Person-centered care practices in nursing homes: Staff perceptions and the organizational environment.

Person-centered care (PCC) is considered the standard to assure quality of care and quality of life in long-term care, benefiting both residents and staff. This study examines the associations between nursing home staff perceptions of person-centered care practices, the organizational system, and work-related attitudes in a sample of 340 nurses and direct care workers across 32 nursing homes in Oregon. Random-intercepts regression models were used to estimate within- and between-nursing home variation in staff perceptions of PCC practices as measured by the Staff Assessment of Person-Directed Care (SA-PDC), and identify characteristics associated with these perceptions. Staff in nursing homes that accept Medicaid reported lower SA-PDC scores, and higher scores were reported in nonprofit nursing homes. Staff perceptions varied extensively within nursing homes, suggesting a lack of staff cohesion regarding core aspects of PCC. Cultivating a supportive work environment is key to promoting person-centered care practices, increasing job satisfaction, elevating affective commitment, and reducing turnover intention.

"This 'Family Setting' Is Not that Anymore": Rewards and Challenges of Adult Foster Home Owners.

Small residential care settings for older adults and people with disabilities are found throughout the United States. Those with fewer than 25 residents account for half of residential care settings. Adult foster homes (AFH) are under-studied although they provide personal and health-related services to residents, including people with Alzheimer's disease. This qualitative study collected data from 726 AFH owners over four years. Results provide a contemporary perspective on owners' experience of the rewards and challenges of operating a small home. These results are relevant since many residents prefer small settings, and because federal regulatory changes affect AFH policies and practices.

Prevalence and Correlates of Antipsychotic Medication Use in Oregon Assisted Living.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate how assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) and memory care (MC) contexts are associated with the 90-day prevalence of antipsychotic medication use (APU), considered a quality measure in long-term care. DESIGN: All licensed AL/RC settings in Oregon received an annual mailed questionnaire to provide aggregate resident demographics, health acuity, health service use, payment type, and organizational policies. Organizational measures were collected from state websites. METHODS: Random intercepts regression models were estimated to assess organizational and resident population characteristics associated with 90-day APU prevalence over 3 study waves (2017-2019). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We examine 932 observations in 463 AL/RC settings from 2017 to 2019 (137 settings participated in all 3 waves, 195 in 2 waves, and 131 in 1 wave). RESULTS: The average 90-day APU prevalence in 464 Oregon AL/RC settings is 30.7%, although rates differ by MC endorsement (23.9% in AL/RC and 42.7% in MC). Nonprofit settings were associated with lower rates of APU in both AL/RC [ß = -4.4 (percentage points), 95% CI -8.4, -0.4] and MC (ß = -12.4, 95% CI -21.2, -3.6). Compared with low-Medicaid settings, settings with very high proportions of Medicaid residents were associated with higher APU prevalence, +8.9 in AL/RC (95% CI 1.7, 16.1) and +11.0 percentage points in MC (95% CI 2.3, 19.8). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: APU prevalence in MC settings and with high-Medicaid populations is considerably higher than non-MC and lower-Medicaid settings. Federal policies guide APU in nursing homes but not AL/RC. No national database of AL/RC exists; thus, state-based studies can inform the discussion of state policy and practice development. Additional study is needed to contextualize the relationships between AL/RC population-level practices and characteristics and the APU prevalence to inform policy and practice development related to this measure as a quality indicator.

Paperwork, Paradox, and PRN: Psychotropic Medication Deficiencies in Assisted Living.

Individual state approaches to assisted living/residential care (AL/RC) licensing and oversight in the United States result in different practice standards and requirements, including psychotropic medication use. We examined 170 psychotropic medication deficiency citations issued to 152 Oregon AL/RC settings from 2015 to 2019. Applied thematic analysis resulted in the following themes: (1) documentation issues are primarily responsible for noncompliance, (2) unclear parameters place direct care workers in a role paradox, and (3) there is a persistent disconnect about when to seek qualified expertise before requesting psychotropic medications. AL/RC-specific mechanisms for medication prescription and administration are necessary to improve the structure and processes of care. Policymakers might consider how regulations unintentionally incentivize task-oriented versus person-centered care practices.

Beyond the Medication Pass: Attitudes, Ethics, Agency, and Antipsychotic Medications in Assisted Living/Residential Care.

Background and Objectives: As-needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication use (APU) among assisted living/residential care (AL/RC) residents is a controversial health policy issue. AL/RC care staff, families, clinicians, researchers, and policymakers disagree about PRN APU to manage behavioral expressions associated with residents' dementia or cognitive impairment. Research Design and Methods: Semistructured interviews among eleven direct care staff (n = 3), licensed nurses (n = 2), administrators/executive directors (n = 4), and consultant pharmacists (n = 2) currently working in Oregon AL/RC. Using situational analysis, we identify, describe, and visualize positions and ideologies by job role to theorize PRN APU decision-making. Results: Three broad processes underlie APU to manage residents' behavioral expressions: justifying PRN APU, moralizing APU, and balancing local practices (eg, managing behavioral expressions, respecting individuals) with nonlocal practices (eg, professional authority). People involved in the situation of APU in AL/RC describe positive and negative justifications, and personal moral positions that frame PRN antipsychotics or nonpharmaceutical interventions as "right" or "wrong," driving various approaches to behavior management. Participants described a converse orientation between perceived level of agency within and proximity to the situation of APU. Those most closely involved, or local, to the situation of passing medications (eg, direct care staff and nurses) expressed less agency compared with nonlocal physicians and policymakers, who are not involved in the day-to-day practices within AL/RC. Discussion and Implications: This study raises practice and policy implications regarding APU in AL/RC settings. Care staff roles, ethical considerations, and perceived agency inform decision-making on whether to use antipsychotic medications. Participants described costs and benefits associated with both PRN APU and nonpharmaceutical interventions when responding to AL/RC residents' behavioral expressions. Participants' experiences emphasize the interactions across multiple levels of care. Balancing regulatory goals with resident-centered practices underscores the need for a system-level perspective, extending beyond direct care staff passing antipsychotic medications to residents.

As-Needed Prescribing and Administration of Psychotropic Medications in Assisted Living: A 7-State Study.

OBJECTIVES: Psychotropic medications administered on an as-needed basis, often designated as pro re nata (or PRN, hereafter as-needed), can alleviate acute symptoms and facilitate deprescribing, although as-needed use is associated with negative outcomes such as polypharmacy and drug interactions. The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which PRN psychotropic medications are prescribed and administered to assisted living (AL) residents, overall and in relation to resident- and community-level characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All AL residents and select staff in 250 AL communities in 7 states. METHODS: Data regarding prescribing and administration of 5 types of PRN psychotropic medications in the prior 7 days (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers and antiepileptics, antidepressants, anxiolytics/hypnotics, and cognitive enhancers) were abstracted and compared across resident and community characteristics. RESULTS: Prescribing of PRN psychotropics in AL is low (10.3%). Of prescribed PRN medications, 2.5% of residents were administered a PRN and 8% had PRN that was not administered in the previous 7 days. Anxiolytics were administered PRN more commonly compared with antipsychotics (2.0% vs 0.2%). Of all PRN psychotropic prescriptions (n = 1039), 70.5% had a written indication describing the reason for administration. Among PRN medications administered (n = 242), the proportion with an indication was lower (62.0%). PRN psychotropic medication prescribing was higher among residents with dementia and a psychiatric diagnosis, and in larger AL communities and those with a higher proportion of dementia care beds. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The prescribing and administration of PRN psychotropic medications in AL is relatively rare, although more common among residents with dementia. Emerging psychotropic medication policies should be expanded to address mental health care, anxiolytic/hypnotic use for residents living with dementia, PRN prescribing in chart review, and the use of detailed indications for PRN use, especially when medications are administered by unlicensed care staff.

Cognition-Enhancing, Antipsychotic, and Opioid Medication Use Among Assisted Living and Residential Care Residents in Oregon.

OBJECTIVES: Explore community- and resident-level characteristics associated with polypharmacy and use of cognition-enhancing, antipsychotic, and opioid medications among a statewide representative sample of assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1135 AL/RC residents living in 387 licensed communities in Oregon were recruited. One-third of residents lived in communities certified to provide memory care to residents with dementia. METHODS: All licensed AL/RC communities received a mail survey with questions about 3 randomly selected residents' demographic, health service use, health conditions, medication use, and payment information. We estimated bivariate and multiple logistic regression models, resulting in unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of resident- and community-level characteristics associated with each medication use indicator. RESULTS: One in 5 residents took a cognition-enhancing medication (20%) in the prior 7 days. Just more than one-fifth (22%) and one-quarter (25%) of residents took opioid or antipsychotic medications, on a scheduled or as-needed basis in the prior 7 days, respectively. Residents with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD) living in rural communities were half as likely to take cognitive-enhancing medications compared with their urban counterparts. When controlling for all resident and community covariates, residents with ADRD were almost 3 times as likely to receive an antipsychotic and half as likely to receive an opioid compared to residents without an ADRD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Understanding variation in the use of medications associated with behavioral expressions of ADRD in AL/RC residents is a crucial clinical and policy area.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Regulatory Response in United States-Assisted Living Communities: Lessons Learned.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disproportionately affected residents, their families, staff, and operators of congregate care settings. Assisted living (AL) is a type of long-term care setting for older adults who need supportive care but not ongoing nursing care and emphasizes a social model of care provision. Because AL is a type of long-term care, it has at times been referenced along with nursing homes in discussions related to COVID-19 but not recognized for its different care practices that pose unique challenges related to COVID-19; in that manner, it has largely been left out of the COVID-19 discourse, although ~812,000 older adults live in AL. To identify COVID-19 issues specific to AL, stakeholders with expertise in AL operations, policy, practice, and research (n = 42) were recruited to participate in remote interviews between July and September 2020. Using a thematic analysis, we derived the following overarching themes: (1) Policymakers are disconnected from and lack an understanding of the AL context; (2) AL administrators were left to coordinate, communicate, and implement constantly changing guidelines with little support; (3) AL organizations faced limited knowledge of and disparate access to funding and resources; (4) state-level regulatory requirements conflicted with COVID-19 guidelines resulting in uncertainty about which rules to follow; and (5) AL operators struggled to balance public health priorities with promoting their residents' quality of life and well-being. To develop evidence-informed policy and avoid unintended consequences, AL operators, direct care workers, residents, and clinicians practicing in these settings should have opportunities to provide feedback throughout the policy development process, both state and national.

Revisiting the Role of Physicians in Assisted Living and Residential Care Settings.

As the United States population ages, a higher share of adults is likely to use long-term services and supports. This change increases physicians' need for information about assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) settings, which provide supportive care and housing to older adults. Unlike skilled nursing facilities, states regulate AL/RC settings through varying licensure requirements enforced by state agencies, resulting in differences in the availability of medical and nursing services. Where some settings provide limited skilled nursing care, in others, residents rely on resident care coordinators, or their own physicians to oversee chronic conditions, medications, and treatments. The following narrative review describes key processes of care where physicians may interact with AL/RC operators, staff, and residents, including care planning, managing Alzheimer's disease and related conditions, medication management, and end-of-life planning. Communication and collaboration between physicians and AL/RC operators are a crucial component of care management.

Correlates of Administrator Tenure in US Residential Care Communities.

OBJECTIVE: To determine community- and individual-level correlates of administrator tenure in US residential care communities (RCCs). DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities designed by the National Center for Health Statistics. Analysis was conducted using Tobit regression. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of RCCs in the United States (n = 2302). MEASURES: The outcome measure for this study is RCC administrator tenure. Residential care community characteristics include chain ownership, size, occupancy rate, profit status, years of operation, if the building was purposely constructed as an RCC, Medicaid census, presence of a dementia care unit, and whether administrative staff provided care. Administrator characteristics included age, gender, race/ethnicity, and level of education. RESULTS: Over a quarter of administrators in this sample remained employed with the same RCC for 10 or more years (28%). Chain membership, community size, and presence of a dementia care unit are associated with shorter administrator tenure (P < .001). Communities with greater than 80% occupancy, administrator's age 40+, and Hispanic race/ethnicity were associated with longer administrator tenure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Various community and administrator characteristics are associated with shorter or longer tenure within the same community. More setting-specific research is needed to identify how RCC administrators influence care quality and what different lengths of tenure indicate in the context of RCC operations.