Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Care Among Children in Immigrant Families.

OBJECTIVES: Children in immigrant families comprise ∼25% of US children and live in families with high levels of poverty and food insecurity. Studies suggest a decline in public benefit enrollment among children in immigrant families. We aimed to explore perspectives on barriers and facilitators in accessing care among immigrant caregivers of hospitalized children. METHODS: With a general qualitative descriptive design, we developed a semistructured interview guide using an iterative process informed by literature and content expertise. Using purposive sampling, we recruited immigrant caregivers of hospitalized children in March 2020 and conducted interviews in English or Spanish. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated to English. Three authors coded transcripts using Dedoose and identified themes via thematic analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of 12 caregiver interviews revealed barriers and facilitators in accessing healthcare and public benefit use. Barriers included healthcare system barriers, immigration-related fear, and racism and discrimination. Within healthcare system barriers, subthemes included language barriers, cost, complexity of resource application, and lack of guidance on available benefits. Within immigration-related fear, subthemes included fear of familial separation, fear of deportation, fear that benefit use affects immigration status, and provider distrust. Healthcare system facilitators of resource use included recruiting diverse workforces, utilizing language interpretation, guidance on benefit enrollment, legal services, and mental health services. Participants also recommended hospital partnership with trusted information sources, including media stations and low-cost clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant caregivers of hospitalized children identified barriers and facilitators in access to care. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of caregiver-suggested interventions.

Challenges in the implementation of electronic systems for patient report of symptoms in oncology: a scoping review.

Background: Under-recognition and under-treatment of symptoms are prevalent throughout the health care system in the United States. While the reasons for this are complex, it is widely recognized that electronic symptom reports can improve clinicians' ability to manage symptoms. However, electronic symptom reporting has yet to be widely implemented. Electronic systems are most effective when tailored to the specific patient population or clinical setting. For example, numerous oncology-focused electronic symptom reporting systems have been developed for patients with cancer undergoing treatment in the United States. The objective of this scoping review was to identify challenges that arose in the implementation of electronic systems for patient-reported symptoms in oncology clinical practice, and approaches that were taken or recommended to overcome those challenges. Methods: This scoping review involved comprehensive searches of Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, which yielded 3,133 articles. Following screening, 20 research studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Data were systematically extracted from the articles using a qualitative content analysis. Results: Challenges identified were thematically categorized as technical issues, system usability issues, patient lack of comfort/knowledge of technology, incomplete/missing data, lack of patient use of the system, other patient issues, difficulties timing completion with clinical processes, lack of clinic staff involvement/engagement, and lack of clinician comfort/knowledge regarding the use of patient-reported outcome data. Discussion: The findings of this review highlight challenges that need to be addressed when implementing an electronic symptom reporting system for patients with cancer, and potential strategies for overcoming these challenges. This review may help hospital administrators and clinicians prepare for and improve the implementation of electronic symptom reporting systems into clinical practice, thereby providing evidence to enable their broader use.