RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White patients in treatment for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in the equal access Military Health System to better understand racial-ethnic cancer health disparities observed in the United States. METHODS: We used the MilCanEpi database to identify a cohort of men and women aged 18 or older who were diagnosed with PTC between 1998 and 2014. Low- or high-risk status was assigned using tumor size and lymph node involvement. Treatment with surgery (e.g., thyroidectomy) overall and treatment by risk status [active surveillance (low-risk) or adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) (high-risk)] was compared between racial-ethnic groups using multivariable logistic regression and expressed as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The study included 598 Asian, 553 Black, 340 Hispanic, and 2958 non-Hispanic White patients with PTC. Asian (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.98, 1.49), Black (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.87, 1.32), and Hispanic (AOR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.71, 1.19) patients were as likely as White patients to receive surgery. By risk status, there were no significant racial-ethnic differences in receipt of active surveillance or thyroidectomy for low-risk PTC or in thyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy with adjuvant RAI for high-risk PTC. CONCLUSIONS: In the Military Health System, where patients have equal access to care, there were no overall racial-ethnic differences in surgical treatment for PTC. As American Thyroid Association guidelines evolve to include more conservative treatment, further research is warranted to understand potential disparities in active surveillance and surgical management in U.S. healthcare settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a high case fatality and relatively short survival after diagnosis. Treatment is paramount to improving survival, but studies on the effects of standard treatment by surgery or chemotherapy on survival in U.S. healthcare settings is limited. Further, variability in access to care may impact treatment and outcomes for patients. We aimed to assess the relationship between standard treatment(s) and survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a population with access to comprehensive healthcare. METHODS: We used the Military Cancer Epidemiology (MilCanEpi) database, which includes data from the Department of Defense cancer registry and medical encounter data from the Military Health System (MHS), to study a cohort of 1408 men and women who were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2014. Treatment with surgery or chemotherapy in relation to overall survival was examined in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 75 % of 441 patients with early-stage and 51 % of 967 patients with late-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma received treatment. In early-stage disease, surgery alone or surgery with chemotherapy were both associated with statistically significant 52 % reduced risks of death, but chemotherapy alone was not. In late-stage disease, surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or both surgery and chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death by 42 %, 25 %, and 52 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from the MHS demonstrate improved survival after treatment with surgery or surgery with chemotherapy for early- or late-stage pancreatic cancer and after chemotherapy for late-stage pancreatic cancer. In the era of immunotherapy and personalized medicine, further research on treatment and survival of pancreatic cancer in observational settings is needed.