Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Gut ; 71(9): 1803-1811, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34803023

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Revised guidelines for caesarean section (CS) advise maternal antibiotic administration prior to skin incision instead of after umbilical cord clamping, unintentionally exposing the infant to antibiotics antenatally. We aimed to investigate if timing of intrapartum antibiotics contributes to the impairment of microbiota colonisation in CS born infants. DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, women delivering via CS received antibiotics prior to skin incision (n=20) or after umbilical cord clamping (n=20). A third control group of vaginally delivering women (n=23) was included. Faecal microbiota was determined from all infants at 1, 7 and 28 days after birth and at 3 years by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing. RESULTS: Compared with vaginally born infants, profound differences were found in microbial diversity and composition in both CS groups in the first month of life. A decreased abundance in species belonging to the genera Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium was found with a concurrent increase in members belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria. These differences could not be observed at 3 years of age. No statistically significant differences were observed in taxonomic and functional composition of the microbiome between both CS groups at any of the time points. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that microbiome colonisation is strongly affected by CS delivery. Our findings suggest that maternal antibiotic administration prior to CS does not result in a second hit on the compromised microbiome. Future, larger studies should confirm that antenatal antibiotic exposure in CS born infants does not aggravate colonisation impairment and impact long-term health.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cesárea , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteroides , Bifidobacterium , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
2.
Pediatr Res ; 92(2): 362-372, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34711944

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood culture (PBC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS), but its diagnostic value can be questioned. We aimed to systematically asses the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of umbilical cord blood culture (UCBC) for EOS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies performing UCBC for the diagnosis of EOS were included. RESULTS: A total of 1908 articles were screened of which 17 were included. Incidences of positive PBC and UCBC were low in all studies. There was a large heterogeneity in the consistency between positive PBC and UCBC outcomes. PBC had a pooled sensitivity of 20.4% (95% CI 0.0-40.9) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 100.0-100.0) compared to 42.6% (95% CI 12.7-72.4%) and 97.8% (95% CI 93.1-100.0) of UCBC for clinical EOS, defined as clinical sepsis regardless of PBC outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that, compared to PBC, UCBC has higher sensitivity and comparable specificity for clinical EOS and might be considered as diagnostic test for EOS. Due to the limited number of studies, low incidences of EOS cases, and the imperfect reference standards for EOS, results should be interpreted cautiously. IMPACT: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the diagnostic test accuracy of umbilical cord blood culture for neonatal early-onset sepsis. Peripheral blood culture is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis, but its value for this specific diagnosis can be questioned. Umbilical cord blood culture has higher sensitivity and comparable specificity for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis compared to peripheral blood culture, circumventing the risk for iatrogenic anemia and consequently might be used as a diagnostic tool for early-onset sepsis. Quality of evidence was regarded as low due to imperfect diagnostic methods of neonatal early-onset sepsis.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Sepse , Biomarcadores , Hemocultura , Sangue Fetal , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 181(10): 3715-3724, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35927379

RESUMO

The threshold to initiate empiric antibiotics for suspicion of early-onset sepsis (EOS) is low in preterm infants. Antibiotics' effects on short-term outcomes have recently been debated. We aimed at exploring the extent of early empiric antibiotic exposure (EEAE) in preterm infants and the association between the duration of EEAE with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) within different EEAE groups. EEAE practice for suspicion of EOS was evaluated in all included infants (gestational age < 30 weeks) born in 9 centers in the Netherlands and Belgium between Oct. 2014 and Jan. 2019. EEAE association with NEC and LOS development was analyzed by multivariate regression. After excluding 56 EOS cases, 1259 infants were included. A total of 1122 infants (89.1%) were exposed to empirical antibiotics for the suspicion of EOS of whom 802 (63.7%) had short (≤ 72 h) and 320 (25.4%) prolonged EEAE (> 72 h). Infants with EEAE ≤ 72 h had a lower incidence of NEC compared to both infants without EEAE (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.19-0.80]; p = 0.01) and with prolonged EEAE (> 72 h) (aOR [95%CI]: 0.58 [0.35-0.96]; p = 0.03). With every additional day of EEAE, LOS incidence decreased (aOR [95%CI]: 0.90 [0.85-0.97]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Almost 90% of preterm infants who have negative blood culture results in the first 72 h of life are exposed to EEAE under suspicion of EOS. One-fourth has prolonged EEAE. Duration of EEAE was differently associated with NEC and LOS incidence. The effects of antibiotics, and potentially induced microbial dysbiosis related to development of NEC and LOS, should further be explored. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Preterm infants often receive antibiotics empirically directly after birth for suspicion of early-onset sepsis. • The effects of the duration of early empirical antibiotic exposure on the risk for necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis are debated. WHAT IS NEW: • Almost 90% of preterm infants with a gestational age below 30 weeks are exposed to antibiotics empirically after birth despite negative culture results. In a quarter of these culture-negative infants, empirical antibiotics are prolonged. • A short course of empirical antibiotics (≤72h) is associated with decreased odds for necrotizing enterocolitis compared to both prolonged (>72h) or no empirical antibiotics after birth. Furthermore, every additional day of empirical antibiotic exposure is associated with decreased risk for late-onset sepsis in the first month of life.


Assuntos
Enterocolite Necrosante , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Sepse , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Enterocolite Necrosante/induzido quimicamente , Enterocolite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Necrosante/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Sepse/complicações
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925919

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants decreases the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and mortality. The underlying mechanisms, including effects on the gut microbiota, are largely unknown. We aimed to systematically review the available literature on the effects of probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants on gut microbiota development. DESIGN: A systematic review in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Premature infants. INTERVENTION: Probiotic supplementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gut microbiota. RESULTS: A total of 1046 articles were screened, of which 29 were included. There was a large heterogeneity in study design, dose and type of probiotic strains, timepoints of sample collection and analysing techniques. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were the most used probiotic strains. The effects of probiotics on alpha diversity were conflicting; however, beta diversity was significantly different between probiotic-supplemented infants and controls in the vast majority of studies. In most studies, probiotic supplementation led to increased relative abundance of the supplemented strains and decreased abundance of genera such as Clostridium, Streptococcus, Klebsiella and Escherichia. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation to preterm infants seems to increase the relative abundance of the supplemented strains with a concurrent decrease of potentially pathogenic species. These probiotic-induced microbial alterations may contribute to the decreased risk of health complications such as NEC. Future trials, including omics technologies to analyse both microbiota composition and function linked to health outcomes, are warranted to identify the optimal mixture and dosing of probiotic strains. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023385204.

5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2418129, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967929

RESUMO

Importance: Probiotics are often considered in children to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea. However, the underlying mechanistic effects and impact of probiotics on antibiotic-induced microbiota changes are not well understood. Objective: To investigate the effects of a multispecies probiotic on the gut microbiota composition in children receiving antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from February 1, 2018, to May 31, 2021, including 350 children receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Patients were followed up until 1 month after the intervention period. Fecal samples and data were analyzed between September 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023. Eligibility criteria included 3 months to 18 years of age and recruitment within 24 hours following initiation of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics. In total, 646 eligible patients were approached and 350 participated in the trial. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to receive daily placebo or a multispecies probiotic formulation consisting of 8 strains from 5 different genera during antibiotic treatment and for 7 days afterward. Main Outcomes and Measures: Fecal stool samples were collected at 4 predefined times: (1) inclusion, (2) last day of antibiotic use, (3) last day of the study intervention, and (4) 1 month after intervention. Microbiota analysis was performed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Results: A total of 350 children were randomized and collected stool samples from 88 were eligible for the microbiota analysis (54 boys and 34 girls; mean [SD] age, 47.09 [55.64] months). Alpha diversity did not significantly differ between groups at the first 3 times. Shannon diversity (mean [SD], 3.56 [0.75] vs 3.09 [1.00]; P = .02) and inverse Simpson diversity (mean [SD], 3.75 [95% CI, 1.66-5.82] vs -1.31 [95% CI, -3.17 to 0.53]; P = 1 × 10-4) indices were higher in the placebo group compared with the probiotic group 1 month after intervention. Beta diversity was not significantly different at any of the times. Three of 5 supplemented genera had higher relative abundance during probiotic supplementation, but this difference had disappeared after 1 month. Conclusions and Relevance: The studied probiotic mixture had minor and transient effects on the microbiota composition during and after antibiotic treatment. Further research is needed to understand their working mechanisms in manipulating the microbiome and preventing antibiotic-associated dysbiosis and adverse effects such as antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334604.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Diarreia , Fezes , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Probióticos , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Fezes/microbiologia , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Diarreia/microbiologia , Adolescente , Lactente
6.
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol ; 9(1): 9, 2023 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: Dutch obstetrics guideline suggest an initial maternal benzylpenicillin dose of 2,000,000 IU followed by 1,000,000 IU every 4 h for group-B-streptococci (GBS) prophylaxis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether concentrations of benzylpenicillin reached concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in umbilical cord blood (UCB) and neonatal plasma following the Dutch guideline. RESULTS: Forty-six neonates were included. A total of 46 UCB samples and 18 neonatal plasma samples were available for analysis. Nineteen neonates had mothers that received intrapartum benzylpenicillin. Benzylpenicillin in UCB corresponded to concentrations in plasma drawn directly postpartum (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.01). A log-linear regression suggested that benzylpenicillin concentrations in neonates remained above the MIC threshold 0.125 mg/L up to 13.0 h after the last intrapartum dose. CONCLUSIONS: Dutch intrapartum benzylpenicillin doses result in neonatal concentrations above the MIC of GBS.

7.
Microorganisms ; 11(4)2023 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37110382

RESUMO

Delay in the time-to-positivity of a peripheral blood culture (PBC), the gold standard for early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) diagnosis, has resulted in excessive use of antibiotics. In this study, we evaluate the potential of the rapid Molecular Culture (MC) assay for quick EOS diagnosis. In the first part of this study, known positive and spiked blood samples were used to assess the performance of MC. In the in vivo clinical study, the second part of this study, all infants receiving antibiotics for suspicion of EOS were included. At initial EOS suspicion, a blood sample was collected for PBC and MC. MC was able to detect bacteria present in the spiked samples even when the bacterial load was low. In the clinical study, MC was positive in one infant with clinical EOS (Enterococcus faecalis) that was not detected by PBC. Additionally, MC was positive in two infants without clinical sepsis (Streptococcus mitis and multiple species), referred to as contamination. The other 37 samples were negative both by MC and PBC. MC seems to be able to detect bacteria even when the bacterial load is low. The majority of MC and PBC results were comparable and the risk for contamination and false positive MC results seems to be limited. Since MC can generate results within 4 h following sampling compared with 36-72 h in PBC, MC may have the potential to replace conventional PBC in EOS diagnostics in order to guide clinicians on when to discontinue antibiotic therapy several hours after birth.

8.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(3)2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978356

RESUMO

The difficulty in recognizing early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) in a timely manner due to non-specific symptoms and the limitations of diagnostic tests, combined with the risk of serious consequences if EONS is not treated in a timely manner, has resulted in a low threshold for starting empirical antibiotic treatment. New guideline strategies, such as the neonatal sepsis calculator, have been proven to reduce the antibiotic burden related to EONS, but lack sensitivity for detecting EONS. In this review, the potential of novel, targeted preventive and diagnostic methods for EONS is discussed from three different perspectives: maternal, umbilical cord and newborn perspectives. Promising strategies from the maternal perspective include Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prevention, exploring the virulence factors of GBS, maternal immunization and antepartum biomarkers. The diagnostic methods obtained from the umbilical cord are preliminary but promising. Finally, promising fields from the newborn perspective include biomarkers, new microbiological techniques and clinical prediction and monitoring strategies. Consensus on the definition of EONS and the standardization of research on novel diagnostic biomarkers are crucial for future implementation and to reduce current antibiotic overexposure in newborns.

9.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(4)2023 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37107057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to a lack of rapid, accurate diagnostic tools for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) at the initial suspicion, infants are often unnecessarily given antibiotics directly after birth. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for EOS before antibiotic initiation and to investigate whether presepsin can be used to guide clinicians' decisions on whether to start antibiotics. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, all infants who started on antibiotics for EOS suspicion were consecutively included. Presepsin concentrations were determined in blood samples collected at the initial EOS suspicion (t = 0). In addition to this, samples were collected at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the initial EOS suspicion and from the umbilical cord directly after birth. The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 333 infants were included, of whom 169 were born preterm. We included 65 term and 15 preterm EOS cases. At the initial EOS suspicion, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.70) in the term-born infants compared to 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.95) in the preterm infants. A cut-off value of 645 pg/mL resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% in the preterm infants. The presepsin concentrations in cord blood and at other time points did not differ significantly from the concentrations at the initial EOS suspicion. CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin is a biomarker with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for EOS (culture-proven and clinical EOS) in preterm infants and might be of value in reducing antibiotic exposure after birth when appended to current EOS guidelines. However, the small number of EOS cases prevents us from drawing firm conclusions. Further research should be performed to evaluate whether appending a presepsin-guided step to current EOS guidelines leads to a safe decrease in antibiotic overtreatment and antibiotic-related morbidity.

10.
JAMA Pediatr ; 176(9): 860-866, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727573

RESUMO

Importance: The efficacy of multispecies probiotic formulations in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) remains unclear. Objective: To assess the effect of a multispecies probiotic on the risk of AAD in children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted from February 2018 to May 2021 in a multicenter, mixed setting (inpatients and outpatients). Patients were followed up throughout the intervention period. Eligibility criteria included age 3 months to 18 years, recruitment within 24 hours following initiation of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics, and signed informed consent. In total, 646 eligible patients were approached and 350 patients took part in the trial. Interventions: A multispecies probiotic consisting of Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, L acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum W62, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24, for a total dose of 10 billion colony-forming units daily, for the duration of antibiotic treatment and for 7 days after. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was AAD, defined as 3 or more loose or watery stools per day in a 24-hour period, caused either by Clostridioides difficile or of otherwise unexplained etiology, after testing for common diarrheal pathogens. The secondary outcomes included diarrhea regardless of the etiology, diarrhea duration, and predefined diarrhea complications. Results: A total of 350 children (192 boys and 158 girls; mean [range] age, 50 [3-212] months) were randomized and 313 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Compared with placebo (n = 155), the probiotic (n = 158) had no effect on risk of AAD (relative risk [RR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49-1.33). However, children in the probiotic group had a lower risk of diarrhea regardless of the etiology (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94). No differences were observed between the groups for most of the secondary outcomes, including adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: A multispecies probiotic did not reduce the risk of AAD in children when analyzed according to the most stringent definition. However, it reduced the overall risk of diarrhea during and for 7 days after antibiotic treatment. Our study also shows that the AAD definition has a significant effect on clinical trial results and their interpretation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334604.


Assuntos
Diarreia , Probióticos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Coleta de Dados , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Diarreia/microbiologia , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probióticos/uso terapêutico
11.
Trials ; 20(1): 479, 2019 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31382981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A disturbance in the early colonisation of the gut by microorganisms is associated with an aberrant innate immune system and a variety of clinical conditions later in life. Several factors are considered to influence this initial colonisation, including maternally administered antibiotics during pregnancy and delivery. Recent revisions to international obstetric guidelines have resulted in the exposure of all infants born by caesarean section (CS) to broad-spectrum antibiotics perinatally. To date, the consequences of these new guidelines on neonatal gut colonisation and the associated short- and long-term health implications have not yet been addressed. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the timing of antibiotic administration during CS to the mother on the course of neonatal intestinal colonisation up to 2 years of age. METHODS/DESIGN: This single-centre randomised controlled trial will recruit 40 women scheduled for an elective CS. The subjects will be randomised to receive 1500 mg of cefuroxime intravenously either prior to the skin incision (n = 20) or after clamping of the umbilical cord (n = 20). Levels of cefuroxime in cord blood will be determined for exposed neonates. Faecal samples from the children will be collected on days 1, 7 and 28 days and at 2 years old and analysed by 16S sequencing. Shannon-diversity indices, absolute and relative abundances, and unsupervised and supervised classification methods will be used to evaluate the effect of the timing of intrapartum cefuroxime administration on the composition of the microbiota. The outcomes for both study groups will be compared to the intestinal microbiota of vaginally born infants (n = 20). To detect possible effects on health state, a questionnaire on health-related issues will be taken at the age of 2 years. DISCUSSION: In the proposed study, changes in the intestinal microbiota of 40 children born by CS will be followed until the age of 2 years. Research on this topic is necessary since significant effects relating to the timing of antibiotic administration on microbial colonisation may conflict with the current guidelines, as this may have health consequences later in life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Clinical Trial Registry, NTR6000 . Retrospectively registered on 25 July 2016.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cesárea , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA