Expanding the time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte injection: does it affect the embryological and clinical outcome?

STUDY QUESTION: Is the time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte denudation/injection associated with embryological and clinical outcome after ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER: Expanding the time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte denudation/injection is not associated with any clinically relevant impact on embryological or clinical outcome. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The optimal time interval between ovulation triggering and insemination/injection appears to be 38-39 h and most authors agree that an interval of >41 h has a negative influence on embryological and clinical pregnancy outcomes. However, in ART centres with a heavy workload, respecting these exact time intervals is frequently challenging. Therefore, we questioned to what extent a wider time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte injection would affect embryological and clinical outcome in ICSI cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-centre retrospective cohort analysis was performed including 8811 ICSI cycles from 2010 until 2015. Regarding the time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte injection, seven categories were considered: <36 h, 36 h, 37 h, 38 h, 39 h, 40 h and ≥41 h. In all cases, denudation was performed immediately prior to injection. The main outcome measures were oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryo utilization rate (embryos adequate for transfer or cryopreservation) per fertilized oocyte. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were considered as secondary outcomes. Utilization rate, CPR and LBR were subdivided into two groups according to the day of embryo transfer: Day 3 or Day 5. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: During the study period, oocyte retrieval was routinely performed 36 h post-triggering except in the <36 h group. The interval of <36 h occurred only if OR was carried out before the planned 36 h trigger interval and was followed by immediate injection. Only cycles with fresh autologous gametes were included. The exclusion criteria were: injection with testicular/epididymal sperm, managed natural cycles, conventional IVF, combined conventional IVF/ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing and IVM cycles. Female age, number of oocytes, pre-preparation sperm concentration, post-preparation sperm concentration and motility, day of transfer, number of embryos transferred and quality of the best embryo transferred were identified as potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the seven interval groups, adjusted mean maturation rates ranged from 76.4% to 83.2% and differed significantly (P < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant difference in adjusted mean fertilization rates (range 69.2-79.3%; P < 0.001). The adjusted maturation and fertilization rates were significantly higher when denudation/injection was performed >41 h post-triggering compared to 38 h post-triggering (reference group). Oocyte denudation/injection at <36 h post-triggering had no significant effect on maturation, fertilization or embryo utilization rates compared to injection at 38 h. No effect of the time interval was observed on CPRs and LBRs, after adjusting for potential confounders. When oocyte injection was performed before 36 h the adjusted analysis showed that compared to 38 h after ovulation triggering the chance of having a live birth tends to be lower although the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.533, 95% CI: 0.252-1.126; P = 0.099). Injection ≥41 h post-triggering did not affect LBR compared to injection at 38 h post-ovulation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: As this is a large retrospective study, the influence of uncontrolled variables cannot be excluded. These results should not be extrapolated to other ART procedures such as IVM, conventional IVF or injection with testicular/epididymal sperm. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results indicate that the optimal injection time window may be less stringent than previously thought as both embryological and clinical outcome parameters were not significantly affected in our analysis. This is reassuring for busy ART centres that might not always be able to follow strict time intervals. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding. The authors declare no conflict of interest related to the present study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Determination of strontium in human whole blood by ICP-AES.

The determination of strontium in human blood samples by ICP-AES is described. For the analysis no chemical separations were required after microwave destruction. A mean value of 11.4 +/- 0.83 micrograms/l is found for normal whole blood. The limit of detection of the method is 0.3 microgram/l. As a possible application the enhancement of the strontium level in blood of human beings who died from drowning is examined.

Element concentrations in the air of an indoor shooting range.

Elemental emissions during firing in a shooting range were measured for different types of ammunition. When using Hirtenberger bullets, lead, barium, antimony and to a lesser extent copper and arsenic were the primary metal pollutants. Stationary sampling at three locations in the range did not reveal large concentration gradients. Large concentration variations were observed by sampling before, during and after shooting. Lead and antimony concentrations peak at 5060 and 119 micrograms m-3, respectively. Soil elements such as aluminium, sodium and calcium are enriched during shooting, probably due to soil resuspension by the shooters and the bullets hitting the sand backstop. After shooting has ceased the concentrations fall to within pre-shooting levels within a couple of hours. Measurement of the aerodynamic particle size shows low mass median diameters for the elements emitted during firing and larger diameters for the soil-associated elements. The peak airborne concentrations measured by stationary sampling, and human exposure measured by a personal sampler carried by an instructor were compared with threshold limit values. During the shooting the TLV is significantly exceeded for lead.

[Description and classification of extra-oral implants]. / Description et classification des implants extra-oraux.

There is no universal extra-oral implant (EOI) that provides an answer to all clinical situations. We present briefly the two main categories of extra-oral implants currently available, endo-osseous implants and juxta-osseous implants, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each. We also discuss the new developments currently under experimentation in extra-oral implantology.

The influence of the site of sperm deposition and mode of oolemma breakage at intracytoplasmic sperm injection on fertilization and embryo development rates.

The aims of this study were to examine, in a prospective, controlled way, the effect of the sperm deposition site in the oocyte and the mode of oolemma breakage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on fertilization and embryo development rates. In the first trial (100 cycles in total), the spermatozoa were deposited further from the meiotic spindle (polar body at the 12 o'clock position) in half of the oocytes (n = 649), while in the other half (n = 605) the spermatozoa were deposited nearer to the meiotic spindle (polar body at the 6 o'clock position). In the second trial (6860 oocytes in 624 cycles), five different modes of membrane breakage (the reaction of the oolemma to the penetrating injection needle) at the moment of injection were noted: oolemma breakage, type A pricking once, no suction (n = 1401); type B, pricking once, small suction (n = 2761); type C, pricking once, long suction (n = 2310); type D, pricking twice or more, no or small amount of suction (n = 259); and type E, pricking twice or more, long suction (n = 129). No differences were observed between the 12 and 6 o'clock positions in the survival rate (90 and 90% respectively) and in the normal fertilization rates (78 and 77% respectively). Significantly more transfer quality embryos (< or = 50% fragmentation) were obtained in the 6 o'clock position group (83%) than in the 12 o'clock position group (79%). In the second trial, significantly lower survival rates were noted after membrane breakage type A (82%) than after breakages of types B, C, D and E (93, 92, 88 and 88% respectively). There were no significant differences present in the normal fertilization rates (70, 72, 70, 71 and 73% for types A-E respectively), but significantly more freeze quality embryos (< or = 20% fragmentation) were obtained after injection B (65%) than after injection types A, C, D and E (59, 61, 55 and 51% respectively). In conclusion, the site of sperm deposition in the oocyte does not influence the normal fertilization rate but does affect the embryo development rate. Furthermore, the mode of membrane breakage does not influence the normal fertilization rate but does affect oocyte survival and embryo development rates.