Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with positional therapy: long-term results.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of a sleep position trainer (SPT) in patients with an established diagnosis of positional obstructive sleep apnea and to evaluate the adherence after 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Polysomnography (PSG) was performed at baseline and after 1 year of SPT use. Patients received questionnaires to assess treatment satisfaction and subjective adherence. Data on objective adherence and number of vibrations initiated by the SPT were collected from the SPT device. RESULTS: Nine out of 58 patients stopped using the SPT during the first year of treatment (16%). Thirty-four middle-aged and overweight patients underwent a PSG after 1 year of SPT use (male/female ratio, 28/6; overall apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), 16/h). A significant reduction in overall AHI to 6/h was observed using treatment (p < 0.001). The median percentage of supine sleep decreased significantly to 1% with SPT (p < 0.001). The mean objective SPT use in 28 patients was 7.3 ± 0.9 h/night and 69 ± 26% of the nights. Furthermore, 75% of the patients reported a better sleep quality since the start of SPT treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with the SPT was found to be effective in reducing overall AHI. Time spent sleeping in supine position was reduced to almost zero in the continuing users. Patient satisfaction was high when using the SPT.

Comparison of upper airway collapse patterns and its clinical significance: drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: To compare patient characteristics, upper airway (UA) collapse patterns and treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, including non-positional OSA patients (NPP) and positional OSA patients (PP), and non-OSA. METHODS: Cohort study of patients screened for OSA in 2012. Polysomnography was performed and UA was evaluated using the VOTE classification during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Treatment outcome of MAD and UA surgery was evaluated. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty patients were included. Higher BMI, larger neck circumference, and greater age were independent significant predictors for OSA. DISE was performed in 543 patients: 119 non-OSA and 424 OSA patients of whom 257 PP and 167 NPP patients. PP were younger, had smaller neck circumference, lower BMI and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) than NPP. Collapse at velum (p < 0.001) and oropharynx (p < 0.001) significantly increased the odds for having OSA. Tongue base and epiglottis collapse were, on group level, not determinative for OSA or non-OSA. Complete concentric collapse (CCC) was observed less frequently in PP (31.5%) as compared to NPP (46.1%). After UA surgery, OSA often was cured or improved to less severe positional OSA. Lower efficacy of UA surgery was observed in PP as compared to NPP. No differences were observed in MAD treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Current study provides insight in patients screened for OSA: collapse at velum and oropharynx significantly determined presence of OSA and CCC occurred less frequently in PP compared to NPP. In addition, residual positional dependency is common after UA surgery. More trials are needed to gain insight in pathophysiology and treatment outcome.

Treatment efficacy of a titratable oral appliance in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a prospective clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical trial assessed the therapeutic outcomes of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with a novel duobloc custom-made titratable mandibular advancement device (OAm). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The modular Somnomed G2® OAm (Somnomed Europe AG, Zurich, Switzerland) with 'click-to-fit' adjustability provides instant feedback on the mandibular advancement. 161 consecutive patients with established diagnoses of OSA. Dental impressions were made and a bite registration in 75% of the maximal protrusion being the starting protrusion. Treatment response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Treatment success was defined as 1a) AHI with OAm < 5 events/h sleep or 1b) AHI with OAm < 10 events/h. Treatment success and response were combined to define additional criteria: 2a) reduction in AHI ≥ 50% and AHI < 5 events/h; and 2b) reduction in AHI ≥ 50% and AHI <10 events/h. RESULTS: In 112 patients AHI decreased significantly from 25 ± 18/h sleep at baseline to 12 ± 13/h with the OAm (p < 0.001). The visual analogue scoring for snoring (VAS) decreased significantly from 7 ± 3 to 2 ± 2 (p < 0.001). Treatment response was achieved in 65 of 112 patients (58%); 31% and 57% of patients were treated successfully according to criteria 1a and 1b, respectively. Furthermore, 31% and 50% of patients were treated successfully according to criteria 2a and 2b, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial indicates that treatment with a novel custom-made OAm can reduce the severity of sleep-disordered breathing by significantly decreasing the AHI and VAS scores.

Evaluation of the impact of a clinical pathway on the organization of a multidisciplinary dental sleep clinic.

PURPOSE: Clinical pathways are used to organize complex care processes by providing structure and standardization. The multidisciplinary approach of oral appliance (OA) therapy for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a complex and dynamic process suitable for such a structured pathway approach. METHODS: A clinical pathway for patients referred for OA therapy was developed and implemented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this clinical pathway on the time to delivery of the OA and the organization of the multidisciplinary dental sleep clinic (MDSC). The latter was achieved using the care process self-evaluation tool (CPSET). RESULTS: First, development and implementation of the clinical pathway gave structure and shortened the mean time to delivery by 102 days (240 ± 70 vs. 138 ± 33 days) (Mann-Whitney U: P < 0.001). Second, the CPSET scores were obtained in a cohort of 49 healthcare professionals involved in the pathway. Overall, patient-focused organization received the highest scores (80.5 ± 9.0%), whereas cooperation with primary care received the lowest score (66.7 ± 12.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first project on clinical pathways in OA therapy for SDB. The implementation of the pathway in our MDSC has created a significant shortening of the time to delivery. A first evaluation of the clinical pathway using the CPSET scores indicates that all disciplines involved should be thoroughly informed in an ongoing approach.

Impact of type D personality on adherence to oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing.

PURPOSE: Type D personality, defined as a combination of social inhibition and negative affectivity, has been associated with poor medication adherence and lower adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Up to this date, the association of patient's personality with adherence with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) has not been studied. The purposes of this study were to examine the association between type D personality and poor adherence to MAD treatment and to examine the impact of type D personality on perceived side effects during this treatment. METHODS: Eighty-two patients out of 113 patients with a known baseline type D scale who have started MAD treatment between June 2006 and December 2009 were included. Information about side effects and adherence were collected via a postal questionnaire. Thirty-three patients were using a monobloc MAD and 49 patients were using a duobloc MAD. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of type D patients discontinued MAD treatment, whereas only 15 % of non-type D patients reported treatment discontinuation. The odds ratio for treatment discontinuation was 6.03 (95 % confidence interval 1.22-29.81; p = 0.027) for type D personality, adjusted for age, gender, MAD type (monobloc or duobloc), and decrease in apnea severity. In continuing MAD users, no significant difference in perceived side effects was reported between the personality types. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine the relationship between type D personality and adherence to MAD treatment. Type D patients reported a significantly higher discontinuation rate when compared to patients without type D personality.

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using a custom-made titratable duobloc oral appliance: a prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: This prospective clinical study investigates the efficacy of a specific custom-made titratable mandibular advancement device (MAD) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This MAD has attachments in the frontal teeth area that allow for progressive titration of the mandible. METHODS: Sixty-one adult OSA patients were included (age, 46.7 ± 9.0 years; male/female ratio, 45/16; apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), 23.2 ± 15.4 events/h sleep; body mass index, 27.9 ± 4.1 kg/m²). After an adaptation period, titration started based on a protocol of symptomatic benefit or upon reaching the physiological limits of protrusion. As a primary outcome, treatment response was defined as an objective reduction in AHI following MAD treatment of ≥50 % compared to baseline, and treatment success as a reduction in AHI with MAD to less than 5 and 10 events/h sleep. Compliance failure was defined as an inability to continue treatment. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease was observed in AHI, from 23.4 ± 15.7 at baseline to 8.9 ± 8.6 events/h with MAD (p < 0.01). Treatment response was achieved in 42 out of 61 patients (68.8 %), whereas 42.6 % met criteria of AHI < 5 and 63.9 % achieved an AHI < 10 events/h sleep, respectively. Four patients (6.6 %) were considered as "compliance failures." CONCLUSIONS: The present study has evaluated the efficacy of a specific custom-made titratable MAD in terms of sleep apnea reduction.

Prevalence of residual excessive sleepiness during effective oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing.

BACKGROUND: Oral appliance therapy with a mandibular advancement device (OAm) can yield to complete therapeutic response (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]<5 events/h), though some patients show little or no improvement in daytime sleepiness. The prevalence of residual excessive sleepiness (RES) despite effective treatment with OAm therapy is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of RES in patients treated with a titratable custom-made duobloc OAm. METHODS: A prevalence study was performed, collecting data from 185 patients with an established diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) under OAm therapy with a titratable custom-made duobloc device (baseline data were male:female ratio, 129:56; age, 48±9 years; body mass index [BMI], 27±4 kg/m2; Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score, 10±5; and AHI, 19±12 events/h). A full-night polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 months of OAm therapy. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using the ESS with RES defined as an ESS score of 11 or higher out of 24, despite complete therapeutic response. RESULTS: Out of 185 patients, 84 patients (45%) showed a complete therapeutic response with an AHI of <5 events per hour after 3 months of OAm therapy. Despite this normalization of AHI, 27 out of these 84 patients (32%) showed RES and had a significantly higher baseline ESS (15±4 vs. 9±4; P<.001) and were younger (43±9 vs. 47±9; P=.028) compared to patients without RES. CONCLUSION: RES under OAm therapy showed a prevalence of up to 32% in SDB patients effectively treated with respect to AHI. Patients with RES were younger and had higher baseline daytime sleepiness.