RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical, ultrasonographic, pathological features and response to medical therapy of four dogs with intestinal lipogranulomatous lymphangitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of dogs with an ultrasonographic evidence of focal or multifocal intestinal wall thickening and a histological diagnosis of lipogranulomatous lymphangitis. Only dogs that did not undergo surgical resection of the lesions were included. The clinical response to medical treatment, consisting of low-fat or hydrolysed diet along with immunosuppressive agents was assessed; clinicopathological and ultrasonographic abnormalities were re-evaluated over time, with a median follow-up period of 16.5 months. RESULTS: Four dogs met the inclusion criteria. The main historical complaints were diarrhoea (three of four dogs), vomiting (three of four dogs) and abdominal pain (two of four dogs). Clinicopathological abnormalities comprised hypoproteinaemia, hypoalbuminaemia and mild/moderate increase in C-reactive protein levels (three of four dogs). Abdominal ultrasound revealed focal (two of four dogs) or multifocal (two of four dogs) intestinal wall thickening involving distal jejunum, ileum and ileocolic junction. Histopathology of full thickness intestinal biopsies revealed granulomatous enteritis and lymphangitis with lymphangiectasia. Nutritional and medical treatment allowed complete clinical remission in all four dogs within a month of therapy. Improvement of ultrasound abnormalities was noted in three of the four dogs over a 3- to 12-month period. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Intestinal lipogranulomatous lymphangitis is a rare form of canine chronic enteropathy characterised by focal or multifocal intestinal lesions due to the presence of transmural intestinal lipogranulomas. This is the first case series describing successful management of intestinal lipogranulomatous lymphangitis through medical treatment alone.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment satisfaction and owner preference for two delivery devices (VetPen, MSD Animal Health, and U40 insulin syringes) and the effect on glycaemic control in diabetic dogs treated with porcine insulin zinc suspension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomised prospective cross-over study with two arms, each of 8 weeks. Twenty client-owned diabetic dogs on insulin treatment by U40 syringe were enrolled. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive insulin by syringe or pen injector for 2 months, followed by 2 months of the other injection method. Treatment satisfaction and owners' insulin delivery device preference were assessed using a questionnaire. Glycaemic control was assessed using a clinical score, serum fructosamine and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c%) at the time of the enrolment (T0) and the end of each arm of treatment (T2 and T4). RESULTS: Treatment satisfaction differed for the two types of the delivery device when the order that each device was used was taken into consideration. Owners who used the syringe first did not have a significant preference for an injection device. In contrast, owners who used the pen injector first expressed a significant preference for VetPen compared to syringes. No significant differences in the number of dogs of Groups 1 and 2 with good and poor glycaemic control at T2 and T4 were detected. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Overall treatment satisfaction and preference for the two delivery methods were similar. However, VetPen was preferred by owners who were randomised to use this device first. Glycaemic control did not appear to be affected by the insulin delivery device used.