RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current available evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for increasing the withdrawal of patients with substance use disorder. METHOD: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with a control group has been carried out where a non-pharmacological intervention is carried out in which nurses participate. The search was carried out in Pubmed, Cinahl, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane. randomized clinical trials with a control group published between 2018 and 2023 were selected. RESULTS: 15 articles were selected. A longer abstinence time was observed in the interventions that proposed a personalized telematic follow-up with a health worker, the establishment of the figure of the care coordinator or financial rewards based on the abstinence time. No significant differences regarding abstinence were observed in the formative interventions or with relaxation techniques only. However, relaxation techniques combined with other interventions could be effective. CONCLUSIONS: The identified interventions can be incorporated into nursing practice. They present encouraging results, although it would be advisable to study their long-term effectiveness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The wellbeing of nursing professionals can be affected by emotionally challenging situations. Emotional intelligence (EI) is a recognised ability to manage stress, reduce work overload, and improve clinical relationships and decision making. Therefore, these emotional skills should be identified and developed throughout nursing education. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to create an observer-based emotional measurement tool to assess the level of emotional skills in university students. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING: Complutense University in Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 415 first- and fourth-year nursing students participated. METHODS: The Situational Emotional Response Scale (ERES) is a questionnaire for observing emotional competence in nursing practice. It underwent content validation using the Delphi method with 6 experts, resulting in a final version of 34 items. Focus group sessions were conducted with nursing students to ensure readability and appropriateness. Participants completed the ERES after viewing two clinical interaction videos, resulting in two sets of responses. Half of the responses were used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and half for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: A total of 415 nursing students participated in the study. Four factors were extracted, explaining 55.1 % of the variance. The CFA was conducted with 208 students, yielding a total of 4 factors and a variance of 55.1 %. The internal consistency of the scale was high, with Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients of 0.947 and 0.949, respectively. Test-retest reliability showed a moderate intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.604 (95 % CI: 0.503-0.688) over a 15-day interval. CONCLUSIONS: The ERES questionnaire is well grounded in the theoretical framework of emotional competence as manifested in clinical practice. The empirical evidence provided by this study suggests that the ERES is a reliable, valid, useful, and innovative instrument for measuring emotional competence in university students.
Assuntos
Educação em Enfermagem , Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Estudantes de Enfermagem/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Transversais , Emoções , Inquéritos e Questionários , PsicometriaRESUMO
Vaccination against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 is recommended in health sciences students to reduce the risk of acquiring these diseases and transmitting them to patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate how the pandemic influenced the modification of influenza vaccination coverage during the 2019/2020 and 2021/2022 campaigns and to analyze the vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 in health sciences students. A cross-sectional study was conducted among students of the Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry of the Complutense University of Madrid. A questionnaire was administered in two stages, the first, Q1, before the start of the pandemic, where we analyzed influenza coverage during the 2019/2020 campaign and a second, Q2, 18 months after the start of the pandemic where we analyzed influenza coverage during the 2021/2022 campaign and coverage against SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1894 students (58.78% of the total of those enrolled) participated. Flu vaccination coverage increased from 26.7% in Q1 to 35.0% in Q2 (p < 0.05), being higher in the age group older than 21 years, who studied nursing, were in their fourth year and lived with people at risk. Vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 was very high (97.8%), especially in students vaccinated against influenza. Coverage of the influenza vaccine in health sciences students increased from 2019-2020 to 2021-2022, being higher in the age group older than 21 years, who studied nursing, were in their first and fourth year and lived with people at risk. Coverage of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in health sciences students was very high, especially in those vaccinated against influenza.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the frequency of visits to the hospital emergency department due to puerperal complications in low risk postpartum women attended by midwives instead of obstetricians. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental retrospective study with non-random allocation, comprising two groups: a control group of women attended by obstetricians and an intervention group of women attended by midwives. SETTING: A level 2 hospital in Madrid (España). PARTICIPANTS: Low risk postpartum women attended at the maternity unit of the Fuenlabrada University Hospital between 2013 and 2015. METHODS: We gathered variables to record the homogeneity of the groups and to assess for confounders and interactions. In the case of women with different behaviours and/or who generated confounders or interactions, a multivariate adjustment with logistic regression was performed. The Homer & Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression was used to determine the validity of the model. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The intervention group comprised a total of 1308 women, whereas there were 1313 women in the control group. In the first 40-days postpartum, 33 women in the intervention group (2.5%) attended the hospital emergency department compared to 41 in the control group (3.1%). This difference was not statistically significant (p value 0.354). The relative risk of this decrease was 0.808 (95% CI 0.514; 1.270). The NNT was 167. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Care by midwives of low risk postpartum women did not lead to a worsening of puerperal complications requiring emergency department care. Furthermore, care by midwives was more effective than obstetrician care with lower emergency department attendance rates. Their qualification and capacity to provide health education were determinant factors.