Benign Intravalvular Strut Leak After Placement of the Inspiris Resilia Valve.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of intravalvular leak after aortic valve replacement with the Inspiris Resilia valve. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review. SETTING: This study used data from a single tertiary care academic center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 81 patient charts and echo images were reviewed. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent an aortic valve replacement using the Inspiris Resilia valve. Pediatric patients and patients receiving an aortic valve conduit were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images were reviewed independently by 2 echocardiographers for the incidence and severity of intravalvular leak after Inspiris Resilia valve placement. Outpatient follow-up imaging was then compared to intraoperative findings. Valve size and mean gradients were documented as well. Of the 81 TEEs that were reviewed, 56 (69.1%) were found to have a strut leak at the time of implantation. Among these 56 cases, 30 were classified as trace regurgitation, 21 as mild regurgitation, and 5 as moderate regurgitation. Only 1 case necessitated a return to cardiopulmonary bypass owing to persistent intravalvular leak. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography reports were available for 50 of the patients with no persistent leaks. CONCLUSIONS: This pattern of intravalvular leak is unique to the Inspiris Resilia valve and is commonly found in the intraoperative period. While many hypotheses exist for the origin of this leak, the exact mechanism is unclear. Given the high frequency of this postprocedure finding, it is essential that intraoperative echocardiographers be able to distinguish this clinically insignificant leak based on its origin, severity, and direction and to provide appropriate recommendations to our surgical colleagues.

Liver atrophy and regeneration in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: Effect of surgical shunts.

The goal of the study is to characterize the relationship between portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and hepatic atrophy in patients without cirrhosis and the effect of various types of surgical shunts on liver regeneration and splenomegaly. Patients without cirrhosis with PVT suffer from presinusoidal portal hypertension, and often hepatic atrophy is a topic that has received little attention. We hypothesized that patients with PVT have decreased liver volumes, and shunts that preserve intrahepatic portal flow enhance liver regeneration. Sixty-four adult and pediatric patients with PVT who underwent surgical shunt placement between 1998 and 2011 were included in a retrospective study. Baseline liver volumes from adult patients were compared with standard liver volume (SLV) as well as a group of healthy controls undergoing evaluation for liver donation. Clinical assessment, liver function tests, and liver and spleen volumes from cross-sectional imaging were compared before and after surgery. A total of 40 patients received portal flow-preserving shunts (32 mesoportal and 8 selective splenorenal), whereas 24 received portal flow-diverting shunts (16 nonselective splenorenal and 8 mesocaval). Baseline adult liver volumes were 26% smaller than SLV (1248 versus 1624 cm3 ; P = 0.02) and 20% smaller than the control volumes (1248 versus 1552 cm3 ; P = 0.02). Baseline adult spleen volumes were larger compared with controls (1258 versus 229 cm3 ; P < 0.001). Preserving shunts were associated with significant increase in liver volumes (886 versus 1131 cm3 ; P = 0.01), whereas diverting shunts were not. Diverting shunts significantly improved splenomegaly. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that patients without cirrhosis with PVT have significant liver atrophy and splenomegaly. Significant liver regeneration was achieved after portal flow-preserving shunts. Liver Transplantation 24 881-887 2018 AASLD.

Recent advancements in the minimally invasive management of esophageal perforation, leaks, and fistulae.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, the gold standard management of esophageal perforations, leaks, and fistulae has been traditional open surgery, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive approaches offer alternatives to surgery in treating hemodynamically stable patients with such defects. In this review article, we will discuss the recent advancements in the minimally invasive management of esophageal perforations, leaks, and fistulas. AREAS COVERED: This review includes information from case reports, case series, and clinical trials on minimally invasive management of esophageal perforations, leaks, and fistulas. The focus is on the devices, outcomes, and application of the technology. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Minimally invasive treatment represents significant progress in the management of esophageal perforations, leaks, and fistulas. Based on current evidence, it seems safe and effective but it is evolving and more studies are needed to help draw definitive conclusions.

Basiliximab induction and delayed calcineurin inhibitor initiation in liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Renal insufficiency (RI) is common after liver transplantation (LT) and may worsen due to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use. We compared LT outcomes using basiliximab induction and delayed CNI initiation to controls with a standard CNI regimen in patients with peri-LT RI. METHODS: All adults transplanted January 2004 to December 2007 with peri-LT RI (hemodialysis or creatinine ≥1.5 within 1 week of LT) were included in a retrospective nonrandomized cohort. Outcomes including 30-day and 1-year patient and graft survival and renal function were compared between basiliximab and control groups. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients (102 basiliximab, 127 controls) were analyzed, mean age 54 years, 72% men, 54% with hepatitis C virus. Mean model for end-stage liver disease (28.2 vs. 20.0; P<0.001) and creatinine (1.9 vs. 1.6; P=0.001) were higher and more patients were on hemodialysis at LT (29% vs. 6%; P<0.001) in the basiliximab group. 30-day patient (99% vs. 97%; P=0.26) and graft survival (98% vs. 95%; P=0.17), 1-year patient (87% vs. 87%; P=0.89) and graft survival (86% vs. 82%; P=0.37), mean creatinine at 1-year (1.5 vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.82), and treated acute rejection (6% vs. 6%; P=0.90) were similar between basiliximab and control groups, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression, basiliximab was not significantly associated with 30-day (odds ratio, 0.10; P=0.11) or 1-year (odds ratio, 0.97; P=0.94) survival, controlling for age, previous LT, model for end-stage liver disease, and hepatitis C virus. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab induction resulted in 30-day and 1-year patient, graft and renal outcomes comparable with a control group receiving standard CNI-based immunosuppression. Antibody induction with delayed CNI should be further studied prospectively.