Comprehensive genomic profiling in routine clinical practice leads to a low rate of benefit from genotype-directed therapy.

BACKGROUND: Describe a single-center real-world experience with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to identify genotype directed therapy (GDT) options for patients with malignancies refractory to standard treatment options. METHODS: Patients who had CGP by a CLIA-certified laboratory between November 2012 and December 2015 were included. The medical records were analyzed retrospectively after Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. The treating oncologist made the decision to obtain the assay to provide potential therapeutic options. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of patients who benefited from GDT, and to identify barriers to receiving GDT. RESULTS: A total of 125 pediatric and adult patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of malignancy were included. Among these, 106 samples were from adult patients, and 19 samples were from pediatric patients. The median age was 54 years for adults. The majority had stage IV malignancy (53%) and were pretreated with 2-3 lines of therapy (45%). The median age was 8 years for pediatric patients. The majority had brain tumors (47%) and had received none or 1 line of therapy (58%) when the profiling was requested. A total of 111 (92%) patients had genomic alterations and were candidates for GDT either via on/off-label use or a clinical trial (phase 1 through 3). Fifteen patients (12%) received GDT based on these results including two patients who were referred for genomically matched phase 1 clinical trials. Three patients (2%) derived benefit from their GDT that ranged from 2 to 6 months of stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: CGP revealed potential treatment options in the majority of patients profiled. However, multiple barriers to therapy were identified, and only a small minority of the patients derived benefit from GDT.

Defining the optimal timing of adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A statewide cancer registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term results of the ESPAC-3 trial suggest that while completing adjuvant therapy (AT) is necessary after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), early initiation (within 8 weeks) may not be associated with improved overall survival (OS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the OS impact of early versus late AT in a statewide analysis. METHODS: Patients with stages I-III PDAC in the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) from 2004 to 2013, were evaluated. Those undergoing pancreatectomy were stratified into two groups ("early," <8 weeks, vs. "late," 8-16 weeks). RESULTS: Of 2,221 diagnosed patients with stages I-III, 831 (37.4%) underwent pancreatectomy upfront. Of these, only 420 (50.5%) received AT. Initiation date of AT was not associated with OS (median OS: early, 20.2 vs. late, 19.0 months, P = 0.97). On multivariate analysis, factors that affected OS included stage (II, HR-1.82, P = 0.017; III, HR-3.77, P < 0.001), node positivity (HR-1.51, P = 0.004), poorly/undifferentiated grade (HR-1.34; P = 0.011), but not AT initiation date. CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide analysis, there was no difference in OS between early and late AT initiation for resected PDAC. The ideal window for AT initiation remains unknown as tumor biology continues to trump regimens from the past decade. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:451-455. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cancer recurrence worry, risk perception, and informational-coping styles among Appalachian cancer survivors.

Despite a growing literature on the psychosocial impact of the threat of cancer recurrence, underserved populations, such as those from the Appalachian region, have been understudied. To examine worry and perceived risk in cancer survivors, Appalachian and non-Appalachian cancer patients at an ambulatory oncology clinic in a university hospital were surveyed. Appalachians had significantly higher worry than non-Appalachians. Cancer type and lower need for cognition were associated with greater worry. Those with missing perceived risk data were generally older, less educated, and lower in monitoring, blunting, and health literacy. Additional resources are needed to assist Appalachians and those with cancers with poor prognoses (e.g., liver cancer, pancreatic cancer) to cope with worry associated with developing cancer again. More attention for cancer prevention is critical to improve quality of life in underserved populations where risk of cancer is greater.

A four-arm, randomized, multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin combined with varying schedules of 5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy in previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with or without leucovorin (LV), is effective and well tolerated for first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is no consensus as to which oxaliplatin/5-FU-containing regimen is superior in the first-line setting. This randomized, multicenter phase II trial was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 4 different oxaliplatin/5-FU regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC (mCRC; n = 129) were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment regimens: (1) continuous 5-FU infusion plus oxaliplatin (n = 23); (2) weekly 5-FU bolus with LV plus oxaliplatin (n = 40); (3) oxaliplatin with 2-day infusion 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX4, n = 41); and (4) chronomodulated 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (n = 25). RESULTS: Overall response rates, after expert assessment, ranged from 24% to 34%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 6 months to 8 months. Although no significant differences in efficacy were detected in pairwise comparisons of the 4 different regimens, patients randomized to FOLFOX4 had the highest response rate and longest PFS. The FOLFOX4 regimen was also associated with the lowest incidence of severe (grade 3/4) toxicity, with the exception of cumulative peripheral neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: This randomized phase II trial provides evidence that oxaliplatin/5-FU regimens are effective and well tolerated for first-line therapy of previously untreated mCRC. The FOLFOX regimens are now an established standard for CRC.

Neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Patients Who Are Ineligible for FOLFIRINOX.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Combination nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG) is superior to gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). There are limited data for AG in borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Herein, we report our experience with neoadjuvant AG for BR/LAPC in patients ineligible for FOLFIRINOX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective series, included patients with BR/LAPC who received AG as neoadjuvant therapy for 3-4 months followed by radiation, then re-evaluation for surgery. RESULTS: Between 10/2013-2/2018, 32 patients (22 BR, 10 LAPC) were treated with this approach. Median age was 70 years. Nine patients were converted to resectability by imaging; six had R0 resections (19%), five (16%) achieved a partial response and 24 (75%) had stable disease. CONCLUSION: In this small series, the R0 resection rate and response rate were 19% and 16% respectively. These data suggest that neoadjuvant AG may be an alternate option for patients ineligible for FOLFIRINOX.

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia associated with scrotal and penile involvement with capecitabine.

Capecitabine is an orally active fluoropyrimidine that has been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer when fluoropyrimidines alone are indicated. One of the toxicities described in the literature associated with capecitabine is palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Based on a careful review of the literature, no reported cases of erythema, ulceration, and swelling that involves the penis and scrotum have been described in association with capecitabine. The following 2 cases illustrate palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia with scrotal and penile involvement secondary to capecitabine.

Dose-escalation study of ICA-17043 in patients with sickle cell disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the dose tolerance, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of ICA-17043 in patients with sickle cell disease. DESIGN: Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, dose-escalation study. SETTING: Four university medical centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with sickle cell disease, aged 18-60 years, who were otherwise healthy and in a noncrisis state. INTERVENTION: Patients in three separate dose cohorts--50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg--received single doses of ICA-17043 or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) for ICA-17043 increased in a dose-related manner (11,827, 19,697, and 30,676 ng.hr/ml for 50, 100, and 150 mg, respectively). Overall mean half-life was 12.8 days. Mean peak plasma concentrations rose between the 50- and 100-mg dose levels but plateaued at 150 mg (59.1, 108.7, and 109.1 ng/ml, respectively). Weekly pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were conducted in each patient during the follow-up phase for 56 days. No dose-limiting adverse events were noted in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Total systemic exposure of ICA-17043 after a single oral dose, as measured by AUC(0-infinity), increased nearly proportionally with the dose. The rate of absorption, however, appeared to be delayed at doses greater than 100 mg. With the long half-life of ICA-17043 demonstrated in this study, once-daily dosing is probably adequate to maintain steady-state plasma concentrations. In addition, single doses of ICA-17043 were well tolerated.

Low-dose fractionated radiation as a chemopotentiator of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a new treatment paradigm.

PURPOSE: Current therapies for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) result in 50% long-term remission. Low-dose radiotherapy (<100 cGy) induces enhanced cell killing in vitro via the hyper-radiation sensitivity phenomenon but has not been used in the clinical setting. On the basis of the demonstrated synergy between chemotherapy and low-dose fractionated RT, a novel neoadjuvant therapy was designed using low-dose fractionated RT as a chemopotentiator for locally advanced SCCHN. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with locally advanced SCCHN received paclitaxel (225 mg/m2), carboplatin (area under the curve of 6), and four 80-cGy fractions of radiotherapy (two each on Days 1 and 2). This sequence was repeated on Days 22 and 23. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients enrolled, 39 were assessable. Grade 3 or worse toxicities included neutropenia (50%), infection (13%), arthralgias/myalgias (3%), skin (8%), lung (3%), and allergic reaction (3%), with no Grade 5 toxicity. The response was assessed radiographically and by panendoscopy. At the primary site, 11 patients (28%) had a complete response, 24 (62%) had a partial response, and 4 (10%) had stable disease. Of those with lymph node involvement, 10 (31%) had a complete response, 12 (38%) a partial response, 9 (28%) had stable disease, and 1 (3%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 82%. CONCLUSION: Low-dose fractionated RT combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin is effective in SCCHN and has a similar toxicity profile to chemotherapy alone. This novel approach provided a response rate of 90% at the primary site and a nodal response rate of 69%. Additional scientific investigation of this new treatment paradigm is warranted.

A phase I study of 7-t-butyldimethylsilyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin in adult patients with refractory or metastatic solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: 7-t-Butyldimethylsilyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (AR-67) is a novel third generation camptothecin selected for development based on the blood stability of its pharmacologically active lactone form and its high potency in preclinical models. Here, we report the initial phase I experience with i.v. AR-67 in adults with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND METHODS: AR-67 was infused over 1 hour daily five times, every 21 days, using an accelerated titration trial design. Plasma was collected on the 1st and 4th day of cycle 1 to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated at nine dosage levels (1.2-12.4 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in five patients and consisted of grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 fatigue, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Common toxicities included leukopenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (15.4%), fatigue (15.4%), neutropenia (11.5%), and anemia (11.5%). No diarrhea was observed. The maximum tolerated dosage was 7.5 mg/m(2)/d. The lactone form was the predominant species in plasma (>87% of area under the plasma concentration-time curve) at all dosages. No drug accumulation was observed on day 4. Clearance was constant with increasing dosage and hematologic toxicities correlated with exposure (P < 0.001). A prolonged partial response was observed in one subject with non-small cell lung cancer. Stable disease was noted in patients with small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and duodenal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: AR-67 is a novel, blood-stable camptothecin with a predictable toxicity profile and linear pharmacokinetics. The recommended phase II dosage is 7.5 mg/m(2)/d five times every 21 days.

Cancer family history reporting: impact of method and psychosocial factors.

Family history is one the greatest risk factors for disease and one of the most important informational tools in medical genetics for the purpose of diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention and treatment. However, research is needed on the comparability of different methods of cancer family history assessment and the influence of psychosocial factors in family history reports. The purpose of this study was to determine if individuals had discrepancies between written and interview reports of cancer family history and the role of psychosocial factors in these discrepancies. Oncology patients (n=104) were administered a survey to assess psychosocial factors (i.e., information-seeking, worry, perceived risk, and health literacy) and were asked to provide family history in a written and an interview form. Randomization determined which form individuals received first. No differences in the amount of missing data or the amount of unspecified data were noted between the written and interview method. Psychosocial factors did not differentiate between those who had discrepancies in family history reports and those who did not have discrepancies in family history reports; although there was a trend for those with lower literacy and those who were blunters to be more discrepant on type of cancer diagnosis. In sum, this preliminary study indicates that written and interview methods of family history assessment for first degree relatives may be used interchangeably. The ability to use written methods will facilitate collection of basic family history information in the oncology clinic.