Comparison of neuraxial acoustic target window of the spine among rider sitting, cross leg, hamstring stretch, and classical sitting position: An observational study.

Background and Aims: To compare ultra-sonographic dimensions of acoustic target window of the spine in the participants at four different sitting positions namely cross leg sitting (CLP), hamstring stretch (HSP), classical sitting (CSP) and riders sitting position (RSP). The primary objective of this study was to measure the neuraxial acoustic target window (defined as interlaminar distance between L3-L4 lamina). The secondary objective was to compare ultra-sonographic measurements of the depth of ligamentum flavum from the skin, and to compare the diameter of intrathecal space and comfort score in the four different sitting positions. Material and Methods: This study is a prospective observational study. Eighty participants were included and positioned in four different sitting positions to perform an ultra-sonographic scan and measure various parameters of the acoustic neuraxial window. The interlaminar distance, the distance of skin from the ligamentum flavum, and the diameter of the spinal canal or intrathecal space was measured in the L3-L4 intervertebral space in different positions. Results: The mean value of interlaminar distance among four sitting positions was ranging from 1.40 cm to 1.44 cm (P value 0.725.) The distance of ligamentum flavum from skin and diameter of intrathecal space was also comparable in all the groups. The comfort score in CSP was significantly better when compared to other groups with a median score of 4 (P value < 0.001). Conclusions: There is no statistically significant difference in interlaminar distance in various sitting positions. All four positions are equally effective and can be used as an alternative to spinal/epidural intervention, but the CSP came out to be the most comfortable and more emphasis should be given to the comfort as it increases the chance of success rate of the procedure.

Propeller vs. free fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of complex lower limb defects-A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Of all body regions, lower extremity wounds have been and remain the greatest challenge. Free flaps have been accepted as a reasonable option to solve this dilemma, but they require the complexity of microsurgery. This study aimed to compare the postoperative and clinical outcomes of propeller flap and fasciocutaneous free flap in the reconstruction of complex lower limb defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2023. Selected patients were randomized into two groups: the propeller flap group and fasciocutaneous free flap group. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, and postoperative parameter, including esthetic analysis, scar assessment, neurosensory analysis, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity function, were estimated and statistically significant compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: Road traffic accident (73.3%) was the most common etiology for lower limb defects in both groups. The foot and lower third of the leg were the most common site of defect, constituting 79.99%. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in propeller flap as compared to fasciocutaneous free flaps. Flap size was smaller, with better neurosensory improvements in propeller flap group. Esthetic analysis, scar assessment, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity functional analysis yielded similar results in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Propeller flap has better outcomes compared to free flap in terms of smaller size of flap, shorter duration of surgery, and reduced length of hospital stay. Comparable results were obtained with respect to esthetic score, scar assessment score, psychosocial analysis, and neurosensory recovery and lower extremity functional score.

Comparison of Binaural Tone Music vs Patient Choice Music vs Midazolam on Perioperative Anxiety in Patients Posted for Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia: a Randomized Control Trial.

Background Perioperative anxiety affects patients' hemodynamics by increasing stress levels, leading to delayed recovery. In this study, we compared the anxiety-reducing effect of music (patient choice and binaural tone music) with midazolam for perioperative anxiolysis in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical clearance and informed written consent, a total of 225 patients classified as ASA grades 1 and 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists) were enrolled and randomised into three groups of 75 patients per group. Group A patients received research-selected music (binaural tone) via noise-cancelling headphones, Group B received intravenous midazolam (minimum of 1 mg to 2 mg maximum) as per clinical judgement, and Group C participants provided patient-preferred music via noise-cancelling headphones. The patient's perioperative anxiety was assessed using a visual analogue anxiety scale at regular time intervals. Results Anxiety scores were significantly reduced in the patient's choice music group (Group C) and binaural tone music group (Group A) as compared to the midazolam group (Group B). Postoperative pain scores were statistically significantly lower in Group C, followed by Group A and Group B. On comparing patient satisfaction scores, using numerical rating scores, 96% of patients in Group C achieved excellent scores with a p-value of 0.007. Conclusion Binaural tone music and patient choice music can be suitable alternatives to pharmacological therapies for perioperative anxiolysis.

A Rare Case Of Schwannoma Of Maxillary Sinus

Schwann cell tumor or schwannomas is the benign nerve sheath tumors, which arise mostly from head and neck region and rarely from the nasal and paranasal sinuses. Of these, very few arise solely from the maxillary sinus. This is a case report of a 25-year-old female patient presenting with painful swelling below the right eye turned out to be a rare case of schwannoma arising solely from the maxillary sinus. Details of clinical history, examination, histopathological finding, radiological finding, treatment, and follow-up have been presented