RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence supports streamlined approaches for inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) including early transition to oral antibiotics and shorter therapy. Uptake of these approaches is variable, and the best approaches to local implementation of infection-specific guidelines are unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool linked with a clinical pathway on CAP care. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational pre-post intervention study of inpatients with pneumonia admitted to a single academic medical center. Interventions were introduced in 3 sequential 6-month phases; Phase 1: education alone; Phase 2: education and a CDS-driven CAP pathway coupled with active antimicrobial stewardship and provider feedback; and Phase 3: education and a CDS-driven CAP pathway without active stewardship. The 12 months preceding the intervention were used as a baseline. Primary outcomes were length of intravenous antibiotic therapy and total length of antibiotic therapy. Clinical, process, and cost outcomes were also measured. RESULTS: The study included 1021 visits. Phase 2 was associated with significantly lower length of intravenous and total antibiotic therapy, higher procalcitonin lab utilization, and a 20% cost reduction compared with baseline. Phase 3 was associated with significantly lower length of intravenous antibiotic therapy and higher procalcitonin lab utilization compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A CDS-driven CAP pathway supplemented by active antimicrobial stewardship review led to the most robust improvements in antibiotic use and decreased costs with similar clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common condition, with wide variation in admission location and clinical practice. We aimed to decrease intensive care unit (ICU) admission for DKA by implementing a standardized, electronic health record-driven clinical care pathway that used subcutaneous insulin, rather than a continuous insulin infusion, for patients with nonsevere DKA. This is a retrospective, observational preintervention to postintervention study of 214 hospital admissions for DKA that evaluated the effect of our intervention on clinical, safety, and cost outcomes. The primary outcome was ICU admission, which decreased from 67.0% to 41.7% (p < .001). Diabetes nurse educator consultation increased from 45.3% to 63.9% (p = .006), and 30-day Emergency Department (ED) return visit decreased from 12.3% to 2.8% (p = .008). Time to initiation of basal insulin increased from 18.19 ± 1.25 hours to 22.47 ± 1.76 hours (p = .05) and reopening of the anion gap increased from 4.7% to 13.9% (p = .02). No changes in ED length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, hypoglycemia, treatment-induced hypokalemia, 30-day hospital readmission, or inpatient mortality were observed. The implementation of a standardized DKA care pathway using subcutaneous insulin for nonsevere DKA resulted in decreased ICU use and increased diabetes education, without affecting patient safety.
Assuntos
Administração Cutânea , Cetoacidose Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Bombas de Infusão , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unnecessary telemetry monitoring contributes to healthcare waste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of 2 interventions to reduce telemetry utilization. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A 2-group retrospective, observational pre- to postintervention study of 35,871 nonintensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted to 1 academic medical center. INTERVENTION: On the hospitalist service, we implemented a telemetry reduction intervention including education, process change, routine feedback, and a financial incentive between January 2015 and June 2015. In July 2015, a system-wide change to the telemetry ordering process was introduced. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was telemetry utilization, measured as the percentage of daily room charges for telemetry. Secondary outcomes were mortality, escalation of care, code event rate, and appropriateness of telemetry utilization. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate changes in outcomes while adjusting for patient factors. RESULTS: Among hospitalist service patients, telemetry utilization was reduced by 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], -72% to -64%; P < .001), whereas on other services the reduction was a less marked 22% (95% CI, -27% to -16%; P < .001). There were no significant increases in mortality, code event rates, or care escalation, and there was a trend toward improved utilization appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: Although electronic telemetry ordering changes can produce decreases in hospital-wide telemetry monitoring, a multifaceted intervention may lead to an even larger decline in utilization rates. Whether these changes are durable cannot be ascertained from our study.
Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos Hospitalares/educação , Telemetria/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Redução de Custos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
In-hospital continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, commonly referred to as telemetry, has allowed for rapid recognition of life-threatening conditions, including complex arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia. However, inappropriate use can lead to unnecessary downstream testing from "false alarms," which in turn affects clinician efficiency and increases health care costs without benefiting patients. For these reasons, the Society of Hospital Medicine's Choosing Wisely campaign recommended use of a protocol-driven discontinuation of telemetry. The American Heart Association (AHA) developed a set of Practice Standards for the appropriate use of telemetry monitoring in 2004, which they updated in 2017. Unfortunately, the AHA Practice Standards have not been widely adopted-with as many as 43% of monitored patients lacking a recommended indication for monitoring. Thus, we created an overview discussing the safety and efficacy of incorporating the AHA Practice Standards and a review of studies highlighting their successful incorporation within patient care workflow. We conclude by outlining an "implementation blueprint" for health system professionals and administrators seeking to change their institution's culture of telemetry use. As the health care landscape continues to shift, enacting high-value initiatives that improve patient safety and efficiency of care will be critical.
Assuntos
Telemetria , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate laboratory testing is a contributor to waste in healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted laboratory reduction intervention on laboratory costs. DESIGN: A retrospective, controlled, interrupted time series (ITS) study. SETTING: University of Utah Health Care, a 500-bed academic medical center in Salt Lake City, Utah. POPULATION: All patients 18 years or older admitted to the hospital to a service other than obstetrics, rehabilitation, or psychiatry. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted quality-improvement initiative in a hospitalist service including education, process change, cost feedback, and financial incentive. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes of lab cost per day and per visit. Secondary outcomes of number of basic metabolic panel (BMP), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), complete blood count (CBC), and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio tests per day; length of stay (LOS); and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 6310 hospitalist patient visits (intervention group) were compared to 25,586 nonhospitalist visits (control group). Among the intervention group, the unadjusted mean cost per day was reduced from $138 before the intervention to $123 after the intervention (P < 0.001), and the unadjusted mean cost per visit decreased from $618 to $558 (P = 0.005). The ITS analysis showed significant reductions in cost per day, cost per visit, and the number of BMP, CMP, and CBC tests per day (P = 0.034, 0.02, <0.001, 0.004, and <0.001). LOS was unchanged and 30-day readmissions decreased in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted approach to laboratory reduction demonstrated a significant reduction in laboratory cost per day and per visit, as well as common tests per day at a major academic medical center. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:348-354. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Retroalimentação , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Feminino , Médicos Hospitalares/educação , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , UtahRESUMO
Older patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism compare with younger patients. For most patients, oral anticoagulation remains the most effective way to reduce this risk. Although vitamin K antagonists have been used for decades, the more recent development of non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants provides clinicians with a broader selection of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in older patients with AF. This article discusses stroke risk-stratification tools for clinical decision making, reviews pharmacologic options for the prevention of stroke, and highlights several practical considerations to the use of these agents in older adults.