Risk Factors for Midfoot Arthritis Associated With Medical History by Weight Bearing Computed Tomography.

Tarso-metatarsal joints and naviculocuneiform joints comprising midfoot is the second most commonly involved joints following the first metatarsophalangeal joint in the foot. However, related factors of midfoot arthritis (MA) have been rarely reported. The bony structure and alignment can be more precisely assessed using Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography (WBCT) than conventional radiographs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for MA related to medical history and comorbid foot deformities using WBCT. WBCT data from September 2014 to April 2022 were extracted from a single referral hospital. All cases were divided into two groups by the presence of MA. Twenty-five potential related factors including demographics, etiology, and common co-occurring foot deformities were collected for comparison. Six hundred six cases (247 males and 359 females) among consecutive 1316 cases between September 2014 to April 2022 were selected. One hundred thirty-nine male cases (56.3%) and 210 female cases (58.5%) showed MA. In stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, 5 factors remained statistically significant. The multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for age, laterality, body mass index (BMI), Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD), and lesser toe deformities (LTD) were 1.08, 1.54, 1.05, 6.62, and 3.03 respectively. Risk factors for MA associated with medical history and foot deformities included age, laterality, BMI, PCFD, and LDT.

Prevalence of midfoot arthritis and lesser toe deformities.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of Midfoot Arthritis (MA) and Lesser toe deformity (LTD) using Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography (WBCT). METHODS: 606 cases (247 male, 359 female) among 1316 consecutive cases with WBCT data from September 2014 to April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed at a single referral institution. The Cochran-Armitage test was performed to evaluate the trend of prevalence with respect to age group and obesity classification. RESULTS: 139 male (56.3%) and 210 female cases (58.5%) showed MA. 157 male (63.6%) and 222 female cases (61.6%) showed LTD. 115 male (19.0%) and 157 female cases (25.9%) showed both MA and LTD. The prevalence of MA and LTD increased with age in both genders. The incidence of MA in males showed an increasing tendency until obesity class II and then was slightly decreased in obesity class III. This is contrary to females whose prevalence increased with increasing obesity groups. LTD had a similar pattern in both genders to obesity classification. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MA and LTD increased with age and increasing obesity groups for both genders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Altered Ulnar Variance With Full-Body Weight-bearing During Handstands With Upper Extremity Weight-bearing CT.

PURPOSE: Ulnar variance (UV) is a radiographic measurement relating the articular surface heights of the distal radius and ulna. Abnormal UV increases the risk for wrist pathology; however, it only provides a static measurement of an inherently dynamic bony relationship that changes with wrist position and loading. The purpose of this study was to investigate how full-body weight-bearing affects UV using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). METHODS: Ten gymnasts completed two 45-second scans inside a WBCT machine while performing a handstand on a flat platform (H) and parallettes (P). A non-weight-bearing CT scan was collected to match clinical practice (N). Differences in UV between weight-bearing conditions were evaluated separately for dominant and nondominant sides, and then, UV was compared between weight-bearing conditions on pooled dominant/nondominant data. RESULTS: Pooled analyses comparing weight-bearing conditions revealed a significant increase in UV for H versus N (0.58 mm) and P versus N (1.00 mm), but no significant change in UV for H versus P (0.43 mm). Significant differences in UV were detected for H versus N, P versus N, and H versus P for dominant and nondominant extremities. The change from N to H was significantly greater in the dominant versus nondominant side, but greater in the nondominant side from N to P. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar variance changed with the application of load and position of the wrist. Differences in UV were found between dominant and nondominant extremities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Upper extremity loading patterns are affected by hand dominance as defined by a cartwheel and suggest skeletal consequences from repetitive load on a dominantly used wrist. Although statistically significant, subtle changes detected in this investigational study do not necessarily bear clinical significance. Future WBCT research can lead to improved diagnostic measures for wrist pathologies affected by active loading and rotational wrist behavior.

Prevalence and pattern of lateral impingements in the progressive collapsing foot deformity.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of lateral bony impingements [i.e., Sinus Tarsi (STI), Talo-Fibular (TFI) and Calcaneo-Fibular (CFI)] and their association with Peritalar Subluxation (PTS) have not been clearly established for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD).This study aims to assess the prevalence of STI, TFI and CFI in PCFD, in addition to their association with PTS. We hypothesized that STI and TFI would be more prevalent than CFI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two continuous symptomatic PCFD cases were retrospectively reviewed. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) was used to assess lateral impingements and classified as STI, TFI and CFI. PTS was assessed by the percent of uncovered and the incongruence angle of the middle facet, and the overall foot deformity was determined by the foot and ankle offset (FAO). Data were collected by two fellowship-trained independent observers. RESULTS: Intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities for impingement assessment ranged from substantial to almost perfect. STI was present in 84.7%, TFI in 65.2% and CFI in 19.4%. PCFD with STI showed increased middle facet uncoverage (p = 0.0001) and FAO (p = 0.0008) compared to PCFD without STI. There were no differences in FAO and middle facet uncoverage in PCFD with TFI and without TFI. PCFD with CFI was associated with STI in 100% of cases. PCFD with CFI showed decreased middle facet incongruence (p = 0.04) and higher FAO (p = 0.006) compared to PCFD without CFI. CONCLUSIONS: STI and TFI were more prevalent than CFI in PCFD. However, only STI was associated with PTS. Conversely, CFI was associated with less PTS, suggesting a different pathological mechanism which could be a compensatory subtalar behavior caused by deep layer failure of the deltoid ligament and talar tilt.

Early results and complication rate of the LapiCotton procedure in the treatment of medial longitudinal arch collapse: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Instability/collapse of the medial column has been associated with many conditions, particularly progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), hallux valgus (HV), and midfoot arthritis (MA). Restoration of first ray length and sagittal plane alignment to restore the foot tripod is essential when treating these deformities. This study aimed to assess early results, healing, and complication rate of a distraction dorsal opening plantarflexion wedge allograft first tarsometatarsal joint fusion (LapiCotton Procedure) in patients with collapse/instability of the medial column. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included PCFD, HV, and MA patients that underwent a LapiCotton procedure. Fusion site healing was defined by > 50% bone bridging in both interfaces between allograft wedge and host bone using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) after 3 months. First ray collapse radiographic correction and minor and major complications (deep dehiscence, deep infection, and reoperation) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (22 feet) were included (11 PCFD, 6 MA, and 5 of HV patients). Mean follow-up was 5.9 months (range 3-12) and median allograft size was 8 mm (range 5-19 mm). Bone healing was observed in 91% of cases. Two minor complications (9%, both superficial dehiscence) and one major complication (4.5%, deep infection) were observed. Statistically significant improvement of the sagittal plane talus-first metatarsal angle was observed, with mean improvement of 9.4° (95% CI 6.7-12.1°; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this prospective cohort study of 22 patients treated with the LapiCotton procedure for medial longitudinal arch collapse/instability, we observed a low complication rate (9% minor, 4.5% major), high healing rate after 3 months (91%), one clinically stable radiographic non-union (4.5%) and one unstable non-union (4.5%) needing reoperation. Our results demonstrate promising initial results for LapiCotton technique in treating collapse of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with PCFD, MA and HV deformities. Long-term results are needed to confirm these promising results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Distribution, prevalence, and impact on the metatarsosesamoid complex of first metatarsal pronation in hallux valgus.

BACKGROUND: Previous simulated weight-bearing CT (WBCT) studies classifying first metatarsal (M1) pronation suggested a high prevalence of M1 hyper-pronation in hallux valgus (HV). These findings have prompted a marked increase in M1 supination in HV surgical correction. No subsequent study confirms these M1 pronation values, and two recent WBCT investigations suggest lower normative M1 pronation values. The objectives of our WBCT study were to (1) determine M1 pronation distribution in HV, (2) define the hyperpronation prevalence compared to preexisting normative values, and (3) assess the relationship of M1 pronation to the metatarso-sesamoid complex. We hypothesized that the M1 head pronation distribution would be high in HV. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 88 consecutive feet with HV in our WBCT dataset and measured M1 pronation with the Metatarsal Pronation (MPA) and α angles. Similarly, using two previously published methods defining the pathologic pronation threshold, we assessed our cohort's M1 hyper-pronation prevalence, specifically (1) the upper value of the 95% confidence interval (CI95) and (2) adding two standard deviations at the mean normative value (2 SD). Sesamoid station (grading) was assessed on the coronal plane. RESULTS: The mean MPA was 11.4+/-7.4 degrees and the α angle was 16.2+/-7.4 degrees. According to the CI95 method, 69/88 HV (78.4%) were hyperpronated using the MPA, and 81/88 HV (92%) using the α angle. According to the 2 SD method, 17/88 HV (19.3%) were hyperpronated using the MPA, and 20/88 HV (22.7%) using the α angle. There was a significant difference in MPA among sesamoid gradings (p = 0.025), with a paradoxical decrease in MPA when metatarsosesamoid subluxation was increased. CONCLUSION: M1 head pronation distribution in HV was higher than in normative values, but threshold change demonstrated contradictory hyper-pronation prevalences (85% to 20%), calling into question the previously reported high prevalence of M1 hyper-pronation in HV. An increase in sesamoid subluxation was associated with a paradoxical decrease in M1 head pronation in our study. We suggest that a greater understanding of the impact of HV M1 pronation is warranted before routine M1 surgical supination is recommended for patients with HV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Impact of First Metatarsal Hyperpronation on First Ray Alignment: A Study in Cadavers.

BACKGROUND: There is increased evidence of first metatarsal hyperpronation in patients with hallux valgus, but its impact on the stability of the first metatarsophalangeal and metatarsosesamoid joints is unknown. A previous biomechanical study showed that an increase in hallucal pronation might lead to medial soft tissue failure of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Conversely, dynamic studies on hallux valgus have shown that the first tarsometatarsal joint moves in supination during weightbearing, and supination was associated with an increase in the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does an increase in first metatarsal pronation cause an increase in hallucal pronation? (2) Can an intrinsic increase in first metatarsal pronation lead to first ray supination during weightbearing? (3) Can a combination of intrinsic first metatarsal hyperpronation and first metatarsophalangeal medial soft tissue failure increase supination of the first ray during weightbearing? (4) Is first ray supination during weightbearing associated with an increase in the IMA and HVA? METHODS: Twelve transtibial, nonpaired cadaver specimens without deformities were used. Each specimen underwent six weightbearing CT scans under different conditions. The first three CT examinations were performed without any osteotomy of the first metatarsal. The first was a simulated nonweightbearing condition. The second was a simulated weightbearing condition. The third was a simulated weightbearing condition with medial soft tissue release. Subsequentially, a 30° pronation osteotomy of the first metatarsal was performed, and the same sequence of weightbearing CT images was obtained. On each weightbearing CT image, the HVA, IMA, sesamoid rotation angle, metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), metatarsosesamoid rotation angle, and hallucal pronation (HP) were measured. Motions were calculated based on the differential values of these angular measurements produced by the six different conditions (weightbearing, medial soft tissue release, 30° pronation osteotomy, and combinations of these conditions). We compared means using a t-test for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonnormally distributed variables. Correlations were assessed with Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. RESULTS: We found that 30° pronation osteotomy of the first metatarsal increased the MPA and HP by 28° ± 4° and 26° ± 6°, respectively, in the nonweightbearing condition. No differences between the increase in MPA and the increase in HP were noted (mean difference 2° [95% CI -1° to 5°]; p = 0.20). Therefore, an increase in first metatarsal pronation caused an increase in hallucal pronation. When a 30° pronation osteotomy of the first metatarsal was performed, the first ray motion during weightbearing went from pronation to supination (4° ± 2° in pronation without osteotomy versus 4° ± 2° in supination after the osteotomy, mean difference 8° [95% CI 6° to 9°]; p < 0.001). Therefore, an intrinsic increase in pronation of the first metatarsal led to a first ray supination motion during weightbearing. When a first metatarsophalangeal medial soft tissue release was performed in addition to the 30° osteotomy of the first metatarsal, the supination motion of the first ray increased (4° ± 2° without medial soft tissue release versus 11° ± 7° after the release, mean difference 8° [95% CI 3° to 12°]; p = 0.003). Therefore, a combination of intrinsic first metatarsal hyperpronation and first metatarsophalangeal medial soft tissue failure increased supination of the first ray during weightbearing. Regarding static angular measurements, the HVA and IMA were not correlated with the MPA (ρ = 0.20; p = 0.09 and ρ = 0.22; p = 0.07, respectively). Regarding motions, as the HVA and IMA increased from nonweightbearing to weightbearing the pronation decreased, with strong correlations (ρ = -0.82; p < 0.001 and ρ = -0.77; p < 0.001, respectively). Therefore, a first ray supination during weightbearing was associated with an increase in the HVA and IMA. CONCLUSION: The combination of first metatarsal intrinsic hyperpronation and first metatarsophalangeal medial soft tissue failure led to a hallux valgus deformity in this cadaveric study. The static measurement of first metatarsal head pronation relative to the ground (MPA) did not reflect the real intrinsic pronation of the first ray, and foot and ankle specialists should be careful when interpreting these measurements. Hallux valgus is a dynamic condition, and the deformity could be more correlated with motions during weightbearing than with plain static measurements. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray supination compensating for first metatarsal intrinsic hyperpronation might be an important factor in the hallux valgus pathogenesis. Further in vivo studies involving nonweightbearing and weightbearing comparative assessments of hallux valgus and controls should be performed to confirm this pathomechanism.

Multiplanar instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Hypermobility of the first ray has been considered associated with various forefoot diseases including hallux valgus (HV) and hallux rigidus (HR). Weightbearing CT scan can be a reliable method for analysis of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Our objective was to comparatively investigate signs of instability of the first TMT joint on weightbearing CT between three groups (control, HV, and HR). METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, case-control study, 27 HV patients (30 feet; mean age 54.2 years), 26 HR patients (30 feet; mean age 56.6 years), and 30 controls (30 feet; mean age; 43 years) were enrolled. Measurements of signs of instability were performed in multiplanes including first TMT angle, dorsal translation of the first metatarsal (M1) at the first TMT joint, plantar distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and M1 in sagittal plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) in axial plane, rotational profiles of C1 and M1 in coronal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and chi-square test were performed to compare each parameter between the three groups. Interobserver reliabilities were assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The HV group had significantly increased first TMT angle (0.23° in controls, 1.15° in HV, 0.19° in HR, p < 0.001), HVA (7.52°, 33.50°, 11.21°, p < 0.001), IMA (9.46°, 16.98°, 11.87°, p < 0.001), C1-M1 angle (22.44°, 29.46°, 23.74°, p < 0.001), and rotational profile of the distal M1 (7.06°, 17.88°, 9.85°, p < 0.001) compared with the control and HR groups. Dorsal translation of M1 (23% in controls, 63% in HV, 70% in HR, p < 0.001) was frequently found in the HV and HR groups with significantly increased plantar distance (0.37 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.46 mm, p < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar instability of the first TMT joint was confirmed using weightbearing CT in HV and HR groups compared with controls. HV group demonstrated instability mainly in sagittal and axial planes; HR group had sagittal instability predominantly. Our measurement of rotational instability at the first TMT joint was not able to detect differences between groups. A surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint can be an option to address HV and HR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray hypermobility at the first TMT joint is an important consideration when addressing HV and HR, a surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint should be taken in consideration as an option.

Diagnostic accuracy of measurements in progressive collapsing foot deformity using weight bearing computed tomography: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of known two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) in weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). We hypothesized that 3D biometrics would have better specificity and sensitivity for PCFD diagnosis than 2D measurements. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study, including 28 PCFD feet and 28 controls matched for age, sex and Body Mass Index. Two-dimensional measurements included: axial and sagittal talus-first metatarsal angles (TM1A and TM1S), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), forefoot arch angle (FFAA), middle facet incongruence angle (MF°) and uncoverage percentage (MF%). The 3D Foot Ankle Offset (FAO) was obtained using dedicated semi-automatic software. Intra and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve (AUC)), sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: In PCFD, mean MF% and MF° were respectively 47.2% ± 15.4 and 13.3° ± 5.3 compared with 13.5% ± 8.7 and 5.6° ± 2.9 in controls (p < 0.001). The FAO was 8.1% ± 3.8 in PCFD and 1.4% ± 1.7 in controls (p < 0.001). AUCs were 0.99 (95%CI, 0.98-1) for MF%, 0.96 (95%CI, 0.9-1) for FAO, 0.90 (95%CI, 0.81-0.98) for MF°. For MF%, a threshold value equal or greater than 28.7% had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92.8%. Conversely, a FAO value equal or greater than 4.6% had a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 89.2%. All other 2D measurements were significantly different in PCFD and controls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MF% and FAO were both accurate measurements for PCFD. MF% demonstrated slightly better specificity. FAO better sensitivity. A combination of threshold values of 28.7% for MF% and 4.6% for FAO yielded 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Comparison between Weightbearing-CT semiautomatic and manual measurements in Hallux Valgus.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic measurements are an essential tool to determine the appropriate surgical treatment and outcome for Hallux Valgus (HV). HV deformity is best evaluated by weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). The objective was (1) to assess the reliability of WBCT computer-assisted semi-automatic imaging measurements in HV, (2) to compare semi-automatic with manual measurements in the setting of an HV, and (3) to compare semi-automatic measurements between HV and control group. METHODS: In this retrospective IRB (ID# 201904825) approved study, we assessed patients with hallux valgus deformity. The sample size calculation was based on the hallux valgus angle (HVA). Thus to obtain the 0.8 power, including 26 feet with HV in this study, was necessary. Our control group consisted of 19 feet from 19 patients without HV. Raw multiplanar data was evaluated using software CubeVue®. In the axial plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and interphalangeal angle (IPA) were measured. The semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the Bonelogic®Software. Inter-rater reliabilities were performed using ICC. Agreement between methods was tested using the Bland-Altman plots. The difference between Patologic and Control cases using semi-automatic measurements was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Alpha risk was set to 5% (α = 0.05). P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Reliabilities utilizing ICC were over 0.80 for WBCT manual measurements and WBCT semi-automatic readings. Inter and intraobserver agreement for Manual and Semi-automatic WBCT measurements demonstrated excellent reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-automatic measurements are reproducible and comparable to measurements performed manually. The software differentiated pathological from non-pathological conditions when subjected to semi-automatic measurements. The development of advanced semi-automatic segmentation software with minimal user intervention is essential for the establishment of big data and can be integrated into clinical practice, facilitating decision-making.

Correlation between indirect radiographic parameters of first metatarsal rotation in hallux valgus and values on weight-bearing computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To verify if indirect radiographic signs of first metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correspond to weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) measurements. METHODS: In this case-control retrospective study, we analyzed 26 hallux valgus (HV) feet and 20 controls through conventional radiograph (CR) and WBCT images. Two blinded orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons performed the measurements. Pronation classification (head roundness), head diameter (HD), traditional HV angles, arthritis, sesamoid positioning, and first metatarsal rotation angle (MRA) (alpha angle) were evaluated. Comparisons were performed by Student's T-test and a multivariate regression was executed. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Mean values were higher in HV patients than controls when evaluating MRA (11.51 [9.42-13.60] to 4.23 [1.84-6.62], 95%CI), HD (22.35 [21.52-23.18] to 21.01 [20.07-21.96]), and sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) (26.72 [24.09-29.34] to 4.56 [1.63-7.50]). The MRA had a low influence in head roundness classification (R2: 0.15). Changes in the pronation classification were explained chiefly by the sesamoid station (SS) (R2: 0.37), where stations 4 to 7 were found to be strong predictors of roundness classifications 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Indirect signs of metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correlate weakly with the alpha angle measured in WBCT. The presence of arthritis and sesamoids displacement might modify the perception of first head roundness. The influence of MRA in the classification was low, where SS from 4 to 7 was strong predictors of a higher pronation classification.

Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Older patients (> 30 years) undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to delay THA often have inferior patient-reported outcomes than younger adult patients (< 30 years). It is unclear how patient age affects hip morphology, mechanics, or patient-reported outcome scores. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is increased patient age associated with computationally derived elevations in joint contact stresses? (2) Does hip shape affect computationally derived joint contact stresses? (3) Do computationally derived joint contact stresses correlate with visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores evaluated at rest in the clinic at a minimum of 1 year after surgery? METHODS: A minimum of 1 year of clinical followup was required for inclusion. The first 15 patients younger than 30 years of age, and the first 15 patients older than 30 years of age, who underwent PAO for treatment of classic dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle < 25°) who met the minimum followup were selected from a historical database of patients treated by a single surgeon between April 2003 and April 2010. The older cohort consisted of 14 females and one male with a median age of 41 years (range, 31-54 years). The younger cohort consisted of 10 females and five males with a median age of 19 years (range, 12-29 years). Median followup for the older than 30 years versus younger than 30 years cohort was 19 months (range, 12-37 months) versus 24 months (range, 13-38 months). Pre- and postoperative hip models were created from CT scans for discrete element analysis (DEA) contact stress computations. DEA treats contacting articular surfaces as rigid bodies (bones) separated by a bed of compressive springs (cartilage), the deformation of which governs computation of joint contact stresses. This technique greatly simplifies computational complexity compared with other modeling techniques, which permits patient-specific modeling of larger cohorts. Articular surface shape was assessed by total root mean square deviation of each patient's acetabular and femoral cartilage geometry from sphericity. Preoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores evaluated at rest in the clinic were correlated with computed contact stresses. RESULTS: Patients older than 30 years had higher predicted median peak contact stress preoperatively (13 MPa [range, 9-23 MPa; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 11-15 MPa] versus 7 MPa [range, 6-14 MPa; 95% CI, 6-8 MPa], p < 0.001) but not postoperatively (10 MPa [range, 6-18 MPa; 95% CI, 8-12 MPa] versus 8 MPa [range, 6-13 MPa; 95% CI, 7-9 MPa], p = 0.137). Deviation from acetabular sphericity positively correlated with preoperative peak contact stress (R = 0.326, p = 0.002) and was greater in the older cohort (0.9 mm [range, 0.8-1.5 mm; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0 mm] versus 0.8 mm [range, 0.6-0.9 mm; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9 mm], p = 0.014). Peak preoperative contact stress did not correlate with preoperative VAS pain score (R = 0.072, p = 0.229), and no correlation was found between change in peak contact stress and change in VAS score (R = 0.019, p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Patients over the age of 30 years with dysplasia had less spherical acetabula and higher predicted preoperative contact stress than those younger than 30 years of age. Future studies with larger numbers of patients and longer term functional outcomes will be needed to determine the role of altered mechanics in the long-term success of PAO varying with patient age. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that long-term exposure to abnormal joint loading may have deleterious effects on the hip geometry and may render the joint less amenable to joint preservation procedures. Given the lack of a direct relationship between mechanics and pain, orthopaedic surgeons should be particularly critical when evaluating three-dimensional dysplastic hip morphology in patients older than 30 years of age to ensure beneficial joint reorientation.

Optimizing Arthroscopy for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: The Effect of Ankle Positions and Distraction During Anterior and Posterior Arthroscopy in a Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: To quantify arthroscopic accessibility of the talar dome with predefined ankle positions through anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: Fourteen below-knee cadaver specimens underwent preoperative range of motion assessments. A 30° 2.7-mm arthroscopic camera was used to mark accessible areas at varying ankle positions. Accessible regions were quantified using a surface laser scanner and digital 3 × 3 grid. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences in arthroscopic accessibility between different flexion angles and noninvasive distraction. RESULTS: The mean arthroscopic accessibility of the talus was 58.5% and 49.8% for the anterior and posterior approaches, respectively (P < .001). During anterior arthroscopy, accessibility increased with up to 30° of plantarflexion (P < .001). There were no significant differences in accessibility between flexion groups for the posterior approach. There was significantly greater central zone accessibility for anterior arthroscopy (87.7%) when compared with posterior arthroscopy (74.3%; P = .002). Arthroscopic accessibility increased with increasing ankle distraction for both the anterior and posterior approaches (parameter estimates ± standard error): anterior = 6.5% ± 1.3%/mm of distraction, P < .001; and posterior = 7.0% ± 2.8%/mm, P = .026. Frequency analysis showed that the posterior third of the talus was completely inaccessible in 7 out of 14 of ankles during anterior arthroscopy. The anterior third of the talus during posterior arthroscopy was inaccessible in 11 out of 14 ankles during posterior arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle plantarflexion up to 30° may be adequate for anterior arthroscopy for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Noninvasive distraction also increases accessibility during both anterior and posterior arthroscopy. Anterior arthroscopy should be used for central third OLTs due to greater accessibility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ankle positioning is an important consideration for anterior arthroscopy. Surgical approach used should match with the location of the OLTs.

The Role of the Transverse Arch in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The transverse arch (TA) has recently been shown to significantly increase the intrinsic stiffness of the midfoot when coupled with the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex deformity that ultimately results in a loss of stiffness and collapse of the MLA. The role of the TA has not been investigated in patients diagnosed with this disorder using weightbearing CT (WBCT). Therefore, this study aims to answer the following questions: (1) Is the curvature of the TA decreased in PCFD? (2) Where within the midfoot does TA curvature flattening happen in PCFD? METHODS: A retrospective review of weightbearing CT images was conducted for 32 PCFD and 32 control feet. The TA curvature was assessed both indirectly using previously described methods and directly using a novel measurement termed the transverse arch plantar (TAP) angle that assesses the angle formed between the first, second, and fifth metatarsals in the coronal plane. Location of TA collapse was also assessed in the coronal plane. RESULTS: The TAP angle was significantly higher in PCFD (mean 115.2 degrees, SD 10.7) than in the control group (mean 100.8 degrees, SD 7.9) (P < .001). No difference was found using the calculated normalized TA curvature between PCFD (mean 17.1, SD 4.8) and controls (mean 18.3, SD 4.0) (P = .266). Location of collapse along the TA in PCFD was most significant at the second metatarsal and medial cuneiform. CONCLUSION: The TA is more collapsed in PCFD compared to controls. This collapse was most substantial between the plantar medial cuneiform and the plantar second metatarsal. This may represent a location of uncoupling of the TA and MLA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control.

Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia.

Computational models of the hip often omit patient-specific functional orientation when placing imaging-derived bony geometry into anatomic landmark-based coordinate systems for application of joint loading schemes. The purpose of this study was to determine if this omission meaningfully alters computed contact mechanics. Discrete element analysis models were created from non-weightbearing (NWB) clinical CT scans of 10 hip dysplasia patients (11 hips) and oriented in the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) coordinate system (NWB-ISB). Three additional models were generated for each hip by adding patient-specific stance information obtained via weightbearing CT (WBCT) to each ISB-oriented model: (1) patient-specific sagittal tilt added (WBCT-sagittal), (2) coronal and axial rotation from optical motion capture added to (1; WBCT-combo), and (3) WBCT-derived axial, sagittal, and coronal rotation added to (1; WBCT-original). Identical gait cycle loading was applied to all models for a given hip, and computed contact stress and contact area were compared between model initialization techniques. Addition of sagittal tilt did not significantly change whole-joint peak (p = 0.922) or mean (p = 0.871) contact stress or contact area (p = 0.638). Inclusion of motion-captured coronal and axial rotation (WBCT-combo) decreased peak contact stress (p = 0.014) and slightly increased average contact area (p = 0.071) from WBCT-sagittal models. Including all WBCT-derived rotations (WBCT-original) further reduced computed peak contact stress (p = 0.001) and significantly increased contact area (p = 0.001). Variably significant differences (p = 0.001-1.0) in patient-specific acetabular subregion mechanics indicate the importance of functional orientation incorporation for modeling applications in which local contact mechanics are of interest.

Effect of Peritalar Subluxation Correction for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Peritalar subluxation (PTS) is part of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). This study aimed to evaluate initial deformity correction and PTS optimization in PCFD patients with flexible hindfoot deformity undergoing hindfoot joint-sparing surgical procedures and its relationship with improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at latest follow-up. We hypothesized that significant deformity/PTS correction would be observed postoperatively, positively correlating with improved PROMs. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed with 26 flexible PCFD patients undergoing hindfoot joint-sparing reconstructive procedures, mean age 47.1 years (range, 18-77). We assessed weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) overall deformity (foot and ankle offset [FAO]) and PTS markers (distance and coverage maps) at 3 months, as well as PROMs at final follow-up. A multivariate regression model assessed the influence of initial deformity correction and PTS optimization in patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 19.9 months (6-39), and the average number of procedures performed was 4.8 (2-8). FAO improved from 9.4% (8.4-10.9) to 1.9% (1.1-3.6) postoperatively (P < .0001). Mean coverage improved by 69.6% (P = .012), 12.1% (P = .0343) and 5.2% (P = .0074) in, respectively, the anterior, middle, and posterior facets, whereas the sinus tarsi coverage decreased by an average 57.1% (P < .0001) postoperatively. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes were noted for all scores assessed (P < .03). The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that improvement in both FAO and PTS measurements significantly influenced the assessed PROMs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant improvements in the overall 3D deformity, PTS markers, and PROMs following hindfoot joint-sparing surgical treatment in patients with flexible PCFD. More importantly, initial 3D deformity correction and improvement in subtalar joint coverage and extraarticular impingement have been shown to influence PROMs significantly and positively. Addressing these variables should be considered as goals when treating PCFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Distance mapping and volumetric assessment of the ankle and syndesmotic joints in progressive collapsing foot deformity.

The early effects of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) on the ankle and syndesmotic joints have not been three-dimensionally quantified. This case-control study focused on using weight bearing CT (WBCT) distance (DM) and coverage maps (CM) and volumetric measurements as 3D radiological markers to objectively characterize early effects of PCFD on the ankle and syndesmotic joints. Seventeen consecutive patients with symptomatic stage I flexible PCFD and 20 matched controls that underwent foot/ankle WBCT were included. Three-dimensional DM and CM of the ankle and syndesmotic joints, as well volumetric assessment of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis was performed as possible WBCT markers of early PCFD. Measurements were compared between PCFD and controls. Significant overall reductions in syndesmotic incisura distances were observed in PCFD patients when compared to controls, with no difference in the overall syndesmotic incisura volume at 1, 3, 5 and 10 cm proximally to the ankle joint. CMs showed significantly decreased articular coverage of the anterior regions of the tibiotalar joint as well as medial/lateral ankle joint gutters in PCFD patients. This study showed syndesmotic narrowing and decreased articular coverage of the anterior aspect of the ankle gutters and talar dome in stage I PCFD patients when compared to controls. These findings are consistent with early plantarflexion of the talus within the ankle Mortise, and absence of true syndesmotic overload in early PCFD, and support DM and CM as early 3D PCFD radiological markers.

Coverage maps demonstrate 3D Chopart joint subluxation in weightbearing CT of progressive collapsing foot deformity.

A key element of the peritalar subluxation (PTS) seen in progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) occurs through the transverse tarsal joint complex. However, the normal and pathological relations of these joints are not well understood. The objective of this study to compare Chopart articular coverages between PCFD patients and controls using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). In this retrospective case control study, 20 patients with PCFD and 20 matched controls were evaluated. Distance and coverage mapping techniques were used to evaluate the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid interfaces. Principal axes were used to divide the talar head into 6 regions (medial/central/lateral and plantar/dorsal) and the calcaneocuboid interface into 4 regions. Repeated selections were performed to evaluate reliability of joint interface identification. Surface selections had high reliability with an ICC > 0.99. Talar head coverage decreases in plantarmedial and dorsalmedial (- 79%, p = 0.003 and - 77%, p = 0.00004) regions were seen with corresponding increases in plantarlateral and dorsolateral regions (30%, p = 0.0003 and 21%, p = 0.002) in PCFD. Calcaneocuboid coverage decreased in plantar and medial regions (- 12%, p = 0.006 and - 9%, p = 0.037) and increased in the lateral region (13%, p = 0.002). Significant subluxation occurs across the medial regions of the talar head and the plantar medial regions of the calcaneocuboid joint. Coverage and distance mapping provide a baseline for understanding Chopart joint changes in PCFD under full weightbearing conditions.

Association Between Middle Facet Subluxation and Foot and Ankle Offset in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Subtalar middle facet (MF) subluxation was recognized as a reliable marker for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) diagnosis. Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) is an established measurement, predictive of malalignment severity. The objective of this study was to assess the potential association between MF subluxation and FAO in PCFD patients. METHODS: 56 individuals with flexible PCFD (74 feet) were assessed. Two blinded foot and ankle surgeons calculated MF uncoverage, MF incongruence, and FAO. Agreement was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A multivariate regression analysis and partition prediction models were applied to assess relationship between values. RESULTS: All ICCs were >0.80. MF subluxation and FAO were found to be correlated (rs = 0.56; P < .0001). Changes in the MF subluxation were noticeably explained by FAO and BMI (R2 = 0.33). MF incongruence was not correlated with the assessed variables (P = .10). In this cohort, an MF subluxation of 27.5% was a threshold for increased FAO (FAO of 3.4%±2.4% when below; FAO of 8.0% ±3.5% when above). CONCLUSION: We found a correlation between MF subluxation and FAO. An MF subluxation of 27.5% was found to be a threshold for higher FAO, which corresponded to a greater malalignment. These data may help surgeons optimize treatment decisions in PCFD patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Coronal Plane Rotation of the Medial Column in Hallux Valgus: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported an increase in pronation of the first metatarsal (M1) head relative to the ground in hallux valgus (HV) patients compared to controls. Still, the origin and location of this hyperpronation along the medial column is unknown. Recent studies showed that presence of progressive collapsing foot deformities (PCFDs), which is a condition frequently associated with HV, can strongly influence the medial column coronal plane alignment. The objective of this study was to assess the coronal rotation of the medial column bones in HV feet, HV feet with radiologic markers of PCFD, and controls. We hypothesized that hyperpronation in HV will originate from a combination of M1 intrinsic torsion and first tarsometatarsal joint malposition. METHODS: The same cohort of 36 HV and 20 controls matched on age, gender, and body mass index was used. Previously, a validation of the measurements was carried out through a cadaveric study. Using these metrics, we assessed the coronal plane rotation of the navicular, medial cuneiform, and the M1 at its base and head with respect to the ground using weightbearing CT images. We measured the Meary angle and the calcaneal moment arm in our 36 HV subjects. We subdivided our cohort into an HV group and a potential PCFD HV group according to these measurements. Comparisons on medial column bones coronal rotation were performed between HV, PCFD HV, and control groups. RESULTS: Twenty-two HV cases were included in the HV group and 14 in the PCFD HV group. Both groups presented an increase in pronation of the first metatarsal head relative to the ground when compared to the control group (P < .001). Comparing HV and controls showed an 8.3 degrees increase in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion (P < .001) and a 4.7 degrees pronated malposition of the first tarsometatarsal joint (P = .02) in HV. A 9.7 degrees supinated malposition of the first naviculocuneiform joint (P < .001) was also observed in HV. Comparing PCFD HV and controls showed a significant increase in pronation of the navicular (respectively, 17.2 ± 5.4 and 12.3 ± 3.4 degrees, P = .007) and a 5.5 degrees increase in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion (P = .02) in PCFD HV, without malposition of the first tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints. CONCLUSION: Hyperpronation of the M1 head relative to the ground originated from both increases in pronation of M1 intrinsic torsion and first tarsometatarsal joint malposition in HV, although partially counterbalanced by a supinated malposition of the first naviculocuneiform joint. On the other hand, PCFD HV patients showed a generalized pronated position throughout the medial column from the navicular to the M1 head and may be related to the midfoot and hindfoot deformities frequently present in PCFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.