Reconstructing the fall: individual, behavioural and contextual factors associated with falls in individuals with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: Falls are a significant and recurrent problem for individuals with intellectual disability (ID). There has been little exploration of the fall event from the perspective of the individual who falls or their carers. Research has focused predominantly on personal risk factors, leaving the behavioural and contextual analysis of falls much less understood. This study aimed to identify these additional factors as well as briefly explore the fall experience for individuals and their carers. METHOD: A qualitative design was used incorporating fall reconstructions and ethnographic-style interviews conducted in the home setting. Nine people with ID and their carers/family member participated: five pairs were living at home and four were in out-of-family-home settings. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and major themes identified via thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 17 themes that contributed to falls and fell under the three headings of individual, behavioural or contextual factors. Themes include decreased physical capacity, unsafe behaviours, limited hazard awareness and the impact of others in the home on an individual's fall behaviours. Additionally, families and individuals identified a number of consequences and adaptations which they implemented to alleviate possible fall impact. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative interviews, observational methods and carer assistance are valuable in offering insight into understanding the individual, behavioural and contextual factors associated with falls in people with ID. The fall reconstruction technique may be a useful supplement when evaluating intrinsic risk in programmes designed to reduce falls.

Does increased sunlight exposure work as a strategy to improve vitamin D status in the elderly: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

SUMMARY: Sunlight exposure by improving vitamin D status could be a simple public health strategy in reducing falls among frail elder people. In a randomised controlled trial, adherence to sunlight exposure was low (median adherence, 26%) and no effect of increased UV exposure on falls risk was observed (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.06, P = 0.73). INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether increased sunlight exposure was effective to improve vitamin D status and reduce falls in the elderly. METHODS: In a cluster randomised controlled trial (NCT00322166 at ClinicalTrials.gov), 602 residents aged 70 or more (mean age, 86.4 years; 71% female) were recruited from 51 aged care facilities in Northern Sydney, Australia. Participants were randomised by facility to receive either increased sunlight exposure (additional 30-40 min/day in the early morning) with (UV+) or without (UV) calcium supplementation (600 mg/day) or neither (control) for a year. The co-primary endpoints were change in serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) and falls incidence after 12 months. RESULTS: Adherence to sunlight exposure was low (median adherence, 26%; IQR, 7%-45%). Serum 25OHD levels were low at baseline (median, 32.9 nmol/L) and increased only slightly depending on the number of sunlight sessions attended over 12 months (P = 0.04). During the study, 327 falls occurred in 111 (54%) subjects in the control group, 326 falls in 111 (58%) subjects in the UV only group and 335 falls in 108 (52%) subjects in the UV+ group. By intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant effect of increased UV exposure on falls risk (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.76-1.48; P = 0.73). However, in 66 participants who attended ≥130 sessions per year (adherence, ≥50% of 260 sessions-five per week), falls were significantly reduced (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.88; P = 0.01) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Increased sunlight exposure did not reduce vitamin D deficiency or falls risk in frail older people. This public health strategy was not effective most likely due to poor adherence to the intervention.

Incidence of and risk factors for falls among adults with an intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: Falls among people with intellectual disability (ID) occur at a younger age than the general population and are a significant cause of injury and hospitalisation. There is very limited research investigating risk factors for falls among people with ID and none with people living outside of formal care arrangements, either independently or with their family.We used a medical chart audit to identify the incidence and risk factors for falls among people with ID living in a variety of settings. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 114 consecutive patients, aged 18 years and over who attended a clinic for people with developmental disabilities within a 15-month period. Fall information was measured by carer recall of falls in the past 12 months. Potential risk factors were extracted from medical reports and a patient information questionnaire. Potential predictors were identified using univariate analysis and entered into a multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 114 participants, 39 (34%) reported a fall in the previous 12 months.The number of reported falls was similar for formal care and non-formal care arrangements.The vast majority of fallers (84%) reported sustaining an injury from a fall and many potential risk factors were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed having seizures in the past 5 years, a history of fracture and increasing age were risk factors for falls. CONCLUSIONS: Falls are a significant health concern for adults with ID of all ages as a result of their incidence and the resulting injuries. Falls appear to be equally an issue for people residing in formal and non-formal care accommodation. Further research is needed to develop screening tools and interventions for this population.

Behavior and emotional disturbance in Prader-Willi syndrome.

To determine if persons with the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) have increased psychopathology when compared with matched controls, and whether there is a specific behavior phenotype in PWS, the behavior of 46 persons with PWS was compared with that of control individuals derived from a community sample (N = 454) of persons with mental retardation (MR). Behaviors were studied using the Developmental Behaviour Checklist, an instrument of established validity in the evaluation of behavioral disturbance in individuals with MR. PWS subjects were found to be more behaviorally disturbed than controls overall, and especially in antisocial behavior. In addition, some individual behaviors were more common in PWS subjects than controls. When these behaviors are considered together with findings from other studies using acceptably rigorous methods, a consensus behavior phenotype for PWS can be formulated. This will provide a valid foundation for studies of the mechanism of genetic pathogenesis of behavior in PWS.