RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Keratoconus remains difficult to diagnose, especially in the early stages. It is a progressive disorder of the cornea that starts at a young age. Diagnosis is based on clinical examination and corneal imaging; though in the early stages, when there are no clinical signs, diagnosis depends on the interpretation of corneal imaging (e.g. topography and tomography) by trained cornea specialists. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyse the corneal images and detect cases of keratoconus could help prevent visual acuity loss and even corneal transplantation. However, a missed diagnosis in people seeking refractive surgery could lead to weakening of the cornea and keratoconus-like ectasia. There is a need for a reliable overview of the accuracy of AI for detecting keratoconus and the applicability of this automated method to the clinical setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for detecting keratoconus in people presenting with refractive errors, especially those whose vision can no longer be fully corrected with glasses, those seeking corneal refractive surgery, and those suspected of having keratoconus. AI could help ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other eye care professionals to make decisions on referral to cornea specialists. Secondary objectives To assess the following potential causes of heterogeneity in diagnostic performance across studies. ⢠Different AI algorithms (e.g. neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines) ⢠Index test methodology (preprocessing techniques, core AI method, and postprocessing techniques) ⢠Sources of input to train algorithms (topography and tomography images from Placido disc system, Scheimpflug system, slit-scanning system, or optical coherence tomography (OCT); number of training and testing cases/images; label/endpoint variable used for training) ⢠Study setting ⢠Study design ⢠Ethnicity, or geographic area as its proxy ⢠Different index test positivity criteria provided by the topography or tomography device ⢠Reference standard, topography or tomography, one or two cornea specialists ⢠Definition of keratoconus ⢠Mean age of participants ⢠Recruitment of participants ⢠Severity of keratoconus (clinically manifest or subclinical) SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, OpenGrey, the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 29 November 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included cross-sectional and diagnostic case-control studies that investigated AI for the diagnosis of keratoconus using topography, tomography, or both. We included studies that diagnosed manifest keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus, or both. The reference standard was the interpretation of topography or tomography images by at least two cornea specialists. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted the study data and assessed the quality of studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. When an article contained multiple AI algorithms, we selected the algorithm with the highest Youden's index. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 63 studies, published between 1994 and 2022, that developed and investigated the accuracy of AI for the diagnosis of keratoconus. There were three different units of analysis in the studies: eyes, participants, and images. Forty-four studies analysed 23,771 eyes, four studies analysed 3843 participants, and 15 studies analysed 38,832 images. Fifty-four articles evaluated the detection of manifest keratoconus, defined as a cornea that showed any clinical sign of keratoconus. The accuracy of AI seems almost perfect, with a summary sensitivity of 98.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.6% to 99.1%) and a summary specificity of 98.3% (95% CI 97.4% to 98.9%). However, accuracy varied across studies and the certainty of the evidence was low. Twenty-eight articles evaluated the detection of subclinical keratoconus, although the definition of subclinical varied. We grouped subclinical keratoconus, forme fruste, and very asymmetrical eyes together. The tests showed good accuracy, with a summary sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI 84.5% to 93.8%) and a summary specificity of 95.5% (95% CI 91.9% to 97.5%). However, the certainty of the evidence was very low for sensitivity and low for specificity. In both groups, we graded most studies at high risk of bias, with high applicability concerns, in the domain of patient selection, since most were case-control studies. Moreover, we graded the certainty of evidence as low to very low due to selection bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. We could not explain the heterogeneity between the studies. The sensitivity analyses based on study design, AI algorithm, imaging technique (topography versus tomography), and data source (parameters versus images) showed no differences in the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: AI appears to be a promising triage tool in ophthalmologic practice for diagnosing keratoconus. Test accuracy was very high for manifest keratoconus and slightly lower for subclinical keratoconus, indicating a higher chance of missing a diagnosis in people without clinical signs. This could lead to progression of keratoconus or an erroneous indication for refractive surgery, which would worsen the disease. We are unable to draw clear and reliable conclusions due to the high risk of bias, the unexplained heterogeneity of the results, and high applicability concerns, all of which reduced our confidence in the evidence. Greater standardization in future research would increase the quality of studies and improve comparability between studies.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Ceratocone , Humanos , Ceratocone/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Exame Físico , Estudos de Casos e ControlesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Keratoconus is a degenerative disorder of the cornea leading to a protrusion and thinning with loss of visual acuity. The only treatment to halt the progression is corneal crosslinking (CXL), which uses riboflavin and UV-A light to stiffen the cornea. Recent ultra-structural examinations show that the disease is regional and does not affect the entire cornea. Treating only the affected zone with CXL could be as good as the standard CXL, that treats the entire cornea. METHODS: We set up a multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial comparing standard CXL (sCXL) and customized CXL (cCXL). Patients between 16 and 45 years old with progressive keratoconus were included. Progression is based on one or more of the following changes within 12 months: 1 dioptre (D) increase in keratometry (Kmax, K1, K2); or 10% decrease of corneal thickness; or 1 D increase in myopia or refractive astigmatism, requiring corneal crosslinking. DISCUSSION: The goal of this study is to evaluate whether the effectiveness of cCXL is non-inferior to sCXL in terms of flattening of the cornea and halting keratoconus progression. Treating only the affected zone could be beneficial for minimalizing the risk of damaging surrounding tissues and faster wound healing. Recent non-randomized studies suggest that a customized crosslinking protocol based on the tomography of the patient's cornea may stop the progression of keratoconus and result in flattening of the cornea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on August 31st, 2020, the identifier of the study is NCT04532788.
Assuntos
Ceratocone , Fotoquimioterapia , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ceratocone/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/uso terapêutico , Colágeno/uso terapêutico , Córnea , Refração Ocular , Riboflavina/uso terapêutico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Reagentes de Ligações Cruzadas/uso terapêutico , Topografia da Córnea/métodos , Raios Ultravioleta , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To understand and compare perspectives of patients and professionals on current ophthalmologic care for high myopia, and to identify challenges and future opportunities. METHODS: Self-reported data were collected through two online questionnaires. Patient perspective was obtained from highly myopic members of a patient organisation based in the Netherlands using a 17-item questionnaire consisting of open and multiple-choice questions regarding personal experience with myopia care. The ophthalmologist perspective was obtained from practising Dutch ophthalmologists with a 12-item questionnaire of multiple-choice questions on work-related demographics, myopia care in daily practice and need for improvement. The response rate for patients was 27% (n = 136/500) and for ophthalmologists, 24% (n = 169/716). RESULTS: Patients were highly concerned about personal progressive loss of vision (69%) and feared their psychological well-being (82%) in case this would happen. The quality of performance of care provided by ophthalmologists was rated as excellent or satisfactory by 64% of the patients. These ratings for multidisciplinary care and insurance reimbursement were as low as 28% and 18% respectively. The mean concern among ophthalmologists about the rise in high myopia was 6.9 (SEM 0.1) on a 10-point scale. Sixty-nine per cent of the ophthalmologists reported that asymptomatic myopic patients should not be examined regularly at outpatient clinics. Ophthalmologists urged the development of clinical guidelines (74%), but did report (95%) that they informed patients about risk factors and complications. This contrasted with the view of patients, of whom 42% were discontent with information provided by ophthalmologists. CONCLUSIONS: These questionnaires demonstrated that the current clinical care delivered to highly myopic patients is in need of improvement. The expected higher demand for myopia care in the near future requires preferred practice patterns, professionals specifically trained to manage myopic pathology, accurate and comprehensive information exchange and collaboration of in- and out-of-hospital professionals across the full eye care chain.
Assuntos
Miopia , Humanos , Miopia/diagnóstico , Miopia/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Risco , Previsões , EtnicidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Age-related cataract affects both eyes in most cases. Most people undergo cataract surgery in both eyes on separate days, referred to as delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). An alternative procedure involves operating on both eyes on the same day, but as two separate procedures, known as immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). Potential advantages of ISBCS include fewer hospital visits for the patient, faster visual recovery, and lower healthcare costs. Nevertheless, concerns exist about possible bilateral, postoperative, sight-threatening adverse effects with ISBCS. Therefore, there is a clear need for evaluating evidence regarding the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ISBCS versus DSBCS. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts and to summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs, and cost-effectiveness associated with the use of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts (primary objectives). The secondary objective was to assess visual and patient-reported outcomes of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO ICTRP; and DARE and NHS EED on the CRD Database on 11 May 2021. There were no language restrictions. We limited the searches to a date range of 2007 onwards. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess complications, refractive outcomes, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with ISBCS compared to DSBCS. We included non-randomised (NRSs), prospective, and retrospective cohort studies comparing ISBCS and DSBCS for safety assessment, because of the rare incidence of important adverse events. To assess cost-effectiveness of ISBCS compared to DSBCS, we included both full and partial economic evaluations, and both trial-based and model-based economic evaluations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures and assessed risk of bias for NRSs using the ROBINS-I tool. For cost-evaluations, we used the CHEC-list, the CHEERS-checklist, and the NICE-checklist to investigate risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with the GRADE tool. We reported results for economic evaluations narratively. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 studies in the review; two RCTs, seven NRSs, and six economic evaluations (one study was both an NRS and economic evaluation). The studies reported on 276,260 participants (7384 for ISBCS and 268,876 for DSBCS) and were conducted in Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Iran, (South) Korea, Spain (Canary Islands), Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Overall, we considered the included RCTs to be at 'high to some concerns' risk of bias for complications, 'some concerns' risk of bias for refractive outcomes and visual acuity, and 'high' risk of bias for PROMs. The overall risk of bias for NRSs was graded 'serious' regarding complications and 'serious to critical' regarding refractive outcomes. With regard to endophthalmitis, we found that relative effects were estimated imprecisely and with low certainty, so that relative estimates were not reliable. Nonetheless, we found a very low risk of endophthalmitis in both ISBCS (1/14,076 participants) and DSBCS (55/556,246 participants) groups. Based on descriptive evidence and partially weak statistical evidence we found no evidence of an increased risk of endophthalmitis with ISBCS. Regarding refractive outcomes, we found moderate-certainty (RCTs) and low-certainty (NRSs) evidence there was no difference in the percentage of eyes that did not achieve refraction within 1.0 dioptre of target one to three months after surgery (RCTs: risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.26; NRSs: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.75). Similarly, postoperative complications did not differ between groups (RCTs: RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.40; NRSs: 1.04, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.29), although the certainty of this evidence was very low for both RCTs and NRSs. Furthermore, we found low-certainty (RCTs) to very low-certainty (NRSs) evidence that total costs per participant were lower for ISBCS compared to DSBCS, although results of individual studies could not be pooled. Only one study reported on cost-effectiveness. This study found that ISBCS is cost-effective compared to DSBCS, but did not measure quality-adjusted life years using preferred methods and calculated costs erroneously. Finally, regarding secondary outcomes, we found limited evidence on BCDVA (data of two RCTs could not be pooled, although both studies individually found no difference between groups (very low-certainty evidence)). Regarding PROMs, we found moderate-certainty evidence (RCTs only) that there was no difference between groups one to three months after surgery (standardised mean difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.03). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports there are probably no clinically important differences in outcomes between ISBCS and DSBCS, but with lower costs for ISBCS. However, the amount of evidence is limited, and the certainty of the evidence was graded moderate to very low. In addition, there is a need for well-designed cost-effectiveness studies.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Endoftalmite , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of commonly used contact lens disinfectants against severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: The efficacy of five disinfectant solutions against SARS-CoV-2 was tested in the presence and absence of contact lenses (CLs). Three types of unused CLs (hard gas permeable, soft hydrogel, and soft silicone hydrogel) and worn silicone hydrogel CLs were tested. Contact lenses were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and disinfected at various times, with and without rubbing and rinsing, as per manufacturer's instructions. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viability polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were applied to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viral infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. RESULTS: In the presence of SARS-CoV-2-infected CLs, no SARS-CoV-2 RNA could be detected when disinfectant solutions were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. When SARS-Co-V2-infected CLs were disinfected without the rub-and-rinse step, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected at almost each time interval with each disinfecting solution tested for both new and worn CLs. In the absence of CLs, viable SARS-CoV-2 was detected with all disinfectant solutions except Menicon Progent at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Disinfectant solutions effectively disinfect CLs from SARS-CoV-2 if manufacturer's instructions are followed. The rub-and-rinse regimen is mainly responsible for disinfection. The viability PCR may be useful to indicate potential infectiousness.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas , Desinfetantes , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Soluções para Lentes de Contato/farmacologia , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Humanos , Hidrogéis , RNA , SARS-CoV-2 , SiliconesRESUMO
To discuss and evaluate new technologies for a better diagnosis of corneal diseases and limbal stem cell deficiency, the outcomes of a consensus process within the European Vision Institute (and of a workshop at the University of Cologne) are outlined. Various technologies are presented and analyzed for their potential clinical use also in defining new end points in clinical trials. The disease areas which are discussed comprise dry eye and ocular surface inflammation, imaging, and corneal neovascularization and corneal grafting/stem cell and cell transplantation. The unmet needs in the abovementioned disease areas are discussed, and realistically achievable new technologies for better diagnosis and use in clinical trials are outlined. To sum up, it can be said that there are several new technologies that can improve current diagnostics in the field of ophthalmology in the near future and will have impact on clinical trial end point design.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Epitélio Corneano/patologia , Limbo da Córnea/citologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Células-Tronco/citologia , Congressos como Assunto , Doenças da Córnea/metabolismo , Doenças da Córnea/patologia , Epitélio Corneano/metabolismo , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), refractive astigmatism, and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four pseudophakic eyes of 54 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction resulting from Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were enrolled in 6 corneal centers in The Netherlands. METHODS: Participants were allocated to DMEK (n = 29) or UT-DSAEK (n = 25) using minimization randomization based on preoperative BSCVA, recipient central corneal thickness, gender, age, and institution. Donor corneas were prestripped and precut for DMEK and UT-DSAEK, respectively. Six corneal surgeons participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was BSCVA at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Central graft thickness of UT-DSAEK lamellae measured 101 µm (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-112 µm). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between DMEK and UT-DSAEK groups at 3 months (0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [95% CI 0.08-0.22 logMAR] vs. 0.22 logMAR [95% CI 0.16-0.27 logMAR]; P = 0.15), 6 months (0.11 logMAR [95% CI 0.05-0.17 logMAR] vs. 0.16 logMAR [95% CI 0.12-0.21 logMAR]; P = 0.20), and 12 months (0.08 logMAR [95% CI 0.03-0.14 logMAR] vs. 0.15 logMAR [95% CI 0.10-0.19 logMAR]; P = 0.06). Twelve months after surgery, the percentage of eyes reaching 20/25 Snellen BSCVA was higher in DMEK compared with UT-DSAEK (66% vs. 33%; P = 0.02). Endothelial cell density did not differ significantly 12 months after DMEK and UT-DSAEK (1870 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1670-2069 cells/mm2] vs. 1612 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1326-1898 cells/mm2]; P = 0.12). Both techniques induced a mild hyperopic shift (12 months: +0.22 diopter [D; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.68 D] for DMEK vs. +0.58 D [95% CI 0.13-1.03 D] for UT-DSAEK; P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and UT-DSAEK did not differ significantly in mean BSCVA, but the percentage of eyes achieving 20/25 Snellen vision was significantly higher with DMEK. Endothelial cell loss did not differ significantly between the treatment groups, and both techniques induced a minimal hyperopic shift.
Assuntos
Lâmina Limitante Posterior/cirurgia , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/métodos , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/cirurgia , Idoso , Contagem de Células , Perda de Células Endoteliais da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Feminino , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare visual acuity, refraction, endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and ultrathin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK). DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective, double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: From 66 patients with irreversible corneal endothelial dysfunction dues to Fuchs' dystrophy who enrolled from 4 tertiary medical centers in the Netherlands, 66 eyes were studied. METHODS: Participants were centrally randomized to undergo either UT-DSAEK or DSAEK, based on preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), recipient central corneal thickness, patient age, and recruitment center. Donor corneas were precut by a single cornea bank. PARTICIPANTS: Participants underwent ophthalmic examinations preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, including manifest refraction, BSCVA using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, and endothelium imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BSCVA 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperative BSCVA did not differ between patients undergoing DSAEK (0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.27-0.43]; n = 32) and UT-DSAEK (0.37 logMAR [95% CI 0.31-0.43]; n = 34; P = 0.8). BSCVA was significantly better after UT-DSAEK compared with that after DSAEK at 3 months (0.17 logMAR [95% CI 0.13-0.21], n = 31 vs. 0.28 logMAR [95% CI 0.23-0.33], n = 31; P = 0.001), 6 months (0.14 logMAR [95% CI 0.10-0.18], n = 30 vs. 0.24 logMAR [95% CI 0.20-0.28], n = 30; P = 0.002), and 12 months (0.13 logMAR [95% CI 0.09-0.17], n = 33 vs. 0.20 logMAR [95% CI 0.15-0.25], n = 29; P = 0.03). Refraction, ECD loss (40% at 3 months; P < 0.001), donor loss (DSAEK n = 2 vs. UT-DSAEK n = 3 [relative risk {RR} 1.4 {95% CI 0.24-7.5}; P = 0.7]), and graft dislocation (DSAEK n = 5 vs. UT-DSAEK n = 5 [RR 1.0 {95% CI 0.34-3.33}; P = 0.9]) did not differ between UT-DSAEK and DSAEK. Donor thickness was significantly thinner for UT-DSAEK (101 µm [95% CI 93-110 µm]; range 50-145 µm) than for DSAEK (209 µm [95% CI 196-222 µm]; range 147-289 µm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that compared with DSAEK, UT-DSAEK results in faster and better recovery of BSCVA with similar refractive outcomes, endothelial cell loss, and incidence of complications.
Assuntos
Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/métodos , Endotélio Corneano/transplante , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/cirurgia , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/diagnóstico , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Doadores de Tecidos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is characterised as an immuno-inflammatory condition with potentially blinding ocular sequelae. Therefore, we have investigated the ocular surface immune cell profile and correlated it with secreted tear molecular factors and clinical ocular sequelae in SJS patients. METHODS: 21 patients (42 eyes) with chronic ocular SJS and 16 healthy controls (20 eyes) were included in the study. Severity, types of keratopathies and ocular surface (OS) manifestations were determined. OS wash samples from study subjects were used to determine the status of 13 immune cell subsets using flow cytometry. Levels of 42 secreted immuno-inflammatory factors were measured by flow cytometry-based multiplex ELISA in tear samples. RESULTS: Neutrophils (Total, activated), neutrophils/NK cells ratio, neutrophils/T cells ratio were significantly (p < 0.05) elevated in SJS, while, proportions of T cells and NKT cells were significantly lower in SJS patients. Positive association between neutrophils and chronic ocular surface complication score (COCS) was observed, whereas, a negative association was noted between NK cells and COCS. Tear fluid levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, IFNα/ß/γ, TNFα, LIF, IL-8, HGF, sTNFR-I, NGAL, Granzyme, Perforins, MMP9/TIMP1 ratio were significantly higher in SJS. Loss of Limbal niche correlated significantly with immune profile and clinical sequelae. Increased neutrophils, decreased NK cells and specific set of altered secreted immuno-inflammatory mediators including bFGF, and IL-8 were observed in SJS patients with different types of keratopathies compared to those without keratopathy. CONCLUSION: Distinct ocular surface immune profile variations were observed to correlate with clinical stages of chronic ocular SJS. Our findings uncover novel mechanisms and potential for targeted therapy in chronic ocular SJS patients.
RESUMO
Purpose: We describe a patient after customized crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus who developed corneal edema with spontaneous resolution. Observations: A 24-year-old male with progressive keratoconus of the left eye underwent a customized CXL procedure with a total energy of 10 J/cm2 for 16.4 minutes. Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/30 with a maximum keratometry (K)-value of 58.6 diopter (D) and the thinnest point measured 414 µm. The preoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2414 cells/mm2. During treatment, corneal thickness was 325 µm after epithelial debridement and 375 µm after the application of 0.1 % riboflavin containing HPMC. After the treatment, antibiotic and steroid drops were prescribed for 5 days and 3 weeks, respectively. At the 1-month post-CXL visit the patient had no complaints, visual acuity and clinical examination showed no irregularities. At the 4-months post-CXL visit the patient complained of blurry vision. The CDVA was 20/100 and slit-lamp examination showed microcystic corneal edema. The corneal thickness at the thinnest point measured 440 µm. One month later the edema had resolved spontaneously and CDVA had restored to 20/25. Corneal thickness at the thinnest point measured 415 µm, the ECD was 1514 cells/mm2 and confocal microscopy showed normal structural changes in the anterior stroma after CXL, with the demarcation line located at a depth of 414 µm, just above the corneal endothelium. Conclusions and importance: We report a case of corneal edema following customized CXL with endothelial cell loss that resolved spontaneously. We recommend either adhering to a minimal stromal thickness of 400 µm before administering UV-A irradiation, using a contact lens or adjusting the irradiation to prevent this complication.
RESUMO
The intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) is recently introduced in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery, which aims to increase clinical performance and surgery safety. However, the acquisition of this modality is a substantial investment. The objective of this paper is to report on the cost-effectiveness of an iOCT-protocol in DMEK surgery with the Advanced Visualization in Corneal Surgery Evaluation (ADVISE) trial. This cost-effectiveness analysis uses data 6 months postoperatively from the multicentre prospective randomized clinical ADVISE trial. Sixty-five patients were randomized to usual care (n = 33) or the iOCT-protocol (n = 32). Quality-Adjusted Life Years (EQ-5D-5L), Vision-related Quality of Life (NEI-VFQ-25) and self-administered resources questionnaires were administered. Main outcome is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and sensitivity analyses. The iOCT protocol reports no statistical difference in ICER. For the usual care group compared with the iOCT protocol, respectively, the mean societal costs are 5027 compared with 4920 (Δ107). The sensitivity analyses report the highest variability on time variables. This economic evaluation learned that there is no added value in quality of life or cost-effectiveness in using the iOCT protocol in DMEK surgery. The variability of cost variables depends on the characteristics of an eye clinic. The added value of iOCT could gain incrementally by increasing surgical efficiency, and aiding in surgical decision-making.
Assuntos
Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior , Humanos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/métodos , Endotélio Corneano , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodosRESUMO
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Commonly used methods for both clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and management of infected patients involve the detection of viral RNA, but the presence of infectious virus particles is unknown. Viability PCR (v-PCR) uses a photoreactive dye to bind non-infectious RNA, ideally resulting in the detection of RNA only from intact virions. This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid v-PCR assay for distinguishing intact and compromised SARS-CoV-2. Propidium monoazide (PMAxx) was used as a photoreactive dye. Mixtures with decreasing percentages of intact SARS-CoV-2 (from 100% to 0%) were prepared from SARS-CoV-2 virus stock and a clinical sample. Each sample was divided into a PMAxx-treated part and a non-PMAxx-treated part. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using an in-house developed SARS-CoV-2 viability assay was then applied to both sample sets. The difference in intact SARS-CoV-2 was determined by subtracting the cycle threshold (Ct) value of the PMAxx-treated sample from the non-PMAxx-treated sample. Mixtures with decreasing concentrations of intact SARS-CoV-2 showed increasingly lower delta Ct values as the percentage of intact SARS-CoV-2 decreased, as expected. This relationship was observed in both high and low viral load samples prepared from cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus stock, as well as for a clinical sample prepared directly from a SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal swab. In this study, a rapid v-PCR assay has been validated that can distinguish intact from compromised SARS-CoV-2. The presence of intact virus particles, as determined by v-PCR, may indicate SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness. IMPORTANCE: This study developed a novel method that can help determine whether someone who has been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still capable of spreading the virus to others. Current tests only detect the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA, but cannot tell whether the particles are still intact and can thus infect cells. The researchers used a dye that selectively blocks the detection of damaged virions and free RNA. They showed that this viability PCR reliably distinguishes intact SARS-CoV-2 capable of infecting from damaged SARS-CoV-2 or free RNA in both cultured virus samples and a clinical sample. Being able to quickly assess contagiousness has important implications for contact tracing and safely ending isolation precautions. This viability PCR technique provides a simple way to obtain valuable information, beyond just positive or negative test results, about the actual risk someone poses of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 through the air or surfaces they come into contact with.
RESUMO
The conjunctival epithelium covering the eye contains two main cell types: mucus-producing goblet cells and water-secreting keratinocytes, which present mucins on their apical surface. Here, we describe long-term expanding organoids and air-liquid interface representing mouse and human conjunctiva. A single-cell RNA expression atlas of primary and cultured human conjunctiva reveals that keratinocytes express multiple antimicrobial peptides and identifies conjunctival tuft cells. IL-4/-13 exposure increases goblet and tuft cell differentiation and drastically modifies the conjunctiva secretome. Human NGFR+ basal cells are identified as bipotent conjunctiva stem cells. Conjunctival cultures can be infected by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1), human adenovirus 8 (hAdV8), and SARS-CoV-2. HSV1 infection was reversed by acyclovir addition, whereas hAdV8 infection, which lacks an approved drug therapy, was inhibited by cidofovir. We document transcriptional programs induced by HSV1 and hAdV8. Finally, conjunctival organoids can be transplanted. Together, human conjunctiva organoid cultures enable the study of conjunctival (patho)-physiology.
Assuntos
Túnica Conjuntiva , Células Caliciformes , Humanos , Camundongos , Animais , Túnica Conjuntiva/metabolismo , Células Caliciformes/metabolismo , Epitélio , Interleucina-13 , Homeostase , OrganoidesRESUMO
The cornea is a transparent and avascular tissue located in front of the eye. Its inner surface is lined by a monolayer of corneal endothelial cells (CECs), which maintain the cornea transparency. CECs remain arrested in a non-proliferative state and damage to these cells can compromise their function leading to corneal opacity. The primary culture of donor-derived CECs is a promising cell therapy. It confers the potential to treat multiple patients from a single donor, alleviating the global donor shortage. Nevertheless, this approach has limitations preventing its adoption, particularly culture protocols allow limited expansion of CECs and there is a lack of clear parameters to identify therapy-grade CECs. To address this limitation, a better understanding of the molecular changes arising from the primary culture of CECs is required. Using single-cell RNA sequencing on primary cultured CECs, we identify their variable transcriptomic fingerprint at the single cell level, provide a pseudo-temporal reconstruction of the changes arising from primary culture, and suggest markers to assess the quality of primary CEC cultures. This research depicts a deep transcriptomic understanding of the cellular heterogeneity arising from the primary expansion of CECs and sets the basis for further improvement of culture protocols and therapies.
Assuntos
Células Endoteliais , Endotélio Corneano , Humanos , Análise da Expressão Gênica de Célula Única , Córnea , Células CultivadasRESUMO
The regenerative capacity of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) differs between species; in bigger mammals, CECs are arrested in a non-proliferative state. Damage to these cells can compromise their function causing corneal opacity. Corneal transplantation is the current treatment for the recovery of clear eyesight, but the donor tissue demand is higher than the availability and there is a need to develop novel treatments. Interestingly, rabbit CECs retain a high proliferative profile and can repopulate the endothelium. There is a lack of fundamental knowledge to explain these differences. Gaining information on their transcriptomic variances could allow the identification of CEC proliferation drivers. In this study, human, sheep, and rabbit CECs are analyzed at the transcriptomic level. To understand the differences across each species, a pipeline for the analysis of pathways with different activities is generated. The results reveal that 52 pathways have different activity when comparing species with non-proliferative CECs (human and sheep) to species with proliferative CECs (rabbit). The results show that Notch and TGF-ß pathways have increased activity in species with non-proliferative CECs, which might be associated with their low proliferation. Overall, this study illustrates transcriptomic pathway-level differences that can provide leads to develop novel therapies to regenerate the corneal endothelium.
RESUMO
Purpose: Dry eye disease (DED) is characterized by altered ocular surface proinflammatory and antiinflammatory factors. Interferons (IFNs) are a class of pleiotropic cytokines well known for their antimicrobial, inflammatory, and immunomodulatory roles. Hence, this study investigates the ocular surface expression of different types of IFNs in patients with DED. Methods: The cross-sectional, observational study included patients with DED and normal subjects. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) samples were obtained from the study subjects (controls, n = 7; DED, n = 8). The mRNA expression levels of type 1 IFN (IFNα, IFNß), type 2 IFN (IFNγ), and type 3 IFN (IFNλ1, IFNλ2, IFNλ3) were measured by quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in CIC samples. IFNα and IFNγ expression under hyperosmotic stress was also studied in human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) in vitro. Results: The mRNA expression levels of IFNα and IFNß were significantly lower and that of IFNγ was significantly higher in DED patients compared to healthy controls. The mRNA levels of IFNα, IFNß, and IFNλ were significantly lower compared to IFNγ in DED patients. An inverse association between tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (TonEBP; hyperosmotic stress maker) and IFNα or IFNß expression and a positive association between TonEBP and IFNγ expression was observed in CIC samples. The expression of IFNα was lower than IFNγ in HCECs undergoing hyperosmotic stress compared to HCECs without the stress. Conclusion: The presence of an imbalance between type 1 and type 2 IFNs in DED patients suggests newer pathogenic processes in DED, plausible ocular surface infection susceptibility in DED patients, and potential therapeutic targets in the management of DED.
Assuntos
Citocinas , Síndromes do Olho Seco , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interferon-alfa , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/genética , Síndromes do Olho Seco/metabolismo , Células Epiteliais/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of pachymetry mapping 1 day after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) as a biomarker for early graft detachment. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of 65 pseudophakic subjects with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent DMEK surgery between December 2018 and April 2021 as part of the Advanced Visualization In Corneal Surgery Evaluation international multicenter randomized controlled trial. One eye per patient was included. Preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively, patients underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging. Using a grid consisting of 25 zones (ie, pachymetry map), corneal thickness and presence of a graft detachment were mapped for each patient. Detachments of any size were considered, regardless of subsequent clinical interventions. Missing data were imputed and subsequently divided into a training and test set. Two prediction methods were evaluated: one model based on absolute corneal thickness and a regression model. RESULTS: A total of 65 eyes were included for analysis of which 33 developed any form of graft detachment. Preoperatively, no significant differences were observed between the groups ( P = 0.221). Corneal thickness in the corneal zones with a detached graft was significantly increased compared with corneal zones with an attached graft ( P < 0.001). The regression prediction model had an area under the curve of 0.87 (sensitivity: 0.79 and specificity: 0.75), whereas the absolute thickness cutoff model only reached 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: Pachymetry mapping 1 day after DMEK was predictive for early graft detachment, and the prediction model had a good to excellent performance. This aids in identifying patients at risk for graft detachment and subsequent tailored postoperative care.
Assuntos
Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs , Humanos , Endotélio Corneano , Lâmina Limitante Posterior/cirurgia , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/efeitos adversos , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/métodos , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/cirurgia , Acuidade Visual , Contagem de Células , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/cirurgia , Biomarcadores , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the prediction accuracy of the Barrett True-K for keratoconus with standard formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, and Kane) and the Kane keratoconus formula. SETTING: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, and University Eye Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective case series. METHODS: Eyes with stable keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery were included. The predicted refractions were calculated for SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Barrett True-K for keratoconus (predicted and measured), Kane, and Kane adjusted for keratoconus formulas. Primary outcomes were prediction error (PE), absolute error (AE), and percentage of eyes with PE ±0.25 diopters (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of the keratoconus. RESULTS: 57 eyes were included in the study. The PE was not significantly different from zero for SRK/T, Barrett True-K (predicted and measured), and Kane keratoconus formulas (range 0.09 to 0.22 D, P > .05). The AE of Barrett True-K predicted (median 0.14 D) and Barrett True-K measured (median 0.10 D) were significantly lower from Barrett Universal II (median 0.47 D) and Kane (median 0.50 D), P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The Barrett True-K formulas for keratoconus had higher prediction accuracy as compared with new generation formulas and a similar prediction accuracy as compared with the Kane keratoconus formula.
Assuntos
Ceratocone , Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificação , Humanos , Ceratocone/cirurgia , Refração Ocular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Óptica e Fotônica , Biometria , Comprimento Axial do OlhoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasy (DMEK) versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK). METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a multicenter randomized clinical trial was performed. The time horizon was 12 months postoperatively. Patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy were randomized to DMEK (n = 29) or UT-DSAEK (n = 24). Relevant resources from healthcare and societal perspectives were included in the cost analysis. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were determined using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; incremental societal costs per QALY). RESULTS: Societal costs averaged 8851 (US$11 406) for DMEK and 8320 (US$10 722) for UT-DSAEK. Higher costs in the DMEK group were mainly caused by higher rebubbling and regraft rates (21% and 7%, vs. 4% and 0% in the UT-DSAEK group). HUI3 QALYs were 0.70 (DMEK) and 0.79 (UT-DSAEK). EQ-5D-5L QALYs were 0.83 (DMEK) and 0.86 (UT-DSAEK). The ICER indicated DMEK was dominated by UT-DSAEK in both analyses. The cost-effectiveness probability for DMEK ranged from 21% to 5% (HUI3 QALYs) and 27%-14% (EQ-5D-5L QALYs), assuming the maximum acceptable ICER ranged from 2500 to 80.000 (US$3222-US$103 093) per QALY. CONCLUSION: The base case cost-effectiveness analysis favoured UT-DSAEK over DMEK, as costs of DMEK were higher while QALYs were lower. Further studies are required to assess long-term rebubbling and regraft rates and graft survival.