The risk of recurrent IgA nephropathy in a steroid-free protocol and other modifying immunosuppression.

Recurrent glomerulonephritis is an important cause of kidney allograft failure. The effect of immunosuppression on recurrent IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is unclear. We analyzed the impact of steroids and other immunosuppression on the risk of recurrent IgAN post-kidney transplantation. Between June 1989 and November 2008, 3311 kidney transplants were performed at our center. IgAN was the primary disease in 124 patients; of these, 75 (60.5%) patients received steroid-based immunosuppression (15 undergoing late steroid withdrawal), and 49 (39.5%) were maintained on steroid-free immunosuppression. Recurrent IgAN was diagnosed in 27 of 124 (22%) patients in clinically indicated kidney allograft biopsies over a median follow-up of 6.86 ± 5.4 yr. On cox proportional hazards model multivariate analysis, the hazard risk (HR) of IgAN recurrence was significantly higher in patients managed with steroid-free (HR 8.59: 3.03, 24.38, p < 0.001) and sirolimus-based (HR = 3.00:1.16, 7.75, p = 0.024) immunosuppression without antilymphocyte globulin induction (HR = 4.5: 1.77, 11.73, p = 0.002). Mycophenolate use was associated with a lower risk (HR = 0.42: 0.19, 0.95, p = 0.036), whereas cyclosporine did not have a significant impact on the risk of IgAN recurrence (p = 0.61). These results warrant future prospective studies regarding the role of steroids and other immunosuppression drugs in reducing recurrence of IgAN and other glomerulonephritis post-transplant.

Characterization of the in vivo and in vitro inhibition of gastrin secretion from gastrinoma by a somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995).

Earlier experiments characterized the effect of SMS 201-995 on gastrin secretion from gastrinoma in vivo. The results showed that the somatostatin analogue inhibits basal as well as secretin- and calcium-stimulated gastrin secretion. The current study examined the effect of SMS 201-995 on gastrin secretion from gastrinoma in vitro. Gastrinoma cells were prepared in cell culture or acute cell dispersion to study basal gastrin release. In cell culture, SMS 201-995 at 10(-9) M, 10(-8) M, and 10(-7) M significantly stimulated gastrin secretion (basal medium gastrin, 157 +/- 7.9 pg/ml; with SMS 201-995 10(-9) M, 786 +/- 62 pg/ml; with SMS 201-995 10(-8) M, 569 +/- 72 pg/ml; and with SMS 201-995 10(-7) M, 258 +/- 26 pg/ml). In contrast, in acute cell dispersion, the somatostatin analogue inhibited gastrin secretion (basal medium gastrin, 12.8 +/- 1.3 ng/ml; with SMS 201-995 10(-9) M, 9.0 +/- 0.1 ng/ml; with SMS 201-995 10(-8) M, 8.4 +/- 1.5 ng/ml; and with SMS 201-995 10(-7) M, 7.9 +/- 0.2 ng/ml). Gastrinoma cells were prepared in cell culture to study the effect of SMS 201-995 on gastrin secretion stimulated by secretin and by post-receptor increases in adenosine cyclic nucleotide. The somatostatin analogue inhibited gastrin secretion stimulated by secretin (10(-6) M) (797 +/- 48 pg/ml for secretin alone, compared with 396 +/- 9.4 pg/ml for secretin plus SMS 201-995). SMS 201-995 did not inhibit gastrin secretion stimulated by dibutyryl cyclic AMP (10(-7) M) (617 +/- 62 pg/ml for dibutyryl cyclic AMP alone, compared with 778 +/- 55 pg/ml for the two together). In vitro, SMS 201-995 inhibits basal gastrin secretion from gastrinoma prepared in acute cell dispersion, but not gastrinoma in cell culture, probably due to differences in basal secretory rates. The effect in vitro is less than that in vivo. SMS 201-995 does not inhibit postreceptor increases in adenosine nucleotide. This indirectly supports the hypothesis that SMS 201-995 acts in gastrinoma cells to inhibit gastrin secretion by inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity.

OKT3 for primary therapy of the first rejection episode in kidney transplants.

The improvement in one-year graft survival has allowed transplant centers to focus on long-term graft survival. A study of 665 primary cadaveric kidney transplants from a single center treated with cyclosporine demonstrated that patients did not develop chronic rejection if there was not an episode of acute rejection. This study is a retrospective review of 314 consecutive kidney transplants from a single center to determine if early, aggressive treatment of the first episode of acute rejection will improve graft survival without increasing recipient morbidity. The course of 314 consecutive kidney transplants performed during a 27-month period (245 CAD and 68 living-related) was studied. Demographic characteristics were equivalent between the two groups, and all patients received sequential quadruple immunosuppression using ALG and CsA. Patient and graft survivals at 2 years were 89.7% and 84%, respectively. At least one rejection episode occurred in 41% of the patients, one-half within 30 days of transplant. Rejection episodes were treated by oral prednisone taper, primary ALG or OKT3, or "rescue" therapy with ALG or OKT3. Graft survival in the 52 recipients treated with OKT3 for primary treatment of first rejection episode was 20% better than the 50 patients treated with PRED (P = 0.0847). Comparing the 39 recipients of primary CAD kidneys treated with primary OKT3 vs. 38 treated with PRED demonstrated a 32% improvement in 2-year graft survival (P = 0.033). There was no increase in second rejection episodes in patients treated with OKT3. Renal function was equivalent in patients with rejection regardless of type of antirejection therapy used. Of patients treated for rejection, 22% had symptomatic CMV infections, which were divided equally between the two groups. Eighty-two patients received a single course of OKT3, 28 received two courses, and 2 patients received OKT3 three times. Only two patients developed antimurine antibodies that required abandoning OKT3 for the treatment of rejection. This study clearly demonstrates that the early use of OKT3 as primary treatment of rejection results in significant improvement of 2-year graft survival in recipients of first CAD kidney transplants. There is no increase in episodes in CMV in patients treated with OKT3 as primary therapy and no increase in patient mortality. Early use of OKT3 does not prevent or decrease incidence of subsequent rejection episodes. Renal function in surviving grafts is not improved in patients treated with OKT3 vs. PRED.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The frequency of rejection episodes after combined kidney-pancreas transplant--the impact on graft survival.

The recipients of combined kidney-pancreas transplants (SPK) are unique because they routinely receive two allografts from the same donor. In a previous study, we found that the long-term graft survival of the two allografts was different, with better graft survival seen in the pancreas allograft. In an attempt to understand the reason for the different graft survival in the recipients of organs from the same donor, we have reviewed the incidence and timing of rejection episodes in 160 consecutive technically successful whole-organ bladder-drained SPK performed at a single institution using a uniform immunosuppressive regimen. Rejection episodes were common. A total of 53% of the recipients had at least one episode of rejection in one of the organs. Multiple rejection episodes requiring hospitalization occurred in 23% of the recipients. The kidney allograft had more frequent rejection episodes than the pancreas allograft: 78 patients had 130 renal rejection episodes while only 50 patients had 65 episodes of pancreas rejection. No rejection episodes occurred in 111 pancreas and 82 kidney grafts (P = 0.0014). Multiple rejection episodes were three times as common in the kidney grafts (20%) than in the pancreas grafts (6%; P = 0.0001). The timing of the first rejection episode was also different. The median time to the first kidney rejection episode was 29 days compared with 39 days to the first pancreas rejection episode (P = 0.0191). Graft survival in the organs was equal when stratified by the number of rejection episodes (none, one, > one) per organ (P = 0.9378). These data suggest that the worse long-term kidney graft survival seen in SPK recipients is due to the greater risk of rejection (relative risk: 2.04; [95% conf. interval: 1.29-3.23]) and a greater frequency of rejection episodes of rejection episodes in the kidney (0.81/patient) compared with the pancreas (0.41/patient). The implications for patient management and the possible reasons for the different rates of rejection are discussed.

A randomized, prospective, double-blinded trial of cyclosporine vs. OG37-325 in cadaveric renal transplantation--a preliminary report.

The efficacy of cyclosporine is documented, but it has side effects that are troublesome. Another compound, OG37-325, has been identified that appears to have similar efficacy, but less nephrotoxicity. This study was designed to address the benefits and toxicities of cyclosporine and OG37-325 in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. The preliminary results demonstrate similar outcomes in terms of patient and graft survival, but suggest less nephrotoxicity in the OG37-325-treated patients. Longer follow-up will delineate the utility of OG37-325 in solid-organ transplantation.

Impact of serum lipids on long-term graft and patient survival after renal transplantation.

The results after primary cadaveric renal transplantation in 665 consecutive patients were reviewed with respect to posttransplant serum lipids. Data were available for 182 of 665 patients on serum total cholesterol and triglycerides at 1 year posttransplant. Hypercholesterolemia (cholesterol > 200 mg/dl) developed in 141 of 182 patients (77%) and hypertriglyceridemia developed in 73 of 166 patients (44%). At 1 year posttransplant, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia both correlated with age at transplant (P = 0.0001, P = 0.01). Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were also correlated with obesity as determined by body mass index (kg/m2) (P = 0.006, P = 0.01). Hypertriglyceridemia at 1 year posttransplant correlated with pretransplant triglyceride level (P = 0.006), but hypercholesterolemia did not correlate with pretransplant cholesterol level (P = 0.53). Hyperlipidemia was not correlated with cyclosporine (CsA) or prednisone dose (mg/kg), CsA trough levels, number of rejection episodes, or serum creatinine at 1 year. Despite significant differences in serum cholesterol and triglycerides, actuarial graft and patient survival were similar between the normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic groups.

Obesity as a risk factor after combined pancreas/kidney transplantation.

The impact of pretransplant overweight/obesity was analyzed in a group of 268 consecutive primary pancreas renal transplant recipients. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) greater than 27 kg/m2. BMI was available for 240 of the 268 patients. A total of 88% (212/240) of the patients had a BMI < or = 27 and 28/240 (12%) had BMI > 27. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or race between obese and nonobese patients. The incidence and degree of posttransplant hypertension, weight gain, increase in BMI, and hyperlipidemia did not differ on the basis of pretransplant BMI. Serum creatinine at one year posttransplant was slightly increased in obese patients, but the increase was not statistically significant. Cumulative prednisone dose (mg/kg) as well as cyclosporine (CsA) dose (mg/kg) at one year was not significantly different between obese and nonobese patients. However, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between BMI and one-year cumulative (mg/kg) prednisone dose (P = .06). Types and frequency of posttransplant complications were similar between obese and nonobese patients, although there was a slightly higher incidence of wound related complications in obese patients (11% vs. 6.8%) (P = NS). There was no difference in the frequency of acute rejection episodes in obese and nonobese patients. Actuarial patient survival was comparable between patients with BMI < or = 27 versus those with BMI > 27 (P = .10). However, actuarial graft survival, both pancreas and renal, were significantly decreased in patients with BMI > 27 (P = .029). The decrease in pancreas and kidney graft survival in obese patients could not be attributed to decreased "early" patient survival, increased incidence of perioperative or postoperative complications, differences in hypertension, acute rejection episodes, serum lipids, or immunosuppression dosage. The most common causes of graft loss were rejection and patient death in both obese and nonobese patients. After three years posttransplant, the decreased pancreas and renal graft survival in obese patients corresponded to decreased patient survival. The most common cause of patient death was cardiovascular complications in both obese and nonobese PKT recipients.

Transmission of hepatitis C by kidney transplantation--the risks.

The use of cadaveric organ donors with positive serologic tests for hepatitis C (HCV) has caused considerable debate. We have reviewed the clinical course of 43 EIA1 HCV-negative recipients who received kidney transplants from EIA1 HCV-positive donors (Study). We have attempted to define the rate of HCV-RNA transmission and to determine the frequency of HCV disease transmission as determined by abnormalities in liver function tests. Viral transmission was assessed using serologic assays for HCV antibody formation (EIA1, EIA2, and Matrix--an automated multiple antigen immunoblot assay) and with PCR testing for the presence of HCV-RNA on recipient sera. Liver function was followed longitudinally in the Study patients and compared with a group of 103 kidney recipients of organs from EIA1 HCV-negative donors (Control). Of the Study patients, 56% became PCR-positive for HCV-RNA, suggesting the transmission of HCV-RNA from the HCV-positive donor. Interpretation of serologic tests for HCV was complex. Currently available first (EIA1) and second (EIA2) generation serologic assays were always negative. The multiple antigen immunoblots assay (Matrix) had a high positive predictive value (93%) for the presence of HCV-RNA transmission, but one-third of Matrix-negative Study patients were PCR-positive (sensitivity = 66%). Currently, only 38% of recipients have HCV-RNA, suggesting that the virus may have been cleared by one-third of Study recipients who had circulating virus. Traditional tests of liver function (ALT, AST, AP, and GGT) were of limited use in predicting HCV-RNA transmission. Average AST, AP, and GGT were similar in the two groups. Average ALT was increased (93 I/U and 47 I/U) in Study and Control patients, respectively, but this difference was not significant. Episodes of abnormal liver function (ALT 60-99 IU for > or = 14 days) occurred in 22% of Study and 10% of Control patients (P = NS) and lasted longer in Study compared with Control patients (301 vs. 138 days; P < 0.02). Hepatitis (ALT > or = 100 IU for > 14 days) occurred with an equal frequency (6.5%) in both groups. The presence of HCV-RNA did not predict episodes of abnormal liver function. Fulminant hepatitis or rapidly progressive cirrhosis did not occur in the recipients of organs from HCV-positive donors. These data demonstrate a high efficiency of transfer of HCV-RNA by kidney transplantation from an HCV-positive donor to an HCV-negative recipient. A majority of the patients have asymptomatic HCV infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Function and survival of renal allografts from the same donor transplanted into kidney-only or kidney-pancreas recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether kidney-pancreas transplantation (KPT) compromises the prognosis of kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: This study included 368 paired recipients who received grafts from the same donor (184 KPT/184 KT), i.e., renal grafts with the same pretransplant functional and pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: KPT recipients (KPR) were significantly younger and included fewer African-Americans (22% vs. 6%, P=0.0005) than recipients of kidney alone (KR). During year 1 after transplant surgery, KPR were re-admitted more often than KR (4.2+/-2 vs. 2.8+/-2, P < 0.0001). The number of acute rejections (AR) and the serum creatinine were not significantly different in KR and KPR up to 3 years after transplant. After 44+/-29 months, 13% of KR and 17% of KPR died (NS), and 17% of KR and 16% of KPR lost their kidneys (NS). In KPR, reduced renal graft survival did not correlate with AR (P=0.44), but it correlated with: older donors, younger recipients, elevated serum creatinine at 6 months, pancreas loss, and the number of episodes of acute graft dysfunction evaluated by biopsy (multivariate analysis). By Cox, graft and patient survival were not significantly different in KR and KPR. However, the patient survival of KPR < 40 years of age was lower than that of KR (P=0.02). Renal biopsies (n=165) in 40 paired recipients showed no significant differences in AR, interstitial fibrosis, or vascular pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Renal graft function, structure, and survival are not different in KPR and KR, but the correlates of renal graft survival are different in these two groups of recipients.

Obese living kidney donors: short-term results and possible implications.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation has increased recently as the shortage of cadaveric organs continues. This increase has occurred in part, due to expanded donor criteria, including obese patients. This is a potential concern because obesity is associated with surgical complications, possibly death, and chronic medical problems. To address this concern, we examined the outcome of a large group of obese (ObD) and nonobese living kidney donors (NObD). METHODS: A total of 107 obese (body mass index> or =27 kg/m2) and 116 nonobese (body mass index<27 kg/m2) living kidney donors donating at a single institution between 1990 and 1996 were studied. Surgical complications, operative duration, and hospital length of stay were assessed. Preoperative blood pressure, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, protein excretion, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1C were measured and first degree relatives with diabetes were identified. RESULTS: Overall complications were significantly more common in ObD, 16.8 vs. 3.4% (P=0.0012). The majority of complications in the entire cohort, 56%, were wound related and were significantly more common in ObD (P=0.016). There was no significant increase in nonwound-related infections, bleeding, or cardiopulmonary events. There were no deaths or major complications. Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30 vs. 141+/-29 min (P<0.05) but hospital duration was no different. Predonation, blood pressure in ObD was significantly higher, (P<0.05) and they more often had a family history of diabetes, 46 vs. 30% (P<0.05) than nonobese donors. Renal function, proteinuria, fasting glucose, or hemoglobin A1C were no different. CONCLUSION: With prudent selection, the use of obese living kidney donors appears safe in the short term. They experience more minor complications, usually wound related, and slightly longer operations. Given a higher baseline blood pressure and family history of diabetes, the long-term effect on the remaining solitary kidney in ObD needs to be examined.

Increased incidence of gastrointestinal surgical complications in renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: We had the impression that, although our renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) had excellent long-term renal graft function, they had an increased incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) complications. METHODS: Over a 10-year period (1987 through 1996), 1467 renal transplants were performed in 1417 patients; 145 of these transplants involved PKD recipients. In the PKD group, 18 patients (12.4%) developed a posttransplant complication necessitating GI surgery (PKD-GI), an incidence twice that in the non-PKD recipients (73 patients or 6.2%, non-PKD-GI). RESULTS: PKD and non-PKD recipients displayed no significant difference in mortality. The PKD patients had better long-term renal graft survival than the non-PKD patients (P=0.08). There was no difference in mortality (P>0.6) or renal graft survival (P>0.6) between the PKD-GI and PKD-non-GI groups. The PKD-GI group had no increased mortality over the non-PKD-GI patients (P>0.6), despite a higher incidence of GI surgical complications in the PKD group versus the non-PKD group (overall: 12.4 vs. 6.2%, P<0.01; within 90 days of transplant: 7.6 vs. 3.3%, P<0.02) and a greater propensity for small and large bowel complications (overall: 9.0 vs. 2.6%; P< 0.001; less than 90 days: 6.9 vs. 2.0%, P<0.002). The PKD-GI recipients tended toward less long-term graft loss than their non-PKD-GI counterparts (11.1 vs. 27.4%; P=.22). The PKD-GI recipients suffered no acute rejection episodes within 90 days after their GI operation versus 11 of 73 non-PKD-GI recipients (O vs. 15.1%; P=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: PKD recipients of renal grafts should be watched closely early after transplant because of their increased risk of GI complications. These complications resulted in no increase in mortality or graft loss compared to non-PKD recipients with GI complications despite the PKD group's higher incidence of bowel perforation and increased age at time of transplant.

Factors related to the donor organ are major determinants of renal allograft function and survival.

In this study, we analyzed the relative impact of donor and recipient variables on cadaveric renal allograft function and survival. The unique feature of the study population is that each pair of recipients received their allografts from a single donor. The study includes 378 adult patients. In 129 pairs both recipients were Caucasian, and in 60 pairs one recipient was Caucasian and the other was African-American. All transplants were done in one center, thus minimizing differences in preservation time and providing uniform posttransplant management. The initial analysis showed a relationship between the function of the allograft 6 months after transplantation (serum creatinine [SCr]6 mo) and donor variables (P = 0.0004, analysis of variance). Furthermore, it was calculated that 64% of the variability in the SCr 6mo among patients was due to donor factors and 36% was due to recipient factors. An elevated SCr 6 mo was significantly associated with older donors, male recipients, and patients with acute rejection episodes. Furthermore, other unidentified donor factors may have an impact on allograft function. Reflecting the importance of donor factors, there was a significant relationship between SCr 6mo in paired recipients (P < 0.0008 by Spearman). Analysis of racially dissimilar pairs showed that the SCr 6mo and graft survival 6 months after transplantation were not significantly different between Caucasians and African-Americans. However, beyond 6 months, graft survival was worse in African-Americans (P < 0.0001 by Cox). Compared with Caucasians, graft survival was significantly worse in African-Americans with poorly controlled blood pressure (mean arterial pressure > 105 mmHg) (P = 0.002, Cox), but not in those patients with mean arterial pressure < 105 mmHg. In conclusion, donor factors are major determinants of renal allograft function. However, those factors may not be easily identifiable or quantifiable. Donor factors do not contribute to racial differences in allograft survival. However, poorly controlled hypertension correlates with poor renal graft survival in African-Americans.

Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival.

Both acute rejection and the function of a renal allograft early after transplantation correlate with long-term graft survival. In this study we assessed the relationship between these two factors in 843 adult recipients of first cadaveric renal grafts, transplanted at a single institution and followed for a minimum of 3.5 years. Patients were divided into four groups according to (1) history of acute rejection (AR) during the first 6 months after transplantation, and (2) concentration of serum creatinine at 6 months after transplantation (SCr(6mo) < or > or = 2 mg/dl). Death censored allograft survival was not significantly different among patients without AR and with low SCr(6mo) (group 1, n=376), patients without AR but with an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 2, n=117), and patients with AR but low SCr(6mo) (group 3, n=185). In contrast, graft survival was significantly worse in patients with AR and an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 4, n=165) compared with patients in the other three groups (Cox, P<0.0001). The elevated SCr(6mo) in group 4 patients was not necessarily the consequence of AR, as 32% of patients in group 4 had a SCr at 10 days after transplantation (SCr(10d)), before they had AR, that was equal to or higher than the SCr(6mo). Based on this observation we investigated the implications of the SCr(10d) concentration for graft prognosis. The SCr(10d) correlated weakly with graft survival (Cox, P=0.05). However, an elevated SCr(10d) correlated with other potential risk factors for graft survival including: Older donors (P<0.0001), male recipients (P<0.0001), and heavier recipients (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression); and posttransplant factors such as, increasing numbers of AR (P<0.0001), higher posttransplant blood pressure (P<0.0001), and lower doses of cyclosporine (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression). In conclusion, graft dysfunction predicts poor graft survival only when associated with AR. Similarly, AR predicts a poor renal allograft survival only when associated with graft dysfunction. The SCr(10d) is an indicator of risk factors from both the donor and recipient, and an elevated SCr(10d) predicts a higher risk of acquiring additional risk factors early after transplantation.

Clinical and economic impact of flow cytometry crossmatching in primary cadaveric kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

We retrospectively compared the clinical and financial impact of a final cross-match by T cell flow cytometry (FXM) versus conventional complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CXM) in consecutive primary cadaveric kidney (K) and primary simultaneous cadaveric pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients. Mean follow-up was 14 months for both the K (range, 5-22 months) and SPK (range, 5-22 months) recipients. There were no instances of a positive CXM result if the FXM result was negative. However, 18 of the 102 (18%) K recipients and 11 of the 66 (17%) SPK recipients were FXM positive, CXM negative, but no grafts lost to hyperacute rejection in this group. In addition, patient survival, graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and kidney and pancreas function (immediate and late) were not different in the FXM-positive versus the FXM-negative groups. Charges for the CXM and FXM methods were compared over a 6-month period. During that period, the FXM charges averaged $583 less per recipient than the CXM charges (58% reduction in charges), and the time required to perform the FXM method was 50% of that required for the CXM method. These results demonstrate that a clinical pathway for primary transplantation that utilizes the FXM rather than the CXM final cross-match is clinically safe, with no adverse effect on posttransplant outcome, reduces organ preservation time by shortening the waiting period for the final cross-match results, and significantly reduces the tissue typing charges. However, about 9% of all primary K and SPK recipients will be FXM positive, CXM negative on final cross-match and will be unnecessarily denied a transplant. In this study, we describe a method to identify these patients so that they can be tested by traditional CXM to avoid being denied access to donor organs.

Clinical implications of the diagnosis of renal allograft infarction by percutaneous biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Herein we investigated the relationships between acute rejection (AR), infection, and renal allograft infarcts, particularly those infarcts that occur beyond the immediate posttransplant period and that affect functioning grafts. METHODS: Infarcts (n=59) were classified as: (1) early (EI; <2 months after transplant; n=32); or (2) late (LI; >2 months; n=27). Controls included patients with severe AR but without infarction (n=84). RESULTS: There were not significant differences in donor or recipient characteristics between infarcts and controls. At diagnosis, patients with infarcts were more likely to be infected (30%) than controls (14%, P=0.01); 15% of infarcts and 1% of controls had disseminated cytomegalovirus (P=0.04). Infarct and AR coexisted in the biopsy specimens of 66% of patients with EI and 62% of patients with LI, but the AR severity ranged from borderline to severe. Furthermore, 30% of patients with EI/LI had a history of severe AR. Graft survival was 47% in patients with EI, 22% in patients with LI (NS), and 71% in controls (P<0.0001, chi-square and Cox regression). Correlates of better graft survival in infarcts included: older recipient (P=0.03); smaller area of infarction in the biopsy specimen (P=0.04); and use of anti-AR therapy (P=0.03). Therapy was effective in patients with EI (treated, 71% survival; untreated, 29%, P=0.02) but not in patients with LI (25% vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS: Allograft infarcts are associated with AR in 64% of patients, but the AR may be mild. Infarcts are associated with infections. Graft survival is worse in patients with infarcts than in patients with severe AR, consequently these two pathologic diagnoses should not be considered as a single entity.

Pathologic classification of chronic allograft nephropathy: pathogenic and prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: After transplantation renal allografts frequently develop interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and these pathologic changes are the hallmarks of chronic allograft nephropathy (CN). However, the diagnosis of CN has no specific pathogenic implications. In this study we sought to determined whether a subclassification of CN according to vascular pathology correlates with posttransplant events, particularly acute rejection, and graft survival. METHODS: A total of 419 patients with moderate to severe CN were subdivided into: (1) transplant arteriopathy (TA, n=233, 56%); (2) arteriolar hyalinosis (AH, n=89, 21%); and (3) no characteristic vascular pathology (IFb, n=97, 23%). RESULTS: Patients with AH differed significantly from patients with TA or IFb in the following parameters: (1) AH was diagnosed later after transplantation (P=0.001); (2) fewer patients with AH had acute rejection (AR) before the diagnosis of CN (P<0.0001). For example, 44% of AH and 75% of TA had AR before CN; (3) patients with AH also had fewer AR episodes than the other two groups (P<0.0001); finally, (4) graft survival was better in patients with AH than in patients with TA (P=0.01 by chi2, P=0.001 by Cox). In contrast, there were no significant differences between patients with TA and IFb. By multivariate analysis the survival of grafts with CN correlated with: (1) serum creatinine at diagnosis (P<0.0001), (2) recipient's weight (P=0.004); (3) presence of FGS or level of proteinuria (P=0.03); and (4) the occurrence of AR after the diagnosis of CN (P<0.0001). Regarding the latter, AR were more common (P=0.007) and more numerous (P=0.005) in patients with TA or IFb than in AH. CONCLUSIONS: CN can be classified according to vascular pathology in the majority of cases, and this classification correlates with graft survival. Although some forms of CN are closely associated with the occurrence of AR others are not. This study also uncovered several variables that correlate with the survival of grafts with CN.

The high prevalence of severe early posttransplant renal allograft pathology in hepatitis C positive recipients.

In the USA approximately 10% of candidates for renal transplantation have serum antibodies to hepatitis C (HCV). To assess the possible impact of HCV infection on early posttransplant events we assessed allograft complications during the first 6 months following renal transplantation in three groups of adult renal allograft recipients: (1) HCV antibody positive recipients (R-HCV) (n=32); (2) HCV negative recipients who received kidneys from HCV antibody positive donors (D-HCV) (n=48); and (3) HCV negative recipients of HCV negative allografts who were transplanted during the same time period as R-HCV (Ctrl) (n=204). Allograft biopsies were done for evaluation of allograft dysfunction during the first 6 months posttransplant in 58% of Ctrl, 42% of D-HCV, and 63% of R-HCV (not significantly different). The prevalence of acute tubulointerstitial rejection was similar among the 3 groups of patients. In contrast, compared with Ctrl, both R-HCV and D-HCV had a significantly higher prevalence of acute transplant glomerulopathy (Ctrl, 6%; R-HCV, 55%, P<.0001; D-HCV 40%, P=.0004). Acute vascular rejection was more common in R-HCV (60%) than in Ctrl (28%) (P=.009) and the prevalence of chronic vascular rejection was also higher in R-HCV (60%) than in Ctrl (31%) (P=.01). Furthermore, chronic vascular rejection was diagnosed earlier in R-HCV (64% of cases within one month posttransplantation) than in Ctrl (19% within one month) (P=.01). Death censored renal allograft losses occurred in 14% of Ctrl, 17% of D-HCV, and 26% of R-HCV (not significant). In conclusion, R-HCV patients have a high prevalence of severe acute pathologic findings in renal allograft biopsies obtained early after transplantation and develop chronic vascular rejection more often and earlier than HCV negative recipients. These studies also confirm the previously reported association of HCV with acute transplant glomerulopathy.

Effect of secretin on gastrin release from gastrinoma cells in vitro.

Secretin appears to have a direct effect on gastrinoma cells, which results in a paradoxic increase in the serum gastrin level in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. To evaluate this effect, gastrinoma cells were challenged with secretin in acute cell dispersion or after 2 weeks in culture. Acutely dispersed cells were incubated for 15 minutes or 3 hours with and without secretin 10(-6) mol/L. (sec). There was no significant difference in gastrin release between control and sec groups in the two acute incubation periods. At 15 minutes the control value was 47 +/- 1 and the sec value was 54 +/- 1 ng/ml, while at 3 hours the control value was 59 +/- 1 and the sec value was 61 +/- 1 ng/ml. In the cell culture preparation, secretin stimulated gastrin release at all doses (control 463 +/- 85, SEC 10(-10) mol/L 603 +/- 37, sec 10(-8) mol/L 706 +/- 37, sec 10(-6) mol/L 798 +/- 48 pg/ml ([p less than 0.05, Student t test]). These results indicate that secretin stimulates gastrin release directly from cultured gastrinoma cells in a dose-dependent manner but does not stimulate gastrin release from acute cell dispersion. This might be attributed partly to the recovery of secretin receptors in the cultured cells.

Prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated following renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of gallstones in patients undergoing renal transplantation is controversial. Screening for gallstones and subsequent prophylactic cholecystectomy has been recommended by some authors for kidney transplant candidates. Our program does not practice routine pretransplant screening for gallstones, and we reviewed our data to determine the outcome of our management approach. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the 1,364 currently followed patients who have undergone kidney transplant at our institution since 1985 in order to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of biliary disease in the post-transplant period. We attempted to contact all patients by telephone or mail survey for the presence of biliary tract disease or operations. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-two patients were fully evaluated. Fifty-two (7.85%) required cholecystectomy for stone disease. Seven patients underwent incidental cholecystectomy during other operations, 2 patients developed acalculus cholecystitis, and 14 patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis are being followed up. Surgical indications included 38 biliary colic, 9 acute cholcystitis, 3 gallstone pancreatitis, and 2 patients who were asymptomatic. Fifty-two patients underwent 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 20 open cholecystectomies, and 2 conversions. Surgery occurred from 7 days to 9.6 years following transplantation. Overall, the median hospital stay (no postoperative stay) was 4 days (range 1 to 57). Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a median stay of 2 days compared with 7 days for those undergoing an open procedure. Complications were seen in 6 patients (11.5%) with no morbidity and no graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year graft survival was 98%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients are not at an increased risk for developing biliary tract disease compared with nontransplant patients. Gallstone disease does not have a negative impact on graft survival. Treatment of gallstones has a low risk and does not represent an increased risk of complications in patients following renal transplantation.

Simple modification for a more secure vascular clamp.

Large, atraumatic vascular clamps can be prone to slippage, especially at the toe. A simple modification of the clamp is described along with an illustration.