Distribution and functions of phosphotransferase system genes in the genome of the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni.

Oenococcus oeni, the lactic acid bacterium primarily responsible for malolactic fermentation in wine, is able to grow on a large variety of carbohydrates, but the pathways by which substrates are transported and phosphorylated in this species have been poorly studied. We show that the genes encoding the general phosphotransferase proteins, enzyme I (EI) and histidine protein (HPr), as well as 21 permease genes (3 isolated ones and 18 clustered into 6 distinct loci), are highly conserved among the strains studied and may form part of the O. oeni core genome. Additional permease genes differentiate the strains and may have been acquired or lost by horizontal gene transfer events. The core pts genes are expressed, and permease gene expression is modulated by the nature of the bacterial growth substrate. Decryptified O. oeni cells are able to phosphorylate glucose, cellobiose, trehalose, and mannose at the expense of phosphoenolpyruvate. These substrates are present at low concentrations in wine at the end of alcoholic fermentation. The phosphotransferase system (PTS) may contribute to the perfect adaptation of O. oeni to its singular ecological niche.

Alcoholic fermentation drives the selection of Oenococcus oeni strains in wine but not in cider.

Oenococcus oeni is the predominant lactic acid bacteria species in wine and cider, where it performs the malolactic fermentation (MLF). The O. oeni strains analyzed to date form four major genetic lineages named phylogroups A, B, C and D. Most of the strains isolated from wine, cider, or kombucha belong to phylogroups A, B + C, and D, respectively, although B and C strains were also detected in wine. This study was performed to better understand the distribution of the phylogroups in wine and cider. Their population dynamics were determined by qPCR all through wine and cider productions, and the behavior of the strains was analyzed in synthetic wines and ciders. Phylogroups A, B and C were all represented in grape must and throughout the alcoholic fermentation, but on the transition to MLF, only phylogroup A remained at high levels in all wine productions. In the case of cider, phylogroups A, B and C were detected in stable levels during the process. When they were tested in synthetic wine and cider, all phylogroups performed MLF, but with different survival rates depending on the ethanol content. In this sense, ethanol and fermentation kinetics are the main agent that drives the selection of phylogroup A strains in wine, while B and C strains dominates in cider containing less ethanol.

Assessment of chitosan antimicrobial effect on wine microbes.

Chitosan is an active highly charged polysaccharide that has initially been developed in oenology to eliminate the spoilage yeast B. bruxellensis. However, different forms of chitosan exist, some complying with EU regulation for their use in wines, others not. Moreover, with the trend in oenology of limiting SO2, more and more questions arise as to the impact of chitosan on other microorganisms of the grape and wine environment. We investigated the antimicrobial efficiency of chitosan on a large oenological microbial collection, englobing technological as well as spoilage microorganisms. Results show that most species are affected at least transiently. Furthermore, a high variability prevails within most species and sensitive, intermediate and tolerant strains can be observed. This study also highlights different efficiencies depending on the wine parameters or the winemaking stage, giving important indications on which winemaking issues can be solved using chitosan. Chitosan treatment does not seem to be appropriate to limit the musts microbial pressure and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cannot be stopped during alcoholic fermentation, especially in sweet wines. Likewise, acetic acid bacteria are poorly impacted by chitosan. After alcoholic fermentation, chitosan can efficiently limit non-Saccharomyces yeast and lactic acid bacteria but special care should be given as to whether malolactic fermentation is wanted or not. Indeed, O. oeni can be severely impacted by chitosan, even months after treatment. Finally, this study highlights the crucial importance of the chitosan type used in its efficiency towards microbial stabilization. While a high molecular weight chitosan has limited antimicrobial properties, a chitosan with a much lower one, complying with EU and OIV regulation and specifications for its use in wine is much more efficient.

+Brettanomyces bruxellensis Displays Variable Susceptibility to Chitosan Treatment in Wine.

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is the main spoilage microbial agent in red wines. The use of fungal chitosan has been authorized since 2009 as a curative treatment to eliminate this yeast in conventional wines and in 2018 in organic wines. As this species is known to exhibit great genetic and phenotypic diversity, we examined whether all the strains responded the same way to chitosan treatment. A collection of 53 strains of B. bruxellensis was used. In the conditions of the reference test, all were at least temporarily affected by the addition of chitosan to wine, with significant decrease of cultivable population. Some (41%) were very sensitive and no cultivable yeast was detected in wine or lees after 3 days of treatment, while others (13%) were tolerant and, after a slight drop in cultivability, resumed growth between 3 and 10 days and remained able to produce spoilage compounds. There were also many strains with intermediate behavior. The strain behavior was only partially linked to the strain genetic group. This behavior was little modulated by the physiological state of the strain or the dose of chitosan used (within the limits of the authorized doses). On the other hand, for a given strain, the sensitivity to chitosan treatment was modulated by the chitosan used and by the properties of the wine in which the treatment was carried out.

Molecular Cloning, Expression and Characterization of Oenococcus oeni Priming Glycosyltransferases.

Oenococcus oeni is the main bacterial species that drives malolactic fermentation in wine. Most O. oeni strains produce capsular exopolysaccharides (EPS) that may contribute to protect them in the wine hostile environment. In O. oeni genome sequences, several genes are predicted to encode priming glycosyltransferases (pGTs). These enzymes are essential for EPS formation as they catalyze the first biosynthetic step through the formation of a phosphoanhydride bond between a hexose-1-phosphate and a lipid carrier undecaprenyl phosphate. In many microorganisms, mutations abolishing the pGT activity also abolish the EPS formation. We first made an in silico analysis of all the genes encoding putative pGT over 50 distinct O. oeni genome sequences. Two polyisoprenyl-phosphate-hexose-1-phosphate transferases, WoaA and WobA, and a glycosyltransferase (It3) were particularly examined for their topology and amino acid sequence. Several isoforms of these enzymes were then expressed in E. coli, and their substrate specificity was examined in vitro. The substrate specificity varied depending on the protein isoform examined, and several mutations were shown to abolish WobA activity but not EPS synthesis. Further analysis of woaA and wobA gene expression levels suggests that WoaA could replace the deficient WobA and maintain EPS formation.