Color stability and surface roughness of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single shade composite in anterior restoration.

BACKGROUND: The blending ability of universal shade composites and their stability in the oral environment are of great concern in restoring anterior teeth. This study aims to evaluate and compare the color stability and surface roughness of two single-shade composite restorations, ormocer-based composite (OBC) and methacrylate resin-based composite (RBC), after storing them in different staining media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, two universal shade composite restorative materials were tested: a nanohybrid OBC (Admira fusion X-tra, Voco) and a supra-nanofilled RBC (Omnichroma, Toukyama). In total, 60 cylindrical centralized cavities (diameter: 5 mm, depth: 2 mm) were prepared in sound extracted-human central incisors and divided into two equal groups according to the restorative material used (n = 30). According to the storage media, the teeth of each group were divided into three subgroups (n = 10): artificial saliva, black tea, and cola. The restoration color was evaluated for all teeth at baseline and after four weeks of storage. The color stability (∆E) was measured using a reflective spectrophotometer (X-Rite, model RM200QC, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated using three-dimensional optical profilometry (Wyko, Model NT 1100, Veeco, Tucson, USA). Additionally, the extracted data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test. RESULTS: In the baseline evaluation, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to color matching or surface roughness results between the two studied restorative materials. However, the differences were statistically significant after storing them in different media. CONCLUSION: Universal composites showed satisfactory color matching with different teeth colors and accepted surface smoothness, whereas the aging procedure exerted a negative effect on their color stability and surface characteristics.

Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restorations to dentin.

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass ionomer restorations to dentin. Materials and methods: Conventional glass ionomer cement (Equia forte, GC Tokyo, Japan), resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC, GC Tokyo, Japan) and propolis powder (dried extract from honey bees) materials were used in this study. Both conventional glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer were modified by two different concentrations of ethanolic extract of propolis (10 % and 25 % EEP). For antibacterial test, Streptococcus mutans strain was spread on agar petri dishes using a sterile swab. Discs of both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were fabricated within the agar plates. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the inhibition zones around each disc. For microshear bond strength test, 60 healthy human permanent molars were prepared by cutting occlusal surface and expose the dentin at the height of contour of all teeth then conditioned using poly acrylic acid conditioner, both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were mixed and applied on conditioned dentin surface by using tygon tube. Microshear bond strength was evaluated by the universal testing machine. Results: Two-way ANOVA test revealed that both glass ionomer type and different concentrations of EEP had significant effect on the antibacterial test results and microshear bond strength values (p < 0,05). Glass ionomer restorative material with 25%EEP had the highest antibacterial values whereas glass ionomer restorative material without modifications (control groups) had the lowest values. Resin-modified glass ionomer without any modification (control group) had the highest bond strength while resin-modified glass ionomer with 25%EEP had the lowest bond strength. Conclusions: Incorporation of ethanolic extract of propolis to glass ionomer restorative material increases the antibacterial effects of both conventional GIC and RMGI. Inspite of this advantage, it seems that it has deleterious effect on microshear bond strength to dentin.