A cross-cultural study of pain intensity in Egyptian and Dutch women with rheumatoid arthritis.

UNLABELLED: It has been suggested that patients from Mediterranean cultures tend to report more intense pain than their Northern or Western European counterparts in comparable medical conditions. However, empirical data to support this hypothesis are limited. The goals of the present study were to examine differences in pain intensity reports between Dutch and Egyptian women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine the influence of possible confounding variables using multivariate analyses. We performed a cross-sectional study in 30 Dutch and 42 Egyptian women with comparable RA, matched for age and disease duration. Pain intensity was measured on a 100-mm graphic rating scale. Additionally, we assessed physical function, radiographic joint damage, progression of RA, disease activity, number of swollen and tender joints, medication, rheumatoid factor, and socioeconomic variables. The progression of RA and radiographic damage were not significantly different between Egyptian and Dutch patients. However, the Egyptian population reported significantly worse pain and physical function and demonstrated higher disease activity. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the country of residence and the number of tender and swollen joints were significant independent determinants of pain reports. The results provide some support for the idea that there are ethnocultural differences in pain reports between Egyptian and Dutch women with RA, although the mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that after controlling for differences in demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables, Egyptian women with RA reported more pain than Dutch women with RA. Clinicians and investigators should recognize that cultural or ethnic factors may play an important role in patients' pain reports.

The validity and reliability of the graphic rating scale and verbal rating scale for measuring pain across cultures: a study in Egyptian and Dutch women with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the validity and reliability of a graphic rating scale (GRS) and a verbal rating scale (VRS) for measuring pain intensity in young female Egyptian and Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data were obtained in a cross-cultural study of 42 Egyptian and 30 Dutch female outpatients with stable RA. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the scales with other core measures of disease activity in RA. Test-retest reliability was assessed over a 1-week interval. RESULTS: The GRS and the VRS were strongly intercorrelated in the total study cohort and in the Egyptian and Dutch subgroups. In the individual subgroups, only the GRS demonstrated the expected pattern of correlations with other disease activity measures. Test-retest reliability of the GRS was adequate in both Egyptian and Dutch patients (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78 vs. 0.83, respectively), whereas reliability of the VRS was unsatisfactory in the Egyptian subgroup (weighted kappa 0.60 vs. 0.82 in the Netherlands). DISCUSSION: The study confirmed that the GRS and VRS were reliable and valid in the total study cohort. Within the individual countries, the GRS seemed to perform better than the VRS.