Estimating the Relationship Between Nurse Staffing and Medication Pass Workload Using National Barcode Data.

BACKGROUND: Measuring and assessing the relationship between inpatient nurse staffing and workload across a national health system is difficult due to challenges in systematically observing inpatient workload at the unit level. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to apply a novel measure of inpatient nurse workload to estimate the relationship between inpatient nurse staffing and nurse workload at the unit level during a key nursing activity: the peak-time medication pass. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Veterans Health Administration, the largest employer of nurses in the U.S. The sample included all patients (n= 1,578,399 patient days) admitted to 311 non-intensive care unit inpatient acute care units in 112 hospitals in 2019 (104,588 unit days). Staffing was measured as the unit-level, nurse-to-patient ratio, and workload was measured using average time (duration) for RNs to complete the peak-time medication pass. RESULTS: We found a negative relationship between the RN-to-patient ratio and average peak time medication pass duration after adjusting for unit-level patient volume and average patient severity of illness and other unit-level factors. This relationship was non-linear: the marginal effect of staffing on workload decreased as staffing increased. DISCUSSION: As unit-level nurse staffing increased, average RN workload decreased. This result suggests that interventions to improve nurse staffing may have larger non-linear effects for units with lower staffing levels. Understanding the effect of differing staffing decisions on variations in nursing workload is critical for adopting models of care that effectively use scarce staffing resources and contribute to retaining nurses in the inpatient workforce. This work provides evidence that peak time medication pass duration is a valid process-based measure of workload and highlights the potential diminishing returns to increasing staffing.

Veterans Health Administration enrollees' choice of care setting relates to the expansion of care options: Evidence from screening colonoscopies before and after the MISSION Act.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether those enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) were less likely to use VHA-delivered colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies after the MISSION Act. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Secondary data were collected on VHA-enrolled Veterans from FY2017-FY2021. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cross-sectional study measured the volume and share of screening colonoscopies that were VHA-delivered over time and by drive time eligibility-defined as living more than 60 min away from the nearest VHA specialty-care clinic. We used a multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient and facility factors. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for VHA enrollees (n = 773,766) who underwent a screening colonoscopy either performed or purchased by the VHA from FY2017-FY2021. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the 9 months after the implementation of the MISSION Act, and before the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the average monthly VHA-share of screening colonoscopies decreased by 3 percentage points (pp; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-4 to -2 pp]) for the non-drive time eligible group and it decreased by 16 pp (95% CI = [-22 to -9 pp]) for the drive time eligible group. The total number of screening colonoscopies did not significantly change in either group during this time period. After adjusting for patient characteristics, a linear time trend, and parent facility fixed effects, implementation of the MISSION Act was associated with a reduction in the probability of a VHA-delivered screening colonoscopy (average marginal effect [AME]: -2.5 pp; 95% CI = [-5.1 to 0.0 pp]) for the non-drive time eligible group. The drive time eligible group (AME: -9.4 pp; 95% CI = [-13.2 to -5.5 pp]) experienced a larger change. CONCLUSIONS: The VHA-share of screening colonoscopies among VHA enrollees fell in the 9 months immediately after the passage of the MISSION Act. This decline was larger for VHA enrollees who were targeted for eligibility due to a longer drive time. These results suggest that the MISSION Act led to more VHA-purchased care among targeted VHA enrollees, though it is unclear whether total utilization increased.

Determinants of referral network size for screening colonoscopies in the Veterans Health Administration after the implementation of the MISSION Act.

OBJECTIVE: To measure key characteristics of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Community Care (CC) referral network for screening colonoscopy and identify market and institutional factors associated with network size. DATA SOURCES: VHA electronic health records, CC claim data, and National Plan and Provider Enumeration System. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we measure the size of the VHA's CC referral networks over time and by VHA parent facility (n = 137). We used a multivariable linear regression to identify factors associated with network size at the market-year level. Network size was measured as the number of physicians who performed at least one VHA-purchased screening colonoscopy per 1000 enrollees at baseline. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for all Veterans (n = 102,119) who underwent a screening colonoscopy purchased by the VHA from a non-VHA physician from 2018 to 2021. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From 2018 to 2021, median network volume of screening colonoscopies per 1000 enrollees grew from 1.6 (IQR: 0.6, 4.6) to 3.6 (IQR: 1.6, 6.6). The median network size grew from 0.63 (IQR: 0.30, 1.26) to 0.92 (IQR: 0.57, 1.63). Finally, the median procedures per physician increased from 2.5 (IQR: 1.6, 4.2) to 3.2 (IQR: 2.4, 4.7). After adjusting for baseline market characteristics, volume of screening colonoscopies was positively related to network size (ß = 0.15, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.20]), negatively related to procedures per physician (ß = -0.12, 95% CI: [-0.18, -0.05]), and positively associated with the percent of rural enrollees (ß = 0.01, 95% CI: [0.00, 0.01]). CONCLUSIONS: VHA facilities with a higher volume of VHA-purchased screening colonoscopies and more rural enrollees had more non-VHA physicians providing care. Geographic variation in referral networks may also explain differences in the effects of the MISSION Act on access to care and patient outcomes.

Contextual factors influencing the association between the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion and Veteran VA-Medicaid dual enrollment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in dual enrollment after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion by VA priority group, (e.g., service connection), sex, and type of state expansion. STUDY SETTING: Our cohort was all Veterans ages 18-64 enrolled in VA and eligible for benefits due to military service-connection or low income from 2011 to 2016; the unit of analysis was person-year. STUDY DESIGN: Difference-in-difference and event-study analysis. The outcome was dual VA-Medicaid enrollment for at least 1 month annually. Medicaid expansion, VA priority status, whether a state expanded by a Section 1115 waiver, and sex were independent variables. We controlled for race, ethnicity, age, disease burden, distance to VA facilities, state, and year. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We used data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) regarding age and VA Priority Group to select our cohort of VA-enrolled individuals. We then took the cohort and crossed checked it with Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) and T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF) to determine Medicaid enrollment status. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Service-connected Veterans experienced lower dual-enrollment increases across all sex and state-waiver groups (3.44 percentage points (95% CI: 1.83, 5.05 pp) for women, 3.93 pp (2.98, 4.98) for men, 4.06 pp (2.85, 5.27) for non-waiver states, and 3.00 pp (1.58 to 4.41) for waiver states) than Veterans who enrolled in the VA due to low income (8.19 pp (5.43, 10.95) for women, 9.80 pp (7.06, 12.54) for men, 10.21 pp (7.17, 13.25) for non-waiver states, and 7.39 pp (5.28, 9.50) for waiver states). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion is associated with dual enrollment. Dual-enrollment changes are greatest in those enrolled in the VA due to low income, but do not differ by sex or expansion type. Results can help VA identify groups disproportionately likely to have potential care-coordination issues due to usage of multiple health care systems.