Clinical features and treatment outcomes for primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder: a retrospective cohort study from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and updated literature review.

Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCSM-TCLPD) was reclassified in 2016 as a rare benign entity with an excellent prognosis, yet its clinical features and best treatments remain poorly defined. We collected clinical data, treatments, and treatment-responses from our institution's patients with PCSM-TCLPD through September 2018 and an identical PubMed review through June 2021. Among 36 cases (median-age 54 years; 58.3% head/neck), diagnostic biopsy resulted in sustained complete remission (CR) in 13/33 punch/shave biopsies and 3/3 excisional biopsies. The remaining 20 patients further required topical corticosteroids (n = 5); intralesional corticosteroids (n = 1); surgical-excision (n = 5); electron-beam-radiation (n = 6); or brachytherapy (n = 3). All patients ultimately achieved CR, excluding one patient continuing treatment at end-of-study. 57/59 (96.6%) of institutional and literature-reported radiation-treated patients experienced CR. No institutional cases progressed beyond skin; 5/209 (2.4%) literature-reported cases progressed to systemic/extracutaneous involvement, all pre-reclassification. PCSM-TCLPD responds well to local-directed therapy including radiation, and only rarely if ever progresses.

Placement of empty catheters for an HDR-emulating LDR prostate brachytherapy technique: comparison to standard intraoperative planning.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether placing empty catheters within the prostate and then inverse planning iodine-125 seed locations within those catheters (High Dose Rate-Emulating Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy [HELP] technique) would improve concordance between planned and achieved dosimetry compared with a standard intraoperative technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined 30 consecutive low dose rate prostate cases performed by standard intraoperative technique of planning followed by needle placement/seed deposition and compared them to 30 consecutive low dose rate prostate cases performed by the HELP technique. The primary endpoint was concordance between planned percentage of the clinical target volume that receives at least 100% of the prescribed dose/dose that covers 90% of the volume of the clinical target volume (V100/D90) and the actual V100/D90 achieved at Postoperative Day 1. RESULTS: The HELP technique had superior concordance between the planned target dosimetry and what was actually achieved at Day 1 and Day 30. Specifically, target D90 at Day 1 was on average 33.7 Gy less than planned for the standard intraoperative technique but was only 10.5 Gy less than planned for the HELP technique (p < 0.001). Day 30 values were 16.6 Gy less vs. 2.2 Gy more than planned, respectively (p = 0.028). Day 1 target V100 was 6.3% less than planned with standard vs. 2.8% less for HELP (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the urethral and rectal concordance (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Placing empty needles first and optimizing the plan to the known positions of the needles resulted in improved concordance between the planned and the achieved dosimetry to the target, possibly because of elimination of errors in needle placement.