Methylene blue for vasodilatory shock in the intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Refractory vasodilatory shock is a state of uncontrolled vasodilation associated with underlying inflammation and endothelial dysregulation. Rescue therapy for vasoplegia refractory to catecholamines includes methylene blue (MB) which restores vascular tone. We hypothesized that (1) at least 40% of critically ill patients would respond positively to MB administration and (2) that those who responded to MB would have a survival benefit. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review that included all adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit treated with MB for the indication of refractory vasodilatory shock. Responders to MB were identified as those with a ≥ 10% increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) within the first 1-2 hours after administration. We examined the association of mortality to the groups of responders versus non-responders to MB. A subgroup analysis in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was also performed. Statistical calculations were performed in Microsoft Excel® (Redmond, WA, USA). Where appropriate, the comparison of averages and standard deviations of demographics, dosing, MAP, and reductions in vasopressor dosing were performed via Chi squared, Fisher's exact test, or two-tailed t-test with a p-value < 0.05 being considered as statistically significant. After using the F-test to assess for differences in variance, the proper two tailed t-test was used to compare SOFA scores among responders versus non-responders. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were included in the responder analysis; 88 (39.5%) had a ≥ 10% increase in MAP post-MB administration that was not associated with a significant change in norepinephrine requirements between responders versus non-responders (p=0.41). There was a non-statistically significant trend (21.6% vs 14.8%, p=0.19) toward improved survival to hospital discharge in the MB responder group compared to the non-responder group. In 70 patients undergoing CRRT, there were 33 responders who were more likely to survive than those who were not (p = 0.0111). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory shock receiving MB, there is a non-statistically significant trend toward improved outcomes in responders based on a MAP increase >10%. Patients supported with CRRT who were identified as responders had decreased ICU mortality compared to non-responders.

Methylene Blue for Vasoplegia During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of refractory vasodilatory shock in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an area in which there is minimal literature. Based on previous literature, the authors hypothesized that at least 40% of ECMO patients with vasoplegia would respond positively to methylene blue (MB) administration and that those who responded to MB would have increased survival. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single institution, quaternary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 45 patients who received MB for vasoplegia during ECMO. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 45 patients who received MB, 25 patients (55.6%) experienced a ≥10% increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and a reduction in norepinephrine dosing in the one-to-two hour interval after MB administration. There was a trend for improvement in survival to discharge for those who responded to MB (32% v 10%; p = 0.15). In addition, patients who did not have at least a >5% increase in MAP (29 experienced a >5% increase and 16 experienced a ≤5% increase) after MB administration, experienced 100% mortality (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that approximately 50% of ECMO patients with vasoplegia can be expected to respond to MB with a >10% MAP improvement. The lack of a blood pressure response >5% after MB administration may portend poor survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to verify these preliminary results.

Efficacy and Safety of Immediate-Release Nifedipine in Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Immediate-release nifedipine (IRN) is a calcium channel blocker with potent vasodilatory and antihypertensive properties. Safety concerns led to a black box warning for increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and arrhythmias. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IRN for acute blood pressure lowering in critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was performed in critically ill patients who received at least one dose of IRN. The primary endpoint was the change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured at baseline and 1 hour after first administration of IRN. Secondary outcomes included clinically significant hypotension, defined as an absolute reduction in SBP ≥ 15% or vasopressor initiation within 1 hour after administration; incidence of arrhythmias, stroke, or myocardial injury; and time to transition off antihypertensive infusions. Results: IRN resulted in a median [interquartile range] SBP change of -10 [-21 to -1] mmHg between baseline 142 mmHg [124-155] and 1 h post-administration 127 mmHg [114-144]; P < .001. Twenty-seven percent of patients experienced clinically significant hypotension, with hypotension observed in 24% and vasopressors initiated in 4% of patients. Sixteen percent of patients experienced new-onset arrhythmia and 18% experienced myocardial injury following IRN during hospitalization. Median time to transition off intravenous (IV) continuous infusion antihypertensives was 8.5 [0-31.5] hours. Conclusion: IRN led to a reduction in SBP which may have been associated with clinically significant hypotension and need for vasopressor support. Further studies with direct comparisons to alternatives are needed to determine the true association of adverse events with IRN.

Emergency department discharge prescription errors in an academic medical center.

This study described discharge prescription medication errors written for emergency department patients. This study used content analysis in a cross-sectional design to systematically categorize prescription errors found in a report of 1000 discharge prescriptions submitted in the electronic medical record in February 2015. Two pharmacy team members reviewed the discharge prescription list for errors. Open-ended data were coded by an additional rater for agreement on coding categories. Coding was based upon majority rule. Descriptive statistics were used to address the study objective. Categories evaluated were patient age, provider type, drug class, and type and time of error. The discharge prescription error rate out of 1000 prescriptions was 13.4%, with "incomplete or inadequate prescription" being the most commonly detected error (58.2%). The adult and pediatric error rates were 11.7% and 22.7%, respectively. The antibiotics reviewed had the highest number of errors. The highest within-class error rates were with antianginal medications, antiparasitic medications, antacids, appetite stimulants, and probiotics. Emergency medicine residents wrote the highest percentage of prescriptions (46.7%) and had an error rate of 9.2%. Residents of other specialties wrote 340 prescriptions and had an error rate of 20.9%. Errors occurred most often between 10:00 am and 6:00 pm.