developed distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients local tumor control was high when using a combination of surgery and radiation. There was not a clear relationship between radiation dose and local tumor control. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:982-986. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Sacral Insufficiency Fractures are Common After High-dose Radiation for Sacral Chordomas Treated With or Without Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery with high-dose radiation and high-dose radiation alone for sacral chordomas have shown promising local control rates. However, we have noted frequent sacral insufficiency fractures and perceived this rate to be higher than previously reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wished (1) to characterize the incidence of sacral insufficiency fractures in patients with chordomas of the sacrum who received high-dose radiation, and (2) to determine whether patients treated with surgery plus high-dose radiation or high-dose radiation alone are more likely to experience a sacral fracture, and to compare time to fracture in these groups. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who received high-dose radiation for sacral chordomas with (n = 44) or without surgical resection (n = 18) between 1992 and 2013 were included in this retrospective study. At our institution, sacral chordomas generally are treated by preoperative radiotherapy, followed by en bloc resection, and postoperative radiotherapy. Radiation alone, with an intent to cure, is offered to patients who otherwise are not good surgical candidates or patients who elect radiotherapy based on tumor location and the anticipated morbidity after surgery (such as sexual, bowel, or bladder dysfunction). MRI and CT scans were evaluated for evidence of sacral insufficiency fractures. Complete followup was available at a minimum of 2 years (or until fracture or death) for all 18 patients who underwent radiation alone, whereas 14% (six of 44 patients) in the surgery plus radiation group (9% [three of 33] after high sacrectomy and 27% [three of 11] after low sacrectomy) were lost to followup before 2 years. RESULTS: Sacral insufficiency fractures occurred in 29 of the 62 patients (47%). A total of 25 of 33 patients (76%) with high sacrectomy had fractures develop compared with zero of 11 (0%) after low sacrectomy, and four of the 18 patients (22%) who had high-dose radiation alone (p < 0.001). The fracture rate was greater in the high sacrectomy group than in the low sacrectomy group (p < 0.001) and the radiation only group (p < 0.001). There was no difference with the numbers evaluated in fracture probability between patients in the low-sacrectomy group and those treated with radiation alone (p = 0.112). The fracture-free survival probability was 0.99 for the low sacrectomy group at all times as there were no insufficiency fractures in this group; the 1-year fracture-free survival probability was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.35-0.69) after high sacrectomy, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) after radiation alone; the 2-year fracture-free survival probability was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.19-0.52) after high sacrectomy and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.50-0.91) after radiation alone; and the 5-year fracture-free survival probability was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.04-0.30) after high sacrectomy and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.50-0.91) after radiation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the limitations of potential differences in baseline and followup among treatment groups in our study, we found that almost ½ of our patients experienced an insufficiency fracture. We found that the fracture rate was greater in the surgery group compared with the radiation alone group and that high sacrectomy accounted for all fractures in the surgery group. These findings can be used to inform patients and also support the need for further research to elucidate the influence of high-dose radiation on bone quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

How Does the Level of Sacral Resection for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors Affect Physical and Mental Health, Pain, Mobility, Incontinence, and Sexual Function?

BACKGROUND: En bloc resection for treatment of sacral tumors is the approach of choice for patients with resectable tumors who are well enough to undergo surgery, and studies describe patient survival, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates associated with this treatment. However, most of these studies do not provide patient-reported functional outcomes other than binary metrics for bowel and bladder function postresection. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to use validated patient-reported outcomes tools to compare quality of life based on level of sacral resection in terms of (1) physical and mental health; (2) pain; (3) mobility; and (4) incontinence and sexual function. METHODS: Our analysis included 33 patients (19 men, 14 women) who had a mean age of 53 years (range, 22-72 years) with a quality-of-life survey administered at a mean postoperative followup of 41 months (range, 6-123 months). The majority of patient-reported quality-of-life outcome surveys for this study were taken from the National Institute of Health's Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) system. To assess physical and mental health, the PROMIS Global Items Survey with physical and mental subscores, Anxiety, and Depression scores were used. Pain outcomes were assessed using PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference surveys. Patient-reported lower extremity function was assessed using the PROMIS Mobility Survey. Patient-reported quality of life for sexual function was assessed using the PROMIS Sex Interest and Orgasm survey, whereas incontinence was measured using the International Continence Society Voiding and Incontinence scores and the Modified Obstruction and Defecation Score. Surveys were collected prospectively during clinic visits in the postoperative period. Patients were grouped by the level of osteotomy as determined by review of postoperative MRI or CT and half levels were grouped with the more cephalad level. This resulted in the inclusion of total sacrectomy (N = 6), S1 (N = 8), S2 (N = 10), S3 (N = 5), and S4 (N = 4). One-way analysis of variance tests on means or ranks were used to conduct statistical analysis between levels. RESULTS: Patients with more caudal resections had higher physical health (95% confidence interval [CI] total sacrectomy 36-42 versus S4 50-64, p < 0.001), less intense pain (95% CI total sacrectomy 47-60 versus S4 28-37, p < 0.001), less interference resulting from pain (95% CI total sacrectomy 58-69 versus S4 36-51, p = 0.004), higher mobility (95% CI total sacrectomy 24-46 versus S4 59-59, p = 0.002), and were more functionally able to achieve orgasm (95% CI S1 1-1 versus S4 2.2-5.3, p = 0.043). No difference was found for PROMIS Global Item Mental Health Subscore, Sex Interest, Sex Satisfaction, modified obstruction and defecation score, and International Continence Society Voiding and Incontinence although this could be the result of an inadequate sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis on patient-reported quality of life based on the level of bony resection in patients who underwent resection for primary sacral tumor indicates that patients with higher resections have more pain and loss of physical function in comparison to patients with lower resections. Additionally, use of the PROMIS outcomes allows for comparisons to normative data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Perioperative Radiation Therapy and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in 204 Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Retrospective 2-Institution Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma treated with perioperative radiation therapy (RT) versus those treated without perioperative RT. BACKGROUND: RT for retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma is controversial, and few studies have compared outcomes with and without RT. METHODS: Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed to retrospectively compare patients with primary retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma treated during 2003-2011. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess associations with the primary endpoints: local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: At 1 institution, 172 patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas at another institution 32 patients were treated with surgery and perioperative proton beam RT or intensity-modulated RT with or without intraoperative RT. The groups were similar in age, tumor size, grade, and margin status (all P > 0.08). The RT group had a higher percentage of pelvic tumors (P = 0.03) and a different distribution of histologies (P = 0.04). Perioperative morbidity was higher in the RT group (44% vs 16% of patients; P = 0.004). After a median follow-up of 39 months, 5-year LRFS was 91% (95% confidence interval, 79%-100%) in the RT group and 65% (57%-74%) in the surgery-only group (P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, RT was associated with better LRFS (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = 0.03). Five-year disease-specific survival was 93% (95% confidence interval, 82%-100%) in the RT group and 85% (78%-92%) in the surgery-only group (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of advanced-modality RT to surgery for primary retroperitoneal or pelvic sarcoma was associated with improved LRFS, although this did not translate into significantly better disease-specific survival. This treatment strategy warrants further investigation in a randomized trial.