Validation of the adaptive scan method in the quest for time-efficient methods of testing auditory processes.

A major barrier to the clinical application of psychophysical testing of central auditory processes is the time required to obtain precise estimates of different listening abilities. In this study, we validate a novel adaptive scan (AS) method of threshold estimation that is designed to adapt on a range of values around threshold rather than on a single threshold value. This method has the advantage of providing the listener with greater familiarity with the stimulus characteristics near threshold while maintaining precise measurement and increasing time-efficiency. Additionally, we explore the time-efficiency of AS through comparison with two more conventional adaptive algorithms and the method of constant stimuli in two common psychophysical tasks: the detection of a gap in noise and the detection of a tone in noise. Seventy undergraduates without hearing complaints were tested using all four methods. The AS method provided similar threshold estimates with similar precision to those from the other adaptive methods and, thus, it is a valid adaptive method of psychophysical testing. We also provide an analysis of the AS method based on precision metrics to propose a shortened version of the algorithm that maximizes the time/precision tradeoff and can achieve similar thresholds to the adaptive methods tested in the validation. This work lays the foundation for using AS across a wide variety of psychophysical assessments and experimental situations where different levels of precision and/or time-efficiency may be required.

Measurement of auditory temporal processing using modified masking period patterns.

A common metric of auditory temporal processing is the difference in the threshold for a pure-tone signal masked by either unmodulated or amplitude-modulated noise. This technique may be viewed as a modification of the masking period pattern technique. Such measurements have been proposed as an efficient means of estimating auditory temporal resolution in a clinical setting, although in many cases threshold differences may reflect additional spectro-temporal processes. The primary purpose of the present experiment was to examine interactions among signal frequency and masker bandwidth and the effects of modulation frequency on modified masking period patterns. The results revealed unmodulated-modulated threshold differences that increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreased with increasing modulation frequency. There was little effect of signal frequency for narrow-band noise maskers that were equal in absolute bandwidth across frequency. However, unmodulated-modulated threshold differences increased substantially with increasing signal frequency for bandwidths proportional to the signal frequency and for wideband maskers. Although the results are interpreted in terms of a combination of both within-channel and across-channel cues, the specific contributions of these cues in particular conditions are difficult to ascertain. Because modified masking period patterns depend strongly upon a number of specific stimulus parameters, and because it is difficult to determine with any precision the underlying perceptual processes, this technique is not recommended for use as a clinical measure of auditory temporal processing.

Monaural masking release in random-phase and low-noise noise.

Two masking-release paradigms thought to involve across-channel processing are comodulation masking release (CMR) and profile analysis. Similarities between these two paradigms were explored by comparing signal detection in maskers that varied only in degree of envelope fluctuation. The narrow-band-noise maskers were 10 Hz wide and their envelope fluctuations were manipulated using the low-noise noise algorithm of Pumplin [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 100-104 (1985)]. Masking conditions included the classic CMR conditions of an on-frequency band, multiple (five) incoherent bands, or multiple coherent bands. Detection was compared using both random-phase noise (RPN) and low-noise noise (LNN) maskers. In one set of conditions, the signal was identical to the on-frequency masker, yielding an intensity discrimination task. Conditions that included RPN maskers and tonal signals resembled the classic CMR paradigm, whereas conditions including LNN and noise signals more closely resembled the classic profile analysis paradigm. Other conditions may be considered hybrids. This combination of conditions provided a wide variety of within- and across-channel cues for detection. The results suggest that CMR and profile analysis could be based upon the same set of stimulus cues and perhaps the same perceptual processes.

Amplitude-modulation detection at low- and high-audio frequencies.

Estimates of temporal acuity under comparable conditions at low- and high-audio frequencies are rare. The present study used the amplitude-modulation detection paradigm to estimate temporal acuity over a range of audio frequencies from 800 to 12,800 Hz. Amplitude-modulation detection was measured as a function of modulation frequency for bandlimited noise carriers, and the resulting temporal modulation-transfer functions were used to characterize temporal acuity. The most important result from the two experiments reported is that systematic manipulations of carrier upper-cutoff frequency produced estimates of temporal acuity that did not vary from 800 to 12,800 Hz. When the modulated noise bands were filtered after modulation to control for potential spectral cues, the low-pass cutoff of the modulation-transfer function varied with the carrier bandwidth. However, when the standard stimulus was a quasifrequency-modulated (QFM) noise and the signal was an unfiltered, amplitude-modulated noise, the low-pass cutoff of the modulation-transfer function was independent of carrier bandwidth. These results are consistent with a growing body of evidence demonstrating that auditory temporal acuity is constant throughout most of the audible frequency range.

The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.

A masking level difference (MLD) paradigm was used to investigate the influence of stimulus envelope and stimulus fine-structure characteristics on monaural and binaural hearing. The degree of masker envelope fluctuation was manipulated by selecting narrow-band noises (50 Hz) on a continuum of values of the normalized fourth moment of the envelope. The noises were specified as low-noise noise (LNN), medium-noise noise (MNN), and high-noise noise (HNN). Fine-structure cues were studied by measuring thresholds at 500 and 4000 Hz, regions in which the availability of such cues to the auditory system differ substantially. In addition, thresholds were measured for Gaussian noise maskers (GN) and for maskers having a flat magnitude spectrum, termed equal-magnitude noise (EMN) maskers. The results indicated lower NoSo thresholds for LNN than for the other four masker types. Furthermore, there were no differences in threshold for maskers having moderate and high degrees of envelope fluctuation (MNN and HNN). The NoS pi thresholds were not significantly different across masker type and were characterized by large individual differences among the seven listeners. The results are considered in relation to models of monaural and binaural processing. Consistent with previous reports, the results indicate that binaural detection depends on interaural differences in the stimulus envelope and fine structure at low frequencies and changes in the envelope at high frequencies.

Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation.

Two experiments are presented that investigate the influence of envelope fluctuation rate upon the magnitude of comodulation masking release (CMR). In Experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a tonal signal centered in either one or five masker bands. The maskers were either narrow-band noises or 100% sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The five masker bands had either the same (coherent) or different (incoherent) envelopes. Envelope rate was varied by manipulating either the noise bandwidth (10-200 Hz) or the SAM rate (10-128 Hz). The CMR values were largest for slow envelope rates. In Experiment 2, envelope coherence was simultaneously manipulated at two rates by amplitude modulating (10 Hz) narrow-band noises (100 Hz). The modulation depth was 100%, 83%, or 50%. The CMR based on the coherence of the noise carriers was about 5 dB, regardless of the SAM coherence or the modulation depth. The CMR based on the SAM coherence decreased from about 19 to 2 dB as modulation depth decreased, regardless of the noise-carrier coherence. Thresholds were highest when the envelope fluctuations were incoherent at both rates and were lowest when the envelope fluctuations were coherent at both rates. These data suggest that the auditory system is able to make across-frequency envelope comparisons at both envelope rates simultaneously.

The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Temporal gap detection was measured as a function of absolute signal bandwidth at a low-, a mid-, and a high-frequency region in six listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. Gap detection threshold decreased monotonically with increasing stimulus bandwidth at each of the three frequency regions. Given conditions of equivalent absolute bandwidth, gap detection thresholds were not significantly different for upper cutoff frequencies ranging from 600 to 4400 Hz. A second experiment investigated gap detection thresholds at two pressure-spectrum levels, conditions typically resulting in substantially different estimates of frequency selectivity. Estimates of frequency selectivity were collected at the two levels using a notched-noise masker technique. The gap threshold-signal bandwidth functions were almost identical at pressure-spectrum levels of 70 dB and 40 dB for the two subjects in experiment II, while estimates of frequency selectivity showed poorer frequency selectivity at the 70-dB level than at 40 dB. Data from both experiments indicated that gap detection in bandlimited noise was inversely related to signal bandwidth and that gap detection did not vary significantly with changes in signal frequency over the range of 600 to 4400 Hz. Over the range of frequencies investigated, the results indicated no clear relation between gap detection for noise stimuli and peripheral auditory filtering.

Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Gap detection was measured as a function of noise bandwidth with constant high-frequency cutoff in both normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. Band-widening functions were measured in a low-frequency region (0.6-kHz upper cutoff) and a high-frequency region (2.2-kHz upper cutoff). Measures of frequency selectivity were also obtained in the two frequency regions. The results for the normal-hearing listeners indicated that, on a double logarithmic scale, gap thresholds improved more steeply with increasing bandwidth in the higher frequency region than in the lower. However, performance at the narrow bandwidths was independent of frequency region. For the cochlear-impaired listeners, gap thresholds were generally longer than normal in both frequency regions. However, in the higher frequency region, progressively more listeners approached normal values as bandwidth was increased. The elevated gap thresholds were due in part to the higher absolute thresholds and in part to poor ability to process stimulus fluctuation. No correspondence was found between gap detection performance and frequency selectivity.

Spectral shape discrimination of narrow-band sounds.

Measurements are reported on the detectability of signals added to narrow-band sounds. The narrow-band sounds had a bandwidth of 20 Hz and were either Gaussian noise with flat amplitude spectra or sets of equal-amplitude sinusoidal components whose phases were chosen at random. Four different kinds of sinusoidal signals were used. Two signals produced symmetric changes in the audio spectrum adding a component either at the center of the spectrum or at both ends. The other two signals produced asymmetric changes adding a component at either end of the spectrum. The overall level of the sound was randomly varied on each presentation, so that the presence of a signal was largely unrelated to the absolute level of the signal component(s). A model is proposed that assumes the detection of the symmetric signals is based on changes in the shape of the power spectrum of the envelope. Such changes in the envelope power spectrum are probably heard as changes in the "roughness" or "smoothness" of the narrow-band sound. The predictions of this model were obtained from computer simulations. For the asymmetric signals, the most probable detection cues were changes in the pitch of the narrow-band sound. Results from a variety of different experiments using three listeners support these conjectures.