Accuracy of the neurosurgeons estimation of extent of resection in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The surgeons' estimate of the extent of resection (EOR) shows little accuracy in previous literature. Considering the developments in surgical techniques of glioblastoma (GBM) treatment, we hypothesize an improvement in this estimation. This study aims to compare the EOR estimated by the neurosurgeon with the EOR determined using volumetric analysis on the post-operative MR scan. METHODS: Pre- and post-operative tumor volumes were calculated through semi-automatic volumetric assessment by three observers. Interobserver agreement was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A univariate general linear model was used to study the factors influencing the accuracy of estimation of resection percentage. RESULTS: ICC was high for all three measurements: pre-operative tumor volume was 0.980 (0.969-0.987), post-operative tumor volume 0.974 (0.961-0.984), and EOR 0.947 (0.917-0.967). Estimation of EOR by the surgeon showed moderate accuracy and agreement. Multivariable analysis showed a statistically significant effect of operating neurosurgeon (p = 0.01), use of fluorescence (p < 0.001), and resection percentage (p < 0.001) on the accuracy of the EOR estimation. CONCLUSION: All measurements through semi-automatic volumetric analysis show a high interobserver agreement, suggesting this to be a reliable assessment of EOR. We found a moderate reliability of the surgeons' estimate of EOR. Therefore, (early) post-operative MRI scanning for evaluation of EOR remains paramount.

Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery.

The implementation of augmented reality (AR) in image-guided surgery (IGS) can improve surgical interventions by presenting the image data directly on the patient at the correct position and in the actual orientation. This approach can resolve the switching focus problem, which occurs in conventional IGS systems when the surgeon has to look away from the operation field to consult the image data on a 2-dimensional screen. The Microsoft HoloLens, a head-mounted AR display, was combined with an optical navigation system to create an AR-based IGS system. Experiments were performed on a phantom model to determine the accuracy of the complete system and to evaluate the effect of adding AR. The results demonstrated a mean Euclidean distance of 2.3 mm with a maximum error of 3.5 mm for the complete system. Adding AR visualization to a conventional system increased the mean error by 1.6 mm. The introduction of AR in IGS was promising. The presented system provided a solution for the switching focus problem and created a more intuitive guidance system. With a further reduction in the error and more research to optimize the visualization, many surgical applications could benefit from the advantages of AR guidance.

Cranial shape comparison for automated objective 3D craniosynostosis surgery planning.

Virtual planning of open cranial vault reconstruction is used to simulate and define an pre-operative plan for craniosynostosis surgery. However, virtual planning techniques are subjective and dependent on the experience and preferences of the surgical team. To develop an objective automated 3D pre-operative planning technique for open cranial vault reconstructions, we used curvature maps for the shape comparison of the patient's skull with an age-specific reference skull. We created an average skull for the age-group of 11-14 months. Also, we created an artificial test object and selected a cranial CT-scan of an 11 months old trigonocephaly patient as test case. Mesh data of skulls were created using marching cubes and raycasting. Curvature maps were computed using quadric surface fitting. The shape comparison was tested for the test object and the average skull. Finally, shape comparison was performed for the trigonocephalic skull with the average skull. Similar shapes and the area on the patient's skull that maximally corresponded in shape with the reference shape were correctly identified. This study showed that curvature maps allow the comparison of craniosynostosis skulls with age-appropriate average skulls and a first step towards an objective user-independent pre-operative planning technique for open cranial vault reconstructions is made.