Organization, feasibility and patient appreciation of a follow-up consultation in surgical critically ill patients with favorable baseline quality of life and prolonged ICU-stay: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are often left with impairments in physical, mental and cognitive functioning (Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)). We evaluated the organization, the feasibility for caregivers and patients and the patients' appreciation of a post-ICU consultation aiming to detect these PICS-symptoms. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational pilot study was conducted during an 18 month-period in the surgical ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Consecutive adult patients with an ICU-stay of ≥8 days and a favorable baseline quality of life (utility index ≥0.6 on EQ-5D-3 L) were eligible for inclusion. A post-ICU follow-up consultation consisting of a structured interview was scheduled 3 months after hospital discharge. Characteristics of the consultation (CG) and no consultation group (NCG) were compared. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 133 eligible patients, 85 (64%) consented for the study and 42 (49%) attended the consultation. A total of 148 phone calls were made to schedule the consultations. Consultations took a median of 68 (61-74) minutes. Compared to CG-patients, NCG-patients were more often discharged to a care facility (P = 0.003) and had more problems with mobility (P = 0.014), self-care (P < 0.001) and usual activities (P = 0.005) after 3 months. At least one PICS-related problem was documented in all patients in the CG and NCG. Thirty-four CG-patients (81%) appreciated the initiative. CONCLUSION: Organizing an ICU-follow-up consultation was difficult and feasibility was low, but most attending patients appreciated the initiative. Better developed structures for ICU-follow-up are needed in view of the high number of PICS-related problems documented.

Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life at least 12 months after discharge from the intensive care unit of adult critically ill patients, to evaluate the methodology used to assess long-term quality of life, and to give an overview of factors influencing quality of life. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE-PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), SCI/Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and personal files. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed independently and cross-checked by two reviewers using a predefined data extraction form. Eligible studies were published between 1999 and 2009 and assessed quality of life ≥12 months after intensive care unit discharge by means of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, EuroQol-5D, and/or the Nottingham Health Profile in adult intensive care unit patients. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifty-three articles (10 multicenters) were included, with the majority of studies performed in Europe (68%). The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey was used in 55%, and the EuroQol-5D, the Nottingham Health Profile, the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, or a combination was used in 21%, 9%, 8%, or 8%, respectively. A response rate of ≥80% was attained in 26 studies (49%). Critically ill patients had a lower quality of life than an age- and gender-matched population, but quality of life tended to improve over years. The worst reductions in quality of life were seen in cases of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, prolonged mechanical ventilation, severe trauma, and severe sepsis. Study quality criteria, defined as a baseline quality of life assessment, the absence of major exclusion criteria, a description of nonresponders, and a comparison with a reference population were met in only four studies (8%). Results concerning the influence of severity of illness, comorbidity, preadmission quality of life, age, gender, or acquired complications were conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life differed on diagnostic category but, overall, critically ill patients had a lower quality of life than an age- and gender-matched population. A minority of studies met the predefined methodologic quality criteria. Results concerning the influence of the patients' characteristics and illnesses on long-term quality of life were conflicting.

Impact of recent intravenous chemotherapy on outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock patients with hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and outcome of patients with hematological malignancies referred to the ICU with severe sepsis and septic shock who had or had not received recent intravenous chemotherapy, defined as within 3 weeks prior to ICU admission. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort study on prospectively collected data in a medical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 186 ICU patients with hematological malignancies with severe sepsis or septic shock (2000-2006). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were 77 patients admitted with severe sepsis and 109 with septic shock; 91 (49%) had received recent intravenous chemotherapy. Patients with recent chemotherapy more often had a high-grade malignancy and were more often neutropenic, less often had pulmonary infiltrates, and less often required mechanical ventilation. ICU, 28-day, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality rates were 33% vs. 48.4%, 40.7% vs. 57.4%, 45.1% vs. 58.9%, and 50.5% vs. 63.2% in patients with and without recent chemotherapy, respectively. Logistic regression identified four variables independently associated with 28-day mortality: SOFA score at ICU admission, pulmonary site of infection, and fungal infection were associated with worse outcome whereas previous intravenous chemotherapy was protective at borderline significance. After adjustment with a propensity score for recent chemotherapy, chemotherapy was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients referred to the ICU with severe sepsis and septic shock complicating active chemotherapeutic treatment have better prognosis than commonly perceived.

Daily cost of antimicrobial therapy in patients with Intensive Care Unit-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection.

This study analysed daily antimicrobial costs of Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (BSI) per patient admitted to the ICU of a university hospital, based on prospectively collected data over a 4-year period (2003-2006). Costs were calculated based on the price of the agent(s) initiated on the first day of appropriate treatment and according to: (i) focus of infection; (ii) pathogen; and (iii) antimicrobial agent. The study included 310 adult patients who developed 446 BSI episodes. Mean overall daily antimicrobial cost was euro114.25. Daily antimicrobial cost was most expensive for BSIs with unknown focus (euro137.70), followed by catheter-related (euro122.73), pulmonary (euro112.80), abdominal (euro98.00), wound (euro89.21), urinary (euro87.85) and other inciting focuses (euro81.59). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most prevalent pathogens isolated. Treatment of BSIs caused by Candida spp. was the most costly. The daily antimicrobial costs per infected patient with multidrug-resistant BSI was ca. 50% higher compared with those without (euro165.09 vs. euro82.67; P<0.001). Among the total of 852 prescriptions, beta-lactam antibiotics accounted for approximately one-third of the overall daily cost of antimicrobial agents. The antibiotic cost associated with ICU-acquired, laboratory-confirmed BSI is significant and should be reduced by implementing infection control measures and preventive strategies.

Determinants and impact of multidrug antibiotic resistance in pathogens causing ventilator-associated-pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: The idea that multidrug resistance (MDR) to antibiotics in pathogens causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an independent risk factor for adverse outcome is still debated. We aimed to identify the determinants of MDR versus non-MDR microbial aetiology in VAP and assessed whether MDR versus non-MDR VAP was independently associated with increased 30-day mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively registered cohort of adult patients with microbiologically confirmed VAP, diagnosed at a university hospital intensive care unit during a three-year period. Determinants of MDR as compared with non-MDR microbial aetiology and impact of MDR versus non-MDR aetiology on mortality were investigated using multivariate logistic and competing risk regression analysis. RESULTS: MDR pathogens were involved in 52 of 192 episodes of VAP (27%): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 12 (6%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in 28 (15%), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermenting pathogens in 12 (6%). Multivariable logistic regression identified the Charlson index of comorbidity (odds ratio (OR) = 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08 to 1.75, p = 0.01) and previous exposure to more than two different antibiotic classes (OR = 5.11, 95% CI = 1.38 to 18.89, p = 0.01) as predictors of MDR aetiology. Thirty-day mortality after VAP diagnosis caused by MDR versus non-MDR was 37% and 20% (p = 0.02), respectively. A multivariate competing risk regression analysis showed that renal replacement therapy before VAP (standardised hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.47 to 4.94, p = 0.01), the Charlson index of comorbidity (SHR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.41, p = 0.03) and septic shock on admission to the intensive care unit (SHR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.03 to 3.35, p = 0.03), but not MDR aetiology of VAP, were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of MDR pathogens causing VAP was mainly determined by comorbidity and prior exposure to more than two antibiotics. The increased mortality of VAP caused by MDR as compared with non-MDR pathogens was explained by more severe comorbidity and organ failure before VAP.

Health implications of antimicrobial resistance for patients with acute kidney injury and bloodstream infection.

Studies have produced conflicting findings on outcomes for patients with antimicrobial-resistant infection. This study evaluated whether infection with an antimicrobial-resistant organism affects outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy and whose clinical course is complicated with a nosocomial bloodstream infection. We found that infection with an antimicrobial-resistant organism did not adversely affect clinical outcome in this specific cohort, which already has a high mortality rate.

Dynamics of C-reactive protein and white blood cell count in critically ill patients with nosocomial Gram positive vs. Gram negative bacteremia: a historical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial bacteremia is associated with a poor prognosis. Early adequate therapy has been shown to improve outcome. Consequently, rapid detection of a beginning sepsis is therefore of the utmost importance. This historical cohort study was designed to evaluate if different patterns can be observed in either C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WCC) between Gram positive bacteremia (GPB) vs. Gram negative bacteremia (GNB), and to assess the potential benefit of serial measurements of both biomarkers in terms of early antimicrobial therapy initiation. METHODS: A historical study (2003-2004) was conducted, including all adult intensive care unit patients with a nosocomial bacteremia. CRP and WCC count measurements were recorded daily from two days prior (d(-2)) until one day after onset of bacteremia (d(+1)). Delta (Delta) CRP and Delta WCC levels from the level at d-2 onward were calculated. RESULTS: CRP levels and WCC counts were substantially higher in patients with GNB. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that GNB and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score were independently associated with a CRP increase of 5 mg/dL from d-2 to d+1, and both were also independently associated with an increase of WCC levels from d(-2) to d(+1) of 5,000 x 10(3) cells/mm3. CONCLUSION: Increased levels of CRP and WCC are suggestive for GNB, while almost unchanged CRP and WCC levels are observed in patients with GPB. However, despite the different patterns observed, antimicrobial treatment as such cannot be guided based on both biomarkers.

Adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol in the critically ill: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose control during acute illness has been associated with improved outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol for critically ill patients with target blood glucose levels between 81 and 110 mg/dL and to determine factors associated with adequate daily blood glucose control. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, blood glucose levels were determined in 30 patients in intensive care units of a tertiary care university hospital during a 2-month period. All glucose measurements and corresponding insulin infusion rates were evaluated for adherence to and efficacy and safety of the insulin protocol. Linear regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with adequate daily blood glucose control, defined as time in the target range. RESULTS: A total of 6016 blood glucose measurements were obtained during 352 protocol implementation days. Adherence to the protocol was 71%. Blood glucose levels were in the desired range 42% of the total protocol implementation time. Sixty percent of the patients experienced at least one hypoglycemic event. Adherence to the protocol (P < .001), high bilirubin level (P < .001), low daily insulin dose (P = .002), and low C-reactive protein level (P = .048) were independently associated with adequate daily blood glucose control. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol adherence was positively associated with daily time in the target range, but efficacy during the total protocol implementation time remained poor. Because of the frequency of hypoglycemia, protocols to maintain blood glucose levels between 81 and 110 mg/dL in critically ill patients may not be recommended.

Outcome in severely ill patients with hematological malignancies who received intravenous chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome in severely ill patients with hematological malignancies who receive intravenous chemotherapy in an intensive care unit (ICU) for a life-threatening malignancy-related complication. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data. PATIENTS: All 37 critically ill patients with hematological malignancies who received intravenous chemotherapy in the ICU between January 1997 and March 2005 (mean age 46+/-19 years; mean APACHE II 23+/-7). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven (69%) patients received chemotherapy because of extensive disease with organ involvement (54%), extensive disease without organ involvement (19%), severe disseminated intravascular coagulation (11%), and other reasons (16%). In 41% there was concomitant infection when chemotherapy was initiated, in 86% a high-grade malignancy, and 30% relapsing disease. Twenty-three (62%) patients received mechanical ventilation at the moment of or soon after initiation of chemotherapy for a median duration of 5 days (1-67), and 24% underwent renal replacement therapy during ICU stay. Only ventilation was associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 9.3). ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality rates in nonventilated vs. ventilated patients were 7% and 48%, 14% and 61%, and 54% and 74%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Starting chemotherapy in the ICU for a life-threatening malignancy related complication can be lifesaving even when infection or organ failure is present.

Documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating intensive care unit admission in patients with hematological malignancies: impact on outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of documented and clinically suspected bacterial infection precipitating ICU admission on in-hospital mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a 14-bed medical ICU at a tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 172 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU for a life-threatening complication over a 4-year period were categorized into three main groups according to their admission diagnosis (documented bacterial infection, clinically suspected bacterial infection, nonbacterial complications) by an independent panel of three physicians blinded to the patient's outcome and C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: In-hospital and 6-months mortality rates in documented bacterial infection (n=42), clinically suspected bacterial infection (n=40) vs. nonbacterial complications (n=90) were 50.0% and 42.5% vs. 65.6% (p=0.09 and 0.02) and 56.1% and 48.7% vs. 72.1% (p=0.11 and 0.02), respectively. Median baseline C-reactive protein levels in the first two groups were 23 mg/dl and 21.5 mg/dl vs. 10.7 mg/dl (p<0.001 and p=0.001) respectively. After adjustment for the severity of critical and underlying hematological illness and the duration of hospitalization before admission documented (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.62, p=0.006) and clinically suspected bacterial infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p=0.002) were associated with a more favorable outcome than nonbacterial complications. CONCLUSIONS: Severely ill patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU because of documented or clinically suspected bacterial infection have a better outcome than those admitted with nonbacterial complications. These patients should receive advanced life-supporting therapy for an appropriate period of time.

Outcome in noninvasively and invasively ventilated hematologic patients with acute respiratory failure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The survival rate of patients with a hematologic malignancy requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ICU has improved over the last few decades. The objective of this study was to identify the factors affecting the in-hospital mortality of these particular patients, and to assess whether the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) was protective in our study population. DESIGN: We retrospectively collected variables in 166 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies who had acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring MV, and identified factors obtained within 24 h of ICU admission affecting in-hospital mortality in univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyses. The effect of NPPV on mortality was assessed using a pair-wise matched exposed-unexposed analysis. RESULTS: The mean simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II was 58.9. The in-hospital mortality rate was 71%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the in-hospital mortality rate was predicted by increasing severity of illness, as measured by SAPS II (odds ratio [OR] per point of increase, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.11) and a diagnosis of acute myelogenous leukemia (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.05 to 7.11). Female sex (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.82), endotracheal intubation (ETI) within 24 h of ICU admission (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.78), and recent bacteremia (defined as blood cultures positive for bacteria < 48h before or < 24h after ICU admission) [OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61] were associated with a lower mortality rate. Twenty-seven patients who received NPPV were matched for SAPS II (+/- 3) with 52 patients who required immediate ETI on a 1:2 basis. The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 65.4% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Although the in-hospital mortality rate in hematologic patients who develop ARF remains high, the reluctance to intubate and start treatment with invasive MV in this population is unjustified, especially when bacteremia has precipitated ICU admission.

Thrombocytopenia and outcome in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection.

OBJECTIVE: Thrombocytopenia is common in intensive care units (ICUs), and is associated with a poor prognosis. An acute decrease in total platelet count is frequently observed in severe sepsis, followed by a relative increase indicating organ-failure recovery. However, few data are available describing this effect and its relationship with outcomes in specific subgroups of ICU patients. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted to investigate the incidence and prognosis of thrombocytopenia in a cohort of critically ill patients (n=155) with a microbiologically documented nosocomial bloodstream infection. RESULTS: Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in nonsurvivors. The ICU mortality rates increased according to severity of thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia was independently associated with worse outcomes in ICU patients with nosocomial bloodstream infection. CONCLUSION: Determining trends in platelet counts is of additional prognostic value, compared with single measurements.

The impact of the initial ventilatory strategy on survival in hematological patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the 3 types of initial respiratory support (noninvasive positive pressure ventilation vs invasive positive pressure ventilation vs supplemental oxygen only) in hematological patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of hematological patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2002, and June 30, 2006. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven hematological patients were admitted at the ICU with ARF (defined as Pao(2)/Fio(2) <200): within the first 24 hours, 24 and 67 patients received noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive positive pressure ventilation, respectively, and 46 received supplemental oxygen only. Intensive care unit mortality in the 3 patient categories was 71%, 63%, and 32%, respectively (P = .001), and in-hospital mortality was 75%, 80%, and 47%, respectively (P = .001). In multivariate regression analysis, increasing cancer-specific severity-of-illness score upon admission and more organ failure after 24 hours of ICU admission, but not the type of initial respiratory support, were significantly associated with ICU or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit and in-hospital mortality in our population of hematological patients with hypoxemic ARF was determined by severity of illness and not by the type of initial respiratory support.

Impact of organ dysfunction on mortality in ICU patients with hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To compare evolution in organ dysfunction (OD) between hematologic malignancy patients with and without bacterial infection (BI) precipitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and to assess its impact on mortality. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores from day 1 to 5 were calculated in all consecutive hematologic malignancy patients admitted to the ICU (2000-2006). Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence, the diagnostic certainty, and the site of BI. RESULTS: Of the 344 patients admitted, 258 were still in the ICU at day 3 and 164 at day 5. Patients admitted because of BI had more severe OD on day 1 (SOFA 9.7 ± 4.0 vs. 8.4 ± 4.0, p = 0.008) but a more rapidly reversible OD within the first 3 days (ΔSOFA -1.12 ± 3.10 vs. 0.03 ± 3.40, p = 0.013) and a lower in-hospital (43.2% vs. 62.9%, p < 0.001) and 6-month mortality (52.1% vs. 71.7%, p < 0.001) than patients with other complications. In a multivariate analysis, BI remained associated with a lower risk of death (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.1-0.4, p < 0.001) even after adjustment for the SOFA on day 1 (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22-1.52, p < 0.001) and the ΔSOFA (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.29-1.68, p < 0.001). These findings remained significant regardless of the site and the diagnostic certainty of BI. CONCLUSION: BI is associated with a more severe initial but a more rapidly reversible OD and a subsequent lower mortality compared to other complications in ICU patients with hematologic malignancies. These findings further support the recommendation that these patients should certainly benefit from advanced life support, and in the case of an uncertain long-term prognosis due to the underlying malignancy, at least from a 3-day ICU trial.

Update on the management of infection in patients with severe sepsis.

Morbidity and mortality associated with the development of severe sepsis remain unacceptably high. However, with the introduction of a protocol called early goal-directed therapy, significant benefits in terms of patient's outcome have been demonstrated. In an aim to improve outcome and to increase awareness, practical evidence-based guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock were developed under the auspices of the Sepsis Surviving Campaign, easy to apply by the bedside medical and nursing staff. The treatment of severe sepsis includes 3 main essentials: (1) eradication of the inciting infection using source control measures and empiric antimicrobials, (2) hemodynamic resuscitation of tissue hypoperfusion using fluids and inotropic drugs to prevent life-threatening organ damage, and (3) sustained organ support using mechanical interventions to diminish organ injury. This review article highlights the anti-infective approach of the management of sepsis.

Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial bloodstream infection associated with pneumonia and the value of systematic surveillance cultures in an adult intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To study the occurrence of multiple-drug-resistant pathogens in nosocomial bloodstream infection associated with pneumonia. To evaluate prediction of multiple drug resistance by systematic surveillance cultures. DESIGN: A retrospective study of a prospectively gathered cohort. SETTING: Fifty-four-bed adult medical-surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twelve intensive care unit patients with nosocomial bloodstream infection associated with pneumonia from 1992 through 2001. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Concordance of blood cultures with prior surveillance culture was assessed. Surveillance cultures were taken routinely as thrice weekly urinary cultures and oral swabs, once weekly anal swabs, and thrice weekly tracheal aspirates in intubated patients. Tracheal surveillance cultures from 48 to 96 hrs before bloodstream infection and surveillance cultures from any site during the same intensive care unit episode but >or=48 hrs before bloodstream infection were evaluated separately. Forty-four bloodstream infections (39%) were caused by a multiple-drug-resistant pathogen. Multiple-drug-resistant pathogens were predicted by tracheal surveillance culture in 70% (concordant); in 15%, tracheal surveillance culture grew a multiple-drug-resistant pathogen not found in blood cultures (discordant). Multiple-drug-resistant pathogens were predicted by any surveillance culture in 88%, but these surveillance cultures grew additional multiple-drug-resistant pathogens not causing bloodstream infection in up to 46% of patients. In 86% of bloodstream infections, early (i.e., within 48 hrs) antibiotic therapy was appropriate. Patients were divided into four risk categories for multiple-drug-resistant bloodstream infection based on length of prior intensive care unit stay and prior antibiotic exposure. In patients with two risk factors, knowledge of surveillance cultures increased appropriateness of early antibiotic therapy from 75-79% to 90% (p<.05) while limiting use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as antipseudomonal betalactams, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: In our intensive care unit, tracheal surveillance culture predicted multiple-drug-resistant etiology of bloodstream infection associated with pneumonia in 70% of patients but yielded discordant resistant pathogens in 15%. In the subgroup of patients with two risk factors for multiple-drug-resistant infection, incorporating results of surveillance cultures moderately contributed to adequacy of early antibiotic therapy while limiting antibiotic consumption.

Acute effects of upright position on gas exchange in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have dorsal atelectasis of the lungs. This is probably caused by several mechanisms: compression on dependent lung zones, purulent secretions in alveoli, and upward shift of the diaphragm. An upright position (UP) of the patient (the whole body in a straight line at 40 to 45 degrees) can theoretically ameliorate these mechanisms. The objective was to evaluate whether there was an improvement of gas exchange during UP of ARDS patients and to evaluate the hemodynamic effects. A prospective interventional study was performed in the surgical and medical ICUs and the burn unit of the Ghent University Hospital, a tertiary care center. Included were ARDS patients with onset of ARDS within 48 hours before start of the study. Patients were excluded when there was hemodynamic instability or when the PaO2/FiO2 ratio deteriorated during the 2 hours preceding UP. After a 2-hour observation period in a semirecumbent position, patients were put in UP for 12 hours. Respiration and hemodynamic data were recorded at the start and end of the 2-hour observation period, and after 1, 4, and 12 hours in UP. Eighteen patients were included in the study. There was a significant increase of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio during UP (P < .001). Except for the need for volume resuscitation in 5 patients (27.8%), there was no significant change in the hemodynamic profile of the patients. Upright positioning of patients with ARDS, a relatively simple maneuver, resulted in an improvement of gas exchange and was tolerated hemodynamically relatively well during a 12-hour observation period.