Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease. ONJ incidence, risk factors, and outcomes were evaluated in a combined analysis of three phase III trials in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors or myeloma were randomly assigned to receive either s.c. denosumab (120 mg) or i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks. On-study oral examinations were conducted by investigators at baseline and every 6 months. Oral adverse events were adjudicated by an independent blinded committee of dental experts. RESULTS: Of 5723 patients enrolled, 89 (1.6%) patients were determined to have ONJ: 37 (1.3%) received zoledronic acid and 52 (1.8%) received denosumab (P = 0.13). Tooth extraction was reported for 61.8% of patients with ONJ. ONJ treatment was conservative in >95% of patients. As of October 2010, ONJ resolved in 36.0% of patients (29.7% for zoledronic acid and 40.4% for denosumab). CONCLUSIONS: In this combined analysis of three prospective trials, ONJ was infrequent, management was mostly conservative, and healing occurred in over one-third of the patients. Educating physicians about oral health before and during bone-targeted therapy may help reduce ONJ incidence and improve outcomes.

Therapy of human tumors in NOD/SCID mice with patient-derived reactivated memory T cells from bone marrow.

In an analysis of 84 primary-operated breast cancer patients and 11 healthy donors, we found that the bone marrow of most patients contained memory T cells with specificity for tumor-associated antigens. Patients' bone marrow and peripheral blood contained CD8+ T cells that specifically bound HLA/peptide tetramers. In short-term culture with autologous dendritic cells pre-pulsed with tumor lysates, patients' memory T cells from bone marrow (but not peripheral blood) could be specifically reactivated to interferon-gamma-producing and cytotoxic effector cells. A single transfer of restimulated bone-marrow T cells into NOD/SCID mice caused regression of autologous tumor xenotransplants associated with infiltration by human T cells and tumor-cell apoptosis and necrosis. T cells from peripheral blood showed much lower anti-tumor reactivity. Our findings reveal an innate, specific recognition of breast cancer antigens and point to a possible novel cancer therapy using patients' bone-marrow-derived memory T cells.

Adjuvant oral clodronate improves the overall survival of primary breast cancer patients with micrometastases to the bone marrow: a long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Adding oral clodronate to postoperative adjuvant breast cancer therapy significantly improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Long-term follow-up data from the prospective, randomized, controlled study are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary breast cancer received clodronate 1600 mg/day for 2 years or no treatment along with standard adjuvant breast cancer treatment. RESULTS: Analysis of 290 of 302 patients demonstrated that a significant improvement in OS was maintained in the clodronate group at a median follow-up of 103 +/- 12 months; 20.4% of patients in the clodronate group versus 40.7% of control group patients (P = 0.04) died during the 8.5 years following primary surgical therapy. Significant reductions in the incidence of bony and visceral metastases and improvement in duration of DFS at 36- and 55-month follow-up periods were no longer seen with clodronate. CONCLUSION: These long-term survival data extend the survival advantage reported in previous studies with oral clodronate in breast cancer.

Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of the patients with primary breast cancer who have no axillary lymph node involvement (i.e., lymph node negative) at the time of surgery will relapse within 10 years; 10%-20% of the patients with distant metastases will be lymph node negative at surgery. Axillary lymph node dissection, as a surgical procedure, is associated with frequent complications. A possible alternative to nodal dissection in terms of prognosis may be the immunocytochemical detection of tumor cells in bone marrow. PURPOSE: In a prospective study, the value of tumor cell detection (TCD) in bone marrow was compared with axillary lymph node dissection in the prognosis of primary breast cancer after surgery. METHODS: Data from 727 patients with primary, operable breast cancer were included in the analysis. All patients had surgery, including axillary lymph node dissection, from May 1985 through July 1994 at the Women's Hospital of the University of Heidelberg (Federal Republic of Germany). Bone marrow aspiration at two sites on each anterior iliac crest was performed immediately after surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia. Most patients received some type of systemic adjuvant therapy. The monoclonal antibody 2E11, directed against the polymorphic epithelial mucin TAG12, was used to detect tumor cells in bone marrow samples. The association of TCD with recognized prognostic indicators was evaluated by means of chi-squared tests. Survival without the development of distant metastases (i.e., distant disease-free survival) and overall survival were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method; the logrank test was used to compare survival curves. A multivariate Cox regression analysis with stratification according to adjuvant treatment type was used to assess the independent prognostic value of TCD in bone marrow in relation to other variables. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Tumor cells were detected in the bone marrow of 203 (55%) of 367 lymph node-positive patients and in 112 (31%) of 360 lymph node-negative patients. TCD was associated with larger tumors (P < .001), lymph node involvement (P = .001), and higher tumor grade (i.e., more undifferentiated) (P = .002). After a median follow-up of 36 months, patients with tumor cells in their bone marrow experienced reduced distant disease-free survival and overall survival (both P values < .001). TCD was an independent prognostic indicator for both distant disease-free survival and overall survival that was superior to axillary lymph node status, tumor stage, and tumor grade. Among patients with tumors less than 2 cm in diameter, TCD was the most powerful predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TCD in the bone marrow of patients with breast cancer is a valuable prognostic tool associated with negligible morbidity. Prospective randomized studies should be performed to determine whether TCD might replace axillary lymph node dissection in a defined subgroup of patients with small tumors.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management.

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.

Detection of tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with primary breast cancer: a prognostic factor for distant metastasis.

PURPOSE: At the time of primary surgery, approximately 90% of all patients with breast cancer are free of metastases, but in the next 5 years almost 50% of them will relapse. We evaluated the significance of the presence of tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with primary breast cancer to investigate their predictive value for relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with primary breast cancer were examined for tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates taken from six sites of the skeleton. After density centrifugation, cells in interphase were smeared and stained. For the immunocytologic reaction, we used a new monoclonal antibody (2E11) that was reactive with the core protein of the tumor-associated glycoprotein TAG12. TAG12 is secreted by nearly all human breast carcinomas. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between tumor-cell detection and tumor stage (P < .0001), nodal status (P < .0001), and tumor grading (P = .002). A good relation to progesterone receptor (PR; P = .008) was found, but there was no correlation to estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal status. Follow-up examinations showed distant metastases in 26 of 211 patients (15%). Twenty-two relapses occurred among the 81 patients with 2E11-positive cells in bone marrow, but only four occurred among the 130 patients without tumor-cell detection. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that tumor-cell detection in bone marrow of patients with primary breast carcinoma is a good predictor for all distant relapses (P < .0005, Cox multiple regression analysis) and provides additional information in regard to other prognostic factors. The highest predicting value for distant metastasis results from the combination of nodal status, negative PR, and tumor-cell presence in bone marrow.

Current use of bisphosphonates in oncology. International Bone and Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review the recent data on bisphosphonate use in oncology and to provide some guidelines on the indications for their use in cancer patients. DESIGN: The group consensus reached by experts on the rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in cancer patients and their current indications for the treatment of tumor-induced hypercalcemia and metastatic bone pain in advanced disease and for the prevention of the complications of multiple myeloma and of metastatic bone disease are reviewed. RESULTS: Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of tumor-induced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. They now constitute the standard treatment for cancer hypercalcemia, for which we recommend a dose of 1,500 mg of clodronate or 90 mg of pamidronate; the latter compound is more potent and has a longer lasting effect. Intravenous bisphosphonates exert clinically relevant analgesic effects in patients with metastatic bone pain. Regular pamidronate infusions can also achieve a partial objective response by conventional International Union Against Cancer criteria and enhance the objective response rate to chemotherapy. In breast cancer, the prolonged administration of oral clodronate 1,600 mg daily reduces the frequency of morbid skeletal events by more than one fourth, whereas monthly pamidronate infusions of 90 mg for only 1 year in addition to chemotherapy reduce by more than one third the frequency of all skeletal-related events. The use of bisphosphonates to prevent bone metastases remains experimental. Last, bisphosphonates in addition to chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone in patients with stages II and III multiple myeloma and can reduce the skeletal morbidity rate by approximately one half. CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonate use is a major therapeutic advance in the management of the skeletal morbidity caused by metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma, although many questions remain unanswered, notably regarding the optimal selection of patients and the duration of treatment.

Time independence of the prognostic impact of tumor cell detection in the bone marrow of primary breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Tumor cell detection (TCD) in bone marrow is an outstanding prognostic factor in breast cancer. There is only one other study that has investigated more than 300 patients with a median follow-up of more than 5 years (J. L. Mansi et al., Lancet, 354:197-202, 1999). We report data from 727 patients with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a prospective study, intraoperatively aspirated bone marrow was screened for micrometastatic cancer cells. We used an immunocytological method (monoclonal mucin antibody 2E11; the avidin-biotin complex method). RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the patients were TCD positive. Sixty percent of the patients with distant metastases were tumor cell positive (155 of 258 patients). Forty-nine percent of the patients with positive TCD developed distant metastases (155 of 315 patients). TCD was an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcome after a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. The prognostic impact of TCD and tumor size remains constant with the time, whereas the impact of grading and progesterone receptor on risk seems to decrease with longer follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: TCD remains an independent prognostic factor The impact of TCD does not change with longer follow-up time. TCD is a reliable prognostic factor and provides important information about the process of metastasis.

Serum bone sialoprotein in patients with primary breast cancer is a prognostic marker for subsequent bone metastasis.

Bone sialoprotein (BSP) is a noncoflagenous bone matrix protein that is important for both mineralization and cell-cell interactions. Tissue studies in primary breast cancers have shown that immunohistochemical expression of BSP is associated with a high incidence of bone metastases in the course of the disease. We used a RIA to investigate the importance of serum BSP as a marker for subsequent bone metastases. Between 1994 and 1996, preoperative blood samples were collected from 388 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer and from 30 control patients with benign breast disease. Serum BSP concentrations were measured in a blinded fashion by RIA. The cutoff for elevated serum BSP values was 24 ng/ml, ie., two SDs above the normal mean value. Serum BSP was correlated with the risk of metastasis and analyzed with regard to its prognostic value. After a median follow-up period of only 20 months, 28 patients had developed metastases. Fourteen patients had bone metastases only, 9 visceral metastases only, and 5 a combination of osseous and visceral metastases. Of the 19 women with skeletal metastases, 17 had preoperative serum BSP values in excess of 24 ng/ml (median BSP values: 48.3 ng/ml for isolated metastatic bone disease, 30.6 ng/ml for combined metastases), whereas none of the women with visceral metastases only had elevated serum BSP concentrations (median BSP value: 12.3 ng/ml). The median serum BSP value in the control group (benign breast disease) was 8.8 ng/ml serum BSP; levels correlated with the size of the primary tumor, but not with any other prognostic factors. Using a multivariate regression analysis, serum BSP was found to be the most important independent prognostic factor for the development of skeletal metastasis (P < 0.001; relative risk, 94); its specificity was 96.7%, and its sensitivity was 89.5%. Our study shows that patients with preoperatively elevated serum BSP levels are at high risk of subsequent bone metastases in the first years after primary surgery. The mechanism of BSP in the pathogenesis of skeletal metastases is unclear. Because BSP contains an integrin recognition sequence, its expression in tumor cells may facilitate their adhesion to the bone surface. However, it is possible that a proportion of circulation BSP is derived from normal or tumor-induced bone turnover. Breast cancer patients with elevated serum BSP levels may benefit from osteoprotective adjuvant therapy with bisphosphonates.

Reliable and sensitive analysis of occult bone marrow metastases using automated cellular imaging.

The presence of occult bone marrow metastases (OM) has been reported to represent an important prognostic indicator for patients with operable breast cancer and other malignancies. Assaying for OM most commonly involves labor-intensive manual microscopic analysis. The present report examines the performance of a recently developed automated cellular image analysis system (ACIS; ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc.) for identifying and enumerating OM in human breast cancer specimens. OM analysis was performed after immunocytochemical staining. Specimens used in this study consisted of normal bone marrow (n = 10), bone marrow spiked with carcinoma cells (n = 20), and bone marrow obtained from breast cancer patients (n = 39). The reproducibility of ACIS-assisted analysis for tumor cell detection was examined by having a pathologist evaluate montage images generated from multiple ACIS runs of five specimens. Independent ACIS-assisted analysis resulted in the detection of an identical number of tumor cells for each specimen in all instrument runs. Additional studies were performed to analyze OM from 39 breast cancer patients with two pathologists performing parallel analysis using either manual microscopy or ACIS-assisted analysis. In 17 of the 39 cases (44%), specimens were classified by the pathologist as positive for tumor cells after ACIS-assisted analysis, whereas the same pathologist failed to identify tumor cells on the same slides after analysis by manual microscopy. These studies indicate that the ACIS-assisted analysis provides excellent sensitivity and reproducibility for OM detection, relative to manual microscopy. Such performance may enable an improved approach for disease staging and stratifying patients for therapeutic intervention.

Prognostic factors for skeletal relapse in breast cancer.

Bone metastases and the strong interaction between osseous and metastatic cell populations require interdisciplinary thought and actions. If it were possible to interrupt the malignant dialogue between tumour and bone at an early stage, this might not only reduce the amount of bone destruction, but could also reduce the incidence of osseous metastases and remove the source of secondary metastases to other organs. Studies into the preventive effects of bisphosphonates are currently running or are planned. Most of these studies are in breast cancer patients with involvement of the axillary lymph nodes. The prognostic factors of lymph node status, tumour size and grading are better than none, but do not select patients at a high risk of skeletal metastasis. This would be much better done by using immunohistochemical methods to investigate the primary tumour for bone sialoprotein and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP). However, these methods are complicated, have not been validated in large numbers of patients and are not standardized. Serum tests for bone sialoprotein, PTHrP and collagen fragments are currently still under development and cannot be recommended generally. The clinical importance of tumour cells in the bone marrow has been demonstrated but is still only used at a few centres.

Bone marrow and lymph node assessment for minimal residual disease in patients with breast cancer.

The immunocytological detection of disseminated epithelial cells in bone marrow in patients with breast cancer has been performed at many hospitals and institutes since the early 1980s. Despite numerous publications in this field, it has not been possible to standardize the method and establish the 'ideal' antibody, either nationally or internationally. Molecular biological methods using PCR technology could extend the diagnostic spectrum. However, one of the major problems in breast cancer is the lack of a disease-specific marker gene. As a result, immunocytology is still the standard procedure for tumour cell detection. The detection of disseminated single cells in bone marrow in primary breast cancer (also known as minimal residual disease) is a new prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival. This has been demonstrated in two large (N > 300) groups and several small to medium groups (N = 50-300). As a marker of dissemination in a target organ for metastasis this prognostic factor corresponds much more closely to the tendency of breast cancer to early haematogenic spread. Tumour cell detection may predict the course of the disease better than the axillary lymph node status. Bone marrow aspiration and detection of disseminated cells might replace lymph node dissection, at least in those patients with small tumours and no clinical signs of lymph node involvement. This strategy will soon be investigated in appropriate studies. Another possible clinical use might be in deciding on whether or not to give adjuvant systemic therapy to node-negative patients. Patients with positive tumour cell detection are at a higher risk of subsequent metastasis, even if the axillary nodes are histologically normal. The immunohistological or molecular biological detection of tumour cells in axillary lymph nodes might also be very useful, now that it has been shown that a considerable subset of patients determined to be node-negative by means of conventional methods, are positive according to these new techniques. These methods could be a useful supplement to sentinel node biopsy. A further potential use of this method is in monitoring therapy with new treatment modalities such as gene therapy and immunotherapy. Repeated bone marrow aspiration can provide information on the success of therapy in minimal residual disease (cytoreduction). Immunocytochemical investigation of individual cells may be useful in studying the pathogenesis of metastasis, in particular in the skeleton. Phenotyping of cells might allow statements to be made on the metastatic potential of cells and the question of cell dormancy. It remains to be hoped that this aspect of minimal residual disease will be granted more attention in future.

Improved quality of life after long-term treatment with the bisphosphonate ibandronate in patients with metastatic bone disease due to breast cancer.

Bone metastases occur in most women with advanced breast cancer and can lead to considerable morbidity and a rapid deterioration in the patient's quality of life. It was the aim of the present study to assess changes in quality of life and bone pain due to intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate, a potent third-generation bisphosphonate. In a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer, 466 women were randomised to receive placebo, 2 mg ibandronate or 6 mg ibandronate for up to 96 weeks. Treatment was administered i.v. at 3- or 4-weekly intervals. Clinical endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, quality of life (assessed using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Scale - Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30)), and bone pain (assessed on a 5-point scale from 0=none to 4=intolerable). Ibandronate was generally well tolerated. Compared with baseline measurements, the bone pain score was increased at the last assessment in both the placebo and 2 mg ibandronate groups, but was significantly reduced in the patients receiving 6 mg ibandronate (-0.28+/-1.11, P < 0.001). A significant improvement in quality of life was demonstrated for patients treated with ibandronate (P < 0.05) for all global health status. Overall, at the last assessment, the 6 mg ibandronate group showed significantly better functioning compared with placebo (P = 0.004), and had significantly better scores on the domains of physical, emotional, and social functioning, and in global health status (P < 0.05). Significant improvements in the symptoms of fatigue and pain were also observed in the 6 mg ibandronate group. I.v. ibandronate treatment leads to significant improvements in quality of life, and is an effective and well-tolerated palliative treatment in patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer.

Bone marrow staging for breast cancer: is it better than axillary node dissection?

Numerous studies have shown tumor cells in bone marrow to be a new and independent prognostic factor in primary breast cancer. The presence of such cytokeratin-positive or mucin-positive cells reflects the biology and systemic character of breast cancer much better than lymph node status. Axillary lymphadenectomy is associated with a considerable number of complications and is completely unnecessary in about 50% of cases (in node-negative patients). Whether axillary node dissection contributes to improved survival is highly controversial. However, since nearly all patients with primary breast cancer now receive adjuvant systemic therapy, the value of the classic prognostic factors must be discussed and re-evaluated. Much information can now be determined from primary tumor (HER-2/neu, etc). Tumor cell detection in bone marrow is a simple method that can be performed on an outpatient basis and that can be repeated if necessary (for monitoring therapy). The main disadvantage of the technique is that it has not been possible to standardize the laboratory methods and to find the ideal antibody--one that is not only able to recognize an epithelial cell, but which can also describe its metastatic potential. Semin Oncol 28:236-244.

Bisphosphonates in the prevention of bone metastases: current evidence.

The use of bisphosphonates is well established for the treatment of bone metastases to reduce skeletal complications in patients with breast and other cancers, to provide a better quality of life. More recently, however, there is evidence that these agents may also have antitumor effects. Therefore, the use of bisphosphonates is now being examined in improving overall survival, by potentially reducing metastatic bone disease in particular. To date, three randomized trials have been conducted in over 1,500 women with breast cancer using 1,600 mg clodronate as adjuvant medication. This article evaluates and presents the results of these studies, and reviews current evidence surrounding the prophylactic use of bisphosphonates for skeletal progression of breast cancer.

Antitumour effects of bisphosphonates: first evidence and possible mechanisms.

Bisphosphonates have been used successfully for many years in the treatment of hypercalcaemia and to reduce skeletal complications of metastases. In the first years of bisphosphonate use the efficacy of these substances was thought to lie purely in the inhibition of osteoclasts. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that an antitumour effect may also play a role. As well as having an apoptotic and antiproliferative effect on osteoclasts, bisphosphonates may exert a similar influence on macrophages and tumour cells. Whether this effect (at low doses) also plays a role in vivo remains unclear and requires further investigation. Improvements in the survival time of certain subpopulations have been found in many phase III studies with bisphosphonates to date, both in the setting of metastatic breast cancer and in multiple myeloma. However, because survival time in subgroups of patients was neither a primary nor a secondary objective in these studies, these advantages could only be seen as important pointers for future studies. Some preclinical studies have shown that down-regulation of bone metabolism by bisphosphonates is associated with a lower incidence of bone metastases and destruction in animals, whereas activation is correlated with a higher number of metastases. However, varying results were found in animal experiments with regard to the effect of bisphosphonates on the incidence and growth pattern of non-osseous metastases. The results of 3 randomised studies in patients with primary breast cancer who received clodronate 1600 mg/day orally have now been evaluated and presented. All 3 studies arrived at different results. In the Heidelberg study there was a reduction in both osseous and non-osseous metastases, whereas in a much larger study performed in Great Britain, Canada and Scandinavia there was a reduction only in the incidence of skeletal metastases. A third study from Finland found no effect on bone metastases, but an increase in the number of visceral metastases and a deterioration in overall survival. Because the dosage was identical in all 3 studies, the differing results can only be either random or methodological (for example inclusion criteria or sample size). Overall, the results are very promising, but there is a need for further studies.

Treatment of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer: bisphosphonates.

Like other metastases, bone metastases in breast cancer patients are not only a sign of the incurable nature of the underlying disease, but are also associated with specific complications. In particular, bone pain and pathological fractures impair the quality of life of those affected. Any treatment concept must, therefore, place the highest priority on preventing or reducing skeletal complications. There are two treatment options--local and systemic. Local therapy includes radiotherapy as well as surgical and orthopedic measures. The four pillars of systemic treatment are hormone therapy, chemotherapy, antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates, and treatment with centrally and/or peripherally acting analgesics. A precondition for successful treatment is close cooperation between medical/clinical oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons/orthopedists, gynecologists, pain specialists, and endocrinologists (in the presence of a hypercalcemic syndrome). Patients with breast cancer associated solely with osseous metastasis may live for a number of years. It is, therefore, all the more important to start appropriate therapeutic measures early. Bisphosphonates play a particularly valuable role, since their main effect lies in the prevention of skeletal complications. Rather than replacing antineoplastic therapy, this class of substances supplements other treatments. Once started, bisphosphonate therapy should be given for the remainder of the patient's life, even in the event of osseous progression.

Results of iliac crest biopsies taken from 1465 patients with primary breast cancer.

This study was performed to analyze the relevance of iliac crest biopsy in patients with primary breast cancer with regard to metastases of the primary tumor and osteogenic disease. We performed intraoperative bilateral biopsy of the anterior iliac crests in 1465 patients with primary breast cancer. The bone specimens were histologically evaluated with regard to quality of the biopsy, tumor involvement, and osteogenic and hematogenic disease. Accurate and clear evaluation of the iliac crest biopsies was possible in 1365 patients (93%). Osteopenia was diagnosed in 48 patients (3.5%); 24 patients (1.7%) showed histological evidence of tumor involvement of the skeletal system. All these 24 patients received systemic (adjuvant) therapy after surgery. Ten patients had micrometastases, although in 5 of them both the postoperative bone scan and X-rays showed no pathological results. In 10 women with histologically negative bone biopsies, metastases to the bone were diagnosed by bone scan and radiological methods. Random perioperative iliac bone biopsy cannot be recommended in patients with primary breast cancer. Iliac crest biopsy is relevant in certain scenarios (e.g. suspected recurrence, doubtful bone scan).

Metastatic potential of small and minimally invasive breast carcinomas.

Invasive ductal mammary carcinomas (IDC) of 1 cm in tumour size or less account for less than 20% of all IDC. We have observed 167 such cases at our Institution between 1985 and 1989. These were divided into carcinomas with an extensive or predominant intraductal component (EIC or PIC, being least 2x or 4x larger than the invasive component; 90) and compared statistically with the control group (no EIC or PIC; 77) for known prognostic factors and for their metastatic behaviour. Lymph nodes were step sectioned in order to detect occult micrometastases. The median follow up time was 62.6 months. Lymph node metastases were seen in 10% of pT1a and 19% of pT1b cases. Significant differences were found when comparing the EIC/PIC group with the control group (pT1a: 11% vs. 0%, pT1b: 37% vs. 11% lymph node metastases). Also, axillary and infraclavicular recurrence rates were higher for EIC/PIC carcinomas compared with other IDC of < or = 1 cm (9.3% vs. 4.2%). This significantly adverse metastatic behaviour of the EIC/PIC tumours may be in part due to the more frequent occurrence of multifocal tumours in this group (in 43% vs. 6%), resulting in a greater tumour burden. We conclude that the overall risk of lymph node metastasis is not negligible in carcinomas of 1 cm or less in diameter with the risk being more than doubled for carcinomas with an intraductal component exceeding the invasive tumour by a factor of two. These differences were relevant only to regional metastases; the risk for distant metastasis and survival was identical after 5 years.

[Therapeutic value of aredia in treatment of breast carcinoma]. / Der therapeutische Wert von Aredia in der Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Like other metastases, bone metastases in breast cancer patients are not only a sign of the incurable nature of the underlying disease, but are also associated with specific complications. In particular, bone pain and pathological fractures impair the quality of life of those affected. Any treatment concept must therefore place the highest priority on preventing or reducing skeletal complications. THERAPY: There are 2 treatment options--local and systemic. Local therapy includes radiotherapy as well as surgical and orthopedic measures. The 4 pillars of systemic treatment are hormone therapy and chemotherapy, antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates and treatment with centrally and/or peripherally acting analgesics. A precondition for successful treatment is close cooperation between gynecologists, medical/clinical oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons/orthopedists, pain specialists and endocrinologists (in the presence of a hypercalcemic syndrome). CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer associated solely with osseous metastasis may survive for a number of years. It is therefore all the more important to start appropriate therapeutic measures in good time. Bisphosphonates play a particularly valuable role, since their main effect lies in the prevention of skeletal complications. Rather than replacing antineoplastic therapy, this class of substances supplements other treatments. Once started, bisphosphonate therapy should be given life-long, even in the event of osseous progression.